| Literature DB >> 35432605 |
Karolina Fryc1, Agnieszka Nowak2, Barbara Kij-Mitka2, Joanna Kochan2, Maciej Murawski1, Samantha Pena3, Pawel Mieczyslaw Bartlewski3.
Abstract
The assessment of morphology and digital image opacity may provide valuable information on the present embryo quality. Time-lapse imaging has been employed in research to establish a means of monitoring the dynamic nature of preimplantation embryo development. The aim of present study was to use time-lapse imaging for assessing various prospective morphometric and phototextural markers of the developmental potential of in vitro-derived ovine embryos. Oocytes were obtained by scarification of ovaries from nine Polish Longwool ewes. After in vitro maturation (IVM) and fertilization (IVF) of oocytes with fresh ram semen, the development of embryos to the blastocyst stage was monitored and evaluated using Primo Vision time-lapse imaging technology. Commercially available Image-Pro® Plus software was used to measure zona pellucida thickness, embryo diameter, total area of the perivitelline space, cellular grey-scale pixel intensity and cellular pixel heterogeneity. Statistical assessment of all attributes was done at various time points during embryo development (i.e., presumptive zygote stage: t(0); first cleavage detected at t(2) or t(3); and second cleavage detected at t(4) or t(6)). Out of thirty-seven zygotes analyzed in this study, five did not divide, 26 arrested before and six developed to the blastocyst stage. Our present results indicate that most parameters analyzed did not differ among embryos varying in their developmental fate except for the perivitelline space area that was greater (P<0.05) for non-dividing zygotes than future blastocysts at the presumptive zygote stage (4040±1850 vs. 857±262 µm2, respectively; means±SEM). Consequently, the measurement of perivitelline space at t(0) can potentially be used to prognosticate developmental potential of in vitro-produced ovine embryos albeit further confirmational studies are needed.Entities:
Keywords: in vitro embryo production; morphology; phototexture; sheep; time-lapse imaging
Year: 2022 PMID: 35432605 PMCID: PMC9007056 DOI: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2022-0009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Reprod ISSN: 1806-9614 Impact factor: 1.807
Figure 1An overview of sheep embryo culture procedures as well as morphological and phototexture analyses.
Figure 2Digital images of ovine embryonic development from presumptive zygote to blastocyst captured by time-lapse imaging system. (A) presumptive zygote, t(0); (B) two-cell embryo, t(2); (C) four-cell embryo, t(4); (D) eight-cell embryo, t(8); (E) morula, t(M); and (F) blastocyst.
Figure 3Digital images of ovine embryos assessed using Image-Pro® Plus analytical software. (A) Raw morphometric data, computed in pixels, of a four-cell embryo. Six randomly selected points on the zona pellucida, one measurement of the diameter of the embryo, and one measurement of the diameter of the field of view; (B) and (C) polygonal tool used for phototexture analyses of a presumptive zygote and a four-cell embryo, respectively.
Numbers of ovine embryos monitored with time-lapse imaging technology and organized by study replicates/donor ewes and developmental fate.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| 1 | 3 | 13 | 3 | 9 | 1 |
| 2 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 |
| 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 12 | 2 |
| Total | 9 | 37 | 5 | 26 | 6 |
Summary of morphometric and phototextural attributes of the developing ovine embryos evaluated at three different time points or developmental stages: presumptive zygotes: t(0); first cleavage: t(2) or t(3); and second cleavage: t(4) or t(6); *P<0.05.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Non-dividing (n=5) | 14.3±1.0 | 161.8±3.9 | 4040±1850* | 68.6±2.7 | 30.7±1.4 |
| Blastocysts (n=6) | 13.6±0.6 | 152.9±2.9 | 857±262* | 73.7±2.5 | 31.5±1.1 |
| All arresting (n=26) | 13.5±0.3 | 154.4±1.4 | 2139±356 | 76.7±2.5 | 32.0±1.1 |
| First cleavage | |||||
| Blastocyst (n=6) | 12.6±1.1 | 152.9±2.5 | 1443±256 | 74.5±2.5 | 30.3±1.6 |
| All arresting (n=26) | 13.5±0.4 | 156.8±2.0 | 2504±299 | 75.1±2.5 | 32.8±1.7 |
| Second cleavage | |||||
| Blastocyst (n=6) | 12.8±0.7 | 150.9±3.1 | 1731±206 | 72.5±3.6 | 30.0±1.4 |
| Arresting at t(4-7) (n=15) | 13.4±0.5 | 152.0±2.0 | 2096±449 | 72.1±5.0 | 31.8±1.5 |