| Literature DB >> 35432589 |
Wei Liu1, Yan Zhang1, Hai-Jing Liu2, Tian Song3, Song Wang4.
Abstract
As the contemporary society is increasingly entering an aging society, heart failure, as a common disease in the elderly population, has an increasing impact on people. The common one is mainly chronic heart failure. Coupled with the influence of various complications, such as hypostatic pneumonia and venous thrombosis, the mortality and hospital admission rates of patients are very high. Moreover, the current technology is not very effective for the prevention and treatment of chronic heart failure. The per capita consumption level of ordinary people in China is low, and it is not suitable to promote high-cost treatment programs. Based on this, this paper proposes the intervention management of mental failure patients under the intervention of health education based on IMB, in order to explore the impact of the intervention of health education on patients. The research in this paper selected 112 patients with chronic heart failure who were admitted to the cardiovascular ward of a city public hospital in 2017 and divided the patients into two groups. One group received health education intervention, which was the intervention group. The other group was the control group. The control group was given routine education and nursing. The experimental results of this paper show that the satisfaction of the intervention group is higher, accounting for 85.3%, and the satisfaction of the control group is lower than that of the intervention group, about 67.9%. Dissatisfaction with health education and the probability of short-term readmission were higher than those in the intervention group.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35432589 PMCID: PMC9012616 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8517802
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.809
Figure 1Schematic diagram of median filtering.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of two-dimensional image gray difference.
Figure 3The basic flow of medical image extraction and classification.
Figure 4IMB mode process.
Figure 5Improved research framework based on the original IMB.
Basic information of the two groups of patients.
| Normal information | Control group | Intervention group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 31 (55.4%) | 26 (46.4%) | 0.35 |
| Female | 25 (44.6%) | 30 (53.6%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Average age | 64.3 ± 15.5 | 64 ± 18.5 | 0.91 | |
|
| ||||
| Education level | College degree and above | 12 (21.4%) | 14 (25%) | 0.99 |
| Middle school or high school | 16 (28.6%) | 15 (26.8%) | ||
| Elementary school and below | 28 (50%) | 27 (48.2%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Family monthly income | <2000 | 19 (33.9%) | 16 (28.6%) | 0.74 |
| 2000-4000 | 27 (48.2%) | 32 (57.1%) | ||
| >4000 | 10 (17.9%) | 8 (14.3%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Expense reimbursement method | Medical insurance | 19 (33.9%) | 21 (37.5%) | 0.97 |
| Rural cooperative | 22 (39.3%) | 22 (39.3%) | ||
| Poor | 8 (14.3%) | 7 (12.5%) | ||
| Own expense | 7 (12.5%) | 6 (10.7%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Profession | Worker | 6 (10.7%) | 12 (21.4%) | 0.29 |
| Farmer | 27 (48.2%) | 20 (35.7%) | ||
| Other | 10 (17.9%) | 8 (14.3%) | ||
| Unemployed | 7 (12.5%) | 12 (21.4%) | ||
| Retire | 6 (10.7%) | 4 (7.1%) | ||
Figure 6Comparison of the symptoms of heart failure between the two groups.
Comparison of negative emotions between the two groups of patients on admission.
| On admission | ||
|---|---|---|
| Content | Control group | Intervention group |
| Concern | 3.1 ± 0.4 | 3 ± 0.5 |
| Negative emotions | 3 ± 0.5 | 2.9 ± 0.4 |
|
| 0.6 | 1.15 |
|
| 0.55 | 0.25 |
Comparison of the negative emotions of the two groups of patients at the time of discharge.
| On discharge | ||
|---|---|---|
| Content | Control group | Intervention group |
| Concern | 2 ± 0.5 | 1.8 ± 0.5 |
| Negative emotions | 2 ± 0.4 | 1.7 ± 0.5 |
|
| 3.4 | 3.36 |
|
| 0.001 | 0.001 |
Figure 7Satisfaction of the two groups of patients with health education and the probability of short-term readmission.
Comparison of self-care behaviors of two groups of patients with heart failure.
| Group | Project | Before intervention | After the intervention |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Self-care total score | 137.5 ± 28 | 186.4 ± 22 | -21.7 | <0.001 |
| Self-care maintenance | 46.8 ± 10 | 60.4 ± 8.6 | -14.3 | <0.001 | |
| Self-care management | 43.8 ± 11.4 | 64 ± 10.6 | -20.68 | <0.001 | |
| Self-confidence | 47 ± 11 | 62 ± 9.6 | -9.3 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||||
| Control group | Self-care total score | 135.3 ± 18.5 | 138.7 ± 17.3 | -3.1 | 0.004 |
| Self-care maintenance | 45 ± 9.7 | 48.2 ± 9.2 | -8.7 | <0.001 | |
| Self-care management | 43.5 ± 10.4 | 44.4 ± 10.1 | -1.14 | 0.26 | |
| Self-confidence | 47.2 ± 10.8 | 46 ± 9.7 | 1.3 | 0.2 | |
Figure 8Comparison of risk perception between control group and intervention group before and after intervention.
Figure 9The emotional changes of the two groups of patients over time and the number of readmissions.