| Literature DB >> 35432525 |
Zeng-Yao Liu1,2, Qing-Chun Jia1, Wen Wang1, Yu-Xi Liu1, Rui-Tao Wang1, Jia-Yu Li3.
Abstract
Background: Elevated platelet volume is the risk factor for the development and poor overall survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Both microsatellite status and platelet glycoprotein Ibα (GPIbα) are related to platelet volume in CRC patients. This study aimed to investigate platelet GPIbα ectodomain (termed glycocalicin) levels among CRC patients and the association between the glycocalicin levels and microsatellite status in CRC.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35432525 PMCID: PMC9010183 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9012063
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract ISSN: 1687-6121 Impact factor: 1.919
Figure 1Optimal cut-off value was determined for glycocalicin using standard receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis.
Baseline characteristics of CRC patients according to glycocalicin levels.
| Variables | Total | Glycocalicin | Glycocalicin |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 0.575 | |||
| ≤65 | 309 (71.9) | 42 (75.0) | 267 (71.4) | |
| >65 | 121 (28.1) | 14 (25.0) | 107 (28.6) | |
| Gender (%) | 0.581 | |||
| Male | 245 (57.0) | 30 (53.6) | 215 (57.5) | |
| Female | 185 (43.0) | 26 (46.4) | 159 (42.5) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.4 ± 3.2 | 23.9 ± 3.6 | 23.3 ± 3.2 | 0.199 |
| Current smoker (%) | 0.809 | |||
| Yes | 183 (42.6) | 23 (41.1) | 160 (42.8) | |
| No | 247 (57.4) | 33 (58.9) | 214 (57.2) | |
| Drinker (%) | 0.375 | |||
| Yes | 139 (32.3) | 21 (37.5) | 118 (31.6) | |
| No | 291 (67.7) | 35 (62.5) | 256 (68.4) | |
| WBC (×109/L) | 7.09 ± 2.44 | 7.23 ± 2.43 | 7.07 ± 2.45 | 0.657 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 132.9 ± 23.4 | 128.0 ± 27.0 | 133.6 ± 22.8 | 0.138 |
| Platelet count (×109/L) | 269.7 ± 87.8 | 278.5 ± 96.1 | 268.3 ± 86.6 | 0.417 |
| Creatinine ( | 81.1 ± 18.6 | 80.4 ± 12.5 | 81.2 ± 19.3 | 0.790 |
| CEA (ng/mL) | 4.37 (2.03-11.31) | 3.49 (1.86-12.04) | 4.52 (2.12-11.07) | 0.499 |
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.208 | |||
| <5.0 | 278 (64.7) | 32 (57.1) | 246 (65.8) | |
| ≥5.0 | 152 (35.3) | 24 (42.9) | 128 (34.2) | |
| Tumor location (%) | 0.051 | |||
| Proximal | 157 (36.5) | 27 (48.2) | 130 (34.8) | |
| Distal | 273 (63.5) | 29 (51.8) | 244 (65.2) | |
| Histological type (%) | 0.756 | |||
| Non-mucinous | 307 (71.4) | 39 (69.6) | 268-71.7 | |
| Mucinous | 123 (28.6) | 17 (30.4) | 106 (28.3) | |
| Histological grade (%) | 0.147 | |||
| Well/moderately differentiated | 359 (83.5) | 43 (76.8) | 316 (84.5) | |
| Poorly differentiated | 71 (16.5) | 13 (23.2) | 58 (15.5) | |
| Lymphatic invasion (%) | 0.185 | |||
| Absent | 331 (77.0) | 47 (83.9) | 284 (75.9) | |
| Present | 99 (23.0) | 9 (16.1) | 90 (24.1) | |
| Perineural invasion (%) | 0.545 | |||
| Absent | 365 (84.9) | 48 (85.7) | 317 (84.8) | |
| Present | 65 (15.1) | 8 (14.3) | 57 (15.2) | |
| T classification (%) | 0.372 | |||
| T1+T2 | 63 (14.7) | 6 (10.7) | 57 (15.2) | |
| T3+T4 | 367 (85.3) | 50 (89.3) | 317 (84.8) | |
| Lymph node metastasis (%) | 0.511 | |||
| Absence | 267 (62.1) | 37 (66.1) | 230 (61.5) | |
| Presence | 163 (37.9) | 19 (33.9) | 144 (38.5) | |
| Distant metastasis (%) | 0.426 | |||
| Absence | 382 (88.8) | 48 (85.7) | 334 (89.3) | |
| Presence | 48 (11.2) | 8 (14.3) | 40 (10.7) | |
| Stage (%) | 0.682 | |||
| I-II | 258 (60.0) | 35 (62.5) | 223 (59.6) | |
| III-IV | 172 (40.0) | 21 (37.5) | 151 (40.4) | |
| MSI status (%) | < 0.001 | |||
| MSS | 366 (85.1) | 27 (48.2) | 339 (90.6) | |
| MSI-H | 64 (14.9) | 29 (51.8) | 35 (9.4) |
Data are presented as means (standard deviation), median (interquartile range), or number (percentage). BMI: body mass index; WBC: white blood cells; CEA: carcinoembryonic antigen; MSS: microsatellite stable; MSI: microsatellite instability; MSI-H: high MSI.
Figure 2The association between high microsatellite instability and glycocalicin levels among colorectal cancer patients.
Clinicopathological characteristics of the CRC patients according to microsatellite instability status.
| Variables | Total | MSI-H | MSS |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 430 | 64 | 366 | |
| Age (years) | 59.4 ± 10.0 | 56.4 ± 11.8 | 59.9 ± 9.6 | 0.029 |
| Gender (female, %) | 181 (42.1) | 33 (51.6) | 148 (40.4) | 0.096 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.4 ± 3.2 | 24.5 ± 3.3 | 23.2 ± 3.2 | 0.004 |
| Current smoker (%) | 183 (42.6) | 25 (39.1) | 158 (43.2) | 0.540 |
| Drinker (n, %) | 139 (32.3) | 17 (26.6) | 122 (33.3) | 0.285 |
| Creatinine ( | 81.1 ± 18.6 | 80.9 ± 19.7 | 81.1 ± 18.4 | 0.929 |
| CEA (ng/mL) | 3.14 (1.57-7.98) | 3.14 (1.57-7.98) | 4.86 (2.15-12.12) | 0.030 |
| WBC (×109/L) | 7.09 ± 2.44 | 8.07 ± 2.98 | 6.92 ± 2.30 | 0.004 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 132.9 ± 23.4 | 124.6 ± 27.3 | 134.3 ± 22.4 | 0.009 |
| Platelet count (×109/L) | 269.7 ± 87.8 | 286.2 ± 112.6 | 266.8 ± 82.6 | 0.103 |
| Glycocalicin (ng/mL) | 26.5 ± 6.0 | 22.6 ± 6.3 | 27.2 ± 5.6 | < 0.001 |
| Tumor location (%) | < 0.001 | |||
| Proximal | 157 (36.5) | 38 (59.4) | 119 (32.5) | |
| Distal | 273 (63.5) | 26 (40.6) | 247 (67.5) | |
| Tumor size (cm, %) | 0.011 | |||
| <5.0 | 282 (65.6) | 33 (51.6) | 249 (68.0) | |
| ≥5.0 | 148 (34.4) | 31 (48.4) | 117 (32.0) | |
| Histological grade (%) | 0.419 | |||
| Well/moderately differentiated | 307 (71.4) | 43(67.2) | 264 (72.1) | |
| Poorly differentiated | 123 (28.6) | 21 (32.8) | 102 (27.9) | |
| Histological type (%) | 0.007 | |||
| Non-mucinous | 359 (83.5) | 46 (71.9) | 313 (85.5) | |
| Mucinous | 71 (16.5) | 18 (28.1) | 53 (14.5) | |
| Lymphatic invasion (%) | 0.030 | |||
| Absent | 331 (77.0) | 56 (87.5) | 275 (75.1) | |
| Present | 99 (23.0) | 8 (12.5) | 91 (24.9) | |
| Perineural invasion (%) | 0.527 | |||
| Absent | 365 (84.9) | 56 (87.5) | 309 (84.4) | |
| Present | 65 (15.1) | 8 (12.5) | 57 (15.6) | |
| T classification (%) | 0.811 | |||
| T1+T2 | 63 (14.7) | 10 (15.6) | 53 (14.5) | |
| T3+T4 | 367 (85.3) | 54 (84.4) | 313 (85.5) | |
| Lymph node metastasis (%) | 0.010 | |||
| Absence | 267 (62.1) | 49 (76.6) | 218 (59.6) | |
| Presence | 163 (37.9) | 15 (23.4) | 148 (40.4) | |
| Distant metastasis (%) | 0.713 | |||
| Absence | 382 (88.8) | 56 (87.5) | 326 (89.1) | |
| Presence | 48 (11.2) | 8 (12.5) | 40 (10.9) | |
| Stage (%) | 0.003 | |||
| I-II | 258 (60.0) | 49 (76.6) | 209 (57.1) | |
| III-IV | 172 (40.0) | 15 (23.4) | 157 (42.9) |
Data are presented as means (standard deviation), median (interquartile range), or number (percentage). Abbreviations see Table 1.
Logistic regression analysis for the associations between glycocalicin and microsatellite instability status among colorectal cancer patients.
| Variables |
| AOR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | -0.018 | 0.982 (0.949-1.015) | 0.280 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.117 | 1.124 (1.020-1.239) | 0.018 |
| WBC (×109/L) | 0.178 | 1.195 (1.055-1.353) | 0.005 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | -0.012 | 0.988 (0.975-1.001) | 0.063 |
| CEA (ng/ml) | -0.004 | 0.996 (0.985-1.007) | 0.471 |
| Glycocalicin (ng/mL) | -0.158 | 0.854 (0.801-0.910) | < 0.001 |
| Tumor size (cm) (≥ 5.0 vs <5.0) | 1. 000 | 2.718 (1.411-5.234) | 0.003 |
| Tumor location (proximal vs distal) | 1.146 | 3.146 (1.646-6.014) | 0.001 |
| Histological type (mucinous vs non-mucinous) | 0.795 | 2.214 (1.040-4.713) | 0.039 |
| Lymphatic invasion (presence vs absence) | -0.460 | 0.631 (0.230-1.729) | 0.371 |
| Lymph node metastasis (presence vs absence) | -0.020 | 0.980 (0.145-6.649) | 0.984 |
| Stage (III+IV vs I+II) | -0.901 | 0.406 (0.061-2.727) | 0.354 |
All significant variables in univariate analysis were included in the final logistic regression model. Data are presented as coefficient β, and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Abbreviations see Table 1.