| Literature DB >> 35432248 |
Zheng Fan1, Yanling Feng1, Wenjian Xu2, Junxia Feng1, Chao Yan1, Tongtong Fu1, Hanqing Zhao1, Jinghua Cui1, Lin Gan1, Shiyu Liu1, Shuheng Du1, Rui Zhang1, Ziying Xu1, Nannan Li1, Guanhua Xue1, Jing Yuan1.
Abstract
With the increasingly severe problem of bacterial resistance, colistin, as the last line of defense, has attracted attention again. Mobile colistin resistance (mcr-1) gene is involved in the horizontal transmission of colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), which is a serious threat to human health. Therefore, rapid detection of mcr-1 gene presence in clinical samples is crucial. In this study, a Recombinase-aided amplification(RAA) method for mcr-1 was successfully constructed, with sensitivity of 20 copies/reaction. In addition, amplification signal could only be detected in the strain containing mcr-1 gene among 14 different bacterial species. The method was then used to test a total of 672 clinical samples from a pediatric hospital in Beijing. Five strains harbored mcr-1 genes were isolated from mcr-1-positive clinical samples and identified as Escherichia coli. Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) analysis showed that the five E. coli belonged to different ST types. Notably, the mcr-1 gene from the isolates could be transferred conjugately to the recipient strain E. coli J53, with highest transfer efficiency up to 57-58%, suggesting that the mcr-1 gene was located on the plasmid. These findings showed that the RAA assay has potential to be a rapid and sensitive mcr-1 gene screening test for clinical samples, and mcr-1 could be transmitted vertically and horizontally between and within bacterial species in a plasmid-mediated manner.Entities:
Keywords: E. coli; RAA assay; children; colistin; mcr-1
Year: 2022 PMID: 35432248 PMCID: PMC9009391 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.852488
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Bacterial strains used in this study.
| Bacterial strain | Description/function | Source |
|
| Specificity of the RAA Assay | Our microorganism center |
| Specificity of the RAA Assay | Our microorganism center | |
| Specificity of the RAA Assay | Our microorganism center | |
|
| Specificity of the RAA Assay | Our microorganism center |
|
| Specificity of the RAA Assay | Our microorganism center |
|
| Specificity of the RAA Assay | Clinical isolate |
|
| Specificity of the RAA Assay | Clinical isolate |
|
| Specificity of the RAA Assay | Clinical isolate |
|
| Specificity of the RAA Assay | Clinical isolate |
|
| Specificity of the RAA Assay | Clinical isolate |
|
| Specificity of the RAA Assay | Clinical isolate |
|
| Specificity of the RAA Assay | Clinical isolate |
|
| Specificity of the RAA Assay | Clinical isolate |
|
| Specificity of the RAA Assay | Clinical isolate |
| Clinical isolate | ||
| Clinical isolate | ||
| Clinical isolate | ||
| Clinical isolate | ||
| Clinical isolate | ||
| Recipient strain | Our microorganism center | |
| This study | ||
| This study | ||
| This study | ||
| This study | ||
| This study |
Primers used in this study.
| Primer | Sequence (5’→3’) | Function |
| ATGATGCAGCATACTTCTGT | Plasmid construction | |
| TCAGCGGATGAATGCGGTGC | Plasmid construction | |
| CGTTCAGCAGTCATTATGCCAGTTTCTTTCGCGTGC | RAA assay | |
| CTTACGCATATCAGGCTTGGTTGCTTGTACCGC | RAA assay | |
| GCCAATCTACTCGGTGGGTAAGCTTGCCAG[FAM-dT][THF][BHQ-dT]TGAGTATAAAAAAGC3’-block | RAA assay | |
| 16S-F | TGGAGCATGTGGTTTAATTC GATGCAACGC | RAA assay |
| 16S-R | GGATAAGGGTTGCGCTCGTT GCGGGACTTAA | RAA assay |
| 16S-P | TGACATCCACAGAACTTTCCAGAGATGGATTGG[FAM-dT]G[THF]C[BHQ-dT] TCGGGAACTGTGAGAC [30 -block] | RAA Assay |
| dinBoF | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTATGAGAGGTGAGCAATGCGTA | MLST |
| dinB2oR | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCCGTAGCCCCATCGCTTCCAG | MLST |
| icd2oF | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAATTCGCTTCCCGGAACATTG | MLST |
| icdoR | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCATGATCGCGTCACCAAAYTC | MLST |
| pabB2oF | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAAATCCAATATGACCCGCGAG | MLST |
| pabBoR | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCGGTTCCAGTTCGTCGATAAT | MLST |
| polB2oF | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAGGCGGCTATGTGATGGATTC | MLST |
| polBoR | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCGGTTGGCATCAGAAAACGGC | MLST |
| putP2oF | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTACTGTTTAACCCGTGGATTGC | MLST |
| putPoR | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCGCATCGGCCTCGGCAAAGCG | MLST |
| trpAoF | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAGCTACGAATCTCTGTTTGCC | MLST |
| trpAoR | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCGCTTTCATCGGTTGTACAAA | MLST |
| trpB2oF | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTACACTATATGCTGGGCACCGC | MLST |
| trpBoR | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCCCTCGTGCTTTCAAAATATC | MLST |
| uidAoF | GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTACATTACGGCAAAGTGTGGGTCAAT | MLST |
| uidAoR | TTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTTCCCATCAGCACGTTATCGAATCCTT | MLST |
FIGURE 1Primer and probe regions in mcr-1.
FIGURE 2Specificity of the RAA assay. (A) Amplification signal was only amplified from E. coli–1, and no relevant signal was detected in other mcr-1-lacking strains. (B) All strains produced 16S rRNA gene amplification signals: 1: P. mirabilis, 2: K. pneumoniae 2146, 3: K. oxytoca, 4: P. aeruginosa, 5: S. sonnei, 6: A. baumannii, 7: C. jejuni, 8: E. aerogenes, 9: E. coli–1, 10: S. enteritidis, 11: E. cloacae, 12: C. freundii, 13: P. mirabilis, 14: E. coli ATCC 25922.
FIGURE 3Sensitivity of the RAA assay. An increase in the fluorescence signal was observed from 1 × 101 to 1 × 107 copies/reaction.
FIGURE 4RAA assay was applied to clinical samples. Five mcr-1-positive samples were identified among 672 samples by RAA detection (A) and standard PCR (B). The E. coli–1 was used as a positive control and sterile water was used as a negative control.
mcr-1-Positive Strains isolated from clinical samples.
| Isolated strain | Sample ID | RAA | PCR | Sequencing | Transfer efficiency |
| CIP1 | + | + | 3.54 × 10–2 | ||
| CIP2 | + | + | 2.06 × 10–3 | ||
| CIP3 | + | + | 2.34 × 10–3 | ||
| CIP4 | + | + | 0.57 | ||
| CIP5 | + | + | 0.58 |
+, mcr-1-positive.
Bacterial susceptibilities to antibiotics.
| Antibiotic agent | MIC (mg/L) | ||||||||||
| Ticarcillin/ Clavulanic acid | 16S | ≥ 128R | 16S | ≤ 8S | 16S | ≤ 8S | ≤8S | ≤ 8S | ≤8S | ≤ 8S | ≤8S |
| Piperacillin/ Tazobactam | ≤ 4S | ≥ 128R | ≤ 4S | ≤4S | ≤ 4S | ≤4S | ≤ 4S | ≤4S | ≤ 4S | ≤4S | ≤ 4S |
| Ceftazidime | 0.25S | 32R | 8I | ≤ 0.12S | 32R | ≤ 0.12S | ≤0.12S | ≤ 0.12S | ≤0.12S | ≤ 0.12S | ≤0.12S |
| Cefoperazone | ≤ 8S | ≥ 64R | ≤ 8S | ≤8S | 16S | ≤ 8S | ≤8S | ≤ 8S | ≤8S | ≤ 8S | ≤8S |
| Cefepime | ≤ 0.12S | ≥ 32R | 8S | ≤ 0.12S | ≥ 32R | ≤ 0.12S | ≤0.12S | ≤ 0.12S | ≤0.12S | ≤ 0.12S | ≤0.12S |
| Aztreonam | ≤ 1S | ≥ 64R | 16R | ≤ 1S | ≥ 64R | ≤ 1S | ≤1S | ≤ 1S | ≤1S | ≤ 1S | ≤1S |
| Imipenem | ≤ 0.25S | ≤0.25S | ≤ 0.25S | ≤0.25S | ≤ 0.25S | ≤0.25S | ≤ 0.25S | ≤0.25S | ≤ 0.25S | ≤0.25S | ≤ 0.25S |
| Meropenem | ≤ 0.25S | ≤0.25S | ≤ 0.25S | ≤0.25S | ≤ 0.25S | ≤0.25S | ≤ 0.25S | ≤0.25S | ≤ 0.25S | ≤0.25S | ≤ 0.25S |
| Amikacin | ≤ 2S | ≤2S | ≤ 2S | ≤2S | ≤ 2S | ≤2S | ≤ 2S | ≤2S | ≤ 2S | ≤2S | ≤ 2S |
| Tobramycin | 8I | 8I | ≥ 16R | ≤ 1S | 8I | ≤1S | ≤ 1S | ≤1S | ≤ 1S | ≤1S | ≤ 1S |
| Ciprofloxacin | ≥ 4R | ≥4R | ≥ 4R | 1R | 2R | ≤ 0.25S | ≤0.25S | ≤ 0.25S | ≤0.25S | ≤ 0.25S | ≤0.25S |
| Levofloxacin | ≥ 8R | ≥8R | 4R | 1I | 4R | ≤ 0.12S | ≤0.12S | ≤ 0.12S | ≤0.12S | ≤ 0.12S | ≤0.12S |
| Doxycycline | ≥ 16R | ≥16R | ≥ 16R | 8I | ≥16R | 2S | 2S | 2S | 2S | 2S | 2S |
| Minocycline | 8I | ≥ 16R | 4S | ≤ 1S | ≥ 16R | ≤ 1S | ≤1S | ≤ 1S | ≤1S | ≤ 1S | ≤1S |
| Tigecycline | 1S | ≤ 0.5S | ≤0.5S | ≤ 0.5S | ≤0.5S | ≤ 0.5S | ≤0.5S | ≤ 0.5S | ≤0.5S | ≤ 0.5S | ≤0.5S |
| Trimethoprim | ≥ 320R | ≥320R | ≥ 320R | ≥320R | ≥ 320R | ≤ 20S | ≤20S | ≤ 20S | ≤20S | ≤ 20S | ≤20S |
| Colistin | 4R | ≥ 16R | ≥16R | 8R | ≥ 16R | ≤ 0.5I | 4R | 4R | 8R | 2I | 2I |
| Colistin | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | ≤ 0.5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Polymyxin B | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | ≤ 0.5 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistance; SDD, susceptible dose-dependent.