| Literature DB >> 35432242 |
Jinyang Yu1, Yihao Liu1, Zuyu Wang1, Xiaohui Huang1, Dan Chai2, Yunfu Gu1, Ke Zhao1, Xiumei Yu1, Zhengbin Shuai2, Hanjun Liu1,3, Xiaoping Zhang1, Petri Penttinen1, Qiang Chen1.
Abstract
Aims: In garlic cultivation, long-time monoculture has resulted in continuous-cropping obstacles. However, the cause has not been studied to date.Entities:
Keywords: cropping obstacles; garlic; soil enzyme activity; soil microbial community; soily acidification
Year: 2022 PMID: 35432242 PMCID: PMC9006102 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.828196
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1(A) A garlic field with cropping obstacle (foreground) and healthy garlic plants (background). (B) Garlic plants grown in the healthy control soil (CK) and in the cropping obstacle soil (D).
The properties of garlic plants grown in cropping obstacle soil (D) and healthy control soil (CK).
| Item tested | D | CK |
| Shoot length (cm⋅plant–1) | 26.34 ± 4.21 | 71.69 ± 5.14 |
| Maximum root length (cm⋅plant–1) | 4.85 ± 1.03 | 13.87 ± 1.91 |
| Aboveground biomass (g⋅plant–1⋅FW) | 4.65 ± 0.86 | 40.73 ± 11.04 |
| Root biomass (g⋅plant–1⋅FW) | 0.34 ± 0.12 | 4.11 ± 1.56 |
| Root activity (μg⋅g–1 ⋅h–1⋅FW) | 23.54 ± 5.84 | 60.61 ± 9.83 |
Values are means ± standard deviation. *In a row indicate statistically significant difference at P < 0.05 (Student’s t-test).
The properties of cropping obstacle soil (D) and healthy control soil (CK).
| D | CK | |
| pH | 5.09 ± 0.19 | 6.02 ± 0.46 |
| WC (%) | 28.31 ± 1.99 | 27.02 ± 4.38 |
| AP (mg/kg) | 58.81 ± 5.87 | 55.58 ± 11.13 |
| AK (mg/kg) | 250.09 ± 26.49 | 194.14 ± 28.35 |
| AN (mg/kg) | 65.40 ± 6.26 | 65.25 ± 8.24 |
| TN (g/kg) | 1.86 ± 0.16 | 1.86 ± 0.25 |
| SOC (g/kg) | 34.97 ± 6.61 | 38.38 ± 9.09 |
Values are means ± standard deviation. *In a row indicate statistically significant difference at P < 0.05 (Student’s t-test).
WC, soil water content; AP, available phosphorus content; AK, available potassium content; AN, available nitrogen content; TN, total nitrogen content; SOC, soil organic carbon content.
Soil enzyme activities in cropping obstacle soil (D) and healthy control soil (CK).
| Enzyme | D | CK |
| Catalase (KMnO4 ml/g⋅20 min) | 0.54 ± 0.09 | 0.92 ± 0.23 |
| Urease (NH3-N mg/g⋅24 h) | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.31 ± 0.06 |
| Polyphenol oxidase (Purple gallate mg/g⋅2 h) | 0.88 ± 0.18 | 1.99 ± 0.49 |
| Acid phosphatase (Phenol mg/g⋅24 h) | 1.98 ± 0.38 | 1.64 ± 0.21 |
| Invertase (Glucose mg/g⋅24 h) | 2.52 ± 0.69 | 3.57 ± 0.52 |
Values are means ± standard deviation (n = 21). *In a row indicate statistically significant difference at P < 0.05 (Student’s t-test).
FIGURE 2Alpha-diversity of bacterial and fungal communities in the garlic cropping obstacle soil (D) and healthy control soil (CK). *** Indicates statistically significant difference at P < 0.001.
FIGURE 3The relative abundances of bacterial and fungal phyla and genera in the garlic cropping obstacle soil (D) and healthy control soil (CK). (A) Bacterial phyla, (B) fungal phyla, (C) bacterial genera, (D) fungal genera.
FIGURE 4Differential abundances of (A) bacterial and (B) fungal taxa in the garlic cropping obstacle soil (D) and healthy control soil (CK). The histogram shows taxa with LDA scores ≥ 4.0 for bacterial, and LDA scores ≥ 3.5 for fungal in the linear discriminant (LDA) effect size analysis. The cladogram shows taxonomic differences between D and CK.
FIGURE 5Non-metric multidimensional scaling of (A) bacterial and (B) fungal communities in the garlic cropping obstacle soil (D) and healthy control soil (CK).
FIGURE 6Distance-based redundancy analysis (dbRDA) of environmental factors with (A) bacterial and (B) fungal taxa in the garlic cropping obstacle soil (D) and healthy control soil (CK).
FIGURE 7The microbial community assembly processes in the cropping obstacle soil (D) and in the healthy control soil (CK). (A) The values of the weighted beta nearest taxon index (βNTI). Horizontal dashed gray lines indicate upper and lower significance thresholds at βNTI = −2 and + 2, respectively. (B) The percentages of deterministic processes (homogeneous and variable selection), stochastic processes (dispersal limitation and homogeneous dispersal), and undominated processes.