Lindsay Stager1, Skylar Morriss1, Lauren McKibben2, Merida Grant3, Jerzy P Szaflarski4, Aaron D Fobian5. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States; Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States. 4. Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Neurobiology and the UAB Epilepsy Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States. 5. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States. Electronic address: afobian@uabmc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To date, laboratory-based experimental behavioral methods have not been used to identify factors associated with pediatric functional seizures (FS), leaving a critical gap for effective treatment development. METHODS: Children ages 13-18 with video-EEG-confirmed FS were matched to controls (MCs) based on income, sex, race, and age. A modified Stroop task which included a condition requiring participants to report the ink colors in which seizure symptom words were written (e.g., "shaking" in blue) measured selective attention and cognitive inhibition through response time. The magic and turbulence task assessed sense of control in three conditions (magic, lag, turbulence). Children with FS were asked to report premonitory symptoms predicting FS. RESULTS: Participants included 26 children with FS and 26 MCs (Meanage=15.2, 74% female, 59% white). On Stroop, children with FS had a slower reaction time (Mean=1193.83) than MCs (Mean=949.26, p = 0.022) for seizure symptom words. Children with FS had significantly poorer sense of control in the turbulence condition of the magic and turbulence task (Mean=-3.99, SD=8.83) than MCs (Mean=-11.51, SD=7.87; t(20)=-2.61, p =0.017). Children with FS (Mean=-1.80, SD=6.54) also had significantly poorer sense of control in the magic condition than MCs (Mean=-5.57, SD=6.01; p =0.028). Ninety-eight percent of patients endorsed premonitory symptoms. CONCLUSION: Compared with MCs, children with FS have (1) poorer selective attention and cognitive inhibition when presented with seizure-related information and (2) lower sense of control (i.e. poorer awareness that their control was manipulated). Premonitory symptoms were common. Sense of control, selective attention, and inhibition may be novel treatment targets for FS intervention.
PURPOSE: To date, laboratory-based experimental behavioral methods have not been used to identify factors associated with pediatric functional seizures (FS), leaving a critical gap for effective treatment development. METHODS: Children ages 13-18 with video-EEG-confirmed FS were matched to controls (MCs) based on income, sex, race, and age. A modified Stroop task which included a condition requiring participants to report the ink colors in which seizure symptom words were written (e.g., "shaking" in blue) measured selective attention and cognitive inhibition through response time. The magic and turbulence task assessed sense of control in three conditions (magic, lag, turbulence). Children with FS were asked to report premonitory symptoms predicting FS. RESULTS: Participants included 26 children with FS and 26 MCs (Meanage=15.2, 74% female, 59% white). On Stroop, children with FS had a slower reaction time (Mean=1193.83) than MCs (Mean=949.26, p = 0.022) for seizure symptom words. Children with FS had significantly poorer sense of control in the turbulence condition of the magic and turbulence task (Mean=-3.99, SD=8.83) than MCs (Mean=-11.51, SD=7.87; t(20)=-2.61, p =0.017). Children with FS (Mean=-1.80, SD=6.54) also had significantly poorer sense of control in the magic condition than MCs (Mean=-5.57, SD=6.01; p =0.028). Ninety-eight percent of patients endorsed premonitory symptoms. CONCLUSION: Compared with MCs, children with FS have (1) poorer selective attention and cognitive inhibition when presented with seizure-related information and (2) lower sense of control (i.e. poorer awareness that their control was manipulated). Premonitory symptoms were common. Sense of control, selective attention, and inhibition may be novel treatment targets for FS intervention.
Authors: Anne Sofie Hansen; Charlotte Ulrikka Rask; Ann-Eva Christensen; Maria Rodrigo-Domingo; Jakob Christensen; René Ernst Nielsen Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ayushe A Sharma; Adam M Goodman; Jane B Allendorfer; Noah S Philip; Stephen Correia; W Curt LaFrance; Jerzy P Szaflarski Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2021-11-03 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Kasia Kozlowska; Kristi R Griffiths; Sheryl L Foster; James Linton; Leanne M Williams; Mayuresh S Korgaonkar Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2017-05-06 Impact factor: 4.881