Literature DB >> 35428916

The impact of lumbar alignment targets on mechanical complications after adult lumbar scoliosis surgery.

Michael P Kelly1, Keith H Bridwell2, Brian L Dial2, Jeffrey M Hills2, Justin S Smith3, Juan Pablo Sardi3, Bruno Lazaro3, Christopher I Shaffrey4, Shay Bess5, Frank J Schwab6, Virginie Lafage6, Renaud Lafage6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the discriminatory ability of age-adjusted alignment offset and the global alignment and proportion (GAP) score parameters to predict postoperative mechanical complications.
METHODS: Surgical patients from the Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis cohort were reviewed at 2 year follow up. Age-adjusted alignment offsets and GAP parameters were calculated for each patient. A series of nonlinear logistic regression models were fit, and the odds of mechanical complications were calculated. The discriminatory ability of the GAP score, GAP score parameters, and age-adjusted alignment offsets were determined plotting receiver operative characteristic (ROC) with the C statistic (AUC).
RESULTS: A total of 165 patients were included. A total of 49 mechanical complications occurred in 41 patients (21 proximal junctional kyphosis and 28 pseudoarthrosis). The GAP score had no discriminatory ability in this cohort. Relative lumbar lordosis 15 degrees greater than ideal lumbar lordosis was associated with greater mechanical complications. A lumbar distribution index of 90% was associated with fewer mechanical complications compared to a lumbar distribution index of 65%. Age-adjusted offset alignment targets had no discriminatory ability to predict mechanical complications.
CONCLUSION: Radiographic alignment targets using either age-adjusted alignment target offset or GAP score parameters had minimal ability to predict mechanical complications in isolation. Mechanical complications following adult spinal deformity surgery are complex, and patient factors play a critical role. Clinical trial registeration This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT00854828) in March 2009.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult spinal deformity; Age-adjusted; Global alignment and proportion; Spinal alignment

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35428916     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07200-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   2.721


  12 in total

1.  Defining Spino-Pelvic Alignment Thresholds: Should Operative Goals in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Account for Age?

Authors:  Renaud Lafage; Frank Schwab; Vincent Challier; Jensen K Henry; Jeffrey Gum; Justin Smith; Richard Hostin; Christopher Shaffrey; Han J Kim; Christopher Ames; Justin Scheer; Eric Klineberg; Shay Bess; Douglas Burton; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis.

Authors:  Michael P Kelly; Jon D Lurie; Elizabeth L Yanik; Christopher I Shaffrey; Christine R Baldus; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Jacob M Buchowski; Leah Y Carreon; Charles H Crawford; Charles Edwards; Thomas J Errico; Steven D Glassman; Munish C Gupta; Lawrence G Lenke; Stephen J Lewis; Han Jo Kim; Tyler Koski; Stefan Parent; Frank J Schwab; Justin S Smith; Lukas P Zebala; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Age-Adjusted Alignment Goals Have the Potential to Reduce PJK.

Authors:  Renaud Lafage; Frank Schwab; Steve Glassman; Shay Bess; Bradley Harris; Justin Sheer; Robert Hart; Breton Line; Jensen Henry; Doug Burton; HanJo Kim; Eric Klineberg; Christopher Ames; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Adult Spinal Deformity: Epidemiology, Health Impact, Evaluation, and Management.

Authors:  Christopher P Ames; Justin K Scheer; Virginie Lafage; Justin S Smith; Shay Bess; Sigurd H Berven; Gregory M Mundis; Rajiv K Sethi; Donald A Deinlein; Jeffrey D Coe; Lloyd A Hey; Michael D Daubs
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2016-06-16

5.  Lumbopelvic lordosis and pelvic balance on repeated standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and untreated patients with constant low back pain.

Authors:  R P Jackson; T Kanemura; N Kawakami; C Hales
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Degenerative Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Tamir Ailon; Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Lawrence G Lenke; Darrel Brodke; James S Harrop; Michael Fehlings; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Identification of Predictive Factors for Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Atsuyuki Kawabata; Toshitaka Yoshii; Kenichiro Sakai; Takashi Hirai; Masato Yuasa; Hiroyuki Inose; Kurando Utagawa; Jun Hashimoto; Yu Matsukura; Masaki Tomori; Ichiro Torigoe; Kazuo Kusano; Kazuyuki Otani; Koichi Mizuno; Sumiya Satoshi; Fukushima Kazuyuki; Shoji Tomizawa; Yoshiyasu Arai; Shigeo Shindo; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Frank J Schwab; Benjamin Blondel; Shay Bess; Richard Hostin; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Douglas C Burton; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Gregory M Mundis; Christopher P Ames; Khaled Kebaish; Robert A Hart; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score: Development and Validation of a New Method of Analyzing Spinopelvic Alignment to Predict Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Caglar Yilgor; Nuray Sogunmez; Louis Boissiere; Yasemin Yavuz; Ibrahim Obeid; Frank Kleinstück; Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso; Emre Acaroglu; Sleiman Haddad; Anne F Mannion; Ferran Pellise; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Are Higher Global Alignment and Proportion Scores Associated With Increased Risks of Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery? An External Validation.

Authors:  Kenny Yat Hong Kwan; Lawrence G Lenke; Christopher I Shaffrey; Leah Y Carreon; Benny T Dahl; Michael G Fehlings; Christopher P Ames; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Mark B Dekutoski; Khaled M Kebaish; Stephen J Lewis; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Hossein Mehdian; Yong Qiu; Frank J Schwab; Kenneth Man Chee Cheung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.755

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  GAP score potential in predicting post-operative spinal mechanical complications: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  E Quarto; A Zanirato; M Pellegrini; S Vaggi; F Vitali; S Bourret; J C Le Huec; M Formica
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 2.721

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.