Cristina C Torres Cabán1,2,3, Minghan Yang4,5,6,7, Cuixin Lai4,5,6, Lina Yang4,5,6, Fedor V Subach8, Brian O Smith9, Kiryl D Piatkevich4,5,6, Edward S Boyden1,2,3,10,11,12,13,14. 1. McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States. 2. Department of Biological Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States. 3. Department of Media Arts & Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States. 4. School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310024, China. 5. Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310024, China. 6. Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310024, China. 7. College of Physics, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130012, China. 8. Complex of NBICS Technologies, National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute", Moscow 123182, Russia. 9. Institute of Molecular, Cell & Systems Biology, College of Medical Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G128QQ, United Kingdom. 10. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States. 11. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815, United States. 12. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States. 13. K. Lisa Yang Center for Bionics, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States. 14. Center for Neurobiological Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.
Abstract
Genetically encoded potassium indicators lack optimal binding affinity for monitoring intracellular dynamics in mammalian cells. Through structure-guided design and genome mining of potassium binding proteins, we developed green fluorescent potassium indicators with a broad range of binding affinities. KRaION1 (K+ ratiometric indicator for optical imaging based on mNeonGreen 1), based on the insertion of a potassium binding protein, Kbp, from E. coli (Ec-Kbp) into the fluorescent protein mNeonGreen, exhibits an isotonically measured Kd of 69 ± 10 mM (mean ± standard deviation used throughout). We identified Ec-Kbp's binding site using NMR spectroscopy to detect protein-thallium scalar couplings and refined the structure of Ec-Kbp in its potassium-bound state. Guided by this structure, we modified KRaION1, yielding KRaION1/D9N and KRaION2, which exhibit isotonically measured Kd's of 138 ± 21 and 96 ± 9 mM. We identified four Ec-Kbp homologues as potassium binding proteins, which yielded indicators with isotonically measured binding affinities in the 39-112 mM range. KRaIONs functioned in HeLa cells, but the Kd values differed from the isotonically measured case. We found that, by tuning the experimental conditions, Kd values could be obtained that were consistent in vitro and in vivo. We thus recommend characterizing potassium indicator Kd in the physiological context of interest before application.
Genetically encoded potassium indicators lack optimal binding affinity for monitoring intracellular dynamics in mammalian cells. Through structure-guided design and genome mining of potassium binding proteins, we developed green fluorescent potassium indicators with a broad range of binding affinities. KRaION1 (K+ ratiometric indicator for optical imaging based on mNeonGreen 1), based on the insertion of a potassium binding protein, Kbp, from E. coli (Ec-Kbp) into the fluorescent protein mNeonGreen, exhibits an isotonically measured Kd of 69 ± 10 mM (mean ± standard deviation used throughout). We identified Ec-Kbp's binding site using NMR spectroscopy to detect protein-thallium scalar couplings and refined the structure of Ec-Kbp in its potassium-bound state. Guided by this structure, we modified KRaION1, yielding KRaION1/D9N and KRaION2, which exhibit isotonically measured Kd's of 138 ± 21 and 96 ± 9 mM. We identified four Ec-Kbp homologues as potassium binding proteins, which yielded indicators with isotonically measured binding affinities in the 39-112 mM range. KRaIONs functioned in HeLa cells, but the Kd values differed from the isotonically measured case. We found that, by tuning the experimental conditions, Kd values could be obtained that were consistent in vitro and in vivo. We thus recommend characterizing potassium indicator Kd in the physiological context of interest before application.
Potassium
ions serve key physiological
roles in a range of cells and systems, including neurons and glia,[1−6] cardiomyocytes,[7] and renal cells,[8,9] and potassium homeostasis is dysregulated in conditions including
seizures, immune cell impairment, and ischemic events.[10−12] Potassium concentration in cells, tissues, and organisms has been
measured using electrodes or dyes.[13−15] Recent attention has
focused on genetically encoded fluorescent indicators because they
could be targeted to specific cells.[16]The potassium binding protein, Kbp, from E. coli (here E. coli-Kbp or Ec-Kbp for short) undergoes
large conformational changes during potassium binding. Ec-Kbp consists
of ∼150 amino acids forming two domains, LysM (lysin motif)
and BON (bacterial OsmY and nodulation), and binds to one potassium
ion.[17] When binding occurs, Ec-Kbp’s
conformational change brings the two domains closer together and orders
the N-terminus such that it lies close to the C-terminus. However,
Ec-Kbp’s binding site was not previously identified.[17] The conformational change behavior parallels
that of calmodulin and M13 in commonly used genetically encoded calcium
indicators. Ec-Kbp’s conformational change makes it a good
candidate for incorporation into genetically encoded sensors, particularly
using split-fluorescent proteins, as used in the calcium indicator
NCaMP7.[18]The protein engineering
community has used Ec-Kbp to develop genetically
encoded K+ sensors. Two FRET sensors, GEPII 1.0 and KIRIN1,
and a single-fluorescent protein K+ sensor, GINKO1, have
been published.[19,20] These sensors change fluorescence
emission upon K+ binding, and although they have been used
to measure K+ concentration in solution and cell culture,
their binding affinities for K+ are not appropriate for
accurate measurements of intracellular potassium concentrations (previously
reported Kd values range from 0.40 to
2.6 mM), whereas textbook measurements of K+ concentrations
are ∼140–150 mM for mammalian cells at resting potential.[21,22] Extracellular K+ concentrations can fluctuate up to 30–80
mM in events of sustained neuron depolarization.[23−25] In glia, intracellular
K+ concentration can increase up to ∼60% during
potassium concentration regulation.[26,27] Without the
ability to measure K+ dynamically in a cell-specific way,
we will not understand K+ dynamics in different cell types
in healthy and disease states. Our goal was to design and generate
intracellularly expressed potassium sensors sensitive to changes in
K+ comparable to those found in the intracellular milieu.We report a family of green potassium indicators generated via
two approaches. One approach was based on knowledge of the Ec-Kbp
K+ binding site identified by NMR, while the second approach
consisted of identifying and using alternative potassium binding proteins
as sensing moieties. Guided mutagenesis was used to tune the indicator
mNeonGreen (mNG)-Ec-Kbp’s Kd, yielding
two mutants with isotonically measured binding affinities to K+ in the range of 96–138 mM and fluorescence dynamic
ranges of ∼200% over the range of 0.1–150 mM K+. The identification of previously unannotated proteins from metagenomic
databases that share 45–72% amino acid identity with Ec-Kbp
and fusing these to mNeonGreen yielded indicators with isotonically
measured K+ binding affinities ranging from 39 to 112 mM
and fluorescence dynamic ranges of up to ∼200% over the range
of 0.1–150 mM K+. The indicators generated are ratiometric
by excitation. When expressed in HeLa cells that were permeabilized
with valinomycin and CCCP ionophores, all tested indicators had Kd values below those measured in isotonic conditions in vitro. Thus, Kd could vary
depending on the conditions used for its measurement.[28] These indicators thus may be regarded as remaining in the
prototype stage, as discrepancies in binding affinities require thoughtful
consideration of how Kd is affected by
cellular and environmental contexts. Future work is needed to identify
the proper calibration conditions in each cell type of interest for
the indicators described here and elsewhere.
Results and Discussion
Development
of a Genetically Encoded Green Potassium Sensor
We used a
design approach based on the insertion of the sensing
moiety into a fluorescent protein as has been done with other indicators
for calcium: ncpGCaMP6s, NTnC, and NCaMP7.[18,29,30] NCaMP7, which contains mNG as a green fluorescent
reporter, is 1.7-fold brighter than the calcium indicator GCaMP6s[16] and has a maximum ΔF/F of 2700%. Our potassium indicator design used NCaMP7 as
a template, as mNG is brighter than other characterized monomeric
GFP proteins[31] and the design allows for
direct insertion of the binding domain into the fluorescent protein.We replaced NCaMP7’s binding moiety with Ec-Kbp while preserving
the original amino acid linkers between the fluorescent protein and
the binding domain (Figure a,b). We performed detailed characterization of mNG-Ec-Kbp’s
spectroscopic and biochemical properties at 0 and 150 mM under isotonic
conditions (Table ). The absorbance spectrum of mNG-Ec-Kbp shows two peaks at 408 and
508 nm that decrease and increase upon potassium administration, respectively
(Figure c).[32] Correspondingly, mNG-Ec-Kbp’s excitation
fluorescence spectrum has two peaks at 407 and 507 nm, which result
in identical emission maximums at 518 nm (Figure d). mNG-Ec-Kbp’s extinction coefficient
(EC) ratio was 65 300/12 000 M–1cm–1 when excited at 408/507 at 0 mM K+ and
45 600/23 200 M–1cm–1 when excited at 407/507 at 150 mM K+. The corresponding
quantum yields (QYs) obtained at 0 and 150 mM K+ when excited
at 407/507 nm were 35/26% and 29/57%, respectively (Table ). Therefore, upon potassium
administration, the fluorescence excited at 507 nm increases due to
both increasing QY and EC, while fluorescence excited at 407 nm decreases
due to both decreasing QY and EC, confirming mNG-Ec-Kbp as a ratiometric
indicator, which we named KRaION1: K+ ratiometric indicator
for optical imaging based on mNeonGreen 1.
Figure 1
Molecular design and properties of the genetically
encoded green
potassium indicator KRaION1 in solution. (a) Molecular design of the
KRaION1 indicator. (b) The proposed structure of KRaION1 shown as
a ribbon diagram according to the crystal structure of NCaMP7 (PDB: 6XW2) and NMR structure
of the Ec-Kbp domain (PDB: 5FIM). (c) Absorbance spectra of KRaION1 at 0 and 150 mM
potassium at pH = 7.4. (d) Fluorescence spectra of KRaION1 at 0 and
150 mM potassium at pH = 7.4. (e) Relative fluorescence intensity
of KRaION1 at 0 and 150 mM potassium as a function of pH. (f) Fluorescence
changes upon addition of 150 mM potassium as a function of pH at constant
ionic strength. (g) Potassium association using stopped-flow fluorimetry.
Association kinetics curves were acquired at a 40 mM final K+ concentration starting from K-free protein solution. Inset: the
same association kinetics curve shown in the range of the 0–300
ms time frame. (h) Selectivity of KRaION1 to K+ and other
cations represented as ΔF/F % measured by titration of Li+, Na+, K+, Rb+, Cs+, NH4+, Mg2+, Ca2+, and Zn2+. Calculated
fluorescence was obtained at the highest expected intracellular concentration
for each ion. (i) Fluorescent dynamic range and EC50 of
KRaION1 measured in the range of 0–260 mM K+. (j)
Potassium titration data points (open circles) measured at pH = 7.3
and constant ionic strength of 700 mM, fitted using Q = (Qmax – Q0)Y + Q0 function
(green line).
Table 1
Spectral
and Biochemical Properties
of Green Fluorescence Potassium Sensors in Solution and in Cellsa
GINKO1
KRaION1
KRaION1/D9N
KRaION2
0 mM K+
150 mM K+
0 mM K+
150 mM K+
0 mM K+
150 mM K+
0 mM K+
150 mM K+
absorbance (nm)
399/501
400/500
407/509
407/509
409/508
407/506
402/508
404/508
excitation (nm)
399/500
399/500
408/507
407/507
406/506
407/504
403/506
405/506
emission (nm)
514
515
519
518
517
517
516
517
extinction coefficient
(M–1 cm–1)
47 000/19 000
46 000/28 000
65 300/12 000
45 600/23 200
42 300/23 700
40 300/20 200
58 400/9300
47 400/26 100
quantum yield (%)
n.d.
7.7/59
35/26
29/57
28/14
23/47
26/23
29/61
pKa
7.5
7.3
7.7
7.4
7.7
7.3
7.7
7.1
Kd was
calculated using the same equation used for in vitro calculations of Kd. n.d. stands for
not determined.
K+ titration was conducted
in isotonic conditions in a range of 0.1–700 mM K+.
K+ titration
was conducted
at constant 5 mM Na+ with an increasing concentration of
0.1–250 mM K+. The equation used to fit the titration
data and obtain Kd is Q = (Qmax – Q0)Y + Q0.
τfast and τslow indicate time constants with the fluorescence trace fit
according to ΔF/F(t) = Ae– + Be– + C with the percentage indicating A/(A + B).
Fluorescence dynamic range (ΔF/Fmax) values represent the
percent max fluorescence change within the range of 0.1–700
mM K+.
Dynamic
range of the excitation
fluorescence ratio measured in live HeLa cells calibrated with valinomycin
and CCCP within the range of 0–150 mM K+.
Intracellular characterization of Kd measured in HeLa cells calibrated with valinomycin
and CCCP in the range of 0–150 mM K+.
Kd was
calculated using the same equation used for in vitro calculations of Kd. n.d. stands for
not determined.K+ titration was conducted
in isotonic conditions in a range of 0.1–700 mM K+.K+ titration
was conducted
at constant 5 mM Na+ with an increasing concentration of
0.1–250 mM K+. The equation used to fit the titration
data and obtain Kd is Q = (Qmax – Q0)Y + Q0.τfast and τslow indicate time constants with the fluorescence trace fit
according to ΔF/F(t) = Ae– + Be– + C with the percentage indicating A/(A + B).Fluorescence dynamic range (ΔF/Fmax) values represent the
percent max fluorescence change within the range of 0.1–700
mM K+.Dynamic
range of the excitation
fluorescence ratio measured in live HeLa cells calibrated with valinomycin
and CCCP within the range of 0–150 mM K+.Intracellular characterization of Kd measured in HeLa cells calibrated with valinomycin
and CCCP in the range of 0–150 mM K+.Molecular design and properties of the genetically
encoded green
potassium indicator KRaION1 in solution. (a) Molecular design of the
KRaION1 indicator. (b) The proposed structure of KRaION1 shown as
a ribbon diagram according to the crystal structure of NCaMP7 (PDB: 6XW2) and NMR structure
of the Ec-Kbp domain (PDB: 5FIM). (c) Absorbance spectra of KRaION1 at 0 and 150 mM
potassium at pH = 7.4. (d) Fluorescence spectra of KRaION1 at 0 and
150 mM potassium at pH = 7.4. (e) Relative fluorescence intensity
of KRaION1 at 0 and 150 mM potassium as a function of pH. (f) Fluorescence
changes upon addition of 150 mM potassium as a function of pH at constant
ionic strength. (g) Potassium association using stopped-flow fluorimetry.
Association kinetics curves were acquired at a 40 mM final K+ concentration starting from K-free protein solution. Inset: the
same association kinetics curve shown in the range of the 0–300
ms time frame. (h) Selectivity of KRaION1 to K+ and other
cations represented as ΔF/F % measured by titration of Li+, Na+, K+, Rb+, Cs+, NH4+, Mg2+, Ca2+, and Zn2+. Calculated
fluorescence was obtained at the highest expected intracellular concentration
for each ion. (i) Fluorescent dynamic range and EC50 of
KRaION1 measured in the range of 0–260 mM K+. (j)
Potassium titration data points (open circles) measured at pH = 7.3
and constant ionic strength of 700 mM, fitted using Q = (Qmax – Q0)Y + Q0 function
(green line).We assessed the pH sensitivity
of KRaION1, which exhibits a large
fluorescence change in response to 150 mM K+ within the
pH range of 7–8. The maximum dynamic range (ΔF/F) of 332% was seen at pH 7.5 (Figure e,f). Outside this
range, the fluorescence response of the indicator decreased. This
suggests KRaION1 would be sensitive to fluctuations in pH, as seen
for other single fluorescent protein-based indicators.[18,29,30] Monitored at pH = 7.4, KRaION1
displayed a fluorescence response upon binding K+ (at final
[K+] = 40 mM) that was biexponential with time constants
of τfast = 31 ms (55% of total amplitude) and τslow = 71 ms (remaining amplitude) (Figure g). Possible explanations for this include:
at the single molecule level, potassium binding to Ec-Kbp’s
binding pocket is fast, but the previously described[17] conformational rearrangement of the protein is slow; alternatively,
there could be two KRaION1 populations: one that can fold rapidly
after potassium binding, and another that has to overcome a significant
energy barrier to fold. KRaION1’s association kinetics response
is comparable to that of GINKO1 under identical conditions, characterized
by τfast = 34 ms (85% of total amplitude) and τslow = 54 ms (remaining amplitude). The fluorescence response
of KRaION1 is about 3-fold faster than NCaMP7, perhaps due to the
faster association kinetics of potassium ions with Ec-Kbp.We
also assessed KRaION1’s ion selectivity by measuring
fluorescence changes obtained from titrations with the following ions:
Li+, Na+, Rb+, Cs+, NH4+, Mg2+, Ca2+, and Zn2+ along with K+ (Figure h). Only Rb+, which has an ionic
radius similar to K+, resulted in significant fluorescence
increases of KRaION1. At the highest concentrations seen in mammalian
cells,[33−39] KRaION1’s ΔF/F %
for K+ is the highest at ∼200% relative to all other
ions, which remain below 50%. The ΔF/F % response for Li+, Ca2+, and Zn2+ ions increased above 50% only at concentrations that exceed
expected intracellular values (Supplementary Figure 1a). Next, we measured KRaION1’s fluorescence response
in conditions mimicking intracellular ion compositions[40] by increasing potassium concentration until
fluorescence reached an apparent plateau. The fluorescence increased
to ∼286% of ΔF/F at
∼250 mM K+, and the corresponding EC50 was ∼45 mM (Figure i).KRaION1’s Kd was
obtained by
fitting the fluorescence response to a single site binding model and
was 69 ± 10 mM under isotonic conditions of variable K+ (Figure j). For
comparison, GINKO1 had a Kd value of 17
± 7 mM under similar conditions. These Kd values are less useful for the detection of small changes
in mammalian cells’ intracellular potassium concentration,
so we sought to optimize KRaION1 to achieve a higher Kd. To achieve this, we sought additional information about
Ec-Kbp’s ion binding site.
Identification of Ec-Kbp’s
Ion Binding Site
We used NMR spectroscopy to locate Ec-Kbp’s
ion binding site.
In NMR spectroscopy, local chemical shift differences between free
and ligand-bound forms of proteins often provide evidence of binding
site locations, but this was not feasible for Ec-Kbp due to the extreme
line-broadening of many signals in its free form. Evidence for potassium
binding site locations can be obtained using 15N-labeled
ammonium ions to substitute for K+.[41,42] However, Ec-Kbp unfolds at the pHs at which the ammonium 1H signal is distinct from the water 1H signal. Isotopes
of potassium are quadrupolar nuclei with modest sensitivity, making
them unsuitable for determining protein–ion contacts in solution.
Instead, we used thallium(I) as a K+ mimic, allowing the
measurement of direct two bond scalar couplings (2J 13C=O···205/203Tl+) (B. O. Smith, in preparation) of around 100 Hz in the HNCO spectrum
(Figure a) that unambiguously
identify the backbone carbonyls of V7 and A10 from loop 1 in Ec-Kbp’s
N-terminal extension and G75, I77, and I80 from loop 5, the turn immediately
preceding the BON domain’s last β-strand, as Tl+ ligands. We believe this is the first reported observation of scalar
(J) coupling between a protein’s 13C enriched carbonyl
carbons and a bound thallium ion. The large J couplings observed provide
direct and unambiguous evidence of which groups coordinate with the
ion. In fact, the variation in J for the different residues suggests
the data may contain additional information about the interatomic
distances and angles that could be decoded in the future.
Figure 2
Identification
and modification of Ec-Kbp’s potassium binding
site. (a) 1H and 13C strips from HNCO spectra
of K+ (magenta) and Tl+ (green) bound Ec-Kbp
showing the residues whose crosspeaks are split by an additional J
coupling in the Tl+ bound form. The black scale bars represent
100 Hz. (b) Refined configuration of the Ec-Kbp ion binding site.
The ion is coordinated entirely by backbone carbonyls from loops 1
and 5 (backbone atoms shown as sticks). Sections of the rainbow-colored
cartoon of the rest of the protein are visible. Coordinating carbonyl
to K+ interactions and the K8 to G79 hydrogen bond are
shown as yellow dashed lines. (c) Potassium titration data points
for KRaION1 and mutants KRaION1/D9N and KRaION2 (open circles, squares,
and triangles, respectively) measured at pH = 7.4 and constant ionic
strength, fitted using the equation Q = (Qmax – Q0)Y + Q0 (denoted by a green line,
blue line, and magenta line, respectively). (d) Potassium association
using stopped-flow fluorimetry. Association kinetics curves were acquired
at 40 mM final K+ concentration starting from K-free protein
solution. (e) Association kinetics curves in the range of the 0–300
ms time frame.
Identification
and modification of Ec-Kbp’s potassium binding
site. (a) 1H and 13C strips from HNCO spectra
of K+ (magenta) and Tl+ (green) bound Ec-Kbp
showing the residues whose crosspeaks are split by an additional J
coupling in the Tl+ bound form. The black scale bars represent
100 Hz. (b) Refined configuration of the Ec-Kbp ion binding site.
The ion is coordinated entirely by backbone carbonyls from loops 1
and 5 (backbone atoms shown as sticks). Sections of the rainbow-colored
cartoon of the rest of the protein are visible. Coordinating carbonyl
to K+ interactions and the K8 to G79 hydrogen bond are
shown as yellow dashed lines. (c) Potassium titration data points
for KRaION1 and mutants KRaION1/D9N and KRaION2 (open circles, squares,
and triangles, respectively) measured at pH = 7.4 and constant ionic
strength, fitted using the equation Q = (Qmax – Q0)Y + Q0 (denoted by a green line,
blue line, and magenta line, respectively). (d) Potassium association
using stopped-flow fluorimetry. Association kinetics curves were acquired
at 40 mM final K+ concentration starting from K-free protein
solution. (e) Association kinetics curves in the range of the 0–300
ms time frame.
Refined Structure of Ec-Kbp·K+
To provide
an accurate structural model on which to base the mutagenesis of KRaION1’s
potassium binding site, we recalculated the Ec-Kbp·K+ structure[17] by incorporating a K+ ion restrained to the carbonyl oxygens identified as Tl+ ligands (PDB: 7PVC; Supplementary Table 1).
The coordinating carbonyl oxygens were restrained to be between 2.75
± 0.1 Å of the K+ ion, as suggested by Harding[43] without any constraint on the C=O···K+ bond angle. Since the NMR structure calculation software,
ARIA2.3/CNS, uses the OPLX force field with explicit TIP3P-like water
representation for the water refinement stage,[44] we used the parameters for K+ suggested by Mamatkulov
and Schwierz.[45] The refined structure differs
little from the structure calculated without an ion included (Supplementary Figure 2a) but binds K+ between loops 1 and 5 at the center of a distorted square pyramid
whose base of ∼3.3–4.7 Å on each side is formed
by the carbonyl oxygens of residues V7, A10, I77, and I80, while G75’s
carbonyl oxygen sits at the apex with the lateral sides ranging from
3.56 ± 0.40 Å for G75 and I80 to 5.05 ± 0.29 Å
for G75 and V7. The five backbone carbonyls coordinate K+ at distances between 2.62 and 2.86 Å (Supplementary Table 2). K8’s carbonyl oxygen could be a sixth K+ ligand forming the vertex opposite G75’s carbonyl
oxygen in an elongated octahedral coordination sphere. However, it
lies more distant from K+ (3.98 ± 0.37 Å) and
is instead involved in a hydrogen bond with the backbone amide of
G79 (Figure b). The
conserved glycine residues in the two loops allow the ion binding
site to form. G11 adopts an extended conformation with a positive
φ dihedral angle, and its lack of side chain allows the close
approach of the two loops. G75 is in an α-helical conformation,
but the side chain of any other residue at this position would disrupt
the close packing of the conserved F6 with its neighboring residues.
G79 contributes to a tight turn with a positive φ, allowing
its amide to hydrogen bond with K8. The other conserved residue in
loop 5, N76, has a role in the overall fold of the protein as its
side-chain amide makes a pair of interdomain hydrogen bonds with V143
in the LysM domain. As well as contributing to ion binding, A10 likely
ensures close contact can be made with V7 and G141 at the N-terminus
of the final beta-strand in the LysM domain.Pentavalent coordination
of potassium in proteins is commonly observed,[46] but it is possible that a water molecule could be involved
in coordinating the ion raising the coordination number. The structure
reveals a likely explanation for Ec-Kbp’s specificity for potassium
and slightly larger ions over sodium: the two ion binding loops are
already tightly packed with potassium bound, while accommodating sodium
would dictate a shortening of each of the ion–carbonyl distances
by approximately 0.36 Å to maintain favorable interactions, which
does not seem sterically feasible. The structure also explains the
roles of most of the conserved residues surrounding the ion binding
site and explains why it is difficult to find mutations that subtly
alter potassium affinity without abolishing it altogether.
Structure-Guided
Mutagenesis Modulates K+ Binding
To fine-tune
Ec-Kbp’s potassium binding affinity, we introduced
mutations within and around the ion binding site, informed by the
new NMR structure (Figure b and Supplementary Figure 2b).
Since K+ appears to be coordinated by the protein’s
backbone carbonyl groups, our scope for directly affecting the binding
site was limited. We speculated that adjusting the electrostatic character
of residues near the binding pocket could affect the stability of
the K+ bound state and increase the Kd. We generated a set of KRaION1 mutants with altered residues
within and near the K+ binding site. K8, A10, and N76 were
swapped for another small residue (A, G) or to a negatively charged
D. These choices were made on the basis of the residues’ electrostatic
characteristics: positive or neutral residues were swapped for other
neutral or negative residues, respectively. The conserved hydrophobic
residues I77 and I80 were mutated to smaller amino acids that are
either neutral, like A and G, or small and polar, like S. We deduced
that nearby residues D9 and E12 could be mutated to remove their negative
charges and make the local electrostatic environment less favorable
for K+ binding without disrupting binding altogether. These
residues were substituted with either polar, positively charged, or
small nonpolar residue groups: N/A/K or Q/A/K.We measured the
fluorescence and absorbance spectra of the KRaION1 mutants over a
range of K+ concentrations from 0 to 310 mM under nonisotonic
conditions at pH = 7.3. We determined their apparent Kd, ΔF/F, baseline
fluorescence brightness, and protein folding efficiency (Supplementary Table 3). We used nonisotonic conditions
for quick screening of the variants’ functionality but used
isotonic conditions for proper assessment of Kd to remove the effects of varying ionic strength on our measurements.
KRaION1’s apparent Kd in these
nonisotonic conditions was 12 ± 4 mM in comparison to a Kd of 69 ± 10 mM in isotonic conditions,
suggesting the indicator’s Kd is
affected by ionic strength. Variants with mutations made directly
to the K+ binding site appeared to have disrupted functioning,
as we observed fluorescence dynamic ranges of <30% and folding
efficiency of <50% relative to KRaION1. However, mutants D9N and
E12A, residues adjacent to the K+ binding site, exhibited
higher isotonically measured Kd values
of 138 ± 21 and 96 ± 9 mM with a ΔF/Fmax of 434% and 318%, respectively
(Figure c). This suggested
that changing the electrostatic environment of the binding pocket
is possible through structure-guided rational design. Both mutants
maintained selectivity to K+ over other ions and showed
a decreased ΔF/F % response
to Zn2+ (Supplementary Figure 1b,c). Relative to KRaION1, both mutants had different biexponential
kinetics of association to K+. D9N had activation time
constants of τfast = 37 ms (69% of total amplitude)
and τslow = 1211 ms (remaining amplitude) (Figure d), and E12A had
activation time constants of τfast = 26 ms (60% of
total amplitude) and τslow = 890 ms (remaining amplitude)
(Figure e). The D9N
mutation led to slower activation kinetics, whereas the E12A mutation
led to faster activation kinetics relative to KRaION1 and GINKO1.
We named the mNG-Ec-Kbp-E12A mutant KRaION2 because of its favorable Kd and kinetics values.
Ec-Kbp Homologues Can Be
Used as Alternative Binding Moieties
As an alternative approach
for indicator design with a binding
affinity relevant to the intracellular mammalian environment, we searched
for Ec-Kbp homologues to use as the sensing moiety in our sensor.
We used protein BLAST to search through a data set (env_nr) that contains
proteins from whole genome shotgun sequencing (WGS) metagenomic projects.
We selected four proteins with unknown functions that shared 45–72%
amino acid identity with Ec-Kbp and in which the K+ binding
site was also largely conserved (Supplementary Table 4, Figure a). Protein homologue names are based on the organism or origin of
sample collection: Ec, E. coli (NCBI reference
sequence: WP_000522415.1); C, compost (GenBank: MNG82101.1);
Pa, P. aeruginosa (NCBI reference sequence: NP_253865.1); Hv, hydrothermal vent (GenBank: VAV91021.1); D, Defluviicoccus sp. (GenBank: SUS08588.1). Amino acid changes observed in the putative
potassium binding site maintained the original residues’ electrochemical
properties. A change in binding site residue V7 to I7 was observed
in D-Kbp. Changes to residue I77 to V at equivalent positions were
seen in all identified homologues with the exception of Hv-Kbp whose
residue change was to T. Another change was seen in the Pa-Kbp homologue,
in which residue I80 was swapped for V.
Figure 3
Identification of alternative
potassium binding proteins and comparison
to Ec-Kbp. (a) Alignment of amino acid sequences of Ec-Kbp with five
homologues obtained from a metagenomic BLAST search. Residues comprising
the LysM and BON domains are shaded in gray and cyan, respectively.
Residues highlighted in green indicate those that are conserved with
the Ec-Kbp-identified potassium binding site. The β-sheet-forming
regions and α-helix-forming regions are denoted by arrows and
ribbons, respectively. Residues that were selected for site-directed
mutagenesis in Ec-Kbp are denoted by asterisks. (b) Potassium titration
data points for KRaION1 and homologues mNG-C-Kbp, mNG-Pa-Kbp, mNG-Hv-Kbp,
and mNG-D-Kbp (open circles, squares, upward triangles, downward triangles,
and diamonds, respectively) measured at pH = 7.4 and constant ionic
strength, fitted using the equation Q = (Qmax – Q0)Y + Q0 (denoted by a green line, blue line, magenta
line, purple line, and dark green line, respectively).
Identification of alternative
potassium binding proteins and comparison
to Ec-Kbp. (a) Alignment of amino acid sequences of Ec-Kbp with five
homologues obtained from a metagenomic BLAST search. Residues comprising
the LysM and BON domains are shaded in gray and cyan, respectively.
Residues highlighted in green indicate those that are conserved with
the Ec-Kbp-identified potassium binding site. The β-sheet-forming
regions and α-helix-forming regions are denoted by arrows and
ribbons, respectively. Residues that were selected for site-directed
mutagenesis in Ec-Kbp are denoted by asterisks. (b) Potassium titration
data points for KRaION1 and homologues mNG-C-Kbp, mNG-Pa-Kbp, mNG-Hv-Kbp,
and mNG-D-Kbp (open circles, squares, upward triangles, downward triangles,
and diamonds, respectively) measured at pH = 7.4 and constant ionic
strength, fitted using the equation Q = (Qmax – Q0)Y + Q0 (denoted by a green line, blue line, magenta
line, purple line, and dark green line, respectively).We exchanged Ec-Kbp for each of these homologues in the KRaION1
indicator to check their functionality. When tested at different K+ concentrations under isotonic conditions, all sensors had
a fluorescence response that varied with K+ concentration,
suggesting these homologues are also K+ binding proteins
and sequence changes near the binding site did not disable their K+ binding function (Supplementary Table 5, Supplementary Figure 3). These alternative binding moieties
confer a range of isotonically characterized binding affinities to
the indicators from 39 to 112 mM (Figure b). One homologue, mNG-D-Kbp, displayed an
isotonically measured Kd value of 112
± 35 mM in the same range as KRaION1 and its D9N and E12A variants.
Thus, alternative potassium binding domains can generate promising
potassium indicator candidates with a variety of Kd’s.
In Vivo Characterization
of Indicators in HeLa
Cells
We focused on a subset of indicators to characterize
in cultured HeLa cells: KRaION1, KRaION2, and KRaION1/D9N. In addition
to KRaION1, we chose the D9N and E12A mutants due to their higher Kd, fast kinetics, and lower sensitivity to Zn2+. We excluded mNG-D-Kbp from this experiment because of its
lower ΔF/F %. We used UV and
cyan light to excite the fluorescence of KRaION1, KRaION2, and KRaION1/D9N
(Figure a). To permeabilize
the cells and allow intracellular diffusion of potassium while maintaining
steady pH, we used the ionophores valinomycin and CCCP. We exchanged
different concentrations of K+ into the extracellular space,
and in between exchanges, cells were incubated in 0 mM K+ to allow sensor equilibration to baseline fluorescence. The ratio
of fluorescence emission changes (F487 nm/F390 nm) showed KRaION1, KRaION2,
and KRaION1/D9N responses when pulsed with K+ buffers ranging
from 0 to 150 mM K+, suggesting the indicators are still
functional in cells (Figure b). The excitation fluorescence ratio of the indicators measured
when excited at two distinct wavelengths, ΔR/R0, increased up to 150 mM intracellular
K+ with the max ΔR/R0 at 755 ± 88%, 943 ± 310%, and 1112 ±
160% for KRaION1, KRaION2, and KRaION1/D9N, respectively (Table ).
Figure 4
Calibration of KRaION1,
KRaION2, and KRaION1/D9N in live HeLa cells.
(a) Representative fluorescence images of KRaION1, KRaION2, and KRaION1/D9N
in the green channel with UV and cyan excitations (n = 10 FOVs from three independent transfections each). Scale bars,
10 μm. (b) Representative excitation ratiometric response of
KRaION1, KRaION2, and KRaION1/D9N at increasing [K+] from
0 to 150 mM, equilibrated with valinomycin and CCCP (n = 16, 18, and 21 cells, respectively, from 3 independent transfections;
ratio was calculated as F478 nm/F390 nm for the spectral configuration shown
in (a)). (c) Binding titration curves for KRaION1, KRaION2, and KRaION1/D9N
when equilibrated with valinomycin and CCCP (n =
15, 20, and 20 cells from 2 independent transfections; KRaION1, and
KRaION2, and KRaION1/D9N, respectively; data points, mean; error bars,
standard deviation) presented as normalized excitation ratio F478 nm/F390 nm. Experiments were done at 33 °C.
Calibration of KRaION1,
KRaION2, and KRaION1/D9N in live HeLa cells.
(a) Representative fluorescence images of KRaION1, KRaION2, and KRaION1/D9N
in the green channel with UV and cyan excitations (n = 10 FOVs from three independent transfections each). Scale bars,
10 μm. (b) Representative excitation ratiometric response of
KRaION1, KRaION2, and KRaION1/D9N at increasing [K+] from
0 to 150 mM, equilibrated with valinomycin and CCCP (n = 16, 18, and 21 cells, respectively, from 3 independent transfections;
ratio was calculated as F478 nm/F390 nm for the spectral configuration shown
in (a)). (c) Binding titration curves for KRaION1, KRaION2, and KRaION1/D9N
when equilibrated with valinomycin and CCCP (n =
15, 20, and 20 cells from 2 independent transfections; KRaION1, and
KRaION2, and KRaION1/D9N, respectively; data points, mean; error bars,
standard deviation) presented as normalized excitation ratio F478 nm/F390 nm. Experiments were done at 33 °C.We calculated the sensors’ Kd values
when expressed in HeLa cells as 37 ± 9 mM for KRaION1,
58 ± 6 mM for KRaION2, and 95 ± 21 mM for KRaION1/D9N (Figure c). We selected KRaION1/D9N
as the indicator with the highest fluorescence ratio to evaluate whether
cells with a high expression of indicator have a different Kd value than those with lower expression. Kd values obtained accounting for these expression
differences were 90 ± 41 and 94 ± 14 mM for high and low
expressing cells, respectively, which overlap with our previously
reported measurement that assumed equal expression across cells (Supplementary Figure 4a). However, these Kd values are inconsistent with the isotonically
measured Kd values obtained in
vitro. Cell calibration experiments performed with valinomycin
alone without CCCP were even more inconsistent (Supplementary Table 6, Supplementary Figure 4b). When performing
the same calibration experiment with valinomycin for GINKO1, we obtained
an intracellular Kd value of 3 ±
0.23 mM, different from its isotonic value.We attempted to
understand this Kd discrepancy
by measuring the indicator’s binding affinity at constant 5
mM Na+ and variable K+ in the range of 0.1 to
250 mM. In these conditions, we obtained a different Kd value for KRaION1 of 42 ± 10 mM, lower than the
isotonic case but overlapping the HeLa cell case when calibrated with
valinomycin and CCCP (Table ). Overlap in Kd values between
this in vitro measurement and cell calibration was
also observed for KRaION2 and KRaION1/D9N at 66 ± 9 and 100 ±
6 mM, respectively. Different Kd values
were observed in all other measured indicators under these in vitro conditions (Supplementary Table 7). This suggests the indicators are sensitive to changes in
ionic strength when measured in vitro. Kd discrepancies have previously been studied for calcium
and potassium probes.[28,47] For potassium probes, a combination
of several ionophores and sucrose was most effective in potassium
calibration experiments in Jurkat and U937 cell types.[28] This is consistent with our observations of
cell calibration with a combination of valinomycin and CCCP versus
just valinomycin. For these calibration experiments, we suggest identifying
the best combination of ionophores for proper equilibration of ion
concentrations in cell types of interest. Future potassium indicator
engineering efforts may benefit from screens being fully performed
in cell types of interest rather than in vitro with
methods like robotic molecular screening, which has not yet been applied
to potassium indicators.[48]
Conclusion
We have designed a set of potassium indicators on the basis of
the insertion of Ec-Kbp mutants and homologue variants into mNeonGreen.
Insertion of Ec-Kbp into mNeonGreen results in KRaION1, a bright and
fast indicator, with an isotonically measured binding affinity for
potassium of 69 ± 10 mM. We used two approaches to increase this Kd value: structure-guided mutagenesis and identification
of alternative potassium binding proteins. We utilized NMR to determine
the structure of Ec-Kbp to reveal that the backbone carbonyls of residues
V7, A10, G75, I77, and I80 coordinate the potassium ion. With this
information, we designed two mutants, KRaION1/D9N and KRaION2, with
higher isotonically measured Kd values
of 138 ± 21 and 96 ± 9 mM, respectively. We also identified
four Ec-Kbp homologues that have a conserved binding site for potassium
and can be alternative binding moieties in the indicator. When expressed
intracellularly, KRaION1, KRaION2, and KRaION1/D9N maintain their
functionality. However, Kd values measured
in the intracellular environment with valinomycin and CCCP were lower
than those observed in vitro. The measurement of Kd at constant sodium concentration gave values
that overlapped with these intracellular conditions, raising the point
that physiological characterization of potassium indicators needs
to be performed carefully and may need to occur in the exact cell
type and physiological context of interest. KRaION1’s apparent Kd for potassium was already more than 2 orders
of magnitude higher in vitro than Ec-Kbp’s.
Perhaps Ec-Kbp’s conformational change is frustrated by having
its N- and C-termini tethered by mNG. This suggests further optimization
of the linker sequences to mNG may be useful in optimizing KRaION1’s Kd. For all indicators, further structure-guided
mutagenesis can be combined with other techniques such as high-throughput,
multiparameter directed evolution approaches[48] to further improve other parameters of interest, such as brightness
and kinetics.
Materials and Methods
Molecular
Cloning and Mutagenesis
De novo gene synthesis
of the designed potassium sensor including Ec-Kbp
and identified homologues and subsequent subcloning into the pBAD-HisD
vector were done by Genscript. The genes were codon-optimized for
human cells. Mutagenesis of individual residues in KRaION1 was done
using the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent). Forward
and reverse primers used to generate each mutant are provided in Supplementary Table 8. Indicators were transformed
into TOP10 (Invitrogen) electrocompetent E. coli cells and grown on LB plates with 1:1000 dilution of carbenicillin
and 0.002% arabinose. Confirmation of the correct mutation for each
construct was done by colony sequencing (Eton Bioscience Inc.). For
mammalian expression, the selected indicator genes were cloned into
a mammalian expression vector pN1 (Clontech). The DNA sequence of
GINKO1 was obtained from Addgene (plasmid #113112).
Protein Purification
and in Vitro Characterization
Proteins were
expressed and purified using the pBAD/HisB arabinose-inducible
system (Invitrogen) in TOP10 cells (Invitrogen) cultured in RM medium
as previously described.[49,50] Before measurements,
the proteins were dialyzed against various buffers depending on the
subsequent measurement conditions (see sections below) and stored
at 4 °C.The following buffers were prepared for characterization:
150 mM NaCl, 25 mM HEPES, 25 mM MES, and 10 mM Tris (to be used as
0 mM K+) and 150 mM KCl, 25 mM HEPES, 25 mM MES, and 10
mM Tris. Absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer (Hitachi
Shimadzu UV-3600 Plus). The extinction coefficients were determined
using alkine denaturation with 1 M NaOH as described previously.[51] Fluorescence was measured using two excitation
wavelengths at 400 and 480 nm and emission ranges of 410–700
and 490–700 nm, respectively, in the same buffers with 0 and
150 mM K+. Quantum yields were measured at 0 and 150 mM
K+ buffers at excitation wavelengths of 405 and 480 nm
(Edinburgh FLS1000 spectrometer).For pKa measurements, 0 and 150 mM
K+ buffers at various pH values were used to measure the
fluorescence intensity in the range of 250–600 nm (Plate Reader
Thermo Varioskan LUX). The kinetics of the fluorescence response was
obtained with 480 nm excitation and 520/40 nm emission at 40 mM K+ concentration using stopped flow spectrophotometry (Applied
Photophysics Ltd., SX 20).For K+ titration under
nonisotonic conditions, purified
proteins in artificial mammalian cell cytoplasm buffer (12 mM NaHCO3 and 1 mM MgCl2 in 25 mM Tris/MES, pH 7.4) were
diluted into a series of buffers with K+ (potassium d-gluconate) concentrations ranging from 0 to 260 mM. For the
examination of K+ specificity, purified proteins were diluted
into a series of buffers that each contained a different salt, these
being: LiCl, NaCl, KCl, RbCl, CsCl, NH4Cl, MgCl2, and CaCl2 ranging from 0 to 260 mM and ZnCl2 at a range of 0 to 260 μM. The fluorescence spectrum of the
purified proteins in each solution was measured with excitation at
490 nm and emission from 510 to 600 nm (Thermo Scientific Varioskan
LUX).For Kd characterization under
isotonic
conditions, the proteins were dialyzed against 25 mM MES, 25 mM HEPES
buffer at pH 7.3 and added to a series of isotonic solutions with
varied KCl to NaCl ratios. KCl concentrations tested were in the range
of 0 to 700 mM KCl. For characterization of Kd in a secondary condition, the 25 mM MES, 25 mM HEPES buffer
at pH 7.3 with constant 5 mM NaCl concentration and increasing concentrations
of KCl in the range of 0.1 to 250 mM K+ was used. Absorbance
and fluorescence from three technical replicates for each indicator
were measured at 24–26 °C (Tecan Spark Plate Reader).
Titration curves and Kd were later obtained
by fitting to the following equation using a custom Python script: Q = (Qmax – Q0)Y + Q0 where Q is fluorescence and Qmax and Q0 are maximum and minimum fluorescent yields,
respectively. , where M is
a fixed concentration
component of the genetically encoded sensor, L is
the varying concentration component of K+, and Kd is the dissociation constant. All calculated
values are expressed as Kd ± standard
deviation.
Ec-Kbp·Tl+ NMR and Ec-Kbp·K+ Structure Determination
To identify the amino acid
groups
that ligate the cation, a 0.25 mM sample of U–13C- and U–15N-labeled Ec-Kbp prepared as described
previously[17] was diluted in 20 mM sodium
phosphate, pH 7.2, 0.01% w/v sodium azide, and 5% D2O with
the addition of 1 mM thallium sulfate (to achieve 2 mM Tl+). From a 3D HNCO experiment recorded (1024 × 27 × 128
complex points for sweep widths of 9615 × 2127.7 × 2413.8
Hz in 1H, 15N, and 13C, respectively)
at 14.1 T and 298 K on a Bruker AVANCE IIIHD spectrometer equipped
with a TCI cryoprobe and processed conventionally, the cross peaks
that were split by an additional coupling in the 13CO dimension
were identified, making use of the backbone resonance assignment of
Ec-Kbp·Tl+ (B. O. Smith, personal communications)
in CCPN analysis software.[52]The
refined structure of the Ec-Kbp·K+ was calculated
using the same restraints as in the original structure determination[17] but with the addition of a potassium ion and
5 distance restraints of 2.75 ± 0.1 Å between it and the
five coordinating carbonyls.[43] The parameters
for the singly charged potassium ion were added to the topallhdg5.3.pro
and parallhdg5.3.pro files in the ARIA2.3/CNS software with the epsilon
and sigma values set to 0.62 kJ mol–1 and 3.0695
Å in the OPLX section used during refinement in explicit water.[45] Eight rounds of structure calculations starting
from randomized coordinates in Cartesian space were executed with
100 structures each. The 20 structures from the final iteration with
the lowest restraint energy were refined using the ARIA2.3/CNS software
in explicit water. The refined structures were analyzed and figures
prepared using PyMOL and Inkscape. The Ec-Kbp·K+ structure
has been deposited at the protein data bank (PDB: 7PVC).
Metagenomic
Search for Alternative Ec-Kbp Domains Using Protein
BLASTp
To search for alternative potassium binding domains,
we used NCBI’s BLASTp protein to protein sequence alignment
tool. The Ec-Kbp amino acid sequence (NCBI reference sequence: WP_000522415.1) was used to search against the metagenomic database (env_nr). No
other parameters were set to perform the search. The obtained results
were filtered by percentage similarity of the amino acid sequences
and were picked manually. The E-value metric was
also taken into consideration, where numbers closest to 0 would be
identified as good matches.
In Vitro Screening of KRaION1
Mutants and Homologues
Protein expression and purification
was done as described above.
To screen mutants and homologues for binding affinity, the proteins
were dialyzed against 100 mM Tris buffer at pH 7.3 and assessed at
different KCl concentration increments ranging from 0 to 310 mM KCl
in 100 mM Tris at pH 7.3 using a Tecan Plate Reader (Tecan Spark).
Sensor titration curves were fitted, and Kd values were obtained fitting into the single site binding equation
described above.
In Vivo Characterization
and Imaging in HeLa
Cells
HeLa cells (ATCC) were cultured in Dulbecco’s
modified Eagle’s medium (Gibco) with 10% fetal bovine serum
(FBS; YEASEN Biotech) and were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Cells were plated on 12 mm coverslips (Fisher Scientific)
coated with Matrigel in 24-well plates before transfection. Liposomal
transfection was applied according to the manufacturer’s protocol
(YEASEN Biotech). HeLa cells were transfected using Hieff Trans (YEASEN
Biotech) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and imaged
36–48 h post-transfection using an inverted wide-field Nikon
Eclipse Ti2 microscope equipped with a SPECTRA III light engine (Lumencor)
and a Orca Flash4.0v3 camera (Hamamatsu), controlled by NIS-Elements
AR software, and using a 20×, 0.75 NA objective lens.The
solutions with varying concentrations of K+ were prepared
by mixing two stock solutions (25 mM MES, 25 mM HEPES, and 250 mM
NaCl as the “no potassium solution” and 25 mM MES, 25
mM HEPES, and 250 mM KCl with potassium) in the corresponding ratios.
Cell medium was replaced with 500 μL of 25 mM, 25 mM HEPES,
and 250 mM NaCl buffer with 15 μM valinomycin and 5 μM
CCCP and incubated for 15 min before perfusing. The solutions ranging
from 0 to 150 mM K+ were administered with 15 μM
valinomycin (Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd.) and 5 μM
CCCP (Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd.) right before perfusion.
Cell calibration was also performed in the same manner with just 15
μM valinomycin.To perform automated buffer exchange,
the coverslip with the cells
was transferred to the RC-26G flow chamber (Warner Instruments, USA)
and connected to a custom-built perfusion system consisting of a peristaltic
pump (Baoding Chuangrui Precision Pump Co., Ltd.), the SV06 12 port
switch value (Runze Fluid, China), controlled heated platform (Warner
Instruments, USA), and vacuum pump. The system was designed to offer
programmable buffer exchange and continuous monitoring of flow rate,
temperature, and channel switching. The perfusion system was controlled
by the custom LabVIEW code (National Instruments Corporation; Supplementary Figure 5).For live cell
imaging, the programmable perfusion system was used
to provide the series of extracellular buffers at a 1 mL/min flow
rate with different potassium concentrations (0 to 150 mM K+ as described) containing valinomycin and CCCP or valinomycin alone,
ensuring that the cells were bathed in a consistent environment without
pipetting the desired solution manually. The buffer temperature was
kept at 33 °C throughout the entire imaging.
Authors: Wim F Vranken; Wayne Boucher; Tim J Stevens; Rasmus H Fogh; Anne Pajon; Miguel Llinas; Eldon L Ulrich; John L Markley; John Ionides; Ernest D Laue Journal: Proteins Date: 2005-06-01
Authors: Eugeniy S Protasov; Daria V Borsakova; Yuliya G Alexandrovich; Anatoliy V Korotkov; Elena A Kosenko; Andrey A Butylin; Fazoil I Ataullakhanov; Elena I Sinauridze Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Kiryl D Piatkevich; Erica E Jung; Christoph Straub; Changyang Linghu; Demian Park; Ho-Jun Suk; Daniel R Hochbaum; Daniel Goodwin; Eftychios Pnevmatikakis; Nikita Pak; Takashi Kawashima; Chao-Tsung Yang; Jeffrey L Rhoades; Or Shemesh; Shoh Asano; Young-Gyu Yoon; Limor Freifeld; Jessica L Saulnier; Clemens Riegler; Florian Engert; Thom Hughes; Mikhail Drobizhev; Balint Szabo; Misha B Ahrens; Steven W Flavell; Bernardo L Sabatini; Edward S Boyden Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2018-02-26 Impact factor: 15.040