| Literature DB >> 35427387 |
Rongzhu Cheng1,2, Qianqian Wang3, Longbao Wei1.
Abstract
In modern society, dairy products have become increasingly important in our diet because of changes in consumption patterns due to urbanization. However, Chinese residents' dairy consumption remains at a relatively low level, with great potential for growth. Exploring the main determinants of dairy consumption and their effect mechanisms not only helps to improve the health status of residents, but also has important policy implications for the development of China's dairy industry. Based on the data of China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) from 1989 to 2011, this study empirically analyzes the impact of urbanization on residents' dairy consumption. The results indicate that urbanization could significantly promote residents' consumption of dairy products and the effect is higher in areas with low urbanization levels and in midwestern regions than in areas with high urbanization levels and in midwestern regions. From the perspective of effect mechanism, income growth, employment structure transition and the rise of modern markets are three important mediating paths. Additionally, the results imply that in areas with low urbanization levels, income growth and the rise of modern markets are the main significant mediators; while in areas with high urbanization levels, employment structure transition is a significant mediator. Moreover, in midwestern regions, income growth is a significant mediator, and employment structure transition is a significant mediator in all regions. These findings have practical implications for understanding the relationship between urbanization and residents' food consumption and for further promoting residents' dairy consumption and the development of China's dairy industry.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35427387 PMCID: PMC9012357 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Urbanization and statistics related to residents’ consumption of dairy products.
Note: Data source: China Statistical Yearbook, China Dairy Yearbook. The chain retail enterprises above designated size contains chain retail enterprises with 60 employees or more and annual sales of 5 million RMB or more.
Fig 2The relationships and influence paths between the variables.
Definition of variables.
| Variables | Code | Definition | unit | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable | Dairy consumption | Q | Residents’ average daily consumption of dairy products | gram |
| Independent variable | Urbanization level | UR | The proportion of permanent residents with urban hukou in total population | / |
| Mediating variable | Income level | IL | Log (per capita annual net income) | / |
| Employment structure | ES | The proportion of people engaged in agriculture sector among the total labor force | % | |
| Rise of modern markets | RM | The evaluation of development of local retail markets | Score 0–10 | |
| Control variable | Purchasing power | Contr1 | Consumer Price Index | / |
| Production value of cow products | Contr2 | The value of products produced from the third livestock type | CNY | |
| Proportion of the elderly | Contr3 | The proportion of residents older than 65 | / | |
| Proportion of children | Contr4 | The proportion of residents under 6 | / | |
| Education level | Contr5 | Residents’ average years of education | year | |
| Milk scandal | Contr6 | Year before or after 2008 | 0/1 | |
Descriptive statistics results.
| Variables | Min | Max | Mean | S.D. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable | Dairy consumption | 1.50 | 750.00 | 171.06 | 84.30 |
| Independent variable | Urbanization level | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.41 |
| Mediating variables | Income level (log) | 6.33 | 11.08 | 8.94 | 1.04 |
| Employment structure | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.31 | 0.38 | |
| Rise of modern markets | 0.00 | 10.00 | 5.61 | 3.30 | |
| Control variables | Consumer Price Index | 0.93 | 4.10 | 2.38 | 0.73 |
| Production value of cow products | 0.00 | 51200.00 | 183.25 | 1908.63 | |
| Proportion of the elderly | 0.00 | 0.58 | 0.14 | 0.11 | |
| Proportion of children | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.03 | |
| Education level | 2.84 | 14.18 | 7.85 | 2.06 | |
| Milk scandal | Yes (37.16%); No (62.84%) | ||||
Regression results of Model 1 and Model 3.
| Variables | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q | Q | Q | Q | Q | ||
| Independent variable | UR | 4.196 | 0.370 | -29.823 | -0.192 | -28.579 |
| (8.452) | (8.658) | (11.522) | (8.773) | (11.500) | ||
| Mediating variables | IL | 20.499 | 14.549* | |||
| (8.092) | (8.376) | |||||
| ES | -49.114 | -39.712 | ||||
| (11.294) | (12.070) | |||||
| RM | 1.341* | 0.780 | ||||
| (0.780) | (0.788) | |||||
| Control variables | Contr1 | -0.976 | -3.902 | -4.915 | -1.853 | -6.747 |
| (11.865) | (11.765) | (12.025) | (11.824) | (11.902) | ||
| Contr2 | -0.000 | -0.000 | -0.000 | -0.000 | 0.000 | |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | ||
| Contr3 | 23.297 | 21.167 | 25.144 | 25.255 | 24.417 | |
| (24.681) | (24.602) | (24.460) | (24.669) | (24.487) | ||
| Contr4 | -235.081 | -247.515 | -244.850 | -238.083 | -253.552 | |
| (104.445) | (106.091) | (101.481) | (104.609) | (103.432) | ||
| Contr5 | 4.452 | 2.119 | 2.711 | 4.317 | 1.310 | |
| (1.834) | (2.129) | (1.793) | (1.838) | (2.075) | ||
| Contr6 | 92.482 | 47.386 | 103.064 | 93.912 | 69.863 | |
| (23.747) | (30.688) | (23.732) | (23.638) | (31.231) | ||
| Province fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Time fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| R-squared | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.34 | |
| Observations | 1036 | 1036 | 1036 | 1036 | 1036 | |
a *, ** and *** represent that the statistics are significant at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels, respectively.
Regression results of Model 2a.
| Variables | (1) | (2) | (3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| IL | ES | RMM | |
| UR | 0.187 | -0.693 | 3.272 |
| (0.042) | (0.027) | (0.383) | |
| Contr1 | 0.143 | -0.080 | 0.653 |
| (0.062) | (0.038) | (0.615) | |
| Contr2 | -0.000 | 0.000 | -0.000 |
| (0.000) | (0.000) | (0.000) | |
| Contr3 | 0.104 | 0.038 | -1.460 |
| (0.106) | (0.054) | (1.040) | |
| Contr4 | 0.607 | -0.199 | 2.239 |
| (0.460) | (0.278) | (4.031) | |
| Contr5 | 0.114 | -0.035 | 0.101 |
| (0.009) | (0.004) | (0.072) | |
| Contr6 | 2.200 | 0.215** | -1.066 |
| (0.122) | (0.085) | (1.220) | |
| Provincial fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Time fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| R-squared | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.26 |
| Observations | 1036 | 1036 | 1036 |
a *, ** and *** represent that the statistics are significant at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels, respectively.
The regression and bootstrap test results of the mediating effects in different urbanization level groupsa.
| High-urbanization-level communities | Low-urbanization-level communities | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regression | Bootstrap | Mean | Regression | Bootstrap | Mean | |
| IL | 6.868 | insignificant | 9.146 | 22.835 | / | 8.692 |
| (10.116) | [-6.797, 9.227] | (1.017) | (11.002) | (0.998) | ||
| ES | -53.672 | / | 0.039 | -17.313 | insignificant | 0.696 |
| (29.565) | (0.103) | (16.462) | [-26.537, 37.105] | (0.284) | ||
| RM | 1.205 | insignificant | 6.791 | 0.205 | / | 3.958 |
| (1.046) | [-2.851,7.686] | (2.590) | (1.186) | (3.494) | ||
| Contr1-6 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| Provincial fixed effect | Yes | Yes | ||||
| Time fixed effect | Yes | Yes | ||||
| Observations | 597 | 428 | ||||
a *, ** and *** in “Regression coefficients of Model 3” represent that the statistics are significant at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels, respectively.
The regression and bootstrap test results of the mediating effects in eastern and midwestern regions.
|
| Communities in eastern regions | Communities in midwestern regions | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regression | Bootstrap | Mean | Regression | Bootstrap | Mean | |
| IL | 15.359 | insignificant | 9.095 | 25.661 | / | 8.781 |
| (11.012) | [-3.247, 7.933] | (1.023) | (11.714) | (1.031) | ||
| ES | -51.017 | / | 0.301 | -36.608 | / | 0.322 |
| (16.503) | (0.381) | (15.728) | (0.378) | |||
| RM | 0.992 | insignificant | 5.227 | 1.239 | insignificant | 6.029 |
| (0.967) | [-4.865, 10.552] | (3.272) | (1.259) | [-5.905, 5.327] | (3.285) | |
| Contr1-6 | Yes | Yes | ||||
| Provincial fixed effect | Yes | Yes | ||||
| Time fixed effect | Yes | Yes | ||||
| Observations | 543 | 493 | ||||
a *, ** and *** in “Regression coefficients” represent that the statistics are significant at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels, respectively; *** in “Boot indirect effect” represents that the mediating effect is significant.
The test results of the mediating effect using the percentile bootstrap method.
| Path | Indirect effect | Boot SE | 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLCI | ULCI | |||
| Total | 2.141+34.407+1.399→37.947 | 8.367 | 21.369 | 54.283 |
| Income level (IL) | 0.221*9.680→2.141 | 1.741 | 1.076 | 5.803 |
| Employment structure (ES) | (-0.715)*(-48.158)→34.407 | 8.797 | 16.721 | 51.603 |
| Rise of modern markets (RM) | 3.068*0.456→1.399 | 2.357 | -3.392 | 5.916 |
| IL/ES | -32.267 | 9.465 | -50.637 | -13.471 |
| IL/RM | 0.741 | 2.690 | -4.447 | 6.092 |
| ES/RM | 33.008 | 9.543 | 13.825 | 51.958 |
Fig 3Market share of ultra-high-temperature processing milk 2000, 2002–2010.
Note: Data source: China Dairy Yearbook. The market share data of other years has not been revealed by the yearbook.
The estimation results of Model 1 estimated by IV-2SLS method.
| Variables | IV1 | IV2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The first stage | The second stage | The first stage | The second stage | |
| Urbanization level | / | 58.437*** | / | 53.078*** |
| (18.536) | (17.139) | |||
| Housing condition score | 0.076*** | / | / | / |
| (0.004) | ||||
| Sanitation score | / | / | 0.059*** | / |
| (0.004) | ||||
| Contr1 | 0.564*** | -33.338** | 0.463*** | -30.140** |
| (0.041) | (16.071) | (0.044) | (14.704) | |
| Contr2 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | |
| Contr3 | 0.751*** | -25.177 | 0.644*** | -20.387 |
| (0.077) | (25.457) | (0.078) | (26.656) | |
| Contr4 | -0.179 | -232.927** | 0.143 | -233.140** |
| (0.272) | (102.919) | (0.272) | (102.777) | |
| Contr5 | 0.062*** | -1.732 | 0.072*** | -1.121 |
| (0.005) | (2.398) | (0.005) | (2.377) | |
| Contr6 | -1.573*** | 172.349*** | -1.146*** | 164.458*** |
| (0.079) | (33.656) | (0.090) | (31.824) | |
| Provincial fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Time fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Cragg-Donald Wald F statistic | 333.13 | 313.95 | ||
| Observations | 1036 | 1036 | ||