INTRODUCTION: Feces is a highly complex matrix containing thousands of metabolites. It also contains live bacteria and enzymes, and does not have a static chemistry. Consequently, proper control of pre-analytical parameters is critical to minimize unwanted variations in the samples. However, no consensus currently exists on how fecal samples should be stored/processed prior to analysis. OBJECTIVE: The effects of sample handling conditions on fecal metabolite profiles and abundances were examined using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC-TOFMS). METHODS: Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and derivatization via trimethylsilylation (TMS) were employed as complementary techniques to evaluate fresh, frozen, and lyophilized fecal samples with expanded coverage of the fecal metabolome. The total number of detected peaks and the signal intensities were compared among the different handling conditions. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed that the metabolic profiles of fecal samples depend greatly on sample handling and processing conditions, which had a more pronounced effect on results obtained by SPME than by TMS derivatization. Overall, lyophilization resulted in a greater amount of total and class-specific metabolites, which may be attributed to cell lysis and/or membrane disintegration. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive comparison of the sample handling conditions provides a deeper understanding of the physicochemical changes that occur within the samples during freezing and lyophilization. Based on our results, snap-freezing at -80 °C would be preferred over lyophilization for handling samples in the field of fecal metabolomics as this imparts the least change from the fresh condition.
INTRODUCTION: Feces is a highly complex matrix containing thousands of metabolites. It also contains live bacteria and enzymes, and does not have a static chemistry. Consequently, proper control of pre-analytical parameters is critical to minimize unwanted variations in the samples. However, no consensus currently exists on how fecal samples should be stored/processed prior to analysis. OBJECTIVE: The effects of sample handling conditions on fecal metabolite profiles and abundances were examined using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC-TOFMS). METHODS: Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and derivatization via trimethylsilylation (TMS) were employed as complementary techniques to evaluate fresh, frozen, and lyophilized fecal samples with expanded coverage of the fecal metabolome. The total number of detected peaks and the signal intensities were compared among the different handling conditions. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed that the metabolic profiles of fecal samples depend greatly on sample handling and processing conditions, which had a more pronounced effect on results obtained by SPME than by TMS derivatization. Overall, lyophilization resulted in a greater amount of total and class-specific metabolites, which may be attributed to cell lysis and/or membrane disintegration. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive comparison of the sample handling conditions provides a deeper understanding of the physicochemical changes that occur within the samples during freezing and lyophilization. Based on our results, snap-freezing at -80 °C would be preferred over lyophilization for handling samples in the field of fecal metabolomics as this imparts the least change from the fresh condition.