Literature DB >> 35426081

Psychiatry Residency Directors' Attitudes Toward and Uses of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation and Other Potential Tools for Residency Selection.

Rachel A Russo1, Usman Hameed2, Yasin Ibrahim3, Aditya Joshi2, Anna J Kerlek4, Martin Klapheke5, Jessica G Kovach6, Dana M Raml7, Dawnelle Schatte8, Lia A Thomas9, Jeffrey J Rakofsky10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A survey was conducted to determine US psychiatry residency directors' attitudes regarding current measures of medical student performance and their preferences for the future.
METHODS: A team of psychiatry medical student educators and residency program directors developed a 23-question survey. In July 2021, links to the survey were sent out to all program directors registered with the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training.
RESULTS: Seventy program directors out of 223 initiated the survey, resulting in a response rate of 31.4%. Forty percent of respondents reported that the most important use of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) is in screening out applicants for interviews, and only 26.1% reported that the MSPE in its current form could be trusted to provide a valid and reliable assessment of a student's medical school performance. Most respondents agreed that in the absence of United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step 1 numerical scores, the existing MSPE format/content requirements should be modified, use a set of ranking categories that are uniform across all medical schools, and be supplemented with additional measures of the student's character and ability specific to psychiatry.
CONCLUSIONS: US psychiatry program directors are eager for change when it comes to the MSPE and how it reports rankings, grades, and professionalism. The transition of the USMLE step 1 score reporting to pass/fail presents an opportunity to pursue this change and for stakeholders from all medical specialties to work together toward a shared goal of an improved residency selection process.
© 2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Psychiatry; Recruitment; Residency Selection

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35426081     DOI: 10.1007/s40596-022-01636-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Psychiatry        ISSN: 1042-9670


  1 in total

1.  Using the Association of American Medical Colleges Standardized Video Interview in a Holistic Residency Application Review.

Authors:  Andrew King; Chad Mayer; Andrew Starnes; Kelly Barringer; Lancelot Beier; Harsh Sule
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-12-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.