| Literature DB >> 35425831 |
Chunling Zhu1,2, Yaya Zhao1, Xueqin Zhao1,3, Shanqin Liu4, Xiaojing Xia1, Shouping Zhang1, Yimin Wang1, Huihui Zhang1, Yanzhao Xu1, Shijun Chen1, Jinqing Jiang1, Yundi Wu5, Xilong Wu5, Gaiping Zhang1, Yueyu Bai1, Jianhe Hu1, Hanna Fotina3, Lei Wang1,5, Xueming Zhang2.
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is a common pathogen that can cause pneumonia and a variety of skin diseases. Skin injuries have a high risk of colonization by S. aureus, which increases morbidity and mortality. Due to the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains, antimicrobial peptides are considered to be among the best alternatives to antibiotics due to their unique mechanism of action and other characteristics. MPX is an antibacterial peptide extracted from wasp venom that has antibacterial activity against a variety of bacteria. This study revealed that MPX has good bactericidal activity against S. aureus and that its minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is 0.08 μM. MPX (4×MIC) can kill 99.9% of bacteria within 1 h, and MPX has good stability. The research on the bactericidal mechanism found that MPX could destroy the membrane integrity, increase the membrane permeability, change the membrane electromotive force, and cause cellular content leakage, resulting in bactericidal activity. Results from a mouse scratch model experiment results show that MPX can inhibit colonization by S. aureus, which reduces the wound size, decreases inflammation, and promotes wound healing. This study reports the activity of MPX against S. aureus and its mechanism and reveals the ability of MPX to treat S. aureus infection in mice, laying the foundation for the development of new drugs for bacterial infections.Entities:
Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus; antimicrobial peptide MPX; inflammation; membrane destruction; wound healing
Year: 2022 PMID: 35425831 PMCID: PMC9002018 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.819921
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Figure 1Detection of the bactericidal activity of the antimicrobial peptide MPX. (A) The agar diffusion test of the antimicrobial activity of MPX against S. aureus ATCC 25923. (B) MIC results. S: S. aureus ATCC 25923; N: blank LB medium. (C) OD600 measurement of bacterial culture after the action of MPX for different times. (D) The determination of the number of viable bacteria after the action of MPX for different times. (E) Scanning electron microscopy observation of the effect of MPX on S. aureus ATCC 25923. The left picture shows the normal morphology of S. aureus, and the right picture shows the bacterial morphology of S. aureus after MPX (1×MIC) exposure. (F) Transmission electron microscopy observation of the effect of MPX on S. aureus ATCC 25923. The left picture shows the normal morphology of S. aureus, and the right picture shows the bacterial morphology of S. aureus after MPX (1×MIC) exposure. Error bars indicate the mean ± SEM, n = 3. Statistical significance was defined as **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.
Figure 2Stability test of MPX. (A–D) The effect of different concentrations of NaCl, KCl, CaCl2 and MgCl2 on the antibacterial activity of MPX. (E) The effect of different temperatures on the antibacterial activity of MPX. (F) The effect of different pH values on the antibacterial activity of MPX. (G) The effect of repeated freezing and thawing on the antibacterial activity of MPX. Error bars indicate the mean ± SEM, n = 3.
Figure 3The mechanism of action of MPX activity on S. aureus. (A) The BCA kit was used to detect the results of total protein content in bacterial supernatant. (B) Uptake of NPN by S. aureus treated with MPX. (C) DiSC3-5 was used to detect changes in the membrane potential of S. aureus after MPX treatment. (D) Fluorescence microscopy observation of PI staining after MPX treatment. (E) Visual observation of the mechanism of MPX on S. aureus ATCC 25923 by transmission electron microscopy. Error bars indicate the mean ± SEM, n = 3. Statistical significance was defined as **p < 0.01.
Figure 4MPX inhibits biofilm formation. (A) The results of crystal violet staining of biofilms after different concentrations of MPX were applied to S. aureus ATCC 25923. (B) OD570 measurement after crystal violet was dissolved in 70% ethanol. (C) After exposure of S. aureus ATCC 25923 to different concentrations of MPX, scanning electron microscopy was used to observe the biofilm. (D) The results of staining S. aureus with SYTO 9/propidium iodide. Error bars indicate the mean ± SEM, n = 3. Statistical significance was defined as follows: **p < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns P > 0.05.
Figure 5MPX ointment can promote skin wound healing in mice infected with S. aureus ATCC 25923. Mice in each group were infected with S. aureus ATCC 25923 without treatment (S. aureus/SA) or with treatment with MPX ointment (S. aureus+MPX ointment/SA+MPX oint), and mice in an uninfected group did not receive any treatment (Control). (A,B) Wound pictures and superimposed pictures of mice infected with S. aureus 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 days later. The black line represents 0.5 cm; d.p.i: days post infection. (C) Wound healing rate. (D) The number of colonies at the wound site after the sixth day of S. aureus infection. Error bars indicate the mean ± SEM, n = 3. Statistical significance was defined as **p < 0.01.
Figure 6MPX ointment can promote skin repair and reduce inflammation. Mice in each group were infected with S. aureus ATCC 25923 without treatment (S. aureus/SA) or with treatment with MPX ointment (S. aureus+MPX ointment/SA+MPX oint), and mice in an uninfected group did not receive any treatment (Control). (A) The results of HE staining of the wounded skin on the 2nd and 6th days after infection with S. aureus ATCC 25923. (B) HE staining results of the lung, liver, and spleen on the 6th day after S. aureus ATCC 25923 infection. (C) Transmission electron microscopy to observe the ultramicrocellular structure of the wounded skin on the 6th day after S. aureus ATCC 25923 infection. (D) Immunohistochemical observation of Ly6G expression in wound skin on day 6 after infection with S. aureus ATCC 25923.