Effect of surface properties of TiO2 on the performance of Pt/TiO2 catalysts for furfural hydrogenation.

Hydrogenation of biomass-derived furfural is an important process in biofuel production. Herein, different Pt-supported TiO2 morphologies: nanorod (NR), nanoparticle (NP), and hollow microsphere (HMS) were prepared by the impregnation-chemical reduction method. The furfural conversion increased with an increase of Pt dispersion. However, cyclopentanone selectivity was affected by TiO2 properties, the strong metal-support interaction (SMSI) effect, and the reaction conditions. The Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst exhibited the highest cyclopentanone selectivity of 50.4%. Based on the H2-temperature programmed desorption (H2-TPD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results, the Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst showed a SMSI effect, which was introduced by the chemical reduction method. We suggest that electron charge transfer from Ti species to Pt in the Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst affects the cyclopentanone selectivity by controlling the adsorption strength between the reactant and the Pt surface, thus retarding the formation of byproducts. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Introduction

TiO2 is widely used in the chemical industry as a semiconductor, photocatalyst, and catalyst support owing to its unique properties.[1] TiO2 has various advantages as a catalyst support, including chemical stability, acid–base properties, and strong metal–support interactions (SMSIs). Recently, various types of TiO2 with zero-dimensional (0D, nanoparticles (NPs)), one-dimensional (1D, nanowires, nanorods (NRs), and nanobelts), two-dimensional (2D, nanosheets), and three-dimensional structures (3D, hollow microspheres (HMSs)) have been applied as catalysts or catalyst supports. Tian et al. reported that Pd/TiO2 nanowires exhibited higher catalytic activity than Pd/TiO2 (P25) in the selective hydrogenation of phenolics to cyclohexanones,[2] as Lewis acid and basic sites exposed on the TiO2 surface improved the cyclohexanone selectivity. Song et al. reported the selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde over a Pt/TiO2 nanosphere catalyst.[3] In this system, the hollow TiO2 structure enhanced the diffusion and infiltration of reactants. Alqurashi et al. reported that TiO2 NPs contributed to the formation of small and uniform Fe2O3 NPs, resulting in high activity for benzyl alcohol oxidation.[4] The performance of a catalyst is strongly affected by the support properties, such as acid–base properties, specific surface area, oxygen vacancies, and porosity.

With the depletion of fossil fuels, alternative energies have received considerable attention. Furfural derived from biomass resources is considered an important starting material for the production of valuable chemical products such as furfuryl alcohol (FA), tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFAL), tetrahydrofuran (THF), 2-methylfuran (2-MF), and cyclopentanone (CPO) by hydrogenation or rearrangement. These materials are mostly used for manufacturing biofuel, bioplastics, and pharmaceuticals. In particular, the selective rearrangement of furfural to CPO has attracted attention because CPO is widely used in the pharmaceutical, food and chemical industries. Various supported catalysts, such as Pd/TiO2, Pd–Cu/C, Pt/C, and Ru/C, have been used in hydrogenation reactions.[5-8] However, few studies have investigated on the effect of TiO2 properties on the catalytic performance of Pt/TiO2 catalysts for furfural hydrogenation. Herein, we prepared Pt-supported TiO2 catalysts (NR, NP, and HMS supports) by impregnation and chemical reduction. The catalytic activities were determined using the aqueous phase hydrogenation of furfural to CPO. Furthermore, the contribution of the strong metal-support interaction (SMSI) effect to the activity and selectivity of the Pt/TiO2 catalysts for furfural hydrogenation was investigated.

Experimental

Synthesis of TiO2 supports

TiO2 NR

The TiO2 NR were prepared using a titanium glycolate precursor.[9,10] Typically, 1.75 g of titanium(iv) butoxide (97%, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to 200 mL of ethylene glycol (99%, Alfa Aesar). The solution was stirred at 30 °C for 1 h. The solution was heated to 150 °C and then stirred for 14 h. The suspension was then filtered, washed with ethanol and deionized water for several times, and then dried at 105 °C for 24 h in an oven.

TiO2 NP

The TiO2 NP were prepared using a titanium glycolate precursor with acetone.[11] Typically, 5.0 g of titanium(iv) butoxide was added to 50 mL of ethylene glycol. The solution was vigorously stirred at 25 °C for 24 h. Then, 340 mL of acetone and 2.7 mL of deionized water were added and vigorously stirred at 25 °C for 1 h 30 min. The suspension was centrifuged and washed with ethanol and deionized water, and then dried at 105 °C overnight in an oven. Subsequently, 1.0 g of the prepared white powder was added to 200 mL of deionized water and then heated to 90 °C for 1 h under stirring. The suspension was filtered, washed with ethanol and deionized water, and dried at 105 °C for 24 h in an oven.

TiO2 HMS

The TiO2 HMS were prepared by a template-free solvothermal method.[3] Typically, 16 g of oxalic acid (98%, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to 50 mL of ethanol, and then the suspension was vigorously stirred at 25 °C for 10 min. Then, 2.0 g of titanium(iv) butoxide was quickly added and vigorously stirred at 25 °C for 10 min. The mixture was transferred to a 100 mL hydrothermal reactor, which was heated to 140 °C for 12 h in an oven. The suspension was filtered, washed with ethanol and deionized water, and dried at 105 °C for 24 h in an oven. All the TiO2 supports were calcined at 500 °C (heating rate = 5 °C min−1) for 2 h under flowing air.

Preparation of Pt/TiO2 catalysts

5wt% Pt/TiO2 catalysts were prepared by the impregnation–chemical reduction method. Briefly, the H2PtCl6·6H2O (37.5%, Wako Pure Chemical Cooperation) was added to 50 mL of deionized water. Then, 0.65 g of TiO2 support was added and stirred at 25 °C for 1 h. The Pt/TiO2 catalysts were reduced in the liquid phase using 5 mL of NaBH4 (0.15 M, 99%, Sigma-Aldrich) solution. The suspension was stirred at 25 °C for 12 h and then filtered, washed with deionized water, and dried at 105 °C for 24 h in an oven.

Characterization

Specific surface area, pore diameters and volumes were calculated by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) and Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) analyses of N2 isotherm curves at 77 K using a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 instrument. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was carried out on a Bruker D8 Focus instrument using a Cu Kα radiation. The temperature-programmed reduction of H2 (H2-TPR) and temperature-programmed desorption of H2 or NH3 (H2-TPD or NH3-TPD) were carried out using a Micromeritics AutoChem 2920 instrument equipped with a TCD detector. In the H2-TPR analysis, 100 mg of catalyst was pre-treated under a continuous He flow at 150 °C for 2 h. The catalyst was heated to 750 °C (heating rate = 10 °C min−1) under a H2 (5% H2 in He balance) flow. In the H2-TPD analysis, 50 mg of catalyst was pre-treated under H2 (10% H2/Ar) flow at 400 °C for 1 h. Then, the catalyst was cooled into ambient temperature and heated to 800 °C (heating rate = rate = 10 °C min−1) under a He flow. In the NH3-TPD analysis, 100 mg of catalyst was pre-treated under He flow at 150 °C for 2 h. Subsequently, NH3 (10% NH3 in He balance) adsorption was carried out at 50 °C for 0.5 h. The catalysts were heated to 600 °C (heating rate = 10 °C min−1) under a constant He flow. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was carried out using a Thermo Fisher Scientific K Alpha+ instrument with Al Kα radiation. The surface morphologies of the supports were determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) on a Hitachi SU8020 instrument operated at 15 kV. Pt dispersion was estimated by CO pulse chemisorption using a Micromeritics AutoChem 2920 instrument. The average particle size and distribution of Pt in Pt/TiO2 catalysts were measured by field-emission transmission electron microscopy (FE-TEM) using a JEOL JEM-2100F instrument operating at 200 kV.

Furfural hydrogenation

Furfural hydrogenation was conducted in a 250 mL batch reactor using 0.1 g of Pt/TiO2 catalyst, and 100 mL of deionized water containing 2.5 g of furfural. After rapidly transferring the mixture into the reactor, the reactor was sealed and introduced with hydrogen three times to remove air. After reaching the desired temperature, reactor was pressurized with hydrogen 20 bar under stirring at 500 rpm. The liquid product was analyzed by gas chromatography (7890A, Agilent, FID) with a DB-Wax column (30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm).[7]

Results and discussion

Characterization of supports and Pt catalysts

Fig. 1 shows the N2 isotherm curves and pore size distributions of the TiO2 supports and Pt/TiO2 catalysts. All the TiO2 supports had type IV of N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms. TiO2 NP exhibited a H1 hysteresis loop, which is indicative of a mesoporous material according to the IUPAC classification. In contrast, TiO2 NR and TiO2 HMS showed a hysteresis loop of type H2 (b) type with an ink bottle pore structure. The total pore volumes were calculated by adsorption isotherms at P/P0 ∼ 0.995. Capillary condensation in the TiO2 NP and TiO2 HMS supports was initiated at a relative pressure (P/P0) of ∼0.48, whereas that in the TiO2 NR support occurred at a relative pressure of 0.6, which can be attributed to a larger pore size.[12] After Pt loading, the Pt/TiO2 catalysts exhibited similar characteristics. The physical properties of the TiO2 supports and Pt/TiO2 catalysts are listed in Table 1. The TiO2 NP support has the largest BET surface area and pore volume (56 m2 g−1 and 0.16 cm3 g−1, respectively), whereas the TiO2 NR support has the lowest specific surface area and pore volume (10 m2 g−1 and 0.04 cm3 g−1, respectively). However, the TiO2 NR support has the largest pore diameter, which is in agreement with the above-mentioned results.

Fig. 1

N2 isotherm curves and pore size distributions of (a) TiO2 supports and (b) Pt/TiO2 catalysts.

Physical and chemical properties of TiO2 supports and Pt/TiO2 catalysts

	S BET (m2 g−1)	V Total (cm3 g−1)	Pore diameter (nm)	Weight (%)		Acidity (mmol g−1)	Binding energy (eV)		Metal dispersion (%)
				Anatase	Rutile		Ti4+	Pt0
TiO2 NR	10	0.04	14.8	31	69	0.10	458.7	—
TiO2 NP	56	0.16	9.70	100	—	0.31	458.9	—
TiO2 HMS	30	0.08	8.50	79	21	0.27	458.6	—
Pt/TiO2 NR	12	0.05	15.7	31	69	0.11	459.1	71.07	9
Pt/TIO2 NP	48	0.14	9.20	100	—	0.30	459.3	71.20	12
Pt/TiO2 HMS	27	0.09	9.30	79	21	0.28	459.3	71.20	3

After Pt loading, the BET surface area and pore volume decreased, which indicates that Pt NPs block the pores for the Pt/TiO2 NP. Despite of decrease in the BET surface area, the pore volume and pore diameter was slightly increase for the Pt/TiO2 HMS. It was inferred that the addition of NaOH may filled the pores of TiO2, which reduces the pore volume and pore size.[13]

Fig. 2 shows the XRD patterns of the TiO2 supports and Pt/TiO2 catalysts. The TiO2 NR and TiO2 HMS supports exhibited mixtures of anatase (31% and 79%, respectively) and rutile phases (69% and 21%, respectively). In contrast, the TiO2 NP support exhibited only the anatase phase. The amounts of anatase and rutile phases were calculated using eqn (1) and are listed in Table 1.[14]where IA is the intensity of the anatase peak (2θ = 25.3°) and IR is the intensity of the rutile peak (2θ = 27.4°). After Pt loading, the XRD patterns of all the Pt/TiO2 catalysts exhibited a characteristic Pt peak at 40° (Fig. 1), which corresponded to the (111) crystal face of Pt. However, the relative amounts of anatase and rutile phases for each type of support were similar before and after Pt loading.

Fig. 2

XRD patterns of TiO2 supports and Pt/TiO2 catalysts.

The acid properties of the TiO2 supports and Pt/TiO2 catalysts were estimated by NH3-TPD, as shown in Fig. 3 and Table 1. The acidities of the supports and catalysts play an important role in the formation of CPO during furfural hydrogenation. Desorption peaks around 50–200, 200–500, and >500 °C correspond to weak acid sites, medium acid sites, and strong acid sites, respectively. The TiO2 NP support showed desorption peaks at 120 and 280 °C, whereas the TiO2 HMS support showed desorption peaks at 80, 310, and 530 °C. Compared with the other supports, the TiO2 NR support showed desorption peaks at lower temperatures (70, 280, and 530 °C). The total acidity of the TiO2 supports decreased in the following order: TiO2 NP (0.31 mmol g−1) > TiO2 HMS (0.27 mmol g−1) > TiO2 NR (0.1 mmol g−1). After Pt loading, similar results were observed.

Fig. 3

NH3-TPD profiles of TiO2 supports and Pt/TiO2 catalysts.

Fig. 4 shows the H2-TPR profiles of the TiO2 supports and Pt/TiO2 catalysts. The TiO2 supports showed two reduction peaks around 400–500 and 750 °C, which are corresponded to the reduction of the TiO2 support.[15,16] The TiO2 NR exhibited lower reduction temperature than other support, indicating the TiO2 NR can be more easily formation Ti3+ and oxygen vacancies on surface.[17] All the Pt/TiO2 catalysts showed a reduction peak around 300–500 °C ascribed to the reduction of Pt–TiO interface sites by an interaction between Pt and TiO2.[18] The Pt/TiO2 HMS catalyst exhibited three reduction peaks around 300, 400, and <500 °C. The first peak is related to the reduction of PtO species weakly interacting with the TiO2 support,[19] the second peak is related to the reduction of Pt–TiO interface sites, and the third peak correspond to the reduction of the surface-capping oxygen on the TiO2 support.[17,18]

Fig. 4

H2-TPR profiles of TiO2 supports and Pt/TiO2 catalysts.

Fig. 5 exhibits the H2-TPD profiles for the Pt/TiO2 catalysts. The desorption temperature is relevant to the adsorption energy of hydrogen and the nature of hydrogen species. For Pt/TiO2 HMS and Pt/TiO2 NP catalysts, the double peaks were revealed under 300 °C, indicating hydrogen adsorption on Pt surface.[20] Compared to the Pt/TiO2 NP catalyst, the Pt/TiO2 HMS had a large amount of hydrogen adsorbed on Pt due to its 3D structure. The Pt/TiO2 NR showed double peaks at 74 °C and 535 °C, resulting from hydrogen on Pt and H spillover species, respectively. This H spillover can induce SMSIs owing to the reduction of TiO2 supports to TiO (x < 2), leading to improving the catalytic activity and selectivity.[21]

Fig. 5

H2-TPD profiles of Pt/TiO2 catalysts.

The XPS spectra of the TiO2 supports and Pt/TiO2 catalysts in the Ti 2p and Pt 4f regions are shown in Fig. 6 and the results are summarized in Table 1. The TiO2 supports exhibited two peaks at 458.7 and 464.5 eV corresponding to the Ti 2p3/2 and Ti 2p1/2 peaks of Ti4+, respectively.[22] After Pt loading, the Ti 2p peaks shifted toward higher binding energies, which is indicative of an interaction between Pt and TiO2.[23] The binding energy of the Ti 2p peak for the Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst was lower than those for the Pt/TiO2 NP and Pt/TiO2 HMS catalysts, indicating that Ti3+ species exist on the Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst.[24] As shown in Fig. 6c, two Pt peaks are observed at 71.0 and 74.3 eV corresponding to Pt 4f7/2 and Pt 4f5/2, respectively. The Pt 4f7/2 peak at 71.0 eV corresponds to the metallic state. The binding energies of the Pt 4f7/2 peaks for the Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst are slightly lower than those for the Pt/TiO2 NP and Pt/TiO2 HMS catalysts. Generally, SMSIs in metal-supported TiO2 catalysts are introduced during thermal treatment in the range of 150–600 °C under H2 flow.[25,26] Rui et al. reported that an SMSI effect in a Pt/TiO2 catalyst was produced by chemical reduction using NaBH4 or HCHO solution.[27] Among the prepared Pt/TiO2 catalysts, the Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst exhibited a lower binding energy for the peak at 70.18 eV, which was attributed to an SMSI effect.

Fig. 6

XPS spectra of TiO2 supports and Pt/TiO2 catalysts: (a) Ti 2p of TiO2, (b) Ti 2p of Pt/TiO2, and (c) Pt 4f of Pt/TiO2.

Fig. 7 shows the FE-SEM images of the TiO2 supports. The TiO2 NR support shows linear structures with lengths of 500 nm to 1 μm. The TiO2 NP support contains NP with sizes of 300–500 nm. The TiO2 HMS support shows HMS with sizes of 3–5 μm. Fig. 8 shows representative FE-TEM images and particle size distribution of the Pt/TiO2 catalysts. The average particle size was measured using 200 spherical Pt NP. The average particle size in the Pt/TiO2 catalysts increased in the order Pt/TiO2 NP (4.52 nm) < Pt/TiO2 NR (5.25 nm) < Pt/TiO2 HMS (6.48 nm). The dispersion of Pt in the Pt/TiO2 catalysts was estimated by CO chemisorption (Table 1). The Pt/TiO2 NP catalyst exhibited the highest Pt dispersion of 12%, whereas the Pt/TiO2 HMS catalyst exhibited the lowest Pt dispersion of 3%. These results correspond to the FE-TEM results.

Fig. 7

FE-SEM images of TiO2 supports.

Fig. 8

FE-TEM images of Pt/TiO2 catalysts.

Hydrogenation of furfural

The catalytic activities of the prepared TiO2 supports and Pt/TiO2 catalysts were investigated with respect to the hydrogenation of furfural under 20 bar of H2 at 170 °C for 2 h; the results are summarized in Table 2. Furfural hydrogenation did not proceed to any significant extent over the TiO2 supports alone. The conversion of furfural decreased with Pt dispersion in the order Pt/TiO2 NP > Pt/TiO2 NR > Pt/TiO2 HMS. However, the Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst exhibited the highest CPO selectivity of 35.2%. The selectivity for CPO can be affected by several factors such as support properties, hydrogen pressure, and solvent effects. Firstly, the catalytic activities were affected by TiO2 properties. The Pt/TiO2 NP with 0D structure revealed the highest conversion of furfural due to the largest specific surface area. Although the Pt/TiO2 HMS had 3D structure to facilitate hydrogen adsorption, the lowest conversion and selectivity were obtained. This is ascribed to a large quantity of strong acid sites, which causes polymerization and lowers the catalytic activity.[28,29] In contrast, the Pt/TiO2 NR (1D) showed the highest CPO selectivity regardless of Pt dispersion and specific surface area. We suggested that the large pore size of Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst can easily access furfural molecules to inside the catalyst pore with minimized steric hindrance.[30] In addition, furfural and FA can be converted into polymers by heat treatment or acid sites.[31,32] Based on the NH3-TPD results, the Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst has the lowest total acidity and thus can produce more CPO by rearrangement. Cyclopentanol (CPL), THFAL, and other non-identified materials were detected as byproducts.

Hydrogenation of furfural over TiO2 supports and Pt/TiO2 catalystsa

	Conversion (%)	Selectivity (%)
		FA	THFAL	CPO	CPL	Others
TiO2 NR	0.3	—	—	—	—	100
TiO2 NP	1.2	—	—	—	—	100
TiO2 HMS	0.3	—	—	—	—	100
Pt/TiO2 NR	90	2.3	1.5	35.2	—	61
Pt/TIO2 NP	96	2.0	—	13.6	1.8	82.6
Pt/TiO2 HMS	78	4.0	—	14.2	—	81.8

Reaction conditions: PH2 = 20 bar, reaction temp. = 170 °C, and reaction time = 2 h.

The effect of reaction time on furfural hydrogenation over the Pt/TiO2 catalysts was investigated under at 170 °C, PH2 = 20 bar, and reaction time in the range of 30 min to 240 min (Fig. 9). As the reaction time increased, the furfural conversion gradually increased. With the Pt/TiO2 NP catalyst, a furfural conversion of 99.8% was achieved at 170 °C for 3 h. This catalyst exhibited the highest catalytic activity due to its high Pt dispersion. Interestingly, the Pt/TiO2 NP catalyst showed higher CPO selectivity than the Pt/TiO2 HMS catalyst despite having a higher total acidity, likely because the Pt/TiO2 NP catalyst mainly contained weak acid sites, whereas strong acid sites were predominant on the Pt/TiO2 HMS catalyst. Although the Pt/TiO2 NP catalyst had higher acidity than the Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst, the acid site distribution was dominant in weak acid sites compared to Pt/TiO2 HMS. The Pt/TiO2 NP catalyst exhibited high CPO selectivity. We suggested that selectivity of product affected by two perspective; SMSI effect and hydrogen adsorption strength. Based on the XPS and H2-TPD results, the SMSI effect was occurred over Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst. The SMSI effect induced by H spillover species during the reduction process with NaBH4 solution. The H spillover species on Pt surface can diffuse into TiO2 NR and reduce TiO2 surface, resulting in the formation of Pt covered from TiO and oxygen vacancy. The covered Pt particles from TiO affect the adsorption strength of H2, resulting higher CPO yield with retarding over-hydrogenation or polymerization. The CO (carbonyl) group in furfural adsorbs selectively on the oxygen vacancies and is hydrogenated with the H spillover species.[33-36]

Fig. 9

Furfural hydrogenation over (a) Pt/TiO2 NR, (b) Pt/TiO2 NP, and (c) Pt/TiO2 HMS catalysts.

Based on the XPS results, the Ti 2p and Pt 4f binding energies of the Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst in Ti 2p and Pt 4f are lower than those of the other catalysts. Riyapan et al. reported that electron charge transfer from Ti species to Pd affects the adsorption strength of ethylene on the Pd surface, resulting in high selectivity for ethylene.[37] Lee et al. reported that the interaction between TiO species generated at various temperatures and Co NPs provides bifunctional sites for the selective hydrogenation of furfural by controlling the SMSI effect.[38] As the reaction time increased, the CPO selectivity gradually increased over the Pt/TiO2 NR and Pt/TiO2 NP catalysts. However, only a slight increase in the CPO selectivity occurred over the Pt/TiO2 HMS catalyst. Although Pt/TiO2 NR exhibited SMSI effect, we considered the effect of TiO2 phase. Aschauer et al. reported that oxygen vacancies in reduced anatase phase of TiO2 has favorable adsorption site for H2 atoms.[39] Islam et al. reported that molecular of H2 cannot easily interaction with rutile phase of TiO2 support.[40] From the XRD results, the Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst exhibited higher amount of rutile phase than other catalysts. We suggest that the SMSI effect and hydrogen adsorption strength may affect CPO selectivity in furfural hydrogenation. Furfural hydrogenation involves various reaction pathways, including CC and CO hydrogenation, hydrogenolysis, and rearrangement to produce various materials such as FA, CPO, CPL, 2-methylfuran, n-butanol, and 2-pentanol. The Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst showed the highest catalytic performance in the selective hydrogenation of furfural to CPO. Thus, electron charge transfer from Ti species to Pt in the Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst having high content of rutile phase may affect the selectivity for these products by controlling the adsorption strength between the reactant and the Pt surface, which can retard the formation of byproducts (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10

Illustration of the SMSI effect in the Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst.

The effect of reaction temperature on furfural hydrogenation over the Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst was investigated under at PH2 = 20 bar for 3 h at reaction temperature in the range of 110–190 °C (Fig. 11). Furfural conversion increased with increasing reaction temperature. In the range of 110–130 °C, FA was predominantly produced and FA selectivity increased from 72.2% to 84.1%. However, at reaction temperatures over 130 °C, FA selectivity dramatically decreased with a concomitant increase in CPO selectivity. At high temperatures, the rearrangement of FA into 4-hydroxy-2-cyclopentanone (HCP) is promoted by H+ ions in the aqueous phase.[41,42] The produced HCP can be converted into CPO by further hydrogenation. At higher temperatures, more H+ ions are generated, thereby increasing CPO selectivity. However, as the reaction temperature increased from 170 to 190 °C, CPO selectivity was dramatically decreased to 0% owing to the formation of oligomers at high temperatures.[43,44]

Fig. 11

Effect of reaction temperature of furfural hydrogenation over the Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst.

Conclusions

Pt/TiO2 NR, NP, and HMS catalysts were prepared by the impregnation–chemical reduction method for the selective hydrogenation of furfural to CPO. Although furfural conversion increased with Pt dispersion, CPO selectivity was strongly affected by TiO2 properties and the SMSI effect. The Pt/TiO2 HMS catalyst, which had the highest acidity, exhibited the lowest CPO selectivity at reaction times from 30 to 240 min owing to polymerization. The Pt/TiO2 NP catalyst had predominant weak acid sites and higher total acidity than Pt/TiO2 NR, resulting in lower CPO selectivity than Pt/TiO2 NR. We suggested that two perspective on the TiO2 properties effect and SMSI effect. Among three different supports, the Pt/TiO2 NR with the largest pore size facilitated the furfural molecules inside the catalyst and minimized the steric hindrance between the reactant and catalyst, enhancing the CPO selectivity. Based on the XPS results, an SMSI effect was observed after Pt loading on the TiO2 NR support. Electron charge transfer from Ti species to Pt in the Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst may control the adsorption strength between the reactant and the Pt surface, resulting in higher CPO selectivity over the Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst than over the Pt/TiO2 NP catalyst. The Pt/TiO2 NR catalyst showed highest catalytic activity for 98% furfural conversion and 50.4% CPO selectivity.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Author contributions

Mi Yeon Byun: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing – original draft. Ye Eun Kim: investigation, data curation, visualization, Jae Ho Baek: visualization, Jungho Jae: supervision, Man Sig Lee: writing – review & editing, supervision.