| Literature DB >> 35424931 |
Zeju Zhang1, Mang Niu1, Wei Li1, Chenfeng Ding2,3, Peitao Xie1, Yongxin Li1, Lili Chen1, Xiaopeng Lan1, Chunlei Liu1, Xiaodong Yan4, Xuewei Fu5, Yaochun Liu3, Yuan Liu1,3, Dapeng Cao6, Jingjie Dai7, Xiaofen Hong8, Chunzhao Liu1.
Abstract
A breakthrough in enhancing visible-light photocatalysis of wide-bandgap semiconductors such as prototypical titania (TiO2) via cocatalyst decoration is still challenged by insufficient heterojunctions and inevitable interfacial transport issues. Herein, we report a novel TiO2-based composite material composed of in situ generated polymorphic nanodomains including carbon nitride (C3N4) and (001)/(101)-faceted anatase nanocrystals. The introduction of ultrafine C3N4 results in the generation of many oxygen vacancies in the TiO2 lattice, and simultaneously induces the exposure and growth of anatase TiO2(001) facets with high surface energy. The photocatalytic performance of C3N4-induced TiO2 for degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol under visible-light irradiation was tested, its apparent rate being up to 1.49 × 10-2 min-1, almost 3.8 times as high as that for the pure TiO2 nanofibers. More significantly, even under low operation temperature and after a long-term photocatalytic process, the composite still exhibits exceptional degradation efficiency and stability. The normalized degradation efficiency and effective lifespan of the composite photocatalyst are far superior to other reported modified photocatalysts. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35424931 PMCID: PMC8959444 DOI: 10.1039/d2ra00782g
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Scheme 1Flowchart for the synthesis of TiO2-based composite nanofibers.
Fig. 1Schematic illustration and morphologies of C3N4-induced TiO2: (a) schematic illustration of the electrostatic interaction between thiourea and tetrabutyl titanate. (b)–(d) Comparison of constituent and contribution of TiO2, C3N4/TiO2, and C3N4-induced TiO2. (e) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) of C3N4-induced TiO2 nanofibers. (f) Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of single nanofiber. (g)–(j) Energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) elemental mappings of partial C3N4-induced TiO2 nanofiber. (k) High-resolution TEM image of constituents in C3N4-induced TiO2, and (l) selected area electron diffraction. (m) X-ray diffraction spectra of C3N4-induced TiO2 as compared with counterparts.
Fig. 2Photocatalytic activity of samples with/without TiO2(001) plane: HR-TEM images of each plane in (a) C3N4/TiO2 and (c) C3N4-induced TiO2. Simulated free radical generation process on (b) TiO2(101) plane and (d) TiO2(001) plane. Calculated band structures of (e) TiO2(101) and (f) TiO2(001) plane. (g) Comparative photocatalytic rates between C3N4/TiO2 and C3N4-induced TiO2 under the UV light.
Fig. 3Characterization on constituent and band gap of C3N4-induced TiO2 as compared with counterparts: (a) and (b) are HR-TEM images of each interface in C3N4-induced TiO2. (c) Raman spectra of C3N4-induced TiO2, C3N4/TiO2, and TiO2. (d) Magnified partial spectra of C3N4-induced TiO2 and TiO2. (e) XPS spectra of C3N4-induced TiO2, C3N4/TiO2, and TiO2. (f) XPS spectra of O 1s in C3N4-induced TiO2. (g) Comparative carbonaceous constituents of C3N4/TiO2 and C3N4-induced TiO2. (h) Kubelka–Munk-transformed reflectance of TiO2, C3N4/TiO2, and C3N4-induced TiO2. (i) Calculated density of states (DOS) of pure TiO2 and TiO2− in C3N4-induced TiO2. (j) Calculated DOS of TiO2 and C3N4 in C3N4/TiO2 and C3N4-induced TiO2.
Fig. 4Photocatalytic activity of C3N4-induced TiO2 under visible light (λ > 420 nm) as compared with counterparts: (a) photocatalytic degradation curve of 2,4-DCP. (b) Pseudo-first-order kinetics curves. (c) Photodegradation kinetic number of Rh-b at various temperatures, CR, and MB. (d) Photocatalytic degradation efficiency with the introduction of EDTA (h+), TBA (˙OH), and BQ (O2−) as scavengers during the degradation of 2,4-DCP. (e) Kinetic number of C3N4-induced TiO2 with various concentrations of TBA. (f) Long-term photocatalytic degradation of C3N4-induced TiO2. (g) Comparison of final degradation efficiency as a function of maximum degradation capacity between C3N4-induced TiO2 and other reported work.
Comparing the photocatalytic activity of C3N4-induced TiO2 with selected works in detail
| Sample | Light source | Rate constants (min−1) | Final efficiency (%) | Capacity (mg) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C3N4-Induced TiO2 | 230 W xenon lamp (420 nm–780 nm) | 0.015 | 90.76 | 10.86 | This work |
| TiO2/FeO | 150 W xenon lamp (>400 nm) | Not available | 58 | 2.03 |
|
| CeO2/g-C3N4 | 150 W xenon lamp (>420 nm) | Not available | 78 | 1.54 |
|
| In2O3/ZnIn2S4 | 300 W xenon lamp (>420 nm) | 0.0246 | 95.8 | 4.75 |
|
| TiO2/g-C3N4 | 150 W xenon lamp (>400 nm) | 0.012 | 97 | 3.9 |
|
| Ag2CrO4/Ag/g-C3N4 | 500 W xenon lamp (>400 nm) | 0.015 | 80 | 2.2 |
|
| N-Carbon@ZnO | 300 W xenon lamp (380 nm–800 nm) | 0.028 | 72 | 5.7 |
|
| SnO2/Pt/In2O3 | 500 W xenon lamp (>420 nm) | 0.023 | 80 | 8.45 |
|
| Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 | 250 W LED lamp (>420 nm) | 0.056 | 74 | 1.34 |
|
| SnO2/Ag/MoS2 | 150 W xenon lamp (>400 nm) | Not available | 90 | 3.89 |
|
| P–g-C3N4 | 230 W xenon lamp (420 nm–780 nm) | Not available | 84 | 2.1 |
|
| BiO(OH) | 150 W xenon lamp (>400 nm) | 0.16 | 85 | 2.622 |
|
| 3S-BN | 300 W xenon lamp (380 nm–800 nm) | Not available | 63 | 1.12 |
|