Lu Chen1, Xingzhi Wu2, Zhongguo Li3, Ruipeng Niu4, Wenfa Zhou4, Kun Liu1, Yingfei Sun1, Zhangyang Shao1, Junyi Yang1, Yinglin Song1,4. 1. School of Physical Science and Technology, Soochow University Suzhou 215006 People's Republic of China. 2. School of Physical Science and Technology, Suzhou University of Science and Technology Suzhou 215009 People's Republic of China. 3. School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Changshu Institute of Technology Changshu 215500 China. 4. Department of Physics, Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin 150001 People's Republic of China.
Near-infrared (NIR) nonlinear materials are increasingly popular in photoelectric sensing and other fields due to their minimal photodamage to samples and minimal tissue penetration depth.[1] Organic nonlinear materials have great advantages, such as low cost, wide spectral response and easy modification/tailoring of molecular structure. They have promising applications in all optical switching,[2-4] optical limiting devices,[5,6] bioimaging, optical communication and information storage.[7-9] In addition, organic molecular materials containing π-conjugated structures play a decisive role in enhancing the optical nonlinear properties.[10-12] As a promising type of π-conjugated molecule, indandione derivatives have attracted much attention due to their easy synthesis and significant second- and third-order optical nonlinearity.[13-15] Interestingly, these types of compounds exhibit strong nonlinear optical (NLO) responses due to the introduction of bilateral donor and acceptor groups, strong intermolecular interactions and TPA resonance in π-conjugated systems.[16-18]The introduction of electron donors and acceptors into the molecular structure increases the difference in the dipole moment between the excited and ground states, which enhances the polarization of the whole molecule under an external electric field through intramolecular charge transfer (ICT), hence greatly improving the second- or third-order nonlinear effects of materials.[19,20]Under laser irradiation at longer wavelengths, ground state electrons could be promoted to the excited state by simultaneously absorbing two incident photons. After that, ESA shows its effect until the molecular system relaxes to the ground state. The cooperating effect of TPA and ESA could enhance the overall nonlinear optical absorption in the whole spectral region.[21] Thus, it is feasible to achieve a broader spectral response range by proper design of molecular structures, including adjusting the molecular length, ICT and molecular symmetry by introducing different donors and acceptors. At present, indandione research is still confined to theoretical simulations[22] and some low-order nonlinear responses, and in-depth analysis of its high-order NLO is still very rare.[15,23-27]Based on these facts, two compounds, INB3 (2-[4-di(p-tolylamino)benzylidene]-1H-indene-1,3(2H)-dione) and INT3 (2-[(2,2′:5′2′′-terthiophene-5-yl)methylene]-1H-indene-1,3(2H)-dione), were synthesized by introducing triphenylamine and terthiophene as donor groups. In this paper, the higher-order NLO response of 1,3-indandione dissolved in DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) was investigated experimentally by femtosecond Z-scan experiments and transient absorption (TA) spectroscopy. The results indicated that the introduction of triphenylamine and terthiophene exhibits a great effect on the ESA spectrum and ultrafast dynamics. Both compounds exhibit excellent NLO responses in a wide spectral region from visible to NIR (650–1100 nm). This indicates that INB3 and INT3 are potential materials for applications such as near infrared optical sensing and modulation in the photoelectric area (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1
Molecular structure of INB3 and INT3.
Experimental
Synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of INB3 and INT3
Synthesis of 2-[4-di(p-tolylamino)benzylidene]-1H-indene-1,3(2H)-dione (INB3)
A mixture of 4-di-p-tolylamino-benzaldehyde (1 g, 3.32 mmol) and 1,3-indonedione (0.485 g, 3.32 mmol) was dissolved in 100 mL of ethanol. The solution was added in sequence to a 200 mL two-sipped flask and stirred magnetically until the solution was reddish-brown when completely dissolved. Then, several drops of triethylamine were added, and the solution turned dark wine red. The reaction was stirred at room temperature, and the reaction process was tracked by thin layer chromatography (TLC). The reaction time was approximately 5 h (after the end of the reaction, the color of the solution was still dark wine red, and there was no precipitation throughout the reaction process). Dry material was prepared with an appropriate amount of silica gel. Compound INB3 (895 mg, 62.8%) was obtained by column chromatography separation. 1H NMR δ/ppm (600 MHz, DMSO): 8.472–8.458 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.913–7.880 (m, 4H), 7.678 (s, 1H), 7.265–7.252 (d, 4H, J = 7.8 Hz),7.162–7.149 (d, 4H, J = 7.8 Hz), 6.785–6.771 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz),2.238 (s, 6H). 13C NMR δ/ppm (150 MHz, DMSO): 190.61,189.44,153.22, 146.03, 142.85, 142.08, 142.00, 139.70, 137.40, 136.01, 135.87, 135.68, 131.05, 127.17, 124.73, 124.61, 123.08, 122.99, 117.01, 21.05. LC-MS (ESI) m/z: found: 430.15; calcd for C30H23O2N ([M]+): 429.52.
Synthesis of 2-[(2,2′:5′2′′-terthiophene-5-yl)methylene]-1H-indene-1,3(2H)-dione (INT3)
A mixture of 2,2′:5′2′′-terthiophene-5-carbaldehyde (1.01 g, 5 mmol) and 1,3-indonedione (0.73 g, 5 mmol) was placed in a 100 mL round-bottom flask. Then, 30 mL of anhydrous ethanol was added and stirred magnetically to completely dissolve it. Four drops of triethylamine were added, and reflux was heated for 4 h. The reaction was stirred at room temperature, and the reaction process was tracked by thin layer chromatography (TLC). When TLC showed that no product was formed, potassium tert-butoxide (0.55 g, 5 mmol) was added, and reflux was continued. The solution changes from yellow to brick red, and TLC shows that the reaction is successful. The reaction time was approximately 4 h (after cooling to room temperature, the brick red suspension was obtained, which was filtered and washed twice with a small amount of anhydrous ethanol to obtain the reddish-brown coarse product). Compound INT3 (890 mg, 44.1%) was obtained by column chromatography separation. 1H NMR δ/ppm (600 MHz, DMSO): 8.220–8.213 (d, 1H, J = 4.2 Hz), 8.068 (s, 1H), 7.949–7.919 (m, 4H), 6.673–6.667 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz),6.656–6.649 (d, 1H, J = 4.2 Hz), 6.632–6.623 (d, 1H, J = 5.4 Hz),7.486–7.481 (d, 1H, J = 3.0 Hz), 7.433–7.427 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz), 7.168–7.154 (t, 1H,J = 4.2 Hz). 13C NMR δ/ppm (150 MHz, DMSO): 189.85, 189.67, 148.91, 146.14, 141.81, 140.38, 139.19, 136.09, 136.01, 135.97, 135.88, 135.83, 134.44, 129.18, 128.79, 127.25, 126.12, 26.00, 125.78, 113.72, 123.23, 123.08. LC-MS (ESI) m/z: (ESI) found: 404.87; calcd for C19H16O5 ([M]+): 404.53 (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2
Synthetic route of molecules INB3 and INT3.
Quantum chemical calculations
The Gaussian 09 program package was used for density functional theory (DFT) to investigate the influence of molecular structure on the NLO properties of these two compounds. The B3LYP/6-31G model was applied to optimize the structures of all the molecular systems. The energy and electron cloud distribution of frontier molecular orbitals were calculated (Fig. 2). To further analyze the electron transition, density functional theory (DFT)[28] was performed using the CAM-B3LYP functional[29] and the B3LYP/6-311G(d) basis set. The electrons transfer from the donor (three thiophene or triphenylamine groups) to the acceptor (1,3-indandione group) in both compounds. The type of electron transition can be characterized by hole electron analysis using the Multiwfn 3.7 program.[30]
Fig. 2
Frontier molecular orbital distributions of INB3 and INT3. Electrons transfer from the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO).
Transient absorption measurement
The laser source of femtosecond TA spectroscopy was the same as that used in the Z-scan measurement. In femtosecond TA measurements, the pump wavelength was set to 480 nm. The probe wavelength window covers a range from 480 nm to 1100 nm. The time resolution of the TA system was approximately 250 fs. The pump fluence was kept below 8 mW to suppress high-order relaxation processes. Details of TA measurement can be found in a previous report.[31] Both compounds were dissolved in DMSO at the same concentration (1.18 × 10−4 mol L−1) at room temperature. The sample solution was contained in 2 mm quartz cell.
Nonlinear absorption experiments
The ultrafast nonlinear absorption of INB3 and INT3 compounds was characterized by the open-aperture Z-scan technique under the excitation of femtosecond laser pulses. Optical parametric amplifier (OPA) (light conversion ORPHEUS) pumped by a Yb:KGW femtosecond fiber laser (light conversion) was employed as the laser source, and the wavelength of the output beam could be adjusted from 650 nm to 1100 nm. The pulse duration and repetition rate of the laser beam are 190 fs and 20 Hz, respectively. Both compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at a concentration of 3.3 × 10−3 mol L−1, and the sample solution was placed in 2 mm thick quartz sample cells. In the Z-scan experiment, the NLO effect of the solvent was measured as the background, and nonlinear absorption of the compounds was obtained by subtracting the solvent background signal from the solution signal in data processing.
Results and discussion
UV-vis absorption and fluorescence spectra
The UV-vis absorption spectra and fluorescence spectra of the two 1,3-indandione derivatives are shown in Fig. 1. The measurements were made in DMSO solution at a concentration of 5.9 × 10−5 mol L−1 at room temperature. The results show that the absorption peaks of INB3 and INT3 are located at 492 nm and 504 nm, respectively. The absorption peak of INT3 has a certain redshift compared to INB3, indicating a small energy gap in INT3, which is also confirmed by DFT calculations. When both were excited at the absorption peak wavelengths, the fluorescence signal of INB3 was much weaker than that of INT3. In addition, the emission spectral range of INB3 is much broader, suggesting distinct dual emission from the locally excited state (LES) and ICT state.
Fig. 1
UV-vis absorption spectra (solid lines) and fluorescence emission spectra (dashed lines) of INB3 (red) and INT3 (black).
Quantum chemical calculation
The optimal structure and the distribution of frontier molecular orbitals of INB3 and INT3 are displayed in Fig. 2. From the optimization structure, one can find that the three benzene rings of INB3 are not in the same plane, while the 1,3-indandione group of INT3 forms a planar conjugated system with the thiophene unit.[32,33] As we introduced before, in both compounds, the indandione group acts as an acceptor due to its strong electron-withdrawing ability, while terthiophene and triphenylamine act as donors. In the INB3 and INT3 molecular systems, electrons are transferred from trithiophene and triphenylamine groups to 1,3-indendione, respectively, and there is a significant ICT in both molecules. The degree of planarity affects the length of the π-electron system and the polarizability of electrons,[34] and the effect of the torsional angle between rings may be able to promote the contribution of ICT. Quantitative calculations also show that INT3 shows better planarity and a smaller band gap, while INB3's ICT is more pronounced, and these two mechanisms are expected to have different modulation effects on its nonlinear absorption.
Transient absorption spectrum
The results of femtosecond transient absorption spectra (TAS) of the two compounds are displayed in Fig. 3, in which the positive signal represents ESA at a specific wavelength. For INB3, with excitation from the pump pulse, the ESA signal emerges at approximately 900 nm, and a strong negative signal covers a wide spectrum from 500 to 800 nm (0.3 ps). The strong negative signal may originate from ground state bleaching and stimulated emission (SE) at corresponding wavelengths (Fig. 1). After that, one can observe a redshifting of the decreasing SE band with a distinct change in the TAS. At 3.0 ps, the ESA signal at approximately 900 nm becomes negative, and a new ESA rises at approximately 570 nm, which turns the previous negative signal positive. The ultrafast sign change of the TAS signal in INB3 could be considered the sum effect of ESA and SE. The strong SE in the INB3 sample undergoes a significant redshift, with its peak moving from 580 nm at 0.3 ps to 840 nm at 9.0 ps. It should be noted that this redshifting of SE in the first singlet state also agrees with the broadband fluorescence emission in INB3 (Fig. 1). Meanwhile, the TAS of INT3 displays a stable ESA band with a slight blueshift of its peak from 670 (0.3 ps) to 640 nm (14.0 ps) and a sub-ESA peak rising at approximately 575 nm (from 1.4 ps). Similar to the TAS of INB3, the sum effect of strong SE (peaks at 650 nm according Fig. 1) and ESA results in a negative signal at 720 nm.
Fig. 3
Transient absorption spectra of INB3 (a) and INT3 (b) in DMSO at 480 nm under 190 fs excitation.
To further analyze the ultrafast dynamics of the two compounds, global and target analysis is employed to extract several relaxing processes from the TAS based on the above discussions,[11,35-38] and the results are listed in Table 1. For INB3, ultrafast absorption is established within a pulse duration after excitation, which is beyond the instrument response time (0.25 ps). This ultrafast signal is assigned to the formation of a locally excited state (LES). Afterwards, an ICT excited state is populated with an internal conversion time τ2 from the LES. The TAS in this ICT state is characterized by a strong ESA band in the visible region and SE in the NIR region, which plays a key role in the sign switching of the TAS signal in INB3. The following process with lifetimes τ3 is assigned to cooling in the ICT state characterized by a continuous redshifting of the SE signal. Finally, the electrons relaxed back to the ground state from the ICT state with lifetime τ4. The situation in INT3 is less complicated than that in INB3, and we extract four decay processes with four lifetimes (τ1–τ4) listed in Table 1. Four equivalent energy levels and their corresponding evolution associated difference spectra (EADS) are sequentially arranged in order to compare several dynamic processes more accurately (Fig. S7†). Similar to INB3, the ultrafast decay beyond the time resolution of our experiment (τ1) is assigned to an ultrafast relaxation process in LES after excitation. Meanwhile, τ2 is assigned to the internal conversion from the LES to the ICT state, which is followed by the relaxation time in the ICT state and finally relaxation back to the ground state with lifetime τ4. Based on the above discussion, the kinetic traces of INB3 (500 nm, 580 nm and 630 nm) and INT3 (532 nm, 580 nm and 670 nm) were extracted from TAS and are displayed in Fig. 4, in which solid lines represent the fitting results. Furthermore, simplified energy models for both compounds are provided in Fig. 5.
Fitting results of dynamic traces for INB3 and INT3 after photoexcitation. The error range of theoretical fitting is about 15%
Sample
τ1 (ps)
τ2 (ps)
τ3 (ps)
τ4 (ps)
INB3
<0.25
0.9
4.3
24.7
INT3
<0.25
1.6
8.8
424.1
Fig. 4
The kinetic traces of INB3 (a) and INT3 (b) at different wavelengths.
Fig. 5
The energy relaxation diagram for INB3 and INT3.
Femtosecond open aperture Z-scan experiment
To explore the third-order NLO properties of the two compounds, femtosecond open-aperture (OA) Z-scan measurements were carried out at different laser intensities at wavelengths ranging from 650–1100 nm. The signal of pure solvent was measured to ensure that the solvent absorbing background could be neglected in the experiment. Both compounds show high linear transmittance (INB3 ≥ 97%, INT3 ≥ 98%) at experimental wavelengths. The results at 650 nm and 1030 nm are shown in Fig. 6, while the results for other wavelengths can be found in the ESI.†
Fig. 6
OA Z-scan experiment of INB3 and INT3 at 650 nm (a–e) and 1030 nm (d–f), respectively. Example of the intensity dependence of the nonlinear absorption coefficient for two compounds. The dots are experimental points and the solid lines are theoretical fitting curves.
It is known that the OA Z-scan measures the intensity-dependent transmittance of the incident laser, which reflects the third-order nonlinear absorption of the samples. Considering the low repetition rate and high transmittance of samples, the thermal effect of the samples can be ignored in the experiment. As shown in Fig. 6, the OA Z-scan curves show a single valley at the zero point (focus of the lens). The results indicate that the transmittance of both samples decreases as the incident laser intensity increases, which is a typical characteristic of TPA or ESA. In addition, six wavelengths (700 nm, 750 nm, 800 nm, 900 nm, 950 nm, 1100 nm) were selected as examples to show the difference of strength of nonlinear absorption between INB3 and INT3 at the same excitation energy (Fig. 7). It is obvious that the OA curves in the range of 650–800 nm of INT3 have deeper valleys than those of INB3, suggesting significantly stronger nonlinear absorption in INT3. However, the situation is totally opposite when the laser wavelength is tuned to 800–1100 nm, where INT3 displays larger nonlinear absorption. Obviously, the different molecular structures modify the wavelength response of nonlinear absorption in INB3 and INT3 compounds. To further study the ultrafast nonlinear absorption in INB3 and INT3, numerical simulation is employed.
Fig. 7
OA Z-scan experiment at 700 nm, 750 nm, 800 nm, 900 nm, 950 nm, and 1100 nm, respectively. The dots are experimental points and the solid lines are theoretical fitting curves.
Note that both INB3 and INT3 samples display extremely high linear transmittance in our Z-scan experiment. Hence, the nonlinear absorption we observed cannot originate from reverse saturable absorption (RSA). The main mechanism of nonlinear absorption in the Z-scan measurement is assigned to TPA and two-photon absorption-induced excited-state absorption (TPA-ESA). The total absorption of the sample (α) can be written as α = α0 + βeffI, where α0 represents the linear absorption coefficient and βeff is the effective third-order nonlinear absorptive coefficient. To gain deep insight into the ultrafast nonlinear absorption in these compounds, OA Z-scan curves at various intensities were measured and the effective third-order nonlinear absorptive coefficients βeff were extracted (Fig. 6(c) and (f)). At 650 nm, βeff of INB3 basically remains unchanged at different laser intensities, while βeff of INT3 increases linearly with the incident laser intensity (Fig. 6(c)). The results indicate that the main nonlinear absorption in INB3 is TPA since pure TPA is independent of laser intensity. However, considering the linearly increasing βeff in INT3, a higher-order (fifth-order) nonlinear absorption may play a key role in INT3.[39,40] Furthermore, the excitation wavelength here (650 nm) is too short for three-photon absorption; hence, the fifth-order nonlinear absorption in INT3 is attributed to TPA-ESA.[34,41] On the other hand, when the incident wavelength is tuned to 1030 nm, βeff of both samples displays a slight increase with increasing laser intensity, indicating a dominant contribution from pure TPA in the entire nonlinear absorption. Based on the above discussions, the fifth-order optical nonlinearity in these compounds is considered, and we express the effective third-order nonlinear absorptive coefficient βeff as βTPA + γI. Hence, the absorption coefficient of material (α) can be further expressed as α = α0 + βTPAI + γI2, where α0 represents the linear absorption coefficient, βTPA is the TPA coefficient, and γ represents the fifth-order nonlinear absorption coefficient. According to equation σTPA = ħωβTPA/N, the TPA cross sections can be obtained from the Z-scan results. Here, ħ is reduced Planck's constant, ω is angular frequency and N is the number of particles per unit volume. Both βTPA and γ can be obtained by theoretically fitting the Z-scan curves based on Sheik Bahae's theory,[42] and the fitting results of the two compounds are summarized in Table 2.
TPA cross sections and γ at 650–1100 nm fitted from Z-scan experimental data. The error range of theoretical fitting is about 10%
Wavelength (nm)
Sample
βTPA (×10−14 m W−1)
σTPA (GM)
γ (×10−28 m3 W−2)
650
INB3
10
154
—
INT3
17
262
15
700
INB3
4.5
65
—
INT3
10
143
6.0
750
INB3
0.5
7.0
—
INT3
8.0
107
3.3
800
INB3
0.2
10
1.4
INT3
3.5
38
1.3
900
INB3
6.0
67
2.0
INT3
1.5
17
1.0
950
INB3
13
137
3.0
INT3
2.0
21
0.5
1030
INB3
17
166
4.0
INT3
8.5
83
0.5
1100
INB3
9.0
82
3.0
INT3
5.0
46
0.3
One can find that the two 1,3-indandione derivatives show distinct NLO behavior. When the incident wavelength is shorter than 800 nm, INT3 displays stronger nonlinear absorption than INB3. The largest TPA and TPA-ESA of INT3 are observed at 650 nm (σTPA = 262 GM, γ = 15 × 10−28 m3 W−2), which agrees with the results in UV linear absorption and TAS. The strong TPA and TPA-ESA are attributed to the good molecular planarity and small band gap of INT3, which greatly improves the NLO response of the molecule toward laser excitation. With increasing incident wavelength, TPA and TPA-ESA in INT3 gradually decrease. When the excitation wavelength is longer than 900 nm, there is a significant rise in TPA in INB3, which peaks at 1030 nm with σTPA = 166 GM. The enhanced TPA in INB3 at 1030 nm may originate from the resonance of the TPA transition between HOMO–LUMO.[43] In addition, INB3 exhibits an excellent NLO response in the NIR region due to its broadband ultrafast ESA, which is also consistent with the TAS results. Both compounds show strong nonlinear absorption in a wide spectral region from visible to NIR, in which the NLO absorption at different wavelengths could be tuned via proper adjustment of the molecular structures. The strong NLO responses of INB3 and INT3 suggest that they are suitable for applications such as laser modulators in specific wavelength regions.To further verify the mechanism of nonlinear absorption, a degenerate pump-probe experiment was carried out. Details of the relevant experiment can be reported in.[44] Pump–probe experiments can provide dynamic processes of nonlinear absorption and can be considered an advanced alternative to the optical Kerr effect technique.[45] Pump–probe experiments have proven to be one of the powerful tools for studying optical nonlinearity.[46,47] The nonlinear absorption kinetic traces of the two compounds were recorded, as shown in Fig. S16.† The solvent showed no obvious nonlinear absorption signal. The ordinate is expressed as a normalized transmittance, with a linear transmittance of 1 when the sample has not received pump excitation. The decrease at zero time means that the transmittance of the sample is obviously decreased after being excited, which corresponds to the positive nonlinear absorption. In Fig. S16(a),† INB3 drops suddenly after zero delay, and the steep valley is consistent with our 190 fs pulse.[48] TPA is a transient electron response process, and the results show that TPA dominates the nonlinear absorption of INB3. However, in Fig. S16(b),† INT3 returns to the ground state process after a period, and its attenuation life is significantly longer than the pulse width. In addition to TPA, INT3 also has a higher order ESA. Therefore, we determined that the nonlinear response of INT3 comes from a TPA-ESA. A pump–probe experiment verifies the reliability of the Z-scan results and corresponds to the dynamic process of TA. From the absorption kinetics curves of the two molecules, it can be seen that after zero delay, INB3 first appears as a saturation signal soon, then begins to appear as a reverse saturation signal after approximately 1 ps, and finally goes through a long recovery process. INT3 is a process in which a decreasing reverse saturation signal first appears, then slowly recovers and finally returns to the ground state.
Conclusions
In summary, the NLO response at different wavelengths of two 1,3-indandione derivatives was studied. Both compounds exhibit broadband and strong nonlinear absorption from the visible to NIR region. The NLO properties of both molecules originate from the transfer of delocalized π-electrons from the donor group (terthiophene or triphenylamine) to the acceptor group (1,3-indandione). The NLO response of INT3 at 650–800 nm is better than that of INB3 because it has better molecular planarity and longer π-conjugate length. Approaching to the NIR region (800–1100 nm), both molecules also show better NLO response due to two-photon resonance, while INB3 exhibited slightly better NLO response than INT3 in the NIR region due to its broadband ESA. Overall, the nonlinear absorption of indandione derivatives at different wavelengths can be modified by introducing the proper substituted groups. This result indicated that INB3 and INT3 may be promising materials for RSA applications in the visible and NIR region, such as optical limiters.
Authors: Kun Wang; Andrea Vezzoli; Iain M Grace; Maeve McLaughlin; Richard J Nichols; Bingqian Xu; Colin J Lambert; Simon J Higgins Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2019-01-03 Impact factor: 9.825