| Literature DB >> 35424300 |
Mehrdad Khatami1,2, Farideh Mosazade1, Mohammadali Raeisi1, Masoomeh Ghasemi1, Zohreh Fazli1, Kolsum Arefkia1, Rajender S Varma3, Fariba Borhani4, Sanaz Khatami2,5.
Abstract
Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have diverse applications in the diagnosis and treatment of ailments. This study describes an extremely simplified synthesis of AuNPs using antioxidant-rich pollen extract as a local natural source. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to characterize the synthesized AuNPs; strong UV-vis absorption at 534 nm confirmed their formation, the XRD pattern showed the presence of a crystalline structure, and TEM images showed them to be spherical nanoparticles with an average size of 9.3 ± 2.9 nm. As synthesized AuNPs remained stable for up to two months under laboratory conditions without any sedimentation or change in the absorption value, presumably due to the protection afforded by the capping agents from pollen. AuNPs revealed low toxicity effects on MCF-7 and HUVECs cell lines (with an IC50 value of ∼400 μg mL-1 for both the cell lines). The proposed method did not use any hazardous materials or high-energy consuming devices; thus this efficient protocol may be adapted for large-scale production using local resources. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35424300 PMCID: PMC8694009 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra08822f
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Fig. 1Colors of HAuCl4 solution (a), pine pollen extract (b), and biosynthesized AuNPs (c).
Fig. 2Absorption spectra of the pine pollen extract (a) and the AuNPs dispersion (b).
Fig. 3XRD pattern of AuNPs.
Fig. 4FTIR spectra of the dried pine pollen extract (a) and AuNPs (b).
Fig. 5A TEM image from AuNPs (A) and a size distribution histogram (B).
Fig. 6Dependency of viability of MCF-7 cell and HUVEC lines on the AuNPs concentration.
Provides comparison with the earlier reported methods of plant-mediated AuNPs synthesis in terms of size, organs of the plant, stability, cytotoxic features
| Plant | Organs of the plant | Size (nm) | Stability (days) | Cytotoxic features | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Fruit | An average 18–28 | More than 150 | IC50 ∼ 163 μg mL−1 |
|
|
| Stem bark | 10–100 | Several months | IC50 ∼ 74 μg mL−1 |
|
|
| Leaves | 3 to 80 with an average 15 | NM | NM |
|
|
| Leaves | 5–20 | NM | NM |
|
|
| Leaves | 7–22 | 150 | IC50 ∼ 152 μg mL−1 K 562 and 196 μg mL−1 against HeLa cell line |
|
|
| Needles | Less than 20 | More than 180 | The maximum cell mortality of 22.15 and 26.5% were obtained after 72 h |
|
|
| Flower | 3 to 5 with triangular shapes | NM | An effect was not observed in the cancerous A549 cells |
|
|
| The whole plant | An average 11 | NM | NM |
|
|
| Leaves | 10 to 35 with average of 21 | 120 | NM |
|
|
| Leaves | Less than 20 | NM | Cell death was about 98% was found at 250 μg mL−1 AuNPs: used against MCF7 and HepG2 cell lines. |
|
|
| Leaves | 8–37 | In PBS was 2 | IC50 value of 104 μg mL−1 against the human cervical cancer cell line |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM: not mentioned.
A comparison between the reported methods of AuNPs synthesis in terms of use of laboratory devices and energy consumptiona
| Bioresource | Water bath | Centrifuge | Mixer | Heater | Culture medium | Laminar air flow | Incubator | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| − | + | − | + | + | + | + |
|
|
| − | + | + | + | − | − | + |
|
|
| − | − | + | + | − | − | + |
|
|
| − | + | + | − | − | − | − |
|
|
| − | + | + | + | − | − | + |
|
|
| − | + | + | + | − | + |
| |
|
| − | − | + | + | − | + | + |
|
|
| + | + | − | + | + | + | + |
|
|
| − | + | − | + | − | − | + |
|
|
| − | + | + | + | − | − | + |
|
|
| − | + | + | + | − | − | + |
|
|
| − | + | + | + | + | + | + |
|
|
| − | + | + | + | + | + | + |
|
|
| + | − | − | + | − | − | + |
|
|
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
|
|
| − | − | + | + | − | − | + |
|
|
| − | − | + | + | − | − | + |
|
|
| − | − | + | + | − | − | + |
|
|
| − | − | + | + | − | − | + |
|
|
| + | + | + | + |
| |||
|
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
|
|
| + | − | + | + | − | − | + |
|
|
| + | − | + | + | − | − | + |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
− No need, + need.