| Literature DB >> 35424207 |
Anna Kolanowska1, Artur P Herman1,2, Rafał G Jędrysiak1, Sławomir Boncel1.
Abstract
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as 1D nanomaterials of excellent physicochemical characteristics bring hope to compete and eventually conquer traditional solutions in electrocardiography - one of the most powerful and non-invasive diagnostic tools in cardiac disorders. Our review tracks (from 2008) the development of CNTs as critical components in the systems where CNTs serve mainly as electroconductive fillers hence enable recording electrocardiographs (ECG). The characteristics of the CNT-based ECG systems - mainly to-skin electrodes and in a few cases wiring - covers their electrical and mechanical performance (adhesivity, flexibility, elasticity) and qualitative biocompatibility. By comprehensive analysis of the state-of-art in this field, we intend to indicate the most important challenges for the CNT (and other) materials to be applied in scale-up solution for electrocardiography in the near future. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35424207 PMCID: PMC8693996 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra08679g
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Fig. 1(A) Main areas of CNT current applications; (B) diagnostic tools for cardiovascular diseases.
Fig. 2(A) ECG of a heart in its normal (healthy) sinus rhythm – a simplified overview with the distinct features; (B) placement of the ECG electrodes by the Einthoven's triangle.
Fig. 3The requirements for novel ECG materials.
Physical properties of individual CNTs
| Property | SWCNT | MWCNT | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile strength | ∼1 TPa | ∼1–1.2 TPa |
|
| Thermal conductivity (along the axis) | ∼1750–5800 W m−1 K−1 | >3000 W m−1 K−1 |
|
| Bandgap | 0 eV (metallic) | 0 eV |
|
| 0.4–2 eV (semiconducting) | |||
| Electrical resistivity (along the axis) | 10−6 Ωm |
| |
| Max. current density (along the axis) | 107 to 109 A cm−2 |
| |
Fig. 4(A) Schematic depiction of electronic band structure of a graphene sheet. The Fermi level EF intersects the corners of Brillouin zone; this figure has been reproduced from ref. 59 with permission from American Physical Society, Copyright 2020; (B) 1D quantization of graphene band structure resulting in GNRs: (a) filled states in the first Brillouin zone of a single graphene sheet (the sheet consists of two carbon atoms per unit cell – lower right inset). The Fermi circle around K point, the allowed k vectors and their dispersions are shown in (b), and (c) for a metallic and semiconducting GNR (SWCNT), respectively. The dumbbells represent molecular orbitals comprising the states, with white–white, white-black and grey dumbbells representing bonding, antibonding and mixed orbitals respectively. This figure has been adapted from ref. 60 with permission from American Physical Society, Copyright 2020.
Fig. 5(A) Depiction of CNT chiral vector c = na + ma; (B) density of states of metallic and (C) semiconducting SWCNTs; v – valence band, c – conduction band.
CNT-based materials for electrocardiographya
| CNTs outer diameter length | Matrix additive, conc. | CNTs, conc. | Form/assembly thickness | Electrical properties | Biocompatibility tests | Long-term application | Advantages/key features | Disadvantages | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MWCNTs 80–90 nm, 50 μm | PDMS, AgNPs, 11 wt% | 11 wt% | Polymer electrode 0.6 mm |
| Skin compatibility | 11 days | ✓ Signal dependent on CNT conc. | ✗ Strong motion artifacts |
|
| ✓ Stability in stationary positions | ✗ Metallic additive | ||||||||
| ✓ Self-adhesion | ✗ High (>4 wt%) CNT content | ||||||||
| ✓ Stability in 5 cycles detach/attach | ✗ Lower ECG signal than for Ag/AgCl | ||||||||
| ✓ No long-term irritation to skin | ✗ Decreasing adhesivity over use | ||||||||
| MWCNTs 10–40 nm, 1–25 μm | PDMS | 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 wt% | Polymer electrode 200–600 μm |
| n.d. | n.d. | ✓ Signal dependent on CNT conc. | ✗ Weak T-wave |
|
| ✓ Clear QRS-complex | ✗ No dynamic testing | ||||||||
| ✗ Deterioration of mechanics | |||||||||
| MWCNTs 8–15 nm, 50 μm | PDMS | 10 wt% | Polymer electrode thickness n.d. |
| n.d. | n.d. | ✓ Micropillar enhanced contact area | ✗ Noise during walking |
|
|
| ✓ Stability in stationary positions | ✗ High (>4 wt%) CNT content | |||||||
| ✗ No long-term testing | |||||||||
| ✗ No biocompatibility tests | |||||||||
| MWCNTs 80–90 nm, 50 μm | PDMS AgNPs, 11–12 wt% | 11–12 wt% | Polymer electrode sewed into bra/vest thickness = 0.6 mm |
| Skin compatibility | 14 days | ✓ Signal dependent on CNT conc. | ✗ Metallic additive |
|
|
| ✓ Signal dependent on layer thickness | ✗ Lower ECG signal than for Ag/AgCl | |||||||
| ✓ Stability in stationary positions | ✗ High (>4 wt%) CNT content | ||||||||
| ✓ Stability in time | ✗ Noise during walking | ||||||||
| ✓ No irritation to skin | ✗ Motion artifacts in dynamic testing | ||||||||
| ✓ Washability | |||||||||
| MWCNTs 20 nm, 25 μm | PDMS-Ag, PDMS coating | PDMS : CNT 3 : 7 | Polymer electrode thickness n.d. |
| Skin compatibility | 7 days | ✓ Signal dependent on CNT conc. | ✗ Lower ECG signal than for Ag/AgCl |
|
| ✓ Temperature/humidity stable signal | ✗ Metallic coating | ||||||||
| ✓ Attaching/detaching stability | ✗ No dynamic testing | ||||||||
| ✓ No long-term irritation to skin | |||||||||
| ✓ Stability in time | |||||||||
| SWCNTs 0.9–3 nm, <10 μm | Alginate/polyacrylamide hydrogel | SWCNT film deposited on hydrogel | Hydrogel-based electrode thickness = 40 nm |
| n.d. | n.d. | ✓ High signal amplitude | ✗ No dynamic testing |
|
| ✓ Excellent to-skin adhesion | ✗ Susceptibility to cracking | ||||||||
| ✓ Optical transparency | ✗ Noisy baseline | ||||||||
| ✗ High costs | |||||||||
| MWCNTs 20–30 nm, 10–30 μm | PDMS Ag coating | 8 wt% | Polymer electrode thickness n.d. |
| n.d. | n.d. | ✓ Signal of medical quality | ✗ Metallic additive |
|
|
| ✓ Signal dependent on the electrode diameter | ✗ Noisy baseline | |||||||
| ✓ Dynamic stability | ✗ High (>4 wt%) CNT content | ||||||||
| ✗ Strong motion artifacts | |||||||||
| MWCNTs 50–85 nm, 10–15 μm | PDMS | 4.5 wt% | Polymer electrode thickness n.d. |
| n.d. | n.d. | ✓ Signal of medical quality | ✗ No dynamic testing |
|
| ✗ Unknown reproducibility | |||||||||
| MWCNTs 10–40 nm, 1–25 μm | PDMS | 1, 1.5, 2, 4.5 wt% | Polymer electrode thickness = 3 mm |
| Skin compatibility | 7 days | ✓ Signal dependent on CNT conc. | ✗ Noisy baseline in dynamic testing |
|
|
| Cytotoxicity test by culturing skin fibroblast CCD-986sk cells | ✓ Signal dependent on the electrode diameter | ✗ Lower time-stability | ||||||
| 1–4.5 wt% | ✓ ECG signal of nearly medical quality | ✗ Weak QRS- and T-waves | |||||||
| ✓ Stable signal over sweating | |||||||||
| ✓ No long-term irritation to skin | |||||||||
| MWCNTs 10–40 nm, 1–25 μm | PDMS | 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 wt% | Polymer electrode thickness n.d. |
| Skin compatibility | n.d. | ✓ ECG signal of nearly medical quality | ✗ Metal additives |
|
| Metal pattern layer (Au/Ti/polyimide) |
| Cytotoxicity test by culturing human fibroblast cells (CCD-986sk) and mouse fibroblast L929 cells | ✓ Signal stability over attaching/detaching | ✗ No dynamic testing | |||||
| ✓ Waterproof system | ✗ Lower time stability | ||||||||
| ✓ No long-term irritation to skin | |||||||||
| ✓ Washability | |||||||||
| MWCNTs n.d. | PDMS–PEIE | 10 wt% | Polymer electrode thickness nd. |
| Skin compatibility | n.d. | ✓ Mechanic stability over attaching/detaching | ✗ Motion artifacts in dynamic testing |
|
| ✓ No long-term irritation to skin | ✗ Sensibility to sweating | ||||||||
| ✗ Unknown reproducibility | |||||||||
|
| Acrylic ink | Acrylic resin:MWCNT (1 : 1 or 1 : 2; v/v) | Textile electrode thickness n.d. | n.d. | Skin compatibility | n.d. | ✓ Wearable electrode | ✗ Low quality of ECG signal |
|
| [OH] = 12 at% | ✓ Non-toxicity | ✗ Noisy baseline | |||||||
| [COOH] = 7.45 at% | ✗ No dynamic testing | ||||||||
| 20–30 nm | |||||||||
| n.d. | |||||||||
|
| Paper infiltrated | 15, 25, 35 wt% | Paper electrode thickness n.d. |
| Skin compatibility | n.d. | ✓ ECG signal of medical quality | ✗ Noisy baseline after prolonged use |
|
| [COOH] = 0.5–3.86 wt% | Graphite oxide (GO) | ✓ Signal amplitude higher than for conventional electrode | ✗ Loss of signal stability for higher MWCNT concentrations | ||||||
| 7–80 nm, 0.5–2 μm | GO : MWCNTs (5.7 : 1; w/w) | ✓ No long-term irritation to skin | ✗ No dynamic testing | ||||||
| MWCNTs 5 nm > 100 μm | Polyrotaxane-based gel | Polymer electrode thickness = 50–100 μm |
| Colony-forming assay on hamster fibroblasts (V79) | n.d. | ✓ ECG signal of medical quality | ✗ Moderately irritant |
| |
| Implant assay on hypodermal tissues of living rabbits | ✓ Amplitude of signal two times higher than for commercial electrode | ✗ No dynamic testing | |||||||
| SWCNTs 1.2–2 nm, 5 μm | PDMS | n.d. | Polymer electrode thickness = 85 μm |
| n.d. | n.d. | ✓ ECG signal of medical quality | ✗ Noisy baseline during dynamic tests |
|
| ✗ Loss of amplitude stability during dynamic tests | |||||||||
| MWCNTs 8–15 nm, 50 μm | PDMS | 4, 5.5, 7, 8 wt% | Polymer electrode thickness = 500 μm |
| Skin compatibility | 7 days | ✓ ECG signal of medical quality (for MWCNT conc. >4 wt%) | ✗ High (>4 wt%) CNT content |
|
| Cytotoxicity test on HaCaT cells | ✓ Prolonged signal stability | ✗ Weak T-wave | |||||||
| ✓ No long-term irritation to skin | ✗ Noisy baseline in dynamic testing | ||||||||
| MWCNTs 10–20 nm, 10–20 μm | PDMS | 1–20 wt% | Polymer electrode thickness n.d. |
| Skin compatibility | n.d. | ✓ ECG signal of medical quality | ✗ Skin toxicity for >6 wt% MWCNT/PDMS |
|
| Cytotoxicity test on human primary keratinocyte HaCaT cells | ✓ Equal to neat PDMS biocompatibility of MWCNT/PDMS (6 wt%) | ✗ No dynamic tests | |||||||
| ✓ No long-term irritation to skin | ✗ No long-term tests | ||||||||
|
| PVDF | 5 mg mL−1 | PVDF ‘filter’ electrode thickness = <0.1 mm |
| n.d. | n.d. | ✓ ECG signal of medical quality | ✗ Noisier baseline |
|
| ✗ No dynamic tests | |||||||||
| ✗ No long-term tests | |||||||||
| MWCNTs 10–30 nm | On stainless steel foil substrates | 100% | CNT ‘forest’ 1–1.5 mm ‘forest’ |
| Skin compatibility | 7 days | ✓ ECG signal of medical quality | ✗ Noisier baseline |
|
| ✗ Skin irritation | |||||||||
| 1–1.5 mm ‘forest’ | ✗ Leakage/transfer of CNTs onto skin after peel-off | ||||||||
| SWCNTs 0.9–1.3 nm, 1 μm | Poly(3-hexylthiophene) | 0.8 mg mL−1 | Conductive fiber thickness n.d. |
| n.d. | n.d. | ✓ Clear QRS-complex | ✗ Noisy baseline |
|
|
| ✗ High costs of SWCNTs | ||||||||
| ✗ No long-term tests | |||||||||
| ✗ No biocompatibility tests | |||||||||
| ✗ No dynamic tests | |||||||||
|
| Multi-layer composition: Silicon wafers, silicon oxide, titanium, nickel, gold, MWCNTs | n.d. | 3D structural electrode thickness n.d. |
| Cytotoxicity test on primary hippocampal neural cells | n.d. | ✓ Size 1000 times smaller than conventional electrode | ✗ Lower amplitude and less detailed signal than for Ag/AgCl electrode |
|
| ✓ Capable of measuring different anatomical regions of the isolated heart | |||||||||
| ✓ Long-term biocompatibility | |||||||||
| SWCNTs 1.1–1.7 nm, 5–30 μm | Polyurethane | n.d. | Textile electrode thickness n.d. |
| n.d. | n.d. | ✓ P-, T-, U-waves and QRS-complex identical with that of Ag/AgCl electrode regardless of motion states, age, sex and BMI index | ✗ Noisier baseline |
|
| Ag nanowires ( |
| ✓ Manufacture of electrode strongly affecting impedance/resistance | ✗ Lower signal amplitude than for conventional electrode | ||||||
| ✗ No biocompatibility tests | |||||||||
| SWCNTs 1–2 nm, 5–30 μm | — | 8–20 wt% | Cotton yarn thickness n.d. |
| n.d. | n.d. | ✓ ECG signal of medical quality | ✗ No dynamic tests |
|
|
| ✗ No washing resistance tests (aqueous ink) | ||||||||
| MWCNTs 10–30 nm, 10–30 μm | Polyurethane | 17 wt% | Conductive path on textile |
| n.d. | n.d. | ✓ Higher peak amplitude than the gel electrodes | ✗ Noisy baseline |
|
| Thickness n.d. | ✓ Recordings similar with the gel electrode | ✗ Two times higher contacting area | |||||||
| ✗ No biocompatibility tests | |||||||||
| ✗ No dynamic tests |
O-CNTs – oxidized CNTs, n.d. – no data, Z – impedance, Zc – contact impedance, ρ – sheet or specific resistivity, σ – sheet or specific conductivity.
Fig. 6(A) ECG bracelet and ECG signals for PDMS-based electrode; adapted from ref. 148 with permission from Elsevier, Copyright 2020; (B) ECG signals for electrodes with CNTs compared to Ag/AgCl electrode during rest and run tests; adapted from ref. 148 with permission from Elsevier, Copyright 2020; (C) ECG signals for electrodes with different CNTs concentration compared to Ag/AgCl electrode; adapted from ref. 122 with permission from Springer, Copyright 2020; (D) ECG signals for CNT/Ag-PDMS electrode compared to Ag/AgCl; adapted from ref. 121 with permission from Taylor & Francis, Copyright 2020; (E) effect of CNT concentration and ultrasonication time on ECG signal; adapted from ref. 122 with permission from Springer, Copyright 2020.
Fig. 7(A) A photograph of the wearable electrode indicating its flexibility (top), woman's vest with the wearable electrode (middle) and skin compatibility test: no skin irritation was observed at either electrode contact area (bottom); (B) the effect of CNT concentration, layer thickness and wearing time on the ECG signal; figures adapted from ref. 124 with permission from Elsevier, Copyright 2020; (C) ECG for flat versus micropillar PDMS/MWCNT electrode and the reference Ag/AgCl electrode; adapted from ref. 123 with permission from Elsevier, Copyright 2020.
Fig. 8(A) ECG signals for CNT/PDMS and Ag/AgCl electrodes; adapted from ref. 138 with permission from Elsevier, Copyright 2020; (B) the effect of MWCNT/PDMS electrode diameter on the ECG signals compared to ECG signal obtained from the wet Ag/AgCl electrode; adapted from ref. 127 with permission from Elsevier, Copyright 2020; (C) the effect of MWCNT concentration, electrode diameter, wearing time and motion on ECG signal for MWCNT/PDMS electrode; adapted from ref. 129 with permission from IEEE, Copyright 2020.
Fig. 9(A) Placement of the ECG electrodes to the left chest. Triangle shaped RA, LA and LL electrodes represent leads I, II and III and ECG waveforms; (B) recorded with leads I, II, and III for the Ag/AgCl, and dry MWCNT/aPDMS electrodes; these figures have been adapted from ref. 130 and 131 with permission from Nature Publishing Group, Copyright 2020; (C) ECG signals upon resting and walking for various MWCNT concentrations in PDMS; adapted from ref. 137 with permission from Taylor & Francis, Copyright 2020; (D) photograph of adhesion between the MWCNT/PDMS electrode and skin; (E) real-time ECG signal for CNT/aPDMS electrode during motion; these figures have been reproduced/adapted from ref. 132 with permission from The Japan Society of Applied Physics, Copyright 2020.
Fig. 10(A) Photograph of a real-time wearable demonstration with close on ECG sensors during adhesion test; adapted/reproduced from ref. 153 with permission from American Association for the Advancement of Science, Copyright 2020; (B) real-time ECG signals using different CNT concentrations and before and after exercise; adapted/reproduced from ref. 154 with permission from Wiley, Copyright 2020; (C) photograph of MWCNT–PDMS electrode; (D) ECG signal for MWCNT–graphene/PDMS electrode during motion; adapted from ref. 155 with permission from American Chemical Society, Copyright 2020.
Fig. 11(A) Photograph and SEM micrograph (B) of SWCNT/hydrogel structure at the stretched state; (C) ECG signal for SWCNT/hydrogel electrode compared to Ag/AgCl electrode; figures have been adapted/reproduced from ref. 126 with permission from American Chemical Society, Copyright 2020; (D) photograph of a sheet of conductive gel for ECG electrode; (E) TEM image of CNT–gel hybrid Copyrights Nature Publishing Group; (F) placing the ECG electrode on the rat skin; (G) ECG signals for acrylamide electrode and CNT/gel electrode; figures have been reproduced/adapted from ref. 135 with permission from Nature Publishing Group, Copyright 2020.
Fig. 12(A) The chest ECG signals recorded by the different types of electrodes: conventional Ag/AgCl, graphene/MWCNTs-15%, graphene/MWCNTs-25%, and graphene/MWCNTs-35%; (B) photograph of graphene/MWCNT electrodes and (C) the skin-compatibility test of the electrode; figures have been adapted/reproduced from ref. 134 with permission from Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Copyright 2020.
Fig. 13(A) ECG signal for MWCNT textile electrode versus Ag/AgCl electrode; this figure has been adapted from ref. 157 with permission from Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Copyright 2020; (B) Textile MWCNT/PU connectors printed on T-shirt; (C) ECG recordings obtained with the three setups: Ag/AgCl electrode (black), MWCNT connector – textile electrode (red) and Ag connector – textile electrode (blue);[147] these figures have been adapted from ref. 147 with permission from Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Copyright 2020.
Fig. 14(A) Photograph of PET-ECF electrode; (B) SEM image of ECFs; (C) ECG recording across left and right thenar muscles using stained polyester ECF; these figures have been adapted/reproduced from ref. 142 with permission from American Chemical Society, Copyright 2020; (D) the photograph of a setup recording and transmitting human ECG signals using the SWNT-cotton yarns; (E) ECG signals using commercial lead wires (light blue area) and SWNT-cotton yarns (light yellow area);[146] these figures have been adapted/reproduced from ref. 146 with permission from Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Copyright 2020; (F) comparison of ECG signals in morphology of waveforms for different condition of SWCNT-Ag/PU electrode preparation; this figure has been adapted/reproduced from ref. 145 with permission from IOP Publishing, Copyright 2020.
Fig. 15(A) Photographs and (B) SEM micrograph of ECG electrode based on MWCNT forest; these figures have been reproduced from ref. 140 with permission from IEEE, Copyright 2020; (C) the ECG signal collected by two electrodes for comparison with Ag/AgCl electrode and polypyrrole-coated MWCNT ‘forest’ electrode; this figure has been adapted from ref. 141 with permission from Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Copyright 2020.
Fig. 16(A) The schematic of the cardiac recording system for zebrafish using MWCNT-based multilayer microelectrode with its corresponding SEM image; (B) ECG signals for MWCNT microelectrode and Ag/AgCl electrode; these figures have been adapted/reproduced from ref. 143 with permission from Elsevier, Copyright 2020; (C) real-time colour changes of the OLEDs synchronized with the ECG signal; this figure has been adapted/reproduced from ref. 158 with permission from American Chemical Society, Copyright 2020.
Fig. 17The most important challenges for ECG materials in the light of the implementation routes.