| Literature DB >> 35423933 |
Yufan Huang1,2, Qi Li1,2, Teng Zhao1,2, Xiaofeng Zhu1,2, Zijun Wang1,2.
Abstract
Large amounts of industrial waste fly ash (FA) have caused serious pollution to the environment. There are a few reports that this kind of material, with its good thermal stability, can be used as a catalyst support for high-temperature catalytic reactions, and it has a certain application space. Upon the alkali treatment of fly ash, its specific surface area is increased, and it has the potential to be a catalyst support. Using treated fly ash as the carrier, a nickel-based catalyst was prepared via a sol-gel method, and the catalytic performance changes of catalysts with different MgO content levels in the dry reforming of methane are discussed. Under the conditions of a space velocity of 1.8 × 104 mL g-1 h-1 and a reaction temperature of 750 °C, in the presence of Ni/NaFA-M2 (M2 = 20 wt% MgO), the CH4 conversion rate can reach 84%, and it has good reaction stability. This will provide a way to use fly ash and carry out more research. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35423933 PMCID: PMC8697673 DOI: 10.1039/d1ra01381e
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Chemical compositions of fly ash samples
| Constituent | Mass (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| FA | FA-NaOH | FA-HCl | |
| SiO2 | 52.75 | 44.50 | 59.62 |
| Al2O3 | 31.98 | 31.02 | 32.09 |
| Na2O | 0.56 | 12.48 | 0.42 |
| Fe2O3 | 4.60 | 4.09 | 2.31 |
| CaO | 4.40 | 4.40 | 1.21 |
| K2O | 2.07 | 0.55 | 2.04 |
| TiO2 | 1.24 | 1.00 | 1.18 |
| Specific surface area (m2 g−1) | 2.4 | 59.5 | 18.5 |
Fig. 1A catalyst-preparation flow chart.
Fig. 2SEM images of fly ash: (a) untreated original fly ash, (b) HCl-treated fly ash, and (c) NaOH-treated fly ash.
Fig. 3XRD patterns of fresh catalysts.
Fig. 4H2-TPR curves from the catalysts.
Specific surface areas of catalyst samples
| Catalyst |
| Pore volume | Pore width |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ni/FA | 12.3 | 0.05 | 16.6 |
| Ni/NaFA | 14.4 | 0.08 | 19.8 |
| Ni/NaFA-M1 | 15.8 | 0.04 | 9.8 |
| Ni/NaFA-M2 | 30.1 | 0.10 | 10.2 |
| Ni/NaFA-M3 | 20.9 | 0.06 | 9.1 |
Calculated using the BET equation.
BJH desorption pore volume.
BJH desorption average pore diameter.
Fig. 5XPS analysis of spent catalysts: (a) Ni/NaFA-M1 and (b) Ni/NaFA-M2.
Fig. 6Thermogravimetry analysis of the catalysts.
Fig. 7TEM analysis of spent catalysts after reaction at 750 °C and a CH4/CO2 of ratio 1 : 1: (a) Ni/NaFA-M1 and (b) Ni/NaFA-M2.
Fig. 8Catalyst stability at 750 °C for 9 h: (a) CH4 conversion rate, (b) CO2 conversion rate, and (c) H2/CO ratio.