| Literature DB >> 35423400 |
Tuan V Vu1,2, A I Kartamyshev1,2, Nguyen V Hieu3, Tran D H Dang4, Sy-Ngoc Nguyen5, N A Poklonski6, Chuong V Nguyen7, Huynh V Phuc8, Nguyen N Hieu9,10.
Abstract
Surface functionalization is one of the useful techniques for modulating the mechanical and electronic properties of two-dimensional systems. In the present study, we investigate the structural, elastic, and electronic properties of hexagonal boron phosphide monolayer functionalized by Br and Cl atoms using first-principles predictions. Once surface-functionalized with Br/Cl atoms, the planar structure of BP monolayer is transformed to the low-buckled lattice with the bucking constant of about 0.6 Å for all four configurations of functionalized boron phosphide, i.e., Cl-BP-Cl, Cl-BP-Br, Br-BP-Cl, and Br-BP-Br. The stability of functionalized BP monolayers is confirmed via their phonon spectra analysis and ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. Our calculations indicate that the functionalized BP monolayers possess a fully isotropic elastic characteristic with the perfect circular shape of the angle-dependent Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio due to the hexagonal symmetry. The Cl-BP-Cl is the most stiff with the Young's modulus C 2D = 43.234 N m-1. All four configurations of the functionalized boron phosphide are direct semiconductors with a larger band gap than that of a pure BP monolayer. The outstanding stability, isotropic elastic properties, and moderate band gap make functionalized boron phosphide a very intriguing candidate for next-generation nanoelectromechanical devices. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35423400 PMCID: PMC8695274 DOI: 10.1039/d1ra00576f
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Fig. 1(a) Atomic structure and (b) phonon spectrum of monolayer boron phosphide (BP).
Fig. 2(a) Atomic structure and (b) phonon spectra of the surface-functionalizated BP with Br and Cl. The unit cell of the surface-functionalizated boron phosphide is shown as the dashed rectangle in (a).
Optimized lattice constant a, bond length d, buckling constant Δh, and calculated band gap by PBE EPBEg and HSE06 EPBEg methods of BP monolayer without and with surface-functionalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Δ |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BP | 3.210 | 1.853 | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | 0.887 | 1.399 |
| Cl–BP–Cl | 3.371 | 2.039 | 1.823 | — | 2.042 | — | 0.608 | −5.365 | 1.659 | 2.711 |
| Cl–BP–Br | 3.425 | 2.068 | 1.821 | — | 2.182 | — | 0.605 | −4.689 | 1.426 | 2.446 |
| Br–BP–Cl | 3.414 | 2.057 | — | 1.959 | — | 2.047 | 0.591 | −4.638 | 1.084 | 2.075 |
| Br–BP–Br | 3.467 | 2.087 | — | 1.958 | — | 2.187 | 0.591 | −3.980 | 1.055 | 2.032 |
Calculated elastic constants C11 and C12 (N m−1), 2D Young's modulus Y2D (N m−1), 2D shear modulus G2D (N m−1), and Poisson's ratio ν of the surface-functionalizated BP
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BP | 146.285 | 38.753 | 136.019 | 53.766 | 0.265 |
| Cl–BP–Cl | 104.858 | 18.373 | 101.639 | 43.243 | 0.175 |
| Cl–BP–Br | 102.896 | 19.457 | 99.216 | 41.719 | 0.189 |
| Br–BP–Cl | 101.503 | 26.531 | 94.568 | 37.486 | 0.261 |
| Br–BP–Br | 103.361 | 23.472 | 98.030 | 39.944 | 0.227 |
Fig. 3Polar diagram for Young modulus C2D (a) and Poisson ratio ν (b) of the surface-functionalized BP monolayers.
Fig. 4Band structure and PDOS of PB monolayer.
Fig. 5Calculated band structures of BP monolayer (a) and functionalized BP with Cl and Br (b–e) by the HSE06 method.
Fig. 6Partial density of states (PDOS) of the functionalized BP configurations: (a) Cl–BP–Cl, (b) Cl–BP–Br, (c) Br–BP–Cl, and (d) Br–BP–Br.
Fig. 7Calculated band gaps of pure and functionalized BP monolayers by the PBE and HSE06 methods.
Fig. 8Charge density with isolated 0.04 and atom electron density of: (a and b) BP monolayer, (c and d) Cl–BP–Cl, (e and f) Cl–BP–Br, (g and h) Br–BP–Cl, and (i and j) Br–BP–Br. The density of electrons is from 0 to 0.2e bohr−3.
Mulliken population analysis for the internal charge distribution in surface-functionalized BP monolayer (in unit of e). Cl(Br)B/P indicates the Cl(Br) bonded directly to B/P atom. The charge transfer ΔQ between BP monolayer and Br/Cl species is presented in the last column
| Model | s | p | Total | Charge | Δ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BP | B | 0.98 | 2.48 | 3.45 | −0.45 | — |
| P | 1.35 | 3.20 | 4.55 | +0.45 | ||
| Cl–BP–Cl | ClB | 1.91 | 5.24 | 7.15 | −0.14 | +0.39 |
| B | 0.99 | 2.26 | 3.25 | −0.25 | ||
| P | 1.49 | 2.87 | 4.36 | + 0.64 | ||
| ClP | 1.95 | 5.30 | 7.25 | −0.25 | ||
| Cl–BP–Br | ClB | 1.91 | 5.24 | 7.15 | −0.15 | +0.28 |
| B | 1.00 | 2.22 | 3.22 | −0.23 | ||
| P | 1.53 | 2.96 | 4.49 | +0.51 | ||
| BrP | 1.92 | 5.21 | 7.13 | −0.13 | ||
| Br–BP–Cl | BrB | 1.89 | 5.14 | 7.03 | −0.03 | +0.28 |
| B | 1.04 | 2.31 | 3.35 | −0.35 | ||
| P | 1.50 | 2.87 | 4.37 | +0.63 | ||
| ClP | 1.95 | 5.30 | 7.25 | −0.25 | ||
| Br–BP–Br | BrB | 1.90 | 5.14 | 7.04 | −0.03 | +0.18 |
| B | 1.05 | 2.27 | 3.32 | −0.32 | ||
| P | 1.55 | 2.95 | 4.50 | +0.50 | ||
| BrP | 1.93 | 5.21 | 7.14 | −0.14 |