| Literature DB >> 35423330 |
Timothy McCormick Steeves1, Aaron P Esser-Kahn1.
Abstract
The promise of light-to-chemical energy conversion has led researchers to explore photo-thermal processes for chemical reactivity of nanoparticles. Previous work has examined particles as an element of a supported catalyst, but not as an unsupported nanopowder. We present a preliminary examination of a photo-thermal Sabatier reaction performed on suspended Ni nanoparticles. This new system performs a catalytic Sabatier reaction at lower bulk temperatures than reported for a standard reaction, driven by light. This result occurs only when the particles are suspended freely in a gaseous mixture; implying that particle isolation enhances photo-thermal catalysis. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35423330 PMCID: PMC8695177 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra09939b
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Comparison of our observed efficiencies and recent literature for methanation. Compares efficiency considering our estimate of active catalyst mass, see ESI for estimation details. Note, the high temperature trial was evaluated using a different gas chromatography system with a different calibration
| Source | Catalyst temperature (°C) | Light intensity (kW m−2) | Catalyst | Selectivity | Catalyst efficiency mmol (g h)−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This publication | 170 | 20 | Nickel nanoparticles | At least 99.9% | 0.09 |
| This publication | 100 | 2 | Nickel nanoparticles | At least 99.9% | 0.001 |
| Sastre | 230 | 10.1 | Ruthenium | 52 | |
| O'Brien | 150 | 2.47 | Ruthenium film on inverted silicon opal crystal | 2.8 | |
| Jantarang | 285 | 300 W Xe lamp | Ni on CexTiyO2 supports | Not reported | 17 |
| Jelle | 170 | 22 | Ruthenium on TiO2 nanoparticles | 4.4 | |
| Meng | 365 | 300 W Xe lamp | Ruthenium on alumina support | 99.22 | 18.16 |
Efficiencies of several experiments at different illumination levels. Table summarizes the experimental conditions, measured methane, and resulting efficiencies for variation in time and intensity of illumination and associated controls
| Time (min) | Nickel (g) | Light intensity | mL methane | mmol methane | Unadjusted efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 10.0 | 12 kW m−2 | 7.6 | 0.31 | 0.09 mmol h−1 g−1 |
| 180 | 10.0 | 2 kW m−2 | 0.85 | 0.034 | 0.001 mmol h−1 g−1 |
Fig. 1Photo-thermal Sabatier reaction powered by solar spectrum light with corresponding reactant and product species. On the left is a set of example Gas Chromatography (GC) traces and on the right a symbolic diagram of the reaction set-up. The three GC traces show the peaks that were used to identify reactants, products, and to check for CO as a possible side-product. Traces for both the Flame Ionization Detector (FID) and the Thermal Conductivity Detector (TCD) are shown. The experimental diagram shows the standard set-up for the experiments that follow, the green in the vial indicates where the “active” dispersed particles are in the system.
Fig. 2Comparison of low illumination experimental results and dark heat control. The illuminated trials were compared to a comparable heat control, and the current area used to indicate methane production was compared system to system. The 95% confidence intervals for each treatment are graphed, and the means were determined to be significantly different via unpaired t-test.