| Literature DB >> 35422894 |
Fuding Guo1,2,3,4, Yueyi Wang1,2,3,4, Jun Wang1,2,3,4, Zhihao Liu1,2,3,4, Yanqiu Lai1,2,3,4, Zhen Zhou1,2,3,4, Zihan Liu1,2,3,4, Yuyang Zhou1,2,3,4, Xiao Xu1,2,3,4, Zeyan Li1,2,3,4, Meng Wang1,2,3,4, Fu Yu1,2,3,4, Ruijie Hu1,2,3,4, Liping Zhou1,2,3,4, Hong Jiang1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Choline is a precursor of the major neurotransmitter acetylcholine and has been demonstrated beneficial in diverse models of cardiovascular disease. Here, we sought to verify that choline protects the heart from DOX-induced cardiotoxicity and the underlying mechanisms. The results showed that DOX treatment decreased left ventricular ejection fraction and fractional shortening and increased serum cardiac markers and myocardial fibrosis, which were alleviated by cotreatment with choline. DOX-induced cardiotoxicity was accompanied by increases in oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis, which were rectified by choline cotreatment. Levels of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and heme-oxygenase-1 (HO-1), which are antioxidant markers, were lowered by DOX and upregulated by choline. Moreover, DOX significantly decreased serum acetylcholine levels and the high-frequency component of heart rate variability and increased serum norepinephrine levels and the low-frequency component; these effects were rescued by choline administration. Interestingly, the protective effects of choline could be partially reversed by administration of the muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine. This suggests that choline might be a promising adjunct therapeutic agent to alleviate DOX-induced cardiotoxicity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35422894 PMCID: PMC9005275 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4740931
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1Schematic protocol for rat treatments and echocardiography. (a) Study procedure of each group. (b) The survival curves were shown (n = 10-15 per group). (c) Representative echocardiography images of rats from various groups. (d–g) LVEF%, FS%, LVIDs, and LVIDd were assessed by echocardiography. n = 6. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, and∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. LVEF%: left ventricular ejection fraction; FS: fractional shortening; LVIDs: left ventricular internal dimension in systole; LVIDd: left ventricular internal dimension in diastole.
Figure 2Effect of choline treatment on cardiac injury and fibrosis in DOX-treated rat hearts. (a) Typical images of H&E staining; n = 6; bar = 20 μm. (b–d) Serum CK, CK-MB, and LDH levels were measured at the end of the experiment; n = 6. (e) Myocardium stained with Masson. (f) Quantitative analysis of the trichrome-positive area/total area; n = 4; bar = 50 μm. ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, and∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. CK: creatine kinase; CK-MB: creatine kinase myocardial isoenzyme; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase.
Figure 3Effect of choline treatment on oxidative stress parameters. (a–f) SOD activity, GSH-PX activity, MDA level, H2O2 level, CAT activity, and GSH activity were measured; n = 6. (g) Western blotting bands for HO-1 and Nrf2; (h, i) Quantitative results of HO-1 and Nrf2; n = 4. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, and∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. SOD: superoxide dismutase; GSH-PX: glutathione peroxidase; MDA: malondialdehyde; H2O2: hydrogen peroxide; CAT: catalase; GSH: glutathione; HO-1: heme-oxygenase-1; Nrf2: nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2.
Figure 4Effect of choline treatment on proinflammatory factors in cardiac tissue. (a–c) IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α levels were measured in cardiac tissue; n = 6. (d) Immunofluorescence of IL-6 in cardiac tissue; bar = 50 μm. (e) Quantitative analysis of the fold change in IL-6; n = 4. ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, and∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. IL-6: interleukin-6; IL-1β: interleukin-1β; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor alpha.
Figure 5Effect of choline treatment on apoptosis in cardiac tissue. (a) TUNEL staining; bar = 50 μm. (b) Quantitative analysis of the positive apoptotic cells (%); n = 4. (c) Western blotting bands for Bcl-2, c-caspase 3 and Bax. (d–g) Quantitative results of Bcl-2, c-caspase 3, Bax, and Bcl-2/Bax; n = 4. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, and∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.
Figure 6Measurement of cardiac autonomic tone. (a–c) LF power, HF power, LF/HF, and absolute values of the LF/HF ratio; n = 6. (d) Serum Ach level; n = 6. (e) Serum NE level; n = 6. ∗∗P < 0.01 and∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. LF: low-frequency; HF: high-frequency; Ach: acetylcholine; NE: norepinephrine.
Figure 7Effect of cholinergic signaling pathways on oxidative stress and inflammation. (a) Serum SOD activity. (b, c) SOD and MDA levels in cardiac tissue; n = 6. (d) Immunofluorescence of ROS expression in cardiac tissue; bar = 50 μm. (e) Quantitative analysis of ROS expression; n = 6. (f) IL-6 and IL-β levels in cardiac tissue; n = 6. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, and∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. SOD: superoxide dismutase; MDA: malondialdehyde; ROS: reactive oxygen species; IL-6: interleukin-6; IL-1β: interleukin-1β.