Treatment of rituximab in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a case series and literature review.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a major cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of rituximab (RTX) in patients with idiopathic MN (iMN) who have a high risk of progression.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of 13 patients with iMN, who received RTX treatments from January 2014 to July 2020. RTX was indicated in patients with iMN with severe proteinuria and decreasing estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in the previous 6 months despite other immunosuppressive therapies.
RESULTS: The patients were predominantly males (n = 11) and with a mean age of 55.3 years; median eGFR, 37.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 (interquartile range [IQR], 26.3 to 66.5); serum albumin level, 2.6 g/dL (IQR, 1.9 to 3.1); and spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio at baseline, 6.6 g/g (IQR, 5.7 to 12.9). In a median follow-up of 22 months, eight patients (61.5%) achieved complete or partial remission. In responder group (n = 8), median eGFR increased from 31.5 to 61.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.049) and serum albumin level increased from 2.3 to 4.2 g/dL (p = 0.017) from RTX initiation to last follow-up. Antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibody (anti-PLA2R-Ab) was positive in six among seven tested patients, which markedly decreased in the responder group. There were no adverse events after RTX.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that RTX is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with iMN who have a high risk of progression. Individualized therapy based on anti-PLA2R-Ab titer would be needed for better outcomes.

Graphical abstract

INTRODUCTION

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults [1] characterized by the deposition of immune complexes in subepithelial space that result in the thickening of the glomerular basement membrane [2]. Idiopathic MN (iMN) accounts for 80% of all MN cases [3]. Secondary MN (sMN), mainly caused by infection, neoplasm, autoimmune disease, and drugs, causes the other 20% [3].

iMN is associated with autoantibodies mainly against the podocyte antigen M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) [4]. In approximately 70% to 80% of patients with iMN, anti-PLA2R antibody (anti-PLA2R-Ab) is found in serum [4]. PLA2R in kidney tissue is also detected in patients with iMN. Therefore, the presence of serum anti-PLA2R-Ab and histological PLA2R in kidney tissue strongly suggests iMN [5,6].

Regarding prognosis, the achievement of remission is highly important for improving renal and patient survival [7]. Similarly, relapse or persistence of proteinuria is a negative prognostic factor on renal survival [8].

The treatment of MN begins with supportive care with use of diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and lipid-lowering agents aimed to control edema, blood pressure, or other complications of nephrotic syndrome. However, even with the best supportive therapy, full-blown nephrotic syndrome is difficult to control, especially in patients with multiple risk factors for progression, which influences prognosis; these factors include the degree of proteinuria and kidney function, lower molecular weight proteinuria, and the levels of anti-PLA2R-Ab. Immunosuppressive (IS) therapy should only be started in subgroups with a higher risk for progression to determine the optimal balance between benefit and harm, especially due to the side effects of conventional IS agents including steroids, cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide.

Understanding of the pathogenesis of iMN leads to the development of B-cell targeting therapy [9,10]. Rituximab (RTX), a monoclonal antibody against the CD20 antigen present in B lymphocytes, has been used as alternative to the abovementioned IS agents [11]. Since the first clinical study by Remuzzi et al. [12], it has been raised as a promising therapy for iMN. Based on previous studies, the average remission rate of proteinuria after RTX treatment is more than 65% to 90% using different treatment schedules [13]. However, the outcomes were mainly derived from Caucasian patients and it seems to be affected by ethnicity or genetic background as well as a different treatment protocol. From a Chinese study by Wang et al. [14], RTX has induced complete or partial remission in 41.7% of nonresponsive patients with iMN, but it was limited by a small sample size and nonunified protocol. A treatment protocol modified for Asian or Korean patients remains to be established.

Here, we describe our experience in treating patients with RTX in iMN who had severe proteinuria and failed to respond to prior IS therapies from a single-center university-based tertiary hospital in Korea with a literature review.

METHODS

Patients

Fifteen patients with iMN and severe proteinuria were treated with RTX in the Kyungpook National University Hospital from January 2014 to July 2020. We excluded one patient with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at initial treatment and one patient treated with RTX as a first IS agent. We included patients (n = 13) who met the following criteria: biopsy-proven iMN; age of at least 18 years; severe proteinuria (≥ 4 g/day); and failure to respond to prior IS agents including cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid. All patients received RTX as a rescue therapy. Appropriate serological investigations were conducted for all patients with MN to exclude viral or bacterial infection, autoimmune diseases, and malignancy. Anti-nuclear antibody, anti-dsDNA antibody, complements, hepatitis B surface antige and, anti-hepatitis C virus antibody, venereal disease research laboratory test, human immunodeficiency virus Ag/Ab, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were negative in all patients. Drug-related sMN was excluded by reviewing the medical history of the patient. Gastrointestinal endoscopy and radiological investigations, such as abdominal computed tomography or ultrasound, were performed on our patients to rule out malignancy.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kyungpook National University Hospital (IRB No. 2020–07–034). Written informed consent by the patients was waived due to a retrospective nature of this study.

Treatment protocol and follow-up

Treatment of RTX is not covered by the Korean Health Insurance System, and it was used only as off-labeled after approval from the Korean Food and Drug Administration. Therefore, we have established this treatment protocol based on both the efficacy from previous studies with different protocols and the cost. This administration protocol mainly consists of one cycle of two RTX intravenous infusions of 375 mg/m2 at a 2-week interval. However, due to the retrospective nature of this study, the exact doses were determined by the judgment of each physician in charge of the patients.

RTX infusion was always preceded by the administration of methylprednisolone (100 mg intravenously in 100 mL sodium chloride 0.9% over 1 hour, 3 hours prior to RTX), paracetamol (650 mg orally 30 minutes prior to RTX) and fexofenadine (180 mg orally 30 minutes prior to RTX) to prevent possible allergic reactions. RTX was constituted in 5% dextrose 500 mL and was infused at an initial rate of 50 mL/hr, then increased to 100 mL/hr if tolerated. The continued use of other IS agents in each patient depended on the clinical decision of each physician.

The response rate was evaluated up to 71 months (median, 22 months; interquartile range [IQR], 17.0 to 56.0). Clinical and biological data at diagnosis, at RTX initiation, at every 3 months after RTX, and at last follow-up were retrospectively recorded. In each follow-up, we measured proteinuria as spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (PCR), serum creatinine, urea, and albumin. We measured the circulating anti-PLA2R-Abs and the cluster of differentiation 19 (CD19) expressed on the surface of B lymphocytes. For the detection of anti-PLA2R-Abs, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Seoul, Korea) was used. Antibody positivity was indicated by > 14 RU/mL.

Outcome measures

The main outcome measures were the percentage of patients who achieved complete remission or partial remission at 6 months, 12 months, and last follow-up (median, 22 months; IQR, 17.0 to 56.0).

Based on Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2012 guidelines, partial remission in this study was defined as urine PCR < 3.5 g/g with at least a 50% reduction from baseline and stable renal function, and complete remission as urine PCR < 0.3 g/g [15]. Patients who did not meet these values were considered non-responders. Relapse was defined as a recurrence of proteinuria >3.5 g/day after a period of partial or complete remission. Immunologic remission was defined as negative for circulating anti-PLA2R-Ab detection.

Statistical analysis

Data were presented as mean, median (IQR), and percentage as appropriate. For comparison of initial characteristics between responder and non-responder groups, we used a nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test. We analyzed changes of several outcomes before and after RTX in each group using the Wilcoxon tests. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). For this analysis, a p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics

The baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The mean age is 55.3 years (range, 42 to 75). Most patients were males (11 males, two females). The most frequent comorbidities at baseline were hypertension (46.2%), dyslipidemia (30.8%), diabetes mellitus (15.4%), and cerebrovascular accident (7.7%). The median time from renal biopsy to RTX initiation was 26.0 months (IQR, 11.0 to 64.5). The median eGFR, serum albumin level, and spot urine PCR at baseline were 37.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR, 26.3 to 66.5), 2.6 g/dL (IQR, 1.9 to 3.1), and 6.6 g/g (IQR, 5.7 to 12.9), respectively. The median total cholesterol was 259.0 mg/dL (IQR, 188.0 to 312.5). CRP was within the normal range. The median CRP levels at baseline were 0.1 mg/dL (IQR, 0.1 to 0.3). The median percentage of CD19 cells was 14.4% (IQR, 10.4 to 20.3). However, CD19 of only nine patients was measured at baseline.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients (n = 13)

Characteristic	Value
Age, yra	55.3 (42–75)
Sex, male/female	11/2
Comorbid disease
HTN	6 (46.2)
Dyslipidemia	4 (30.8)
DM	2 (15.4)
CVA	1 (7.7)
TRB, mo	26.0 (11.0–64.5)
BMI, kg/m2	24.7 (23.3–25.9)
WBC, 10e3/μL	6.4 (5.2–9.4)
Hb, g/dL	10.9 (9.8–12.3)
AST, U/L	22.0 (15.0–31.5)
ALT, U/L	16.0 (13.0–27.0)
Total protein, g/dL	5.1 (4.1–5.9)
Albumin, g/dL	2.6 (1.9–3.1)
BUN, mg/dL	26.8 (18.0–33.4)
Cr, mg/dL	1.7 (1.1–2.1)
eGFR (MDRD), mL/min/1.73 m2	37.0 (26.3–66.5)
Spot urine PCR, g/g	6.6 (5.7–12.9)
Total cholesterol, mg/dL	259.0 (188.0–312.5)
CRP, mg/dL	0.1 (0.1–0.3)
Anti-PLA2R-IgG, positive/negativeb	6/1
Anti-PLA2R-IgG, titer, RU/mL	80.1 (45.1–428.9)
CD19, %c	14.4 (10.4–20.3)
ARB	12/13 (92.3)
Previous immunosuppressants
Mycophenolate mofetil + steroid	3/13 (23.1)
Cyclosporine + steroid	10/13 (76.9)
Cyclophosphamide	0

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%).

HTN, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; TRB, time from renal biopsy; BMI, body mass index; WBC, white blood cell; Hb, hemoglobin; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cr, creatinine; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease; PCR, protein-to-creatinine ratio; CRP, C-reactive protein; PLA2R, phospholipase A2 receptor; IgG, immunoglobulin G; CD19, cluster of differentiation 19; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker.

Mean age.

Data of only 7 of 13 patients are reported.

Data of only 9 of 13 patients are reported.

ARBs were administered to all patients as conservative care before RTX treatment except in Patient 4. RTX was used in patients who were refractory or experienced relapse after IS therapy. All patients received prednisone combined with cyclosporine or mycophenolate mofetil for at least 6 months (Tables 1 and 2). Three of them received mycophenolate mofetil plus steroid and the remaining patients, cyclosporine plus steroid. Of 13 patients, three (Patients 6, 9, and 11) achieved partial remission or complete remission by other immunosuppressants but subsequently relapsed.

Table 2

Patients’ characteristics at rituximab initiation and follow-up

No.	Sex	Age, yr	Previous IS	Time, mo	sCr, mg/dL	eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2	sAlb, g/dL	uPCR, g/g				Anti-PLA2R-Ab level, RU/mL	Histology			RTX to last FU
				Bx to RTX				uPCR, baseline	uPCR, 6 mo	uPCR, 12 mo	uPCR, last FU		MN stage	TAa	IFa
1	M	57	S, M	7	2.3	25.5	1.5	12.7	6.9	4.2	1.2	NA	II	2	0	61
2	M	53	S, C	9	0.8	95.6	1.4	8.4	1.3	4.9	0.1	NA	I	0	0	71
3	F	56	S, M	63	1.7	27.0	4.2	5.8	0.7	1.1	1.4	NA	NA	0	0	28
4	M	63	S, M	13	2.0	34.0	2.6	6.5	6.3	3.7	0.4	NA	II	2	2	43
5	M	47	S, C	40	2.7	25.1	2.2	6.3	2.3	4.5	4.2	NA	NA	NA	1	55
6	M	50	S, C	132	1.9	37.0	1.8	13.8	5.6	3.6	1.3	NA	IV	1	NA	57
7	M	42	S, C	20	1.2	66.0	2.8	4.1	5.0	4.0	5.8	272.9	II	NA	NA	22
8	M	63	S, C	44	2.2	22.0	3.6	6.6	3.5	1.1	0.5	97.3	II	0	0	21
9	M	75	S, C	66	1.8	29.0	2.0	13.1	1.9	0.5	2.9	46.1	NA	0	0	22
10	M	58	S, C	26	1.5	48.0	3.2	4.0	8.2	3.4	3.6	62.8	II–III	1	1	19
11	F	54	S, C	86	0.7	67.0	3.0	5.6	0.1	0.1	0.1	41.9	III–IV	2	2	15
12	M	46	S, C	5	1.0	81.0	2.6	13.6	5.5	6.2	6.2	896.7	II–III	0	0	15
13	M	55	S, C	16	1.2	61.0	2.2	10.9	3.9	NA	3.9	Negative	III–IV	1	1	7

IS, immunosuppressant; Bx, biopsy; RTX, rituximab; sCr, serum creatinine; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; sAlb, serum albumin; uPCR, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio; FU, follow-up; PLA2R-Ab, phospholipase A2 receptor antibody; MN, membranous nephropathy; TA, tubular atrophy; IF, interstitial fibrosis; S, steroid; M, mycophenolate mofetil; C, cyclosporine; NA, not available.

Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy scores are classified as follows: 0, absent; 1 (mild), < 25%; 2 (moderate), 25%–50%; and 3 (severe), > 50% of the total area.

Histological results (degree of tubular atrophy or interstitial fibrosis and MN stage) are shown in Table 2. Specific information about patients who underwent renal biopsy before transferring from other hospitals was not obtained.

Responder and non-responder groups

Comparison of baseline characteristics between responders and non-responders to RTX are described in Table 3, showing no significant difference. Responders had lower eGFR (31.5 vs. 61.0, p = 0.380) and higher urine PCR (7.5 vs. 6.3, p = 0.380) than non-responders.

Table 3

Comparison between responders and non-responders

Characteristic	Responders (n = 8)	Non-responders (n = 5)	p value
Age, yr	56.5 (53.3–63.0)	47.0 (44.0–56.5)	0.079
eGFR (MDRD), mL/min/1.73 m2	31.5 (25.9–59.5)	61.0 (36.6–73.5)	0.380
Serum albumin, g/dL	2.3 (1.6–3.5)	2.6 (2.2–3.0)	0.607
Serum total cholesterol, mg/dL	272.0 (218.3–302.0)	217.0 (159.5–349.0)	0.942
Spot urine PCR, g/g	7.5 (6.0–13.0)	6.3 (4.1–12.2)	0.380
TRB, mo	53.5 (10.0–81.0)	20.0 (10.5–33.0)	0.242
Anti-PLA2R-IgG, titer RU/mL	46.1 (44.0–71.7)	272.9 (167.9–584.8)	0.157

Values are presented as median (interquartile range).

eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease; PCR, protein-to-creatinine ratio; TRB, time from renal biopsy; PLA2R, phospholipase A2 receptor; IgG, immunoglobulin G.

Change of outcomes after rituximab treatment

Total median follow-up duration from RTX treatment to the last follow-up was 22 months (IQR, 17.0 to 56.0). By 6 months, 38.5% have achieved complete or partial remission. Except Patient 13 who had a short follow-up duration, 33.3% patients achieved complete or partial remission by 12 months (8.3% of complete and 25% of partial remission).

Only two patients relapsed 12 months after the initial RTX therapy. Patient 2, who refused additional second infusion of RTX, experienced partial remission at 6 months (spot urine PCR 1.3 g/g and eGFR 98.3 mL/min/1.73 m2) after only one infusion of RTX. However, he relapsed at 12 months. Spot urine PCR increased to 4.9 g/g and eGFR decreased to 87.9 mL/min/1.73 m2. Consequently, he underwent an additional cycle (two infusions) of RTX and achieved a sustained complete remission. Patient 5 had partial remission at 6 months. At 12 months, spot urine PCR increased from 2.3 to 4.5 g/g and eGFR slightly decreased from 33.3 to 30.0 mL/min/1.73 m2. Serum anti-PLA2R-Ab at RTX was not measured in these patients because this assay technique was not introduced at our center until then. However, in the years following RTX administrations, anti-PLA2R-Ab titer proved negative in these two patients.

At the last follow-up, total response (complete or partial remission) occurred in eight patients (61.5%): Two (15.4%) achieved complete response and six (46.2%) achieved a partial response. Fig. 1 shows a change in outcomes from baseline to 6 months and from baseline to last follow-up between the two groups. In the responder group, the median spot urine PCR decreased from 7.5 g/g (IQR, 6.0 to 13.0) to 2.7 g/g (IQR, 0.9 to 6.1) (p = 0.012) for 6 months and 7.5 g/g (IQR, 6.0 to 13.0) to 0.8 g/g (IQR, 0.2 to 1.4) (p = 0.012) for follow-up duration. The median eGFR increased from 31.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR, 25.9 to 59.5) to 50.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR, 35.0 to 64.3) (p = 0.028) for 6 months and 31.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR, 25.9 to 59.5) to 61.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR, 41.8 to 79.8) (p = 0.049) for follow-up duration. The median serum albumin increased from 2.3 g/dL (IQR, 1.6 to 3.5) to 3.6 g/dL (IQR, 2.7 to 4.1) (p = 0.017) for 6 months and from 2.3 g/dL (IQR, 1.6 to 3.5) to 4.2 g/dL (IQR, 4.1 to 4.4) (p = 0.017) for follow-up duration. The median total cholesterol decreased from 272.0 mg/dL (IQR, 218.3 to 302.0) to 193.5 mg/dL (IQR, 142.5 to 224.8) (p = 0.017) for 6 months and from 272.0 mg/dL (IQR, 218.3 to 302.0) to 144.0 mg/dL (IQR, 137.5 to 152.5) (p = 0.012) for follow-up duration. In the non-responder group, changes in spot urine PCR, eGFR, serum albumin, and total cholesterol from RTX to 6 months or from RTX therapy to the last follow-up were not considered significant. None of the 13 patients are currently undergoing renal replacement therapy such as dialysis or kidney transplantation (KT).

Figure 1

Changes in outcomes between the (A) responder and (B) non-responder groups. Data are presented as median (IQR). PCR, protein-to-creatinine ratio; RTX, rituximab; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; NS, not significant (p > 0.05).

Changes in antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibody

Only seven patients (Patients 7–13) had data for serum anti-PLA2R-Ab titer when they were treated with RTX; only Patient 13 had a negative serum anti-PLA2R-Ab level (Table 2), whereas the other six patients had a positive anti-PLA2R-Ab titer (median titer, 80.1 RU/mL; IQR, 45.1 to 428.9) and showed a decreasing trend of antibody titer from RTX initiation to the last follow-up. In all six patients with positive anti-PLA2R-Ab at baseline, the average rate of decrease in antibody titer was 78.3% (Fig. 2), and among these, Patients 8, 9, and 11 achieved immunologic remission. In Patient 7, the titer decreased at 3 months and then increased slightly again at 12 months but as a result, the titer at last follow-up decreased when compared to the baseline. On the contrary, urine PCR of Patient 7 was decreased from 6.1 g/g at 3 months to 4.0 g/g at 12 months. Patients 1–6 were not tested for anti-PLA2R-Ab at RTX initiation, but they were serologically negative during follow-up.

Figure 2

Changes in antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibody (anti-PLA2R-Ab) of each patient.

We also examined PLA2R glomerular staining in biopsy sample specimens in four patients only due to availability. All patients with positive serum anti-PLA2R-Ab had a positive PLA2R staining. A representative example is shown in Fig. 3.

Figure 3

Phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) detected in a representative biopsy specimen through glomerular staining (×400).

Adverse effects

All patients who received RTX did not show any adverse effects such as tachycardia and flushing. RTX was administered over approximately 5.5 hours. Vital signs were monitored every 30 minutes during the first hour, then every 60 minutes for infusion, and every 4 hours after administration of RTX during hospitalization. Infusion-related toxicity or side effects were also closely monitored. All patients were discharged at least 18 hours after receiving RTX. During the entire follow-up, there were no side effects such as infection, leucopenia, or cancer.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of RTX treatment in patients with iMN who were refractory or relapsed after treatment with other IS agents in a case series. RTX treatment achieved complete or partial remission in 38.5% of patients in 6 months and 61.5% in the last follow-up with no significant safety issues.

Treatment outcomes, standard doses, and protocol of RTX treatment varied between countries and hospital units. In addition, relevant data of RTX for Asian patients have been scarce, despite the recent KDIGO recommendation for RTX in patients with iMN [15]. Therefore, we comparatively reviewed the results of RTX treatment from previous studies, including studies from Asia in Table 4.

Table 4

Study characteristics and clinical outcomes of rituximab-treated patients with membranous nephropathy in the literature

Study	No.	Nationality	RTX protocol	Previous IS	Renal function before RTX	Proteinuria before RTX	FU median, mo	CR	PR	T	SAE
Ruggenenti et al. (2012) [16]	100	Italy	4 weekly (375 mg/m2)	None (n = 68); IS (n = 32)	Median Cr 1.2 mg/dL	Median 9.1 g/day	29	27/100	38/100	65/100	None
Fiorentino et al. (2016) [17]	13	Italy	4 weekly (375 mg/m2)	None	Median Cr 1.1 mg/dL	Median 5.4 g/day	12	15/38	14/38	29/38	None
	25		4 weekly (375 mg/m2)	IS	Median Cr 1.1 mg/dL	Median 6.3 g/day	25				None
Dahan et al. (2017) [18]	37	France	NIAT and 2 weekly (375 mg/m2)	None	Median Cr 1.1 mg/dL	Median PCR 7.7 g/g	17	7/37	14/37	24/37	8
	38		NIAT alone	None	Median Cr 1.0 mg/dL	Median PCR 7.2 g/g	17	1/38	12/38	13/38	8
Wang et al. (2018) [14]	36	China	375 mg/m2 3 (n = 7); 375 mg/m2 2 (n = 11); 375 mg/m2 1 (n = 3); 375 mg/m2 4 (n = 15)	IS	Mean Cr 2.1 mg/dL	Mean 12.3 g/day	12	2/36	13/36	15/36	1
Hanset et al. (2019) [19]	13	France, Belgium	2 weekly (375 mg/m2) or 2 RTX infusions of 1 g/day 2 weeks apart	IS (n = 6)	Mean eGFR 18 ± 7 mL/min/1.73 m2	Mean 13.2 g/day	17.8	NA	NA	9/13	4

RTX, rituximab; IS, immunosuppressants; FU, follow-up; CR, complete remission; PR, partial remission; T, total (complete remission and partial remission); SAE, serious adverse event; Cr, creatinine; NIAT, nonimmunosuppressive antiproteinuric treatment; PCR, protein-to-creatinine ratio; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; NA, not available.

Ruggenenti et al. [16] showed clinical outcomes of RTX treatment in 100 patients with iMN. Of them, 68 patients were treated with RTX as first-line therapy and 32 patients with RTX as second-line therapy for other immunosuppressants. In all patients, the median creatinine and median proteinuria before RTX were 1.2 mg/dL and 9.1 g/day, respectively. RTX (375 mg/m2) was administered weekly for 4 consecutive weeks. After the first infusion of RTX, patients with over five circulating B-cells per mm3 received a second infusion. In a median follow-up duration of 29 months, 65 patients (65%) achieved complete or partial remission. Treatment-related serious adverse effects were not observed.

Fiorentino et al. [17] included 38 patients with iMN treated with RTX, of which 13 received RTX as first-line therapy, and the remaining 25 who received RTX as second-line therapy. RTX (375 mg/m2) was administered by intravenous infusion weekly for 4 consecutive weeks. In both groups, baseline median serum creatinine was 1.1 mg/dL. Median 24-hour proteinuria was 5.4 g in the first-line group and 6.3 g in the second-line group. Complete remission was achieved by 15 patients (39.5%), and partial remission was achieved by 14 patients (36.8%) during a median follow-up duration of 15 months. Serious adverse event data were not reported.

Besides earlier observational studies, more recent randomized controlled trials with RTX have shown positive results of RTX. Dahan et al. [18] randomly allocated patients to nonimmunosuppressive antiproteinuric treatment (NIAT) plus RTX administration (375 mg/m2) at day 1 and 8 or NIAT alone after 6 months of non-IS treatment. In NIAT plus RTX, median serum creatinine and median urine PCR at baseline were 1.1 mg/dL and 7.7 g/g, respectively. In the only NIAT group, median serum creatinine and median urine PCR were 1.0 mg/dL and 7.2 g/g, respectively. Remission rates were higher in NIAT plus RTX (64.9%) group than only NIAT group (34.2%) (p < 0.01). The rates of anti-PLA2R-Ab depletion were higher in the NIAT plus RTX than NIAT groups at 3 months (56% vs. 4.3%) and 6 months (50% vs. 12%). In each group, eight serious adverse events were developed.

Wang et al. [14] has shown the efficacy and safety of RTX in 36 Chinese patients who were nonresponsive to prior immunosuppressants. According to the physician’s discretion, 36 patients were managed with RTX. Baseline mean creatinine and proteinuria in 36 patients were 2.1 mg/dL and 12.3 g/day, respectively. During follow-up (median, 12 months), 15 of 36 patients (41.7%) achieved partial (n = 13, 36.1%) or complete (n = 2, 5.6%) response to RTX. Only one patient experienced severe adverse events.

With a limited use of IS agents in patients with decreased renal function with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, Hanset et al. [19] described the outcome of RTX treatment in an advanced stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in 13 patients with PLA2R-associated MN at stage 4 or 5 CKD treated with RTX. The regimen consisted of either 2-weekly doses of 375 mg/m2 or two RTX infusions of 1 g/day at a 2-week interval. The treatment protocol was repeated as needed to induce PLA2R-Ab complete depletion. The mean eGFR and urinary protein at RTX initiation were 18 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 13.2 g/day, respectively. Over a median follow-up period of 17.8 months, nine of 13 patients achieved complete or partial remission. Immunological remission occurred in 10 patients, but one of them required chronic hemodialysis. Three patients experienced severe adverse events.

Yoon et al. [20] reported the experience of using RTX in two previously treated patients with combinations of IS agents. Because previous immunosuppressant agents were nonresponsive, both patients received two cycles of RTX for the following treatment. One cycle of RTX consisted of 1 g infusion on days 1 and 15. In both cases, their proteinuria decreased and partial remission was achieved without side effects.

Compared with previous studies, in this study, the total remission rate (61.5%) was relatively lower, except that of Wang et al. [14]. It is probably because all patients in our cases had severe proteinuria greater than equal to 4 g/day and lower eGFR compared with other previous studies. Furthermore, the condition of all patients worsened despite previous IS therapy prior to initiation of RTX. A high level of proteinuria at RTX therapy and resistance to other immunosuppressants indicate poor renal outcome and high disease activity of MN. Some patients had a score of at least 2 in the tubular atrophy or interstitial fibrosis core. A higher score is associated with worse baseline eGFR and poor renal outcome. In addition, the higher score of tubular atrophy or interstitial fibrosis score, the more likely it is to not respond to RTX.

A lower dose of RTX than that used in other studies may partly be the reason for a lower response rate. Few data on RTX dosing protocol for iMN in Asian patients are available. We adopted a lower dose of RTX based on a previous study in KT, which showed similar effectiveness for a lower dose of RTX in ABO-incompatible KT [21]. Moreover, the cost of RTX treatment is not covered by the National Health Insurance system for MN treatment in Korea. Remission rate of 61.5% is not too low considering that all patients had high risk of progression. Further studies are necessary to provide a strategy for more cost-effective RTX therapy than the standard regimen, especially in the Asian population.

Although side effects have been reported in other studies, a generally good tolerability of RTX is demonstrated in our study with no side effects related to RTX in all patients. This may also be related to the lower dose and 2-week interval of our protocol. RTX is more expensive compared with other therapies for iMN in Korea because of the lack of insurance coverage. If we treat a patient with MN weighing 60 kg for 6 months, we assume that the dose of each IS administration for 6 months is set as in KDIGO guidelines. Treatment with cyclophosphamide is the least expensive. The cost of mycophenolate mofetil treatment is approximately 12-fold higher than cyclophosphamide, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are approximately 23 to 25-fold higher, and RTX is 37-fold higher than cyclophosphamide. RTX, though expensive on its own, may be potentially more cost-effective and safe than other IS agents [22]. Other IS drugs, especially cyclophosphamide, increase the risk of infection, malignancy, and bone marrow suppression, and CNIs have a risk of renal dysfunction. In view of side effects associated with other immunosuppressants, RTX is superior to other IS drugs. When using RTX, high acquisition cost might be offset by lower adverse events and higher response rates than using other immunosuppressants. RTX also reduced oral pill-burden compared to other IS therapies.

Anti-PLA2R-Ab is a specific marker for iMN [23,24]. Anti-PLA2R-Ab titers have a significant correlation with iMN activity and could also be useful in the prediction of disease outcome [25]. Serial monitoring of anti-PLA2R-Ab appears to be helpful in evaluating the response for RTX and determining the timing of retreatment with RTX. RTX therapy leads to a decline in serum anti-PLA2R-Ab [26]. In other words, RTX can help achieve complete immunological remission. It suggests that patients with a higher titer of anti-PLA2R-Ab might benefit from higher doses of RTX. It is necessary to modify the RTX doses according to the anti-PLA2R-Ab titer. However, not all patients with MN are positive for anti-PLA2R-Ab; therefore, efforts to find other antibodies such as anti-thrombospondin type 1 domain-containing 7A (THSD7A) should be continued.

This study has several limitations. This is a retrospective study with a small number of patients. The total RTX dose derived from body surface area was not equal in all patients. In addition, this study was short to capture long-term side effects of RTX. Furthermore, we are unable to collect sufficient baseline data such as histologic characteristic, CD19, and anti-PLA2R-Ab. Another limitation of this study is the lack of information on changes in peripheral blood CD19/20+ B-cell counts following treatment with RTX.

After the discovery of PLA2R as the target antigen in iMN, THSD7A, neural epithelial growth factor-like 1-protein, protocadherin-7, and exotosin1/exotosin2 were also characterized as causative antigens for MN. We could not measure the antibodies to these antigens due to the limitation of commercialized detection techniques for these antigens.

In conclusion, in Korean patients with iMN who are refractory to other IS agents, RTX induces clinical remission in 61.5% of high-risk iMN without adverse effects. Individualized therapy plan including dose or timing of RTX based on anti-PLA2R-Ab and B-cell counts might be needed to prolong the remission status or reduce relapse in iMN.

1. Immunosuppressive therapy is indicated for patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) with high risk of progression.

2. Rituximab can induce clinical and immunological remission in patients with iMN with resistance to other immunosuppressants.

3. Antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibodies can be used as a marker to evaluate disease activity in iMN and as a guide for treatment schedules.