Literature DB >> 35421224

Age and Framing Effects in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task.

Adam T Schulman1, Amy W Chong1, Corinna E Löckenhoff1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Prior research has documented age differences in risky decisions and indicates that they are susceptible to gain versus loss framing. However, previous studies focused on "decisions from description" that explicitly spell out the probabilities involved. The present study expands this literature by examining the effects of framing on age differences in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), a widely used and ecologically valid measure of experience-based risky decision making that involves pumping a virtual balloon.
METHODS: In a preregistered study, younger (aged 18-30, n = 129) and older adults (aged 60 and older, n = 125) were randomly assigned to either a gain version of the BART, where pumping the balloon added monetary gains, or a loss version, where pumping the balloon avoided monetary losses.
RESULTS: We found a significant age by frame interaction on risk-taking: in the loss frame, older adults pumped more frequently and experienced more popped balloons than younger adults, whereas in the gain frame no significant age differences were found. Total performance on the BART did not vary by age or frame. Supplementary analyses indicated that age differences in pumping rates were most pronounced at the beginning of the BART and leveled off in subsequent trials. Controlling for age differences in motivation, personality, and cognition did not account for age differences in risk-taking. DISCUSSION: In combination, findings suggest that age differences in risk-taking on the BART are more pronounced when the task context emphasizes avoiding losses rather than achieving gains.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision making; Emotion; Risk perception; Time perception

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35421224      PMCID: PMC9535780          DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbac060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci        ISSN: 1079-5014            Impact factor:   4.942


  33 in total

1.  Aging, emotion, and health-related decision strategies: motivational manipulations can reduce age differences.

Authors:  Corinna E Löckenhoff; Laura L Carstensen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2007-03

Review 2.  Prevalence of Financial Fraud and Scams Among Older Adults in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  David Burnes; Charles R Henderson; Christine Sheppard; Rebecca Zhao; Karl Pillemer; Mark S Lachs
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Positive messages enhance older adults' motivation and recognition memory for physical activity programmes.

Authors:  Nanna Notthoff; Peter Klomp; Friederike Doerwald; Susanne Scheibe
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2016-03-09

4.  Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty.

Authors:  Renata M Heilman; Liviu G Crişan; Daniel Houser; Mircea Miclea; Andrei C Miu
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2010-04

5.  Processing speed and memory mediate age-related differences in decision making.

Authors:  Debra E Henninger; David J Madden; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-06

6.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Age differences in the effect of framing on risky choice: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ryan Best; Neil Charness
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-06-22

8.  Age differences in risky choice: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rui Mata; Anika K Josef; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  "You're perfect for the procedure! Why don't you want it?" Elderly arthritis patients' unwillingness to consider total joint arthroplasty surgery: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Pamela L Hudak; Jocalyn P Clark; Gillian A Hawker; Peter C Coyte; Nizar N Mahomed; Hans J Kreder; James G Wright
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Affect dynamics, affective forecasting, and aging.

Authors:  Lisbeth Nielsen; Brian Knutson; Laura L Carstensen
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2008-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.