Literature DB >> 35421079

Surveillance to Track Progress Toward Polio Eradication - Worldwide, 2020-2021.

Amanda L Wilkinson, Ousmane M Diop, Jaume Jorba, Tracie Gardner, Cynthia J Snider, Jamal Ahmed.   

Abstract

Since the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) was established in 1988, the number of reported poliomyelitis cases worldwide has declined by approximately 99.99%. By the end of 2021, wild poliovirus (WPV) remained endemic in only two countries (Pakistan and Afghanistan). However, a WPV type 1 (WPV1) case with paralysis onset in 2021, was reported by Malawi a year after the World Health Organization (WHO) African Region (AFR) was certified as WPV-free and circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV) cases were reported from 31 countries during 2020-2021 (1,2). cVDPVs are oral poliovirus vaccine-derived viruses that can emerge after prolonged circulation in populations with low immunity and cause paralysis. The primary means of detecting poliovirus transmission is through surveillance for acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) among persons aged <15 years, with confirmation through stool specimen testing by WHO-accredited laboratories, supplemented by systematic sampling of sewage and testing for the presence of poliovirus (environmental surveillance). The COVID-19 pandemic caused disruptions in polio vaccination and surveillance activities across WHO regions in 2020; during January-September 2020, the number of reported cases of AFP declined and the interval between stool collection and receipt by laboratories increased compared with the same period in 2019 (3). This report summarizes surveillance performance indicators for 2020 and 2021 in 43 priority countries* and updates previous reports (4). In 2021, a total of 32 (74%) priority countries† met two key surveillance performance indicator targets nationally, an improvement from 2020 when only 23 (53%) met both targets; however, substantial national and subnational gaps persist. High-performing poliovirus surveillance is critical to tracking poliovirus transmission. Frequent monitoring of surveillance indicators could help identify gaps, guide improvements, and enhance the overall sensitivity and timelines of poliovirus detection to successfully achieve polio eradication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35421079      PMCID: PMC9020859          DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7115a2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


Since the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) was established in 1988, the number of reported poliomyelitis cases worldwide has declined by approximately 99.99%. By the end of 2021, wild poliovirus (WPV) remained endemic in only two countries (Pakistan and Afghanistan). However, a WPV type 1 (WPV1) case with paralysis onset in 2021, was reported by Malawi a year after the World Health Organization (WHO) African Region (AFR) was certified as WPV-free and circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV) cases were reported from 31 countries during 2020–2021 (,). cVDPVs are oral poliovirus vaccine-derived viruses that can emerge after prolonged circulation in populations with low immunity and cause paralysis. The primary means of detecting poliovirus transmission is through surveillance for acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) among persons aged <15 years, with confirmation through stool specimen testing by WHO-accredited laboratories, supplemented by systematic sampling of sewage and testing for the presence of poliovirus (environmental surveillance). The COVID-19 pandemic caused disruptions in polio vaccination and surveillance activities across WHO regions in 2020; during January–September 2020, the number of reported cases of AFP declined and the interval between stool collection and receipt by laboratories increased compared with the same period in 2019 (). This report summarizes surveillance performance indicators for 2020 and 2021 in 43 priority countries* and updates previous reports (). In 2021, a total of 32 (74%) priority countries met two key surveillance performance indicator targets nationally, an improvement from 2020 when only 23 (53%) met both targets; however, substantial national and subnational gaps persist. High-performing poliovirus surveillance is critical to tracking poliovirus transmission. Frequent monitoring of surveillance indicators could help identify gaps, guide improvements, and enhance the overall sensitivity and timelines of poliovirus detection to successfully achieve polio eradication.

Acute Flaccid Paralysis Surveillance

Two key performance indicators used to assess AFP surveillance quality are 1) the nonpolio AFP (NPAFP) rate, with a NPAFP rate of ≥2 per 100,000 persons aged <15 years considered sufficiently sensitive to detect circulating poliovirus, and 2) the collection of adequate stool specimens from AFP patients, with a target of ≥80% stool specimen adequacy, which indicates that surveillance can effectively identify poliovirus among AFP patients. Surveillance indicators for 43 priority countries experiencing or at high risk for poliovirus transmission were reviewed (Table 1).
TABLE 1

National and subnational acute flaccid paralysis surveillance performance indicators, number of confirmed wild poliovirus, and circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus cases, by country — 43 priority countries, World Health Organization African, Eastern Mediterranean, European, South-East Asia, and Western Pacific regions, 2020–2021*

Year/WHO region/CountryNo. of AFP cases (all ages)Regional or national NPAFP ratePercentage
No. of confirmed cases
Subnational areas with NPAFP rate ≥2§Regional or national AFP cases with adequate specimensSubnational areas with adequate specimensPopulation living in areas meeting both indicators**WPVcVDPV††
2020
African Region
19,643
5.1
NA
85.6
NA
NA
§§
551
Angola
383
2.4
77.8
82.2
61.1
37.3

3
Benin
278
5.4
100
88.1
91.7
94.5

3
Burkina Faso
1,181
11.8
100
86.0
92.3
95.2

65
Cameroon
605
5.4
100
77.9
50.0
40.3

7
Central African Republic
222
9.8
100
65.3
28.6
28.2

4
Chad
993
11.7
95.7
81.8
65.2
69.0

101
Congo
93
3.7
75.0
83.9
75.0
53.7

2
Côte d’Ivoire
742
6.0
100
85.0
36.4
30.9

64
Democratic Republic of the Congo
3,304
7.6
100
80.4
53.8
55.9

81
Equatorial Guinea
26
5.0
71.4
80.8
57.1
58.5

§§
Ethiopia
1,343
2.9
90.9
86.8
90.9
93.3

36
Guinea
321
4.5
100
69.2
25.0
16.4

44
Guinea-Bissau
20
2.4
45.5
50.0
9.1
6.3


Kenya
336
1.6
29.8
86.3
68.1
17.4


Liberia
48
2.3
73.3
95.8
100
64.8


Madagascar
635
5.7
100
90.6
95.5
96.4

2
Malawi
134
1.4
25.0
88.8
75.0
12.5


Mali
376
3.4
90.9
76.1
45.5
59.9

52
Mauritania
17
0.9
26.7
64.7
13.3
0


Mozambique
375
2.6
72.7
78.7
63.6
38.1


Niger
585
4.7
100
71.8
25.0
24.1

10
Nigeria
6,324
7.0
100
94.6
100
100

8
Senegal
135
1.7
50.0
77.0
28.6
12.2


Sierra Leone
89
2.4
60.0
100
100
62.3

10
South Sudan
434
6.4
100
80.4
70.0
64.3

50
The Gambia
23
2.3
42.9
78.3
42.9
3.7


Togo
161
4.0
100
62.1
0
0

9
Uganda
460
2.1
46.7
90.2
86.7
46.6


Eastern Mediterranean Region
20,336
9.8
NA
87.8
NA
NA
140
547
Afghanistan
3,979
22.9
100
92.4
97.1
98.4
56
308
Djibouti
5
1.7
16.7
100
33.3
4.6


Egypt
1,009
3.0
85.2
94.5
92.6
93.8


Iran
618
3.2
87.1
98.5
100
85.6


Iraq
476
2.9
84.2
93.3
94.7
89.0


Pakistan
11,972
16.4
100
85.3
100
100
84
135
Somalia
376
4.8
90.5
94.7
95.2
96.6

14
Sudan
733
3.9
100
92.8
94.4
93.6

59
Syria
343
5.3
92.9
84.5
78.6
63.6


Yemen
825
6.8
95.7
77.1
52.2
43.6

31
European Region
158
1.5
NA
92.4
NA
NA

1
Tajikistan
83
2.4
60.0
92.8
100
18.1

1
Ukraine
75
1.0
24.0
94.5
76.0
19.1


South-East Asia Region
186
1.3
NA
86.0
NA
NA


Burma (Myanmar)¶¶
186
1.3
22.2
86.0
72.2
9.0


Western Pacific Region
965
2.6
NA
62.9
NA
NA

1
Papua New Guinea
65
1.9
31.8
53.8
27.3
0


Philippines
900
2.7
58.8
63.6
35.3
15.7

1
2021
African Region
24,250
6.2
NA
88.8
NA
NA
1
538
Angola
470
3.0
88.9
82.3
66.7
46.7


Benin
259
4.9
100
88.4
91.7
97.0

3
Burkina Faso
1,400
14.5
100
90.2
100
100

2
Cameroon
755
6.7
100
82.9
50.0
43.7

3
Central African Republic
202
8.9
100
76.7
28.6
35.1


Chad
1,055
13.6
100
84.6
69.6
70.3


Congo
178
6.9
100
79.2
58.3
31.9

2
Côte d’Ivoire
738
6.6
100
85.0
75.8
81.9


Democratic Republic of the Congo
3,439
7.9
100
85.3
84.6
91.0

28
Equatorial Guinea
15
2.8
42.9
93.3
71.4
38.8


Ethiopia
1,694
3.7
90.9
91.5
100
94.5

10
Guinea
370
6.2
100
79.5
50.0
49.6

6
Guinea-Bissau
20
1.9
36.4
65.0
27.3
28.3

3
Kenya
657
3.0
78.7
86.3
66.0
52.1


Liberia
131
6.0
100
99.2
100
100

3
Madagascar
602
5.2
100
94.7
100
100

13
Malawi
177
1.9
50.0
75.1
50.0
54.8
1

Mali
448
4.6
100
84.6
81.8
80.7


Mauritania
122
6.4
100
86.1
73.3
81.2


Mozambique
467
3.1
100
73.9
27.3
19.2

2
Niger
627
4.9
100
83.6
75.0
75.0

17
Nigeria
7,790
8.0
100
93.9
100
100

415
Senegal
359
4.5
100
83.6
71.4
77.5

17
Sierra Leone
173
5.0
100
85.0
60.0
59.4

5
South Sudan
543
8.8
100
89.0
90.0
84.0

9
The Gambia
32
3.1
57.1
90.6
57.1
56.2


Togo
298
8.6
100
91.6
100
100


Uganda
1,229
5.4
100
90.6
100
100


Eastern Mediterranean Region
22,166
10.9
NA
87.8
NA
NA
5
71
Afghanistan
4,095
25.5
100
93.4
100
100
4
43
Djibouti
8
2.7
16.7
75.0
0
0


Egypt
1,251
3.6
100
90.9
88.9
89.4


Iran
681
3.5
100
97.5
100
100


Iraq
709
4.2
94.7
91.1
94.7
85.5


Pakistan
13,084
18.0
100
85.0
100
100
1
8
Somalia
349
4.6
85.7
96.0
95.2
83.0

1
Sudan
637
3.6
100
94.0
100
100


Syria
431
6.7
92.9
85.4
78.6
61.9


Yemen
921
7.5
100
81.7
78.3
67.0

19
European Region
294
2.4
NA
91.8
NA
NA

34
Tajikistan
178
4.1
100
87.1
80.0
99.7

32
Ukraine
116
1.5
32.0
99.1
80.0
35.8

2
South-East Asia Region
33
0.2
NA
84.8
NA
NA


Burma (Myanmar)¶¶
33
0.2
0
84.8
33.3
0


Western Pacific Region
975
2.6
NA
74.6
NA
NA


Papua New Guinea
52
1.3
27.3
50.0
18.2
0


Philippines9232.711.876.647.120.5

Abbreviations: AFP = acute flaccid paralysis; cVDPV = circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus; NA = not applicable; NPAFP = nonpolio acute flaccid paralysis; WHO = World Health Organization; WPV = wild poliovirus.

* Data as of March 25, 2022.

† Per 100,000 persons aged <15 years per year.

§ For all subnational areas regardless of population size.

¶ Standard WHO target is adequate stool specimen collection from ≥80% of AFP cases, assessed by timeliness and condition. For this analysis, timeliness was defined as two specimens collected ≥24 hours apart (≥1 calendar day in this data set), both within 14 days of paralysis onset. Good condition was defined as arrival of specimens in a WHO-accredited laboratory with reverse cold chain maintained and without leakage or desiccation.

** Percentage of the country’s population living in subnational areas that met both surveillance indicators (NPAFP rates ≥2 per 100,000 persons aged <15 years per year and ≥80% of AFP cases with adequate specimens).

†† Includes both cVDPV1 and cVDPV2; cVDPV was associated with ≥1 case of AFP with evidence of community transmission and genetically linked. https://polioeradication.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Reporting-and-Classification-of-VDPVs_Aug2016_EN.pdf

§§ Dashes indicate that no confirmed cases were found.

¶¶ MMWR uses the U.S. Department of State’s short-form name “Burma”; WHO uses “Myanmar.”

Abbreviations: AFP = acute flaccid paralysis; cVDPV = circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus; NA = not applicable; NPAFP = nonpolio acute flaccid paralysis; WHO = World Health Organization; WPV = wild poliovirus. * Data as of March 25, 2022. † Per 100,000 persons aged <15 years per year. § For all subnational areas regardless of population size. ¶ Standard WHO target is adequate stool specimen collection from ≥80% of AFP cases, assessed by timeliness and condition. For this analysis, timeliness was defined as two specimens collected ≥24 hours apart (≥1 calendar day in this data set), both within 14 days of paralysis onset. Good condition was defined as arrival of specimens in a WHO-accredited laboratory with reverse cold chain maintained and without leakage or desiccation. ** Percentage of the country’s population living in subnational areas that met both surveillance indicators (NPAFP rates ≥2 per 100,000 persons aged <15 years per year and ≥80% of AFP cases with adequate specimens). †† Includes both cVDPV1 and cVDPV2; cVDPV was associated with ≥1 case of AFP with evidence of community transmission and genetically linked. https://polioeradication.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Reporting-and-Classification-of-VDPVs_Aug2016_EN.pdf §§ Dashes indicate that no confirmed cases were found. ¶¶ MMWR uses the U.S. Department of State’s short-form name “Burma”; WHO uses “Myanmar.” African Region. Among 28 priority countries in AFR, 50% met both national surveillance indicator targets in 2020 and 79% met the targets in 2021 (as of March 25, 2022). Subnational surveillance performance also improved in AFR; both surveillance indicator targets were met in 52% of first subnational administrative level areas in 2020 and 75% in 2021 (Figure). In AFR, cVDPV type 2 (cVDPV2) cases were reported from 22 countries during 2020–2021; among 525 cVDPV2 cases reported in 2021, a total of 415 (79%) were from Nigeria. One WPV1 case was detected in a child in Malawi with paralysis onset in 2021 (), approximately 1 year after AFR was certified as WPV-free; this is the first WPV1 case reported in AFR since 2016 and the isolate is genetically linked to a WPV1 lineage last detected in Pakistan in 2019.
FIGURE

Combined performance indicators for the quality of acute flaccid paralysis surveillance* in subnational areas of 43 priority countries — World Health Organization African, Eastern Mediterranean, South-East Asia, and Western Pacific regions, 2021

Abbreviations: AFP = acute flaccid paralysis; NPAFP = nonpolio acute flaccid paralysis; WHO = World Health Organization.

* Targets: ≥2 NPAFP cases per 100,000 persons aged <15 years per year and ≥80% of persons with AFP having two stool specimens collected ≥24 hours apart and within 14 days of paralysis onset, and arrival at a WHO-accredited laboratory by reverse cold chain (storing and transporting samples at recommended temperatures from the point of collection to the laboratory) and in good condition (i.e., without leakage or desiccation).

Combined performance indicators for the quality of acute flaccid paralysis surveillance* in subnational areas of 43 priority countries — World Health Organization African, Eastern Mediterranean, South-East Asia, and Western Pacific regions, 2021 Abbreviations: AFP = acute flaccid paralysis; NPAFP = nonpolio acute flaccid paralysis; WHO = World Health Organization. * Targets: ≥2 NPAFP cases per 100,000 persons aged <15 years per year and ≥80% of persons with AFP having two stool specimens collected ≥24 hours apart and within 14 days of paralysis onset, and arrival at a WHO-accredited laboratory by reverse cold chain (storing and transporting samples at recommended temperatures from the point of collection to the laboratory) and in good condition (i.e., without leakage or desiccation). Eastern Mediterranean Region. Among 10 priority countries in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR), eight met both national surveillance indicator targets in 2020 and all but one (Djibouti with stool adequacy of 75%) met both targets in 2021. Most EMR countries performed well at the subnational level, but gaps were apparent in Djibouti. In 2020, a total of 140 WPV1 cases were detected in EMR countries (56 in Afghanistan and 84 in Pakistan), compared with five in 2021 (four in Afghanistan and one in Pakistan). Cases of cVDPV2 in EMR countries declined from 516 in 2020 to 68 in 2021, and cVDPV1 cases declined from 31 in 2020 to three in 2021 (all from Yemen). European Region. In the WHO European Region (EUR), surveillance performance was assessed in Tajikistan and Ukraine. In 2020 and 2021, Tajikistan met both national indicators, whereas Ukraine met only the stool adequacy target. In Tajikistan, the proportion of the population living in areas that met both indicators increased significantly from 2020 to 2021. South-East Asia Region. Surveillance performance was assessed in the WHO South-East Asia Region (SEAR), country of Burma (Myanmar),** which met the national stool adequacy target (86.0% and 84.8%, respectively) in both 2020 and 2021, but not the NPAFP rate target (1.3 and 0.2 per 100,000 persons aged <15 years, respectively). Subnational surveillance performance was poor in both years and none of the subnational areas met both surveillance indicator targets in 2021. Western Pacific Region. In the WHO Western Pacific Region (WPR), surveillance performance was assessed in Papua New Guinea and the Philippines. In 2020 and 2021, the Philippines met the NPAFP rate indicator, and Papua New Guinea did not meet either of the surveillance indicators. None of the subnational areas in Papua New Guinea met the indicator targets in either year; in the Philippines, 20.5% of the population lived in subnational areas in which both surveillance indicators were met in 2021 (Figure). One cVDPV2 case was reported from the Philippines in 2020, but none in 2021. Genomic sequence analysis identified 43 cVDPV emergence groups globally in active transmission from AFP cases during 2020–2021. These included 30 cVDPV2 and four cVDPV1 emergences in 27 countries in 2020 and 24 cVDPV emergence groups (20 cVDPV2 and 4 cVDPV1) in 22 countries in 2021.

Environmental Surveillance

Poliovirus environmental surveillance is the systematic collection and testing of sewage specimens to identify poliovirus circulation. Because paralysis occurs in <1% of poliovirus infections, environmental surveillance can detect poliovirus circulation even in the absence of confirmed paralytic polio cases (). During 2020–2021, cVDPV2 was detected by environmental surveillance before identification of a confirmed AFP case in Afghanistan, Liberia, and Senegal, and by environmental surveillance only in Djibouti, Egypt, Gambia, Iran, Mauritania, and Uganda. In Nigeria, the number of cVDPV2-positive environmental surveillance samples increased from five samples collected from two sites in 2020 to 299 samples collected from 77 sites in 2021. In Afghanistan and Pakistan, the number of cVDPV2-positive samples declined from 310 across 65 sites in 2020 (56% from Afghanistan) to 75 across 30 sites in 2021 (53% from Afghanistan). During 2020–2021, 27 cVDPV emergence groups (24 cVDPV2 and three cVDPV1) were detected in sewage samples collected in 32 countries, including 22 (69%) from AFR, seven (22%) from EMR, two (6%) from WPR, and one (3%) from EUR. In Afghanistan, WPV1 was isolated from only one environmental surveillance sample in 2021 compared with 35 samples from 15 sites in 2020 (). In Pakistan, WPV1-positive samples also declined from 434 across 67 sites in 2020 to 65 across 34 sites in 2021 ().

Global Polio Laboratory Network

The WHO Global Polio Laboratory Network (GPLN) comprises 145 quality-assured poliovirus laboratories in the six WHO regions. GPLN laboratories implement standardized protocols to 1) isolate polioviruses (all laboratories); 2) conduct intratypic differentiation (ITD) to distinguish between WPV, Sabin (oral poliovirus vaccine) virus, and VDPV (134 laboratories); and 3) conduct genomic sequencing (28 laboratories). Poliovirus transmission pathways are monitored through sequence analysis of the viral protein 1 (VP1) capsid protein from virus isolates. The accuracy and quality of testing at GPLN laboratories are monitored through a comprehensive standardized quality assurance program of onsite reviews and proficiency testing (). A different accreditation checklist with separate timeliness indicators is used for laboratories that conduct environmental surveillance. GPLN tested 147,582 stool specimens in 2020 and 170,881 in 2021 (Table 2); cVDPVs were isolated from 1,067 AFP cases in 2020 and from 659 in 2021. From 2020 to 2021, the number of cVDPV isolates decreased from 530 to 521 in AFR, from 533 to 70 in EMR, and from two to zero in WPR; the number increased from two to 68 in EUR and was zero for both years in SEAR. During both 2020 and 2021, GPLN laboratories in all regions met the overall timeliness for onset to ITD results (80% of specimens within 60 days), and all but EUR in 2021 met the timeliness indicators for poliovirus isolation (80% of specimens within 14 days), 79% on time.
TABLE 2

Number of poliovirus isolates from stool specimens of persons with acute flaccid paralysis and timing of results, by World Health Organization region — worldwide, 2020 and 2021*

WHO region/YearNo. of specimensNo. of poliovirus isolates
% Poliovirus isolation results on time**% ITD results within 7 days of receipt at laboratory††% ITD results within 60 days of paralysis onset
WildSabin§cVDPV
African Region
2020
47,914
0
3,314
530
91
91
80
2021
58,004
1
3,396
521
89
79
85
American Region
2020
1,066
0
12
0
81
82
82
2021
1,152
0
6
0
83
100
100
Eastern Mediterranean Region
2020
40,179
245§§
1,311
533
96
61
95
2021
43,370
5
1,050
70
97
97
94
European Region
2020
2,016
0
24
2
89
73
82
2021
2,350
0
53
68
79
96
95
South-East Asia Region
2020
44,799
0
1,315
0
94
95
90
2021
53,649
0
1,030
0
93
89
90
Western Pacific Region
2020
11,608
0
124
2
96
100
84
2021
12,356
0
58
0
97
100
99
Total ¶¶
2020
147,582
245
6,100
1,067
94
84
92
2021 170,881 6 5,593 659 93 84 88

Abbreviations: AFP = acute flaccid paralysis; cVDPV = circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus; ITD = intratypic differentiation; VDPV = vaccine-derived poliovirus; WHO = World Health Organization; VP1 = viral protein 1; WPV = wild poliovirus.

* Data as of March 31, 2022.

† Number of AFP cases with WPV isolates.

§ Either 1) concordant Sabin-like results in ITD test and VDPV screening, or 2) ≤1% VP1 nucleotide sequence difference compared with Sabin vaccine virus (≤0.6% for type 2).

¶ Includes both cVDPV1 and cVDPV2. For cVDPV types 1 and 3, ≥10 VP1 nucleotide differences from the respective poliovirus; for cVDPV2, ≥6 VP1 nucleotide differences from Sabin type 2 poliovirus.

** Results reported within 14 days of receipt of specimen.

†† Results of ITD reported within 7 days of receipt of specimen.

§§ Number of specimens with WPV isolates.

¶¶ For the last three indicators, total represents weighted mean percentage of regional performance.

Abbreviations: AFP = acute flaccid paralysis; cVDPV = circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus; ITD = intratypic differentiation; VDPV = vaccine-derived poliovirus; WHO = World Health Organization; VP1 = viral protein 1; WPV = wild poliovirus. * Data as of March 31, 2022. † Number of AFP cases with WPV isolates. § Either 1) concordant Sabin-like results in ITD test and VDPV screening, or 2) ≤1% VP1 nucleotide sequence difference compared with Sabin vaccine virus (≤0.6% for type 2). ¶ Includes both cVDPV1 and cVDPV2. For cVDPV types 1 and 3, ≥10 VP1 nucleotide differences from the respective poliovirus; for cVDPV2, ≥6 VP1 nucleotide differences from Sabin type 2 poliovirus. ** Results reported within 14 days of receipt of specimen. †† Results of ITD reported within 7 days of receipt of specimen. §§ Number of specimens with WPV isolates. ¶¶ For the last three indicators, total represents weighted mean percentage of regional performance. Since 2017, the WPV1 South Asia genotype is the only WPV1 genotype that has been detected globally. Orphan isolates (isolates with ≤98.5% genetic identity in the VP1 capsid region, compared with other isolates) accounted for 18 of 140 (13%) WPV1 isolates from AFP patients in 2020 and two of six (33%) in 2021.

Discussion

All priority countries faced setbacks in surveillance performance in 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated risk mitigation measures (); in 2021, AFP surveillance performance indicators rebounded in many countries. Several AFR countries’ subnational performance on surveillance indicators in 2021 improved compared with their prepandemic performance in 2019, including Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Niger (). Subnational surveillance gaps were apparent among one or more priority countries in each WHO region that included a priority country. Although WPV1 cases significantly declined in 2021, the recent detection of a WPV1 case in Malawi demonstrates that all countries remain at risk for WPV1 until global transmission is interrupted and underscores the critical importance of maintaining sensitive poliovirus surveillance in all countries, even those considered to be at low risk. An updated Global Polio Surveillance Action Plan for 2022–2024 was developed to guide and monitor surveillance system improvements at all levels of the GPEI (); the plan is applicable globally but focuses on 30 priority countries. The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, issues related to security and hard-to-access populations could affect AFP surveillance and limit interpretation of surveillance indicators. Second, high NPAFP rates do not necessarily indicate highly sensitive surveillance because not all reported AFP cases might meet the case definition, some actual AFP cases might go undetected, and background NPAFP rates might vary. Finally, the accuracy of stool specimen adequacy depends on whether the field investigator can elicit an accurate paralysis onset date. High-quality surveillance is critical to reaching the milestone of global polio eradication and includes timely and effective AFP case detection, notification, and investigation; specimen transport; and laboratory testing. Frequent monitoring of surveillance indicators could help identify gaps, guide improvements, and enhance the overall sensitivity and timelines of poliovirus detection to successfully achieve polio eradication.

What is already known about this topic

Acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) surveillance, the primary means of tracking poliovirus transmission, is supplemented by environmental surveillance of sewage samples. The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected polio surveillance.

What is added by this report?

Analysis of 2020–2021 AFP surveillance data from 43 priority countries experiencing or at high risk for poliovirus transmission found that national AFP surveillance performance improved from 2020 to 2021 in many priority countries, particularly in the World Health Organization’s African Region; however, substantial national and subnational gaps persist.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Surveillance gaps need to be identified and addressed to ensure timely detection of poliovirus circulation and achieve eventual eradication.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Environmental surveillance for polioviruses in the Global Polio Eradication Initiative.

Authors:  Humayun Asghar; Ousmane M Diop; Goitom Weldegebriel; Farzana Malik; Sushmitha Shetty; Laila El Bassioni; Adefunke O Akande; Eman Al Maamoun; Sohail Zaidi; Adekunle J Adeniji; Cara C Burns; Jagadish Deshpande; M Steve Oberste; Sara A Lowther
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  The Global Polio Laboratory Network as a Platform for the Viral Vaccine-Preventable and Emerging Diseases Laboratory Networks.

Authors:  Ousmane M Diop; Olen M Kew; Esther M de Gourville; Mark A Pallansch
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Update on Vaccine-Derived Poliovirus Outbreaks - Worldwide, January 2020-June 2021.

Authors:  Mary M Alleman; Jaume Jorba; Elizabeth Henderson; Ousmane M Diop; Shahzad Shaukat; Mohamed A Traoré; Eric Wiesen; Steven G F Wassilak; Cara C Burns
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Global Poliovirus Surveillance.

Authors:  Delayo J Zomahoun; Ashley L Burman; Cynthia J Snider; Claire Chauvin; Tracie Gardner; Jacquelyn S Lickness; Jamal A Ahmed; Ousmane Diop; Sue Gerber; Abhijeet Anand
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 35.301

5.  Progress Toward Poliomyelitis Eradication - Afghanistan, January 2020-November 2021.

Authors:  Katrin S Sadigh; Irfan Elahi Akbar; Mufti Zubair Wadood; Hemant Shukla; Jaume Jorba; Sumangala Chaudhury; Maureen Martinez
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  Surveillance to Track Progress Toward Polio Eradication - Worldwide, 2019-2020.

Authors:  Jude N Tuma; Amanda L Wilkinson; Ousmane M Diop; Jaume Jorba; Tracie Gardner; Cynthia J Snider; Abhijeet Anand; Jamal Ahmed
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 35.301

  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Poliomyelitis is a current challenge: long-term sequelae and circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus.

Authors:  Jorge Quarleri
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 7.581

2.  Progress Toward Polio Eradication - Worldwide, January 2020-April 2022.

Authors:  Audrey Rachlin; Jaymin C Patel; Cara C Burns; Jaume Jorba; Graham Tallis; Aidan O'Leary; Steven G F Wassilak; John F Vertefeuille
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 17.586

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.