| Literature DB >> 35420808 |
Shuai Fu1, Enquan Jin1,2, Hiroki Hanayama3, Wenhao Zheng1, Heng Zhang1, Lucia Di Virgilio1, Matthew A Addicoat4, Markus Mezger1, Akimitsu Narita1,3, Mischa Bonn1, Klaus Müllen1,5, Hai I Wang1.
Abstract
Two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks (2D COFs) represent a family of crystalline porous polymers with a long-range order and well-defined open nanochannels that hold great promise for electronics, catalysis, sensing, and energy storage. To date, the development of highly conductive 2D COFs has remained challenging due to the finite π-conjugation along the 2D lattice and charge localization at grain boundaries. Furthermore, the charge transport mechanism within the crystalline framework remains elusive. Here, time- and frequency-resolved terahertz spectroscopy reveals intrinsically Drude-type band transport of charge carriers in semiconducting 2D COF thin films condensed by 1,3,5-tris(4-aminophenyl)benzene (TPB) and 1,3,5-triformylbenzene (TFB). The TPB-TFB COF thin films demonstrate high photoconductivity with a long charge scattering time exceeding 70 fs at room temperature which resembles crystalline inorganic materials. This corresponds to a record charge carrier mobility of 165 ± 10 cm2 V-1 s-1, vastly outperforming that of the state-of-the-art conductive COFs. These results reveal TPB-TFB COF thin films as promising candidates for organic electronics and catalysis and provide insights into the rational design of highly crystalline porous materials for efficient and long-range charge transport.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35420808 PMCID: PMC9052747 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c02408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Chem Soc ISSN: 0002-7863 Impact factor: 16.383
Figure 1Synthesis and characterization of TPB–TFB COFs. (a) Schematic of the synthesis of TPB–TFB COF powder and thin films. (b) FTIR spectra of TPB (black), TFB (blue), and TPB–TFB COF (red). (c) PXRD patterns of TPB–TFB COF powder: experimental pattern (red), Pawley refined pattern (green), differences between the experimental and Pawley refined patterns (black), and the simulated pattern for the AA-stacking mode (blue). (d) 2D X-ray scattering pattern of a 3 μm thick TPB–TFB COF thin film recorded at a grazing incident angle of 0.2°. (e) TEM image of TPB–TFB COF showing hexagonal pore structures (scale bar: 2 nm). Reconstructed crystal structures of the (f) top and (g) side views of TPB-TFB COFs. The 2D layers are stacked along the out-of-plane direction with an interlayer spacing of 3.6 Å. (h) Calculated electronic structure of the AA-stacked TPB–TFB COF. The left and right panels display the calculated electronic band structure and the corresponding projected density of state (PDOS), respectively. (i) The blue line represents the Tauc plot of TPB-TFB COF thin film, and the red line stands for the Kubelka–Munk-transformed reflectance spectrum of the TPB–TFB COF powder.
Figure 2Ultrafast THz photoconductivity of TPB–TFB COF. (a) Schematic of the optical pump-THz probe spectroscopy. (b) Time-resolved THz photoconductivity of TPB–TFB COFs in the forms of a thin film (sample A) and powder. The samples are photoexcited by a femtosecond laser pulse (λ = 400 nm, absorbed pump fluence = 22 μJ/cm2), and their photoconductivity is probed by a single-cycle THz pulse with ∼1 THz bandwidth under dry N2 flow. (c) Frequency-resolved complex THz photoconductivity of the TPB–TFB COF thin film at different pump–probe delays following optical excitation. The blue and red dots represent the real and imaginary parts of the complex THz photoconductivity, respectively. The blue and red solid lines correspond to the Drude model describing the real and imaginary components of the complex THz photoconductivity, respectively. (d) Pump-induced changes in the transmitted THz electrical field (−ΔE/E, blue diamonds, left y-axis) and charge carrier densities (N, red circles, right y-axis) obtained from the Drude fits at different pump–probe delays. (e) Charge scattering times (τ) obtained from the Drude fits at different pump–probe delays. The black dashed line reflects the average of the four obtained charge scattering times (orange squares) at different pump–probe delays.
Figure 3Temperature dependence of THz photoconductivity and scattering time of the TPB–TFB COF thin film. (a) Frequency-resolved complex THz photoconductivity of the TPB–TFB COF thin film (sample B) measured at 1 ps following optical excitation at different temperatures. The blue and red solid lines correspond to the Drude model describing the real and imaginary components of the complex THz photoconductivity, respectively. (b) Charge scattering times (τ) obtained from the Drude fits shown in (a). The red dashed line represents a linear fit to guide the eyes.