Literature DB >> 35420793

Structural Basis for Reduced Dynamics of Three Engineered HNH Endonuclease Lys-to-Ala Mutants for the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat (CRISPR)-Associated 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) Enzyme.

Jimin Wang1, Erin Skeens2, Pablo R Arantes3, Federica Maschietto4, Brandon Allen4, Gregory W Kyro4, George P Lisi2, Giulia Palermo3, Victor S Batista4.   

Abstract

Many bacteria possess type-II immunity against invading phages or plasmids known as the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated 9 (Cas9) system to detect and degrade the foreign DNA sequences. The Cas9 protein has two endonucleases responsible for double-strand breaks (the HNH domain for cleaving the target strand of DNA duplexes and RuvC domain for the nontarget strand, respectively) and a single-guide RNA-binding domain where the RNA and target DNA strands are base-paired. Three engineered single Lys-to-Ala HNH mutants (K810A, K848A, and K855A) exhibit an enhanced substrate specificity for cleavage of the target DNA strand. We report in this study that in the wild-type (wt) enzyme, D835, Y836, and D837 within the Y836-containing loop (comprising E827-D837) adjacent to the catalytic site have uncharacterizable broadened 1H15N nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) features, whereas remaining residues in the loop have different extents of broadened NMR spectra. We find that this loop in the wt enzyme exhibits three distinct conformations over the duration of the molecular dynamics simulations, whereas the three Lys-to-Ala mutants retain only one conformation. The versatility of multiple alternate conformations of this loop in the wt enzyme could help to recruit noncognate DNA substrates into the HNH active site for cleavage, thereby reducing its substrate specificity relative to the three mutants. Our study provides further experimental and computational evidence that Lys-to-Ala substitutions reduce dynamics of proteins and thus increase their stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35420793      PMCID: PMC9069930          DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.2c00127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.321


  42 in total

1.  Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method.

Authors:  G N Murshudov; A A Vagin; E J Dodson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  1997-05-01

2.  GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free.

Authors:  David Van Der Spoel; Erik Lindahl; Berk Hess; Gerrit Groenhof; Alan E Mark; Herman J C Berendsen
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Refinement of the AMBER force field for nucleic acids: improving the description of alpha/gamma conformers.

Authors:  Alberto Pérez; Iván Marchán; Daniel Svozil; Jiri Sponer; Thomas E Cheatham; Charles A Laughton; Modesto Orozco
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Protein crystallization by rational mutagenesis of surface residues: Lys to Ala mutations promote crystallization of RhoGDI.

Authors:  K L Longenecker; S M Garrard; P J Sheffield; Z S Derewenda
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2001-04-24

Review 5.  NMR and computational methods for molecular resolution of allosteric pathways in enzyme complexes.

Authors:  Kyle W East; Erin Skeens; Jennifer Y Cui; Helen B Belato; Brandon Mitchell; Rohaine Hsu; Victor S Batista; Giulia Palermo; George P Lisi
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2019-12-14

6.  NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes.

Authors:  F Delaglio; S Grzesiek; G W Vuister; G Zhu; J Pfeifer; A Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments.

Authors:  Martyn D Winn; Charles C Ballard; Kevin D Cowtan; Eleanor J Dodson; Paul Emsley; Phil R Evans; Ronan M Keegan; Eugene B Krissinel; Andrew G W Leslie; Airlie McCoy; Stuart J McNicholas; Garib N Murshudov; Navraj S Pannu; Elizabeth A Potterton; Harold R Powell; Randy J Read; Alexei Vagin; Keith S Wilson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2011-03-18

8.  Structural insights into DNA cleavage activation of CRISPR-Cas9 system.

Authors:  Cong Huai; Gan Li; Ruijie Yao; Yingyi Zhang; Mi Cao; Liangliang Kong; Chenqiang Jia; Hui Yuan; Hongyan Chen; Daru Lu; Qiang Huang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Enhanced specificity mutations perturb allosteric signaling in CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Lukasz Nierzwicki; Kyle W East; Uriel N Morzan; Pablo R Arantes; Victor S Batista; George P Lisi; Giulia Palermo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease.

Authors:  Carolin Anders; Ole Niewoehner; Alessia Duerst; Martin Jinek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.