| Literature DB >> 35420713 |
Sahar Yassine1,2, Ute Gschwandtner3, Manon Auffret4, Sophie Achard5, Marc Verin1,4,6,7, Peter Fuhr3, Mahmoud Hassan8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tracking longitudinal functional brain dysconnectivity in Parkinson's disease (PD) is a key element to decoding the underlying physiopathology and understanding PD progression.Entities:
Keywords: Parkinson's disease; electroencephalography; follow-up study; functional brain networks; movement disorders
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35420713 PMCID: PMC9543227 DOI: 10.1002/mds.29026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mov Disord ISSN: 0885-3185 Impact factor: 9.698
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants at BL, 3YFU, and 5YFU visits
| Baseline | 3YFU | 5YFU | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PD (n = 35) | HC (n = 32) |
| PD (n = 35) | HC (n = 21) |
| PD (n = 35) | HC (n = 3) | |
| Sex (M/F) | 26/9 | 18/14 | 0.13 | — | 10/11 | — | — | 2/1 |
| Age (y) | 67.4 (8.2) | 65.3 (5.6) | 0.24 | 70.4 (8.2) | 68.7 (5.5) | 0.37 | 72.5 (8.2) | 65.7 (4.2) |
| Education (y) | 15.2 (3.2) | 13.8 (2.9) | 0.07 | — | 13.6 (3) | — | — | 11 (2) |
| Disease dur. (y) | 4.1 (3.7) | NA | — | 7.1 (3.7) | NA | — | 9.2 (3.8) | NA |
| LEDD (mg/day) | 555 (430) | NA | — | 660 (449) | NA | — | 647 (396) | NA |
| UPDRS‐III | 13.9 (10.2) | NA | — | 18.4 (9.7) | NA | — | 18 (12.4) | NA |
| MoCA | 26.2 (2.4) | 26.8 (2.5) | 0.26 | 25.1 (3.8) | 27.3 (2.1) | 0.016* | 24.5 (5.5) | 23.3 (4.6) |
Values are expressed as mean (standard deviation). *Indicates results are significant.
BL, baseline; 3YFU, 3 year follow‐up; 5YFU, 5 year follow‐up; PD, Parkinson's disease patients; HC, healthy controls; M/F, male/female; y, years; LEDD, Levodopa equivalent daily dose; UPDRS‐III, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scales motor ratings; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, NA, Not Applicable.
FIG 1General description of the analysis. The connectivity networks of the PD patients at BL and 5YFU were compared using the Network‐Based Statistics (NBS) to retrieve a subnetwork of significantly hypo (BL > 5Y)/hyper (BL < 5Y) connectivity. From this significant network, A network index (NI) was attributed to each PD patient in each of the three visits to evaluate their progression in time and to correlate their longitudinal change with the change in clinical scores. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIG 2Dysconnectivity networks between BL and 5YFU and their corresponding highest degree regions in (A) α2, (C) β. Violin plot representing the longitudinal change of the network index of the PD patients and HC in (B) α2, (D) β. ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05 (corrected for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni). [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIG 3Longitudinal change in the NI and in the MoCA score of PD patients. Correlation between the NI (issued from the hypo‐connectivity networks reported above) and the MoCA score of PD patients at (A) 3YFU and (B) 5YFU. Dysconnectivity subnetworks and corresponding highest degree regions where the longitudinal change in the value of connectivity correlates with the longitudinal change in MoCA score of PD patients in (C) α2 and (E) β. Correlation between the change in NI and the change in MoCA observed between BL and 5YFU (left), 3YFU, and 5YFU (right) in (D) α2 and (F) β. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIG 4Dysconnectivity networks with their corresponding highest degree regions (left) and the longitudinal change of the NI in both LPD and RPD patients (right). (A) Network of the LPD patients in α2, (B) network of the LPD patients in β, (C) network of the RPD patients in α2, (D) network of the RPD patients in β. **P < 0.001, *P < 0.05 (corrected for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni). [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]