Literature DB >> 3542070

Are Mendel's results really too close?

A W Edwards.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1986        PMID： 3542070     DOI： 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1986.tb00656.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN： 0006-3231


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  On Fisher's criticism of Mendel's results with the garden pea.

Authors:  E Novitski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Mud sticks: on the alleged falsification of Mendel's data.

Authors:  Daniel L Hartl; Daniel J Fairbanks
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The tetrad-pollen model fails to explain the bias in Mendel's pea (Pisum sativum) experiments.

Authors:  Daniel J Fairbanks; G Bruce Schaalje
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Robert Heath Lock and his textbook of genetics, 1906.

Authors:  A W F Edwards
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Scientific rigor and the art of motorcycle maintenance.

Authors:  Marcus Munafò; Simon Noble; William J Browne; Dani Brunner; Katherine Button; Joaquim Ferreira; Peter Holmans; Douglas Langbehn; Glyn Lewis; Martin Lindquist; Kate Tilling; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Robi Blumenstein
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Johann Gregor Mendel: paragon of experimental science.

Authors:  Mauricio De Castro
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.183

7.  Mendel's pea crosses: varieties, traits and statistics.

Authors:  T H Noel Ellis; Julie M I Hofer; Martin T Swain; Peter J van Dijk
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.271
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.