| Literature DB >> 35419380 |
Pei-Rong Lee1, Chung Feng Jeffrey Kuo2, Shao-Cheng Liu1.
Abstract
Introduction: Quantitative morphometric measurements of living human upper airway remain challenging. This study aimed to introduce a special laser projection device that can facilitate computer-assisted, digitalized analysis and provide important information on airway mucosa change, before and after endotracheal intubation for palatoplasty. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: computer-aided diagnostic system; oropharyngeal inlet; palatoplasty; quantitative laryngoscopy; tracheal intubation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35419380 PMCID: PMC8995702 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.745755
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Figure 1(A) The laser beams projected on the healthy control subject. (B) Image processing defines the center of the laser dot and gives us its equivalent distance as 1 mm. The laryngeal images before (C) and after (D) general anesthesia with intubation.
Figure 2(A) A total of three line laser beams, including one at an angle of 8.5 degrees with the other two which were parallel, (B) The laser beams projected on the oropharynx pre-operatively. The retropalatal depth and the cross-sectional area were calculated automatically. Post-operative evaluation – week 1 (C) and week 12 (D).
ROC-AUC curve analysis of different hue and texture features for vocal fold (VF) and interarytenoid region (IA).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| VF | 0.679 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.739 | 0.685 | 0.665 | 0.68 | 0.675 | 0.68 | 0.603 | 0.58 | 0.5 | 0.71 | 0.695 | 0.61 |
| IA | 0.873 | 0.835 | 0.833 | 0.829 | 0.807 | 0.814 | 0.826 | 0.776 | 0.777 | 0.812 | 0.8 | 0.762 | 0.714 | 0.716 | 0.752 |
The discrimination was significantly better in IA than in VF.
Figure 3ROC curve of our function index to predict post-intubation larygneal inflammation. Our measurement has a sensitivity of 90.9% and a specificity of 96.9%.
Figure 4The changes in maximum value of the glottic area (31.2% decrease) (A), vocal fold angle (2.58% decrease) (B), and vocal fold width (Left vs. right: 22.01 vs. 23.46% increase, respectively) (C&D).
Pre-operative and post-operative retropalatal depth (%) and CSAOI (%) measurement.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retropalatal depth (%) | 100 | 111.48 ± 6.95 | 135.75 ± 17.31 | 160.59 ± 34.21 | 151.95 ± 33.77 |
| Cross-sectional area (%) | 100 | 128.01 ± 11.32 | 148.46 ± 21.42 | 168.81 ± 31.89 | 159.25 ± 26.65 |