| Literature DB >> 35419264 |
Solmaz Mohammadi1, Zahra Sadat Pajohideh2, Mina Iravani3, Faraz Mojab4, Elham Maraghi5.
Abstract
Background: Vulvovaginal candidiasis is the second most common cause of vulvovaginal infections. Due to the increasing resistance to synthetic antifungal drugs, the use of drugs with a natural origin is a priority. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of Arnebia euchroma with vaginal cream clotrimazole 1% United States Pharmacopeia (USP) for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: Candidiasis; Clotrimazole; Iran; Vulvovaginal; randomized controlled trial
Year: 2022 PMID: 35419264 PMCID: PMC8997174 DOI: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_330_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res ISSN: 1735-9066
Figure 1Consort diagram
Demographic characteristic of patients in Arnebia euchroma and clotrimazole groups’ variables
| Qualitative Variables | Intervention (47) | Control (53) |
| df |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | |||||
| Primary | 4 (8.51) | 5 (9.45) | 0.272 | ||
| Guidance | 12 (25.53) | 7 (13.20) | 3.90 | 3 | |
| High school | 22 (46.80) | 34 (64.15) | |||
| University | 9 (19.16) | 7 (13.20) | |||
| Job | |||||
| Housewife | 43 (91.50) | 44 (83) | 1.58 | 1 | 0.246 |
| Employed | 4 (8.50) | 9 (17) | 1.60 | ||
| History of vulvovaginal candidiasis candidal vaginitis | |||||
| Yes | 29 (61.70) | 26 (49) | 1 | 0.231 | |
| No | 18 (38.30) | 21 (51) | |||
| Method of contraception | |||||
| LD* | 13 (27.66) | 9 (16.98) | 4.91 | 4 | 0.296 |
| DMPA** | 2 (4.26) | 7 (13.20) | |||
| Condom | 13 (27.66) | 18 (33.96) | |||
| Tubectomy ligament | 1 (2.13) | 3 (5.66) | |||
| Withdrawal | 18 (38.29) | 16 (30.20) | |||
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Age (year) | 31.87 (8.14) | 37.73 (9.43) | −3.29 | 98 | 0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2)*** | 26.27 (7.52) | 25.56 (6.73) | 0.57 | 98 | 0.570 |
*Contraceptive low dose (Ethinyl Estradiol + Levonorgestrel). **Depot Medroxy Progesterone Acetate, ***Body Mass Index
Differences between Arnebia euchroma and clotrimazole groups in their effects on symptoms
| Group Symptom | Before treatment | After treatment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
| Intervention (56) | Control (56) |
| Intervention (47) | Control (53) | chi-square (χ2) | df |
| |
| Burning vulva and vagina | 41 (73.21) | 50 (89.28) | 0.299 | 4 (8.51) | 9 (16.98) | 0.10 | 1 | 0.743 |
| Pruritus vulva and vagina | 56 (100) | 52 (92.85) | 1 | 10 (21.27) | 0 (0) | 0 | 1 | 0.997 |
| Discharge | 40 (71.42) | 53 (94.64) | 0.004 | 12 (25.53) | 5 (9.43) | 0.86 | 1 | 0.352 |
| Dysuria | 23 (41.07) | 27 (48.21) | 1 | 0 (0) | 5 (9.43) | 0 | 1 | 0.997 |
| Under abdominal pain | 20 (35.71) | 30 (53.57) | 0.229 | 2 (4.25) | 5 (9.43) | 0.74 | 1 | 0.387 |
| Dyspareunia | 15 (26.78) | 10 (17.85) | 0.167 | 5 (10.63) | 3 (5.66) | 0.31 | 1 | 0.572 |
Differences between Arnebia euchroma and clotrimazole groups in laboratory result
| Laboratory result | Intervention (47) | Control (53) |
| df |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result of direct observation under a microscope and culture | |||||
| Positive | 30 (63.82) | 16 (30.18) | 10.10 | 1 | 0.001 |
| Negative | 17 (36.17) | 37 (69.81) |