Literature DB >> 35419199

Cognitive impairment and pain relief following hip fractures: a case control study.

Raiyyan Aftab1,2, Divyansh Dixit3, Simon Williams2, Laurence Baker2, David Raindle Clarke4, Christopher Jack1.   

Abstract

Hip fractures represent a significant workload of both emergency and orthopaedic departments within the National Health Service (NHS). Pain relief is key in treating hip fractures as highlighted by both National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) and British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST) guidelines. However, the literature shows that patients with cognitive impairment tend to have inconsistent pain management, leading to worse outcomes. We conducted a case-control study looking at 296 patients who presented with hip fractures to a major trauma centre between 1 December 2019 and 30 May 2020. Cognition was assessed using pre-recorded Abbreviated Mental Test Scores (AMTS). There was no significant difference between pain relief provided to patients with or without cognitive impairment in both the pre-hospital (p = 0.208) and Accident & Emergency (A&E) (p = 0.154) setting. A larger proportion of patients in A&E did not receive any pain relief (18.6% versus 42.2%). Pre-hospital, the higher the pain score, the stronger the analgesia given (R = 0.435, p = 0.000). This relationship was present in both the cognitively impaired (R = 0.572, p = 0.000) and cognitively intact groups (R = 0.390 p = 0.000). Strength of analgesia and pain scores did not correlate in A&E (R = 0.014, p = 0.826). Cognition did not impact the time to analgesia both pre-hospital (p = 0.291) and in A&E (p = 0.332); however, patients waited significantly longer to receive pain relief in A&E (29.61 minutes versus 150.28 minutes). Fascia-iliaca blocks were administered to 58.4% of the cohort, with no significant difference noted between cognition status. Overall, cognition does not impact pain management both pre-hospital and in A&E. There is still room for improvement, particularly in the assessment of pain in the cognitively impaired. A possible solution is the utilisation of the Bolton Pain Assessment Tool, a validated pain assessment tool for the cognitively impaired that has been utilised in the trauma setting with good effect. © The British Pain Society 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognition; cognitive impairment; hip fractures; neck of femur fractures; pain assessment

Year:  2021        PMID: 35419199      PMCID: PMC8998528          DOI: 10.1177/20494637211041146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pain        ISSN: 2049-4637


  19 in total

Review 1.  Factors predicting incidence of post-operative delirium in older people following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T O Smith; A Cooper; G Peryer; R Griffiths; C Fox; J Cross
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.485

2.  Prevalence of Alzheimer's disease in a community population of older persons. Higher than previously reported.

Authors:  D A Evans; H H Funkenstein; M S Albert; P A Scherr; N R Cook; M J Chown; L E Hebert; C H Hennekens; J O Taylor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Interchangeability of AMT4 and AMTS in a hip fracture population.

Authors:  W A Lindsay; I K Moppett
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 4.  Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs.

Authors:  R Scott Braithwaite; Nananda F Col; John B Wong
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  The impact of postoperative pain on the development of postoperative delirium.

Authors:  E P Lynch; M A Lazor; J E Gellis; J Orav; L Goldman; E R Marcantonio
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Fracture risk in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  L J Melton; C M Beard; E Kokmen; E J Atkinson; W M O'Fallon
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Assessment, physiological monitoring, and consequences of inadequately treated acute pain.

Authors:  Colleen J Dunwoody; Dina A Krenzischek; Chris Pasero; James P Rathmell; Rosemary C Polomano
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.929

8.  Self- and proxy report for the assessment of pain in patients with and without cognitive impairment: experiences gained in a geriatric hospital.

Authors:  A Lukas; T Niederecker; I Günther; B Mayer; T Nikolaus
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.281

9.  How can pain management in the emergency department be improved? Findings from multiple case study analysis of pain management in three UK emergency departments.

Authors:  Fiona C Sampson; Alicia O'Cathain; Steve Goodacre
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  The differences of femoral neck geometric parameters: effects of age, gender and race.

Authors:  F Zhang; L-J Tan; S-F Lei; H-W Deng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.