| Literature DB >> 35419186 |
Dingfu Zhou1, Zhihang Liao1, Rong Chen2.
Abstract
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder in children. At the same time, ADHD is prone to coexist with other mental disorders, so the diagnosis of ADHD in children is very important. Electroencephalogram (EEG) is the sum of the electrical activity of local neurons recorded from the extracranial scalp or intracranial. At present, there are two main methods of long-range EEG monitoring commonly used in clinical practice: one is ambulatory EEG monitoring, and the other is long-range video EEG monitoring. The purpose of this study is to summarize the brain electrical activity and clinical characteristics of children with ADHD through the video long-range computer graphics data of children with ADHD and to explore the clinical significance of video long-range EEG in the diagnosis of children with ADHD. For a more effective analysis, this study further processed the video data of long-range computer graphics of children with ADHD and constructed several neural network algorithm models based on deep learning, mainly including fully connected neural network models and two-dimensional convolutional neural networks. Model and long- and short-term memory neural network model. By comparing the recognition effects of these several algorithms, find the appropriate recognition algorithm to improve the accuracy and then establish a recognition method for the diagnosis of children's ADHD based on deep learning long-range EEG big data. Finally, it is concluded that long-term video EEG can analyze the EEG relationship of children with ADHD and provide a diagnostic basis for the diagnosis of ADHD.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35419186 PMCID: PMC9001066 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5222136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Fully connected neural network model.
Figure 2Convolutional neural network model.
Some structural parameters.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Initial learning rate | 0.0012 |
| Attenuation rate | 0.95 |
| Training batch size | 20 |
| Number of iterations | 1000 |
Figure 3Training accuracy curve of fully connected neural network.
Figure 4Training loss curve of fully connected neural network.
Figure 5Convolutional neural network training accuracy curve.
Figure 6Convolutional neural network training loss curve.
Specific test results of the fully connected neural network model.
| Volunteer child number | Mean accuracy (%) | Mean underreporting rate (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 96.5 | 1.2 |
| 2 | 90.8 | 3.5 |
| 3 | 94.5 | 4.3 |
| 4 | 93.2 | 8.9 |
| 5 | 90.1 | 7.6 |
| Average value | 92.7 | 5.1 |
Specific test results of the convolutional neural network model.
| Volunteer child number | Mean accuracy (%) | Mean underreporting rate (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 96.5 | 2.3 |
| 2 | 97.4 | 3.5 |
| 3 | 98.6 | 1.7 |
| 4 | 99.3 | 3.1 |
| 5 | 96.4 | 2.6 |
| Average value | 97.7 | 2.2 |
Figure 7Comparison of the average evaluation indicators of the two models.