Renée E Pierre-Louis1, Kelly Pannikodu2, Maher Madhoun3, Josette Hartnett2, Suzanne Rose2. 1. Human Subjects Research and Academic Affairs, Nuvance Health, Danbury, CT, USA. 2. Office of Research, Stamford Hospital, Stamford, Connecticut, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Stamford Hospital, Stamford, CT, USA.
Abstract
Objective: Compare the differences in health outcomes and patient satisfaction between a neurohospitalist model of care and a community-based neurologists model at a single community-based teaching hospital among in-patients diagnosed with a cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Methods: Data was collected from the Stamford Hospital's electronic medical records system. An assessment of patient health outcomes and satisfaction scores was conducted, comparing both discrete and continuous variables between the two time periods. An omnibus P-value of 0.05 (P < 0.05) was considered statistically significant. Results: The sample consisted of 341 patients between the two periods, pre-period n = 168 (49.3%) post-period n = 173 (50.7%). Door to lab and door to tPA times decreased significantly between pre- and post-periods (P = 0.003 and P = 0.002, respectively) as did the number of MRIs (P < 0.001). In addition, statistically significant increases were found between pre-period and post-period percentages, all increasing over time: stroke education (P < 0.001), discharged on anticoagulant medication (P < 0.001), and discharged on anti-thrombolytic medication (P = 0.019). Patient satisfaction scores demonstrated mean gain across both periods for five of six items. Two items "Doctor's Concern of my Questions/Worries" and "Skill of Doctors" demonstrated statistical significance (P = 0.020 and P = 0.029, respectively). Conclusions: The introduction of a neurohospitalist service at a community-based teaching hospital improved patient health outcomes on time to intervention, stroke education, discharge medications as well as patient satisfaction. Therefore, it may be beneficial for hospitals to implement a neurohospitalist model of care for their patients presenting with CVA.
Objective: Compare the differences in health outcomes and patient satisfaction between a neurohospitalist model of care and a community-based neurologists model at a single community-based teaching hospital among in-patients diagnosed with a cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Methods: Data was collected from the Stamford Hospital's electronic medical records system. An assessment of patient health outcomes and satisfaction scores was conducted, comparing both discrete and continuous variables between the two time periods. An omnibus P-value of 0.05 (P < 0.05) was considered statistically significant. Results: The sample consisted of 341 patients between the two periods, pre-period n = 168 (49.3%) post-period n = 173 (50.7%). Door to lab and door to tPA times decreased significantly between pre- and post-periods (P = 0.003 and P = 0.002, respectively) as did the number of MRIs (P < 0.001). In addition, statistically significant increases were found between pre-period and post-period percentages, all increasing over time: stroke education (P < 0.001), discharged on anticoagulant medication (P < 0.001), and discharged on anti-thrombolytic medication (P = 0.019). Patient satisfaction scores demonstrated mean gain across both periods for five of six items. Two items "Doctor's Concern of my Questions/Worries" and "Skill of Doctors" demonstrated statistical significance (P = 0.020 and P = 0.029, respectively). Conclusions: The introduction of a neurohospitalist service at a community-based teaching hospital improved patient health outcomes on time to intervention, stroke education, discharge medications as well as patient satisfaction. Therefore, it may be beneficial for hospitals to implement a neurohospitalist model of care for their patients presenting with CVA.
Authors: Ameer E Hassan; Stephanie E Ossowski; Ahmed A Malik; Christina Sanchez; Erlinda Abantao; Olive Sanchez; Wondwossen G Tekle; Adnan I Qureshi Journal: J Vasc Interv Neurol Date: 2016-10
Authors: Judith H Lichtman; Erica C Leifheit-Limson; Sara B Jones; Emi Watanabe; Susannah M Bernheim; Michael S Phipps; Kanchana R Bhat; Shantal V Savage; Larry B Goldstein Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-10-07 Impact factor: 7.914