| Literature DB >> 35419085 |
Chun Chang1, Kaihua Chen1, Jianjun Cao1, Qian Wu1, Hemu Chen2.
Abstract
Emotional ability is an important symbol of human intelligence. Human's understanding of emotions, from subjective consciousness to continuous or discrete emotional dimensions, and then to physiological separability, has shown a trend of gradually diverging from psychological research to the field of intelligent human-computer interaction. This article is aimed at studying the effects of smart sensor-based emotion recognition technology and badminton on physical health. It proposes a method of using smart sensor technology to recognize badminton movements and emotions during the movement. And the impact of emotion recognition based on smart sensors and badminton sports on physical health is carried out in this article. Experimental results show that the emotion recognition technology based on smart sensors can well recognize the changes in people's emotions during badminton sports, and the accuracy of emotion recognition is higher than 70%. At the same time, experiments show that badminton can greatly improve people's physical fitness and strengthen people's physique.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35419085 PMCID: PMC9001118 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8349448
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Bionics Biomech ISSN: 1176-2322 Impact factor: 1.781
Figure 1Common emotional classification.
Figure 2Diagram of the circular emotion model.
Figure 3Schematic diagram of the coordinate system.
Figure 4Schematic diagram of coordinate system transformation.
Figure 5Human body motion coordinate system.
Figure 6The impact of badminton on people's physical fitness.
Emotion recognition result table.
| Happiness | Anger | Sadness | Disgust | Surprise | Fear | Neutral | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Happiness | 89.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Anger | 0.00% | 83.60% | 0.00% | 16.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sadness | 0.00% | 0.00% | 100.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Disgust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 84.00% | 6.00% | 4.60% | 5.40% |
| Surprise | 9.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 90.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Fear | 18.60% | 11.20% | 5.20% | 15.00% | 0.00% | 50.00% | 0.00% |
| Neutral | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.60% | 0.00% | 2.40% | 0.00% | 94.00% |
The degree of the student population's love for badminton.
| Number of people | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|
| Like very much | 266 | 36.6% |
| Like | 203 | 28.0% |
| Generally | 59 | 8.0% |
| Neutral | 64 | 9.0% |
| Do not like | 61 | 8.4% |
| Dislike very much | 73 | 10.0% |
| Total | 726 | 100% |
Motivation of students participating in badminton.
| Number of people | Percentage | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strengthen physique | 198 | 27.3% | 1 |
| Social interaction | 162 | 22.3% | 2 |
| Chasing fashion | 103 | 14.2% | 3 |
| Show yourself | 96 | 13.2% | 4 |
| Emotional vent | 83 | 11.4% | 5 |
| Kill time | 65 | 9.0% | 6 |
| Other | 19 | 2.6% | 7 |
| Total | 726 | 100% |
Comparison of basic physical indicators.
| Male | Female | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Std. |
| Mean | Std. |
| ||
| Weight | Join | 72.26 | 7.669 | 0.02 | 56.89 | 9.01 | 0.01 |
| Not involved | 71.32 | 8.131 | 55.95 | 7.96 | |||
| Height | Join | 176.6 | 5.216 | 0.39 | 165.8 | 5.48 | 0.12 |
| Not involved | 174.2 | 5.612 | 164.9 | 5.21 | |||
| Muscle | Join | 56.30 | 5.84 | 0.95 | 42.03 | 5.08 | 0.05 |
| Not involved | 56.10 | 5.56 | 39.71 | 3.92 | |||
| Fat | Join | 13.62 | 4.18 | 0.002 | 13.11 | 5.39 | 0.72 |
| Not involved | 12.98 | 3.95 | 12.8 | 4.89 | |||
| Total bone | Join | 3.62 | 0.32 | 0.93 | 2.89 | 0.09 | 0.06 |
| Not involved | 3.60 | 0.31 | 2.63 | 0.21 | |||
Body fluid comparison table.
| Male | Female | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Std. |
| Mean | Std. |
| ||
| Intracellular fluid | Join | 33.1 | 3.39 | 0.71 | 22.3 | 2.96 | 0.29 |
| Not involved | 29.8 | 3.26 | 21.8 | 2.04 | |||
| Extracellular fluid | Join | 16.2 | 1.63 | 0.19 | 11.2 | 1.58 | 0.06 |
| Not involved | 15.1 | 1.59 | 9.8 | 1.26 | |||
| Total moisture | Join | 46.2 | 4.39 | 0.89 | 33.61 | 4.23 | 0.05 |
| Not involved | 42.1 | 4.31 | 30.98 | 4.12 | |||
| Edema index | Join | 0.36 | 0.012 | 0.001 | 0.31 | 0.16 | 0.001 |
| Not involved | 0.32 | 0.008 | 0.28 | 0.12 | |||
Figure 7Comparison of emotion recognition results.
Figure 8Survey results.
Figure 9Body fluid comparison.
Figure 10Comparison of body fat ratio and total protein.