| Literature DB >> 35419007 |
Cesc Bertran-Cobo1,2, Catherine J Wedderburn1,3,4, Frances C Robertson5,6, Sivenesi Subramoney1, Katherine L Narr7, Shantanu H Joshi7, Annerine Roos1,4,8, Andrea M Rehman9, Nadia Hoffman10, Heather J Zar1,11, Dan J Stein4,10,12, Kirsten A Donald1,4.
Abstract
Introduction: Exposure to maternal HIV in pregnancy may be a risk factor for impaired child neurodevelopment during the first years of life. Altered neurometabolites have been associated with HIV exposure in older children and may help explain the mechanisms underlying this risk. For the first time, we explored neurometabolic profiles of children who are HIV-exposed and uninfected (CHEU) compared to children who are HIV-unexposed (CHU) at 2-3 years of age.Entities:
Keywords: HIV exposure; brain development; magnetic resonance spectroscopy; myo-inositol; neuroinflammation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35419007 PMCID: PMC8995436 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.800273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Voxel placements and sample spectra of median SNR and LCModel output from the 3T scanner used in our cohort of children. The following median SNR were obtained for each voxel placement: PGM median SNR = 34, LPWM median SNR = 35, RPWM median SNR = 33. PGM, parietal grey matter; LPWM, left parietal white matter; RPWM, right parietal white matter; SNR, signal-to-noise ratio; ppm, parts per million.
Figure 2DCHS flowchart for MRS sub-study. Exclusion criteria for the MRS nested sub-study are described in the methodology section.
Sociodemographic characteristics of children included in the MRS complete-case analysis, according to HIV exposure.
| CHEU (N = 36) | CHU (N = 47) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (±SD) or n/N (%) | Mean (SD) or n/N (%) | ||
|
| 33.78 (±1.83) | 34.15 (±1.75) | 0.35 |
|
| 0.14 | ||
| Male | 25/36 (69.44%) | 24/47 (51.06%) | |
| Female | 11/36 (30.55%) | 23/47 (48.93%) | |
|
| 0.49 | ||
| < 1000 | 12/36 (33.33%) | 17/47 (37.17%) | |
| 1000 - 5000 | 23/36 (63.88%) | 26/47 (55.31%) | |
| > 5000 | 1/36 (2.77%) | 4/47 (8.51%) | |
|
| 0.82 | ||
| Primary | 3/36 (8.33%) | 3/47 (6.38%) | |
| Some secondary | 22/36 (61.11%) | 26/47 (55.31%) | |
| Completed secondary | 10/36 (27.77%) | 15/47 (31.91%) | |
| Tertiary | 1/36 (2.77%) | 3/47 (6.38%) | |
|
| 9/36 (25%) | 9/47 (19.14%) | 0.70 |
|
| 19/35 (54.28%) | 17/47 (36.17%) | 0.22 |
|
| 29.89 (±4.37) | 25.65 (±5.06) | 0.0001* |
|
| 38.61 (±2.27) | 38.85 (±2.86) | 0.67 |
|
| 5/36 (13.88%) | 6/47 (12.76%) | 1.00 |
|
| 3030 (±501.76) | 3132 (±622.48) | 0.40 |
|
| |||
| Stunting (height-for-age Z-score < -2) | 5/31 (16.13%) | 5/41 (12.19%) | 0.89 |
| Underweight (weight-for-age Z-score < -2) | 2/31 (6.45%) | 1/41 (2.44%) | 0.80 |
| Wasting (weight-for-length Z-score < -2) | 0/31 (0%) | 0/41 (0%) | – |
|
| 3/36 (8.33%) | 4/47 (8.51%) | 1.00 |
|
| 7/36 (19.44) | 11/46 (23.91) | 0.67 |
|
| 3/35 (8.57%) | 10/46 (21.74%) | 0.20 |
|
| 1/28 (3.57%) | 11/42 (26.19%) | 0.032* |
|
| 1.919 (±2.25) | 2.180 (±1.47) | 0.54 |
|
| |||
| Before pregnancy | 26/36 (72.22%) | ||
| During pregnancy | 10/36 (27.77%) | ||
|
| |||
| ≤ 500 cells/mm3 | 12/26 (46.15%) | ||
| > 500 cells/mm3 | 14/26 (53.85%) | ||
|
| |||
| (undetectable) < 40 copies/ml | 25/29 (86.20%) | ||
| 40 - 1000 copies/ml | 2/29 (6.90%) | ||
| >1000 copies/ml | 2/29 (6.90%) | ||
|
| |||
| Before pregnancy | 20/36 (55.55%) | ||
| During pregnancy | 16/36 (44.44%) | ||
|
| |||
| Fixed dose combination | 33/36 (91.66%) | ||
| Lamivudine + Zidovudine + Nevirapine | 2/36 (5.55%) | ||
| Lamivudine + Zidovudine + Efavirenz | 1/36 (2.77%) | ||
|
| |||
| Nevirapine alone | 28/36 (77.77%) | ||
| Nevirapine and zidovudine | 8/36 (22.22%) |
Data are mean (±SD) or n/N (%). *p<0.05. Percentages calculated out of available data. Continuous data was assessed for normality using Shapiro-Wilk tests. Comparisons between CHEU and CHU were made using t-tests or Wilcoxon tests for normally and non-normally distributed continuous data, respectively, and X2 tests with Yates correction for categorical data. Missing data: maternal relationship status (N = 1 in the CHEU group); nutritional conditions at 2 years old (N = 5 in the CHEU group, N = 6 in the CHU group); maternal smoking during pregnancy (N = 1 in the CHU group); maternal alcohol use during pregnancy (N = 1 in the CHEU group, N = 1 in the CHU group); maternal depression during pregnancy (N = 8 in the CHEU group, 5 in the CHU group); maternal CD4 cell count in pregnancy (N = 10); highest maternal viral load during pregnancy (N = 7). The lowest maternal CD4 cell count within 1 year before birth and 3 months after birth was used to maximise numbers. CHEU, children who are HIV-exposed and uninfected; CHU, children who are HIV-unexposed; ZAR, South African Rand; WHO, World Health Organization.
Fractional tissue composition in each defined MRS voxel, according to HIV exposure.
| Voxel | CHEU (N = 36) | CHU (N = 47) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Grey matter | % White Matter | % CSF | % Grey matter | % White Matter | % CSF | |
| Parietal grey matter |
| 12.9 (±2.8) | 9.2 (±3.2) |
| 14.1 (±2.8) | 8.7 (±2.9) |
| Left parietal white matter | 45.2 (±8.8) |
| 2.7 (±1.6) | 46.8 (±7.0) |
| 2.1 (±1.2) |
| Right parietal white matter | 46.2 (±8.7) |
| 1.9 (±1.3) | 46.1 (±6.6) |
| 1.4 (±0.8) |
Data is displayed as mean (±SD) percentages. Bold percentages indicate targeted tissue in each voxel. Data was assessed for normality using Shapiro-Wilk tests. Comparisons between CHEU and CHU were made using t-tests or Wilcoxon tests for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. All p values were greater than 0.05 (data not shown). CHEU, children who are HIV-exposed and uninfected; CHU, children who are HIV-unexposed; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid.
Factor loadings.
| Voxel | Metabolite | Factor Loading | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 4 | ||
|
|
|
| -0.044 | 0.036 | 0.314 |
|
| -0.111 |
| 0.062 | -0.208 | |
|
|
| -0.145 | -0.052 | 0.025 | |
|
| -0.264 | 0.211 |
| 0.007 | |
|
|
| 0.439 | -0.034 | 0.100 |
|
|
| -0.182 |
| 0.015 | 0.003 | |
|
|
| -0.116 | 0.053 | 0.159 | |
|
| 0.113 | -0.086 |
| 0.131 | |
|
|
| 0.151 | 0.008 | -0.043 |
|
|
| -0.111 |
| 0.001 | 0.168 | |
|
|
| -0.208 | -0.029 | 0.072 | |
|
| 0.104 | -0.005 |
| -0.115 | |
Bartlett sphericity and Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin tests were performed and confirmed that a factor analysis approach was suitable for our data. Factor analysis identified four main metabolic patterns (RMSEA < 0.05), which accounted for 69% of data variability and are displayed in this table. Factor loadings in bold represent the main components of each metabolic pattern.
PGM, parietal grey matter; LPWM, left parietal grey matter; RPWM, right parietal white matter; NAA, n-acetyl-aspartate; Ins, myo-inositol; GPC+PCh, total choline (glycerophosphocholine + phosphocholine); Glu, glutamate;/Cr+PCr, relative to creatine + phosphocreatine.
Logistic regression analysis of factor scores as predictors for HIV exposure.
| Mean factor score | Unadjusted logistic regression | Adjusted logistic regression* | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHEU(N = 36) | CHU(N = 47) | OR | Confidence interval (95%) | P value | OR | Confidence interval (95%) | P value | |
|
| -0.182 | 0.139 | 0.72 | 0.45 – 1.12 | 0.14 | 0.72 | 0.44 – 1.50 | 0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -0.030 | 0.023 | 0.91 | 0.51 – 1.59 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.42 – 1.55 | 0.54 |
|
| 0.097 | -0.074 | 1.28 | 0.76 – 2.21 | 0.35 | 1.41 | 0.81 – 2.56 | 0.23 |
Odds ratios (OR) greater than 1 indicate an increased likelihood of association between a certain metabolite pattern and HIV exposure. Bold data represents statistically significant associations. *Adjusted for child age, child sex, and maternal alcohol use during pregnancy.
NAA, metabolite pattern dominated by n-acetyl-aspartate ratios; Ins, metabolite pattern dominated by myo-inositol ratios; GPC+PCh, metabolite pattern dominated by total choline (glycerophosphocholine + phosphocholine) ratios; Glu, metabolite pattern dominated by glutamate ratios; CHEU, children who are HIV-exposed and uninfected; CHU, children who are HIV-unexposed.
Figure 3Individual metabolite relative concentrations. Raincloud plots (54) showing individual metabolite relative concentrations to total creatine in the parietal grey matter (PGM), left parietal white matter (LPWM) and right parietal white matter (RPWM) in our complete-case cohort, according to HIV exposure. *p<0.05; **p<0.01.