| Literature DB >> 35418931 |
Panmei Li1, Yongqiang Shu1, Xiang Liu1, Linghong Kong1, Kunyao Li1, Wei Xie1, Yaping Zeng1, Haijun Li1,2, Dechang Peng1,2.
Abstract
Background andEntities:
Keywords: cognitive impairment; continuous positive airway pressure; degree centrality; obstructive sleep apnea; resting-state fMRI
Year: 2022 PMID: 35418931 PMCID: PMC8995649 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.801121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Population and clinical characteristics of participants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male/female) | 20/1 | 20/1 | 20/1 | 1.000 | / |
| Age (year) | 40.1 ± 8.6 | 40.1 ± 8.4 | / | 1.000 | / |
| Snoring History (year) | 10.2 ± 6.3 | / | / | / | / |
| Education (years) | 10.1 ± 3.6 | 12.4 ± 3.8 | / | 0.033 | / |
| AHI | 2.5 ± 1.9 | 48.4 ± 19.5 | 2.8 ± 2.21 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Nadir SO2 (%) | 94.0 ± 3.27 | 69.8 ± 13.6 | / | <0.001 | / |
| mean SO2 (%) | 97.3 ± 1.9 | 93.7 ± 3.3 | / | <0.001 | / |
| SaO2 <90 (%) | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 15.0 ± 17.4 | / | <0.001 | / |
| Sleep efficiency (%) | 90.5 ± 3.1 | 74.6 ± 24.0 | / | 0.007 | / |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.1 ± 1.5 | 27.3 ± 3.8 | 27.2 ± 4.0 | <0.001 | 0.770 |
| ESS | 2.8 ± 1.9 | 10.9 ± 5.3 | 8.0 ± 4.2 | <0.001 | 0.007 |
| HAMA | 4.4 ± 2.3 | 7.5 ± 4.6 | 4.0 ± 3.7 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| HAMD | 3.1 ± 1.5 | 6.2 ± 3.1 | 3.0 ± 1.7 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| PSQI | 1.6 ± 1.1 | 5.5 ± 1.9 | 4.1 ± 2.2 | <0.001 | 0.020 |
| MoCA | 27.5 ± 1.5 | 23.1 ± 3.0 | 24.5 ± 3.8 | <0.001 | 0.040 |
| mean CPAP use (h/night) | / | / | 5.6 ± 1.3 | / | / |
| days of CPAP use > 4 h(%) | / | / | 65.7 ± 19.8 | / | / |
| mean CPAP pressure (cmH2O) | / | / | 9.2 ± 1.7 | / | / |
HC, healthy controls; pre-CPAP OSA, OSA patients before CPAP treatment; post-CPAP OSA, OSA patients after CPAP treatment; BMI, body mass index; AHI, apnea hypopnea index; SaO2, oxygen saturation; SaO2 <90%, percentage of total sleep time spent at oxygen saturation <90%; ESS, Epworth sleepiness scale; HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Scale; HAMD, Hamilton Depression Scale; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment.
Figure 1Highly similar spatial distributions of the higher DC value in patients in the HC group, pre-CPAP OSA group and post-CPAP OSA group (r0 = 0.25).
Brain areas showed significant differences in DC between pre-CPAP OSA patients and HCs (r0 = 0.25).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| OSA>HC | CPL | L | −33 | −81 | −36 | 294 | 4.534 |
| CPL | R | 15 | −87 | −27 | 46 | 4.275 | |
| OSA < HC | STG | R | 37 | 9 | −27 | 51 | −4.873 |
| SFG | L | −21 | 45 | 42 | 80 | −4.593 | |
| MFG | R | 27 | 3 | 45 | 42 | −4.938 | |
DC, degree centrality; pre-CPAP OSA, OSA patients before CPAP treatment; HC, healthy control; CPL, cerebellum posterior lobe; STG, superior temporal gyrus; SFG, superior frontal gyrus; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; L, left; R, right.
Figure 2Voxelwise comparison of DC between participants in the pre-CPAP and HC groups. Brain clusters showing a significant difference in degree centrality (DC) in the pre-CPAP OSA patients compared with those of participants in the HC group. Hot color (cool) indicates significantly increased (decreased) DC in the pre-CPAP patients.
Brain areas showed significant differences in DC between pre-CPAP OSA and post-CPAP OSA patients (r0 = 0.25).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| post-CPAP < pre-CPAP OSA | CPL | L/R | −3 | −90 | −27 | 1,105 | −7.592 |
| post-CPAP > pre-CPAP OSA | MTG | R | 54 | −18 | −12 | 47 | 4.064 |
| STG | L | −45 | −18 | 0 | 71 | 4.525 | |
| PG/MFG | R | 9 | −21 | 57 | 754 | 7.205 | |
| EN/Insula | L | −33 | −6 | −9 | 105 | 5.033 | |
| MFG | L | −36 | 33 | 18 | 51 | 4.172 | |
| PG | L | −54 | −6 | 42 | 85 | 4.177 | |
| PL | L | −12 | −12 | 60 | 107 | 5.813 | |
DC, based voxel degree centrality; pre-CPAP OSA, OSA patients before CPAP treatment; post-CPAP OSA, OSA patients after CPAP treatment; HC, healthy controls; CPL, cerebellum posterior lobe; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; STG, superior temporal gyrus; PG, precentral gyrus; EN, extranuclear; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; PL, paracentral lobule; L, left; R, right.
Figure 3Voxelwise comparison of DC between pre-CPAP OSA and post-CPAP OSA. Brain clusters showing a significant difference in degree centrality (DC) between OSA patients before and after CPAP treatment (cluster-level p <0.01, GRF correction). Hot color (cool) indicates significantly increased (decreased) DC in the post-CPAP patients.
Figure 4Mean weighted DC signal values of HCs and pre- and post-CPAP OSA patients in altered regional brain areas before and after CPAP treatment. DC, Degree Centrality; pre-CPAP OSA, OSA patients before CPAP treatment; post-CPAP, OSA patients after CPAP treatment; HC, Healthy controls; CPL, Cerebellum posterior lobe; MTG, Middle temporal gyrus; STG, Superior temporal gyrus; PG, Precentral gyrus; MFG, Middle frontal gyrus; PL, Paracentral lobule; L, Left; R, Right.
Correlation analyses between altered DC and clinical assessments in pre-and post-CPAP OSA patients.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| MTG.R | Min SaO2% | 0.439 | 0.046 |
| STG.L | HAMA | −0.647 | 0.002 |
| PG/MFG.R | PSQI | −0.456 | 0.038 |
| HAMD | −0.515 | 0.017 | |
| MFG.L | ESS | −0.454 | 0.039 |
|
| |||
| CPL | MoCA | 0.453 | 0.039 |
| MTG.R | MoCA | 0.504 | 0.020 |
| PSQI | −0.454 | 0.039 | |
| STG.L | MoCA | 0.48 | 0.028 |
| PG.L | MoCA | 0.467 | 0.033 |
| PL.L | MoCA | 0.512 | 0.018 |
pre-CPAP, OSA patients before CPAP treatment; post-CPAP, OSA patients after CPAP treatment; HC, healthy controls; CPL, cerebellum posterior lobe; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; STG, superior temporal gyrus; PG, precentral gyrus; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; PL, paracentral lobule; L, left; R, right; SaO2, oxygen saturation; ESS, Epworth sleepiness scale; HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Scale; HAMD, Hamilton Depression Scale; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment.