| Literature DB >> 35418429 |
Jing Jing Piao1, Boya Wan1,2, Haomei Zhao1, Zhiyang Shang3, Lingjun Yan1,4, Zhina Hao5, Yonghong Wang1, Yanqing Zhang1, Yanmei Gu6,7.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a critical treatment for patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention. Unfortunately, participation and adherence of CR are unexpectedly poor. This study aims to test whether low-intensity or medium-intensity brisk walking is more helpful in improving early attendance, adherence and physical results. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomised controlled study will compare the effects of low-intensity and medium-intensity brisk walking to improve adherence and cardiopulmonary endurance. Participants will be randomly allocated to low-intensity or medium-intensity groups and will be followed-up for 8 weeks. Primary and secondary outcome data will be collected at baseline and at 2, 4 and 8 weeks. Primary outcomes measure changes in oxygen consumption (VO2) peak value (mL/kg/min), as well as adherence. Secondary outcomes include changes in body mass index, oxygen pulse, maximal metabolic equivalent, breathing reserve, vital capacity, ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity, Δoxygen consumption/Δwork rate (ΔVO2/ΔWR), minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production and self-efficacy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval and informed consent form have been obtained from the Ethics Committee of Hebei General Hospital (approval number: NA-2021-03). The study background and main objective, as well as potential benefits and risks, will be fully explained to the participants and their families. Findings from this study will be published on academic journals in Chinese or in English for widespread dissemination of the results TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100047568. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: CARDIOLOGY; Coronary heart disease; REHABILITATION MEDICINE
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35418429 PMCID: PMC9013999 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055437
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 3.006
Figure 1The flowchart of study process. CPET, cardiopulmonary exercise testing; 6MWT, 6-minute walk test distance.
Time points for the outcome assessment
| Outcome | Assessment | Baseline | 2 weeks | 4 weeks | 8 weeks |
| Primary outcomes | |||||
| CPET | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
| Adherence | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ||
| Secondary outcomes | |||||
| CPET | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
| Change in 6MWT distance | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
| ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ||
| CPET | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
| CPET | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
| CPET | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
| CPET | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
| CPET | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
| CPET | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
| CPET | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
| CPET | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
| Secd-6 questionnaire | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
AT/kg, anaerobic threshold/kg; BMI, body mass index; BR, breathing reserve; CPET, cardiopulmonary exercise testing; FEV1/FVC, forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capcacity; MaxVO2, maximal oxygen uptake; MET max, metabolic equivalent max; 6MWT, 6-minute walk test distance; O2/HR, oxygen pulse; VC, vital capacity; VE/VCO2, ventilation/carbon dioxide production; VO2 peak, peak oxygen uptake; ΔVO2/ΔWR, Δoxygen consumption/Δwork rate.