Raymond B Mailhot Vega1, Shu Wang2, Eric D Brooks3, Oluwadamilola T Oladeru3, Natalie A Lockney4, Lisa E Spiguel5, Shannon M MacDonald6, Eleftherios P Mamounas7, Nancy P Mendenhall3, Paul G Okunieff3, Ji-Hyun Lee2, Julie A Bradley3. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, Florida. Electronic address: rbmailhot@floridaproton.org. 2. Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions & College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, Florida. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 5. Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. Department of General Surgery, Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida.
Abstract
PURPOSE: There is a lack of level I evidence to guide radiation therapy recommendations for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. We used 4 neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials to determine which patients benefit from regional nodal irradiation (RNI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We obtained data from the NSABP (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project) B-18, B-27, B-40, and B-41 clinical trials. B-40 and B-41 allowed RNI at physician's discretion. We evaluated locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier, Peto-Peto, χ2, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for survival estimates and comparison. RESULTS: Median follow-up for B-18, B-27, B-40, and B-41 was 13.7, 9.7, 4.5, and 5.1 years, respectively, including 742, 2254, 1154, and 504 patients for analysis. On multivariable analysis, factors significantly associated with RNI included tumor size, ypN status, and tumor subtype; Hispanic patients were less likely to receive RNI. Patients with ypN+HER2+ disease who received RNI had improved OS. B-40 patients with ypN+HR+ disease had improved LRR. On multivariable analysis for the B-40 and B-41 study population, RNI was not associated with significantly improved OS, disease-free survival, distant recurrence, or LRR. CONCLUSIONS: RNI was associated with a clinical benefit for patients with ypN+HER2+ and ypN+HR+ disease. RNI was not significantly associated with a clinically beneficial outcome for the entire cohort. Prospective phase 3 clinical trials are needed to establish guidelines for patients who should receive RNI after neoadjuvant treatment, and action is necessary to eliminate the disparity in care delivery shown for Hispanic women.
PURPOSE: There is a lack of level I evidence to guide radiation therapy recommendations for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. We used 4 neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials to determine which patients benefit from regional nodal irradiation (RNI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We obtained data from the NSABP (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project) B-18, B-27, B-40, and B-41 clinical trials. B-40 and B-41 allowed RNI at physician's discretion. We evaluated locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier, Peto-Peto, χ2, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for survival estimates and comparison. RESULTS: Median follow-up for B-18, B-27, B-40, and B-41 was 13.7, 9.7, 4.5, and 5.1 years, respectively, including 742, 2254, 1154, and 504 patients for analysis. On multivariable analysis, factors significantly associated with RNI included tumor size, ypN status, and tumor subtype; Hispanic patients were less likely to receive RNI. Patients with ypN+HER2+ disease who received RNI had improved OS. B-40 patients with ypN+HR+ disease had improved LRR. On multivariable analysis for the B-40 and B-41 study population, RNI was not associated with significantly improved OS, disease-free survival, distant recurrence, or LRR. CONCLUSIONS: RNI was associated with a clinical benefit for patients with ypN+HER2+ and ypN+HR+ disease. RNI was not significantly associated with a clinically beneficial outcome for the entire cohort. Prospective phase 3 clinical trials are needed to establish guidelines for patients who should receive RNI after neoadjuvant treatment, and action is necessary to eliminate the disparity in care delivery shown for Hispanic women.
Authors: David Cameron; Martine J Piccart-Gebhart; Richard D Gelber; Marion Procter; Aron Goldhirsch; Evandro de Azambuja; Gilberto Castro; Michael Untch; Ian Smith; Luca Gianni; Jose Baselga; Nedal Al-Sakaff; Sabine Lauer; Eleanor McFadden; Brian Leyland-Jones; Richard Bell; Mitch Dowsett; Christian Jackisch Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ian H Kunkler; Linda J Williams; Wilma J L Jack; David A Cameron; J Michael Dixon Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: M Overgaard; M B Jensen; J Overgaard; P S Hansen; C Rose; M Andersson; C Kamby; M Kjaer; C C Gadeberg; B B Rasmussen; M Blichert-Toft; H T Mouridsen Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-05-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Frank A Vicini; Reena S Cecchini; Julia R White; Douglas W Arthur; Thomas B Julian; Rachel A Rabinovitch; Robert R Kuske; Patricia A Ganz; David S Parda; Michael F Scheier; Kathryn A Winter; Soonmyung Paik; Henry M Kuerer; Laura A Vallow; Lori J Pierce; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Beryl McCormick; Joseph P Costantino; Harry D Bear; Isabelle Germain; Gregory Gustafson; Linda Grossheim; Ivy A Petersen; Richard S Hudes; Walter J Curran; John L Bryant; Norman Wolmark Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Eleftherios P Mamounas; Stewart J Anderson; James J Dignam; Harry D Bear; Thomas B Julian; Charles E Geyer; Alphonse Taghian; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-10-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joseph A Sparano; Robert J Gray; Della F Makower; Kathleen I Pritchard; Kathy S Albain; Daniel F Hayes; Charles E Geyer; Elizabeth C Dees; Matthew P Goetz; John A Olson; Tracy Lively; Sunil S Badve; Thomas J Saphner; Lynne I Wagner; Timothy J Whelan; Matthew J Ellis; Soonmyung Paik; William C Wood; Peter M Ravdin; Maccon M Keane; Henry L Gomez Moreno; Pavan S Reddy; Timothy F Goggins; Ingrid A Mayer; Adam M Brufsky; Deborah L Toppmeyer; Virginia G Kaklamani; Jeffrey L Berenberg; Jeffrey Abrams; George W Sledge Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Yi Ren; Gita Suneja; Samantha M Thomas; Rachel A Greenup; Jennifer K Plichta; Laura H Rosenberger; Jeremy Force; Terry Hyslop; E Shelley Hwang Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Abigail S Caudle; Tse-Kuan Yu; Susan L Tucker; Isabelle Bedrosian; Jennifer K Litton; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Karen Hoffman; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Kelly K Hunt; Thomas A Buchholz; Elizabeth A Mittendorf Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: S Darby; P McGale; C Correa; C Taylor; R Arriagada; M Clarke; D Cutter; C Davies; M Ewertz; J Godwin; R Gray; L Pierce; T Whelan; Y Wang; R Peto Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-10-19 Impact factor: 79.321