Yanhong Chu1, Lingyu Qian1,2, Yaohua Ke1, Xiaoyu Feng1, Xinjie Chen1, Fangcen Liu3, Lixia Yu1, Lianru Zhang1, Yaping Tao1, Rui Xu1, Jia Wei1, Baorui Liu1, Qin Liu4. 1. The Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, China. 2. Department of Oncology, Rudong Peoples' Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Nantong, China. 3. Department of Pathology, Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China. 4. The Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, China. liuqin@nju.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neoantigens are considered ideal targets for immunotherapy, especially tumor vaccine, because of their strong specificity and immunogenicity. Here, we developed a neoantigen nanovaccine used liposomes with lymph-node targeting characteristic. METHODS: Our nanovaccine was composed of neoantigens, an amphiphilic liposome and an adjuvant Montanide™ ISA 51. Small animal imaging system and immunofluorescence staining were used to identify the distribution of nanovaccines. A subcutaneous-tumor-resection mouse model of melanoma was established to evaluate the anti-tumor efficacy. Flow cytometry was performed to assay the immune responses initiated by nanovaccines. RESULTS: Nanovaccines could traffic to lymph nodes, be uptaken by CD11c+ DCs and promote DCs maturity. After the treatment of our neoantigen nanovaccines, the average recurrence time was extended from 11 to 16 days and the median survival time was even prolonged 7.5 days relative to the control group (NS group). Nanovaccines increased neoantigen-specific T cells to 10-fold of free vaccines, and upregulated Th1 cytokines, such as IFN-γ and TNF-α. The anti-tumor activity of spleen lymphocytes in the nanovaccine group was significantly stronger than that of other groups. However, some immune-inhibitory cells or molecules in tumor microenvironment have been detected upregulated under the immune pressure of neoantigen nanovaccines, such as Tregs and PD-L1. The efficacy of the neoantigen nanovaccine combined with anti-PD1 antibody or Treg inhibiting peptide P60 was better than that of the single treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a general vaccine strategy, triggering specific T cell responses, and provided feasible combination strategies for better anti-tumor efficacy.
BACKGROUND: Neoantigens are considered ideal targets for immunotherapy, especially tumor vaccine, because of their strong specificity and immunogenicity. Here, we developed a neoantigen nanovaccine used liposomes with lymph-node targeting characteristic. METHODS: Our nanovaccine was composed of neoantigens, an amphiphilic liposome and an adjuvant Montanide™ ISA 51. Small animal imaging system and immunofluorescence staining were used to identify the distribution of nanovaccines. A subcutaneous-tumor-resection mouse model of melanoma was established to evaluate the anti-tumor efficacy. Flow cytometry was performed to assay the immune responses initiated by nanovaccines. RESULTS: Nanovaccines could traffic to lymph nodes, be uptaken by CD11c+ DCs and promote DCs maturity. After the treatment of our neoantigen nanovaccines, the average recurrence time was extended from 11 to 16 days and the median survival time was even prolonged 7.5 days relative to the control group (NS group). Nanovaccines increased neoantigen-specific T cells to 10-fold of free vaccines, and upregulated Th1 cytokines, such as IFN-γ and TNF-α. The anti-tumor activity of spleen lymphocytes in the nanovaccine group was significantly stronger than that of other groups. However, some immune-inhibitory cells or molecules in tumor microenvironment have been detected upregulated under the immune pressure of neoantigen nanovaccines, such as Tregs and PD-L1. The efficacy of the neoantigen nanovaccine combined with anti-PD1 antibody or Treg inhibiting peptide P60 was better than that of the single treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a general vaccine strategy, triggering specific T cell responses, and provided feasible combination strategies for better anti-tumor efficacy.
Authors: Noelia Casares; Francesc Rudilla; Laura Arribillaga; Diana Llopiz; José Ignacio Riezu-Boj; Teresa Lozano; Jacinto López-Sagaseta; Laura Guembe; Pablo Sarobe; Jesús Prieto; Francisco Borrás-Cuesta; Juan José Lasarte Journal: J Immunol Date: 2010-09-24 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Lydia Dyck; Mieszko M Wilk; Mathilde Raverdeau; Alicja Misiak; Louis Boon; Kingston H G Mills Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: Patrick A Ott; Zhuting Hu; Derin B Keskin; Sachet A Shukla; Jing Sun; David J Bozym; Wandi Zhang; Adrienne Luoma; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Lauren Peter; Christina Chen; Oriol Olive; Todd A Carter; Shuqiang Li; David J Lieb; Thomas Eisenhaure; Evisa Gjini; Jonathan Stevens; William J Lane; Indu Javeri; Kaliappanadar Nellaiappan; Andres M Salazar; Heather Daley; Michael Seaman; Elizabeth I Buchbinder; Charles H Yoon; Maegan Harden; Niall Lennon; Stacey Gabriel; Scott J Rodig; Dan H Barouch; Jon C Aster; Gad Getz; Kai Wucherpfennig; Donna Neuberg; Jerome Ritz; Eric S Lander; Edward F Fritsch; Nir Hacohen; Catherine J Wu Journal: Nature Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 49.962