| Literature DB >> 35418058 |
Yuri Noda1, Mitsuaki Ishida2, Yasuhiro Ueno3, Takuo Fujisawa4, Hiroshi Iwai4, Koji Tsuta2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extranodal extension (ENE) is a poor prognostic factor for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Identifying ENE by clinical and/or radiological examination is difficult, thereby leading to unnecessary neck dissections. Currently, no definitive predictors are available for ENE. Thus, we aimed to determine the histological predictors of ENE by routine histopathological examination using biopsy and surgically resected specimens.Entities:
Keywords: Desmoplastic reaction; Extranodal extension; Oral squamous cell carcinoma; Predictor; Tumor budding; Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35418058 PMCID: PMC9006434 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09393-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Definition and measurement of ENE and evaluation of DR, TILs, and TB at ENE. a Diameters of the extent of ENE and tumor deposits were recorded as the widest length of the dissected lymph nodes of the same patients (H&E staining, × 15). b, c The ENE region shows immature stroma, low-grade TILs, and nine budding areas (arrows: budding) (H&E staining, b, × 100; c, × 400). DR, desmoplastic reaction; ENE, extranodal extension; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; TB, tumor budding; TILs, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Fig. 2TB, TILs, and TB grading. a Immature stroma (DR-I), with a fibrotic stroma showing myxoid changes (H&E staining, × 200). b, c Mature stroma (DR-M), with no myxoid stroma or keloid-like collagen (H&E staining, × 200). a, b TILs with low lymphocyte infiltration (TILs-L ≤ 20%) (H&E staining, × 200). c TILs with high-to-low lymphocyte infiltration (TILs-H > 20%) (H&E staining, × 200). d TB classified as low (TB-L ≤ 10, arrowheads: budding) (H&E staining, × 400). e, f TB classified as high (TB-H > 10, arrowheads: budding) (H&E staining, × 200). DR-I, immature desmoplastic reaction; DR-M, mature desmoplastic reaction; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; TB, tumor budding; TILs, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Patients’ demographics
| All patients ( | Early OSCC ( | Progressive OSCC ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | No. of patients | % | No. of patients | % | No. of patients | % | |
| Sex | Female | 71 | (38.1) | 36 | (39.1) | 35 | (37.2) |
| Male | 115 | (61.8) | 56 | (60.9) | 59 | (62.8) | |
| Age, years | Mean age | 68.9 (range, 31 − 91) | 69 (range, 31 − 91) | 68.6 (range, 38 − 87) | |||
| ≥ 64 | 57 | (30.6) | 27 | (29.3) | 30 | (31.9) | |
| < 64 | 129 | (69.4) | 65 | (70.7) | 64 | (68.1) | |
| High-risk HPV exposure | No | 186 | (100) | 92 | (100) | 94 | (100) |
| Anatomical site | Palate | 4 | (2.1) | 4 | (4.3) | 0 | (0) |
| Oral floor | 3 | (1.6) | 2 | (2.2) | 1 | (1.1) | |
| Gingiva | 29 | (15.6) | 4 | (4.3) | 25 | (26.6) | |
| Tongue | 129 | (69.3) | 67 | (72.8) | 62 | (66.0) | |
| Buccal mucosa | 21 | (11.3) | 15 | (16.3) | 6 | (0) | |
| DOI | ≤ 5 mm | 63 | (33.9) | 58 | (63.0) | 5 | (5.3) |
| > 5 mm | 123 | (66.1) | 34 | (40.0) | 89 | (94.7) | |
| DOI | ≤ 10 mm | 102 | (54.9) | 92 | (100) | 10 | (10.6) |
| > 10 mm | 84 | (45.2) | 0 | (0) | 84 | (9.4) | |
| LyV | Negative | 73 | (39.2) | 54 | (58.7) | 19 | (20.2) |
| Positive | 113 | (60.8) | 38 | (41.3) | 75 | (79.8) | |
| ENE | Negative | 159 | (85.5) | 90 | (97.8) | 69 | (73.4) |
| Positive | 27 | (14.5) | 2 | (2.2) | 25 | (26.6) | |
| pT | 1, 2 | 92 | (49.5) | 92 | (100) | 0 | (0) |
| 3, 4 | 94 | (50.5) | 0 | (0) | 94 | (100) | |
| pN | 0 | 128 | (68.8) | 83 | (90.2) | 45 | (47.9) |
| 1 | 16 | (8.6) | 4 | (4.3) | 12 | (64.5) | |
| 2, 3 | 42 | (22.6) | 5 | (5.4) | 37 | (19.9) | |
OSCC Oral squamous cell carcinoma, HPV Human papilloma virus, DOI Depth of invasion, LyV Lymphovascular invasion, ENE Extranodal extension, pT pathological T, pN pathological N. DOI included both cDOI and pDOI because the cohorts of clinical DOI and pathological DOI were matched 100% (concordance rate = 100%); cutoff points were DOI ≤ 5 mm/DOI > 5 mm and DOI ≤ 10 mm/DOI > 10 mm
Association of clinicopathological features with DR, TB, and TILs using surgically resected specimens
| Desmoplastic reaction | Tumor budding | Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mature | (%) | Immature | (%) | Low | (%) | High | (%) | High | (%) | Low | % | ||||
| Sex | 0.81 | 0.19 | 0.06 | ||||||||||||
| Female | 29 | (41) | 42 | (59) | 53 | (75) | 18 | (25) | 44 | (62) | 27 | (38) | |||
| Male | 49 | (43) | 66 | (57) | 95 | (83) | 20 | (17) | 55 | (48) | 60 | (52) | |||
| Age, years | 0.17 | 0.59 | |||||||||||||
| < 65 | 28 | (49) | 29 | (50) | 41 | (72) | 16 | (28) | 32 | (56) | 25 | (44) | |||
| ≥ 65 | 50 | (39) | 79 | (61) | 107 | (83) | 22 | (17) | 67 | (52) | 62 | (48) | |||
| Location | 0.63 | 0.6 | 0.36 | ||||||||||||
| Palate | 3 | (75) | 1 | (21) | 4 | (100) | 0 | (0) | 3 | (75) | 1 | (25) | |||
| Oral floor | 1 | (33) | 2 | (60) | 3 | (100) | 0 | (0) | 2 | (67) | 1 | (33) | |||
| Gingiva | 12 | (41) | 17 | (58) | 22 | (76) | 7 | (24) | 11 | (38) | 18 | (62) | |||
| Tongue | 55 | (43) | 74 | (57) | 101 | (78) | 28 | (22) | 70 | (54) | 59 | (46) | |||
| Buccal mucosa | 7 | (33) | 14 | (66) | 18 | (86) | 3 | (14) | 13 | (62) | 8 | (38) | |||
| pDOI | 0.06 | ||||||||||||||
| ≥ 5 mm | 46 | (73) | 17 | (27) | 55 | (87) | 8 | (13) | 49 | (78) | 14 | (22) | |||
| < 5 mm | 32 | (26) | 91 | (74) | 93 | (76) | 30 | (24) | 50 | (41) | 73 | (59) | |||
| pDOI | |||||||||||||||
| ≥ 10 mm | 57 | (56) | 45 | (44) | 88 | (86) | 14 | (14) | 72 | (71) | 30 | (29) | |||
| < 10 mm | 21 | (25) | 63 | (75) | 60 | (71) | 24 | (29) | 27 | (32) | 57 | (68) | |||
| Metastasis | |||||||||||||||
| Absent | 68 | (53) | 60 | (47) | 108 | (84) | 20 | (16) | 79 | (62) | 49 | (38) | |||
| Present | 10 | (17) | 48 | (83) | 40 | (69) | 18 | (31) | 20 | (34) | 38 | (66) | |||
| Number of LNs | |||||||||||||||
| 68 | (53) | 60 | (47) | 108 | (84) | 20 | (16) | 79 | (62) | 49 | (38) | ||||
| 5 | (23) | 16 | (76) | 16 | (76) | 5 | (24) | 10 | (48) | 11 | (52) | ||||
| 5 | (13) | 32 | (86) | 24 | (65) | 13 | (35) | 10 | (27) | 27 | (73) | ||||
| Pattern of invasion | |||||||||||||||
| 1, 2 | 30 | (70) | 13 | (30) | 40 | (93) | 3 | (7) | 31 | (72) | 12 | (28) | |||
| 3, 4 | 48 | (34) | 95 | (66) | 108 | (76) | 35 | (24) | 68 | (48) | 75 | (52) | |||
| LyV | |||||||||||||||
| Absent | 44 | (60) | 29 | (39) | 64 | (88) | 9 | (12) | 50 | (68) | 23 | (32) | |||
| Present | 34 | (30) | 79 | (70) | 84 | (74) | 29 | (26) | 49 | (43) | 64 | (57) | |||
| pT | |||||||||||||||
| 1, 2 | 54 | (59) | 38 | (41) | 80 | (87) | 12 | (13) | 67 | (73) | 25 | (27) | |||
| 3. 4 | 24 | (26) | 70 | (74) | 68 | (72) | 26 | (28) | 32 | (34) | 62 | (66) | |||
| pN | |||||||||||||||
| 0 | 68 | (53) | 60 | (47) | 108 | (84) | 20 | (16) | 79 | (42) | 49 | (41) | |||
| 1, | 3 | (19) | 13 | (81) | 13 | (81) | 3 | (19) | 6 | (37) | 10 | (63) | |||
| 2, 3 | 7 | (17) | 35 | (83) | 27 | (64) | 15 | (36) | 14 | (33) | 28 | (67) | |||
OSCC Oral squamous cell carcinoma, DR Desmoplastic reaction, TB Tumor budding, TILs Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, pDOI pathological depth of invasion, LN lymph nodes, LyV lymphovascular invasion, pT pathological T, pN pathological N. Boldface indicates statistically significant values
Relationships among DR, TB, and TILs in ENE and resection (n = 27)
| In matched ENE ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR | |||||
| 3 | 2 | 89% | |||
| 1 | 21 | ||||
| CR | |||||
| 13 | 2 | 74% | |||
| 5 | 7 | ||||
| CR | |||||
| 13 | 4 | 78% | |||
| 2 | 8 | ||||
DR Desmoplastic reaction, TB Tumor budding, TILs Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, ENE Extranodal extension, CR Concordance rate, DR-I Immature desmoplastic reaction, DR-M Mature desmoplastic reaction, TB-H High tumor budding, TB-L Low tumor budding, TILs-L Low-grade tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, TILs-H High-grade tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte
Association of clinicopathological features with DR, TB, and TILs in biopsy specimens
| Desmoplastic reaction | Budding | Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mature | (%) | Immature | (%) | Low | (%) | High | (%) | High | (%) | Low | % | ||||
| Sex | 0.44 | 0.62 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
| Female | 13 | (39) | 20 | (61) | 26 | (79) | 7 | (21) | 19 | (58) | 14 | (42) | |||
| Male | 24 | (48) | 26 | (52) | 37 | (74) | 13 | (26) | 25 | (50) | 25 | (50) | |||
| Age, years | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.68 | ||||||||||||
| < 63 | 12 | (40) | 18 | 60) | 24 | (80) | 6 | (20) | 15 | (50) | 15 | (50) | |||
| ≥ 64 | 25 | (47) | 28 | (53) | 39 | (74) | 14 | (26) | 29 | (55) | 24 | (45) | |||
| Location | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.73 | ||||||||||||
| Palate | 1 | (100) | 0 | (0) | 1 | (100) | 0 | (0) | 1 | (100) | 0 | (0) | |||
| Oral floor | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | |||
| Gingiva | 6 | (43) | 8 | (57) | 12 | (86) | 2 | (14) | 7 | (50) | 7 | (50) | |||
| Tongue | 26 | (43) | 34 | (57) | 45 | (75) | 15 | (25) | 31 | (52) | 29 | (48) | |||
| Buccal mucosa | 4 | (50) | 4 | (50) | 5 | (62) | 3 | (38) | 5 | (63) | 3 | (38) | |||
| cDOI | 0.28 | ||||||||||||||
| ≤ 5 mm | 25 | (86) | 4 | (14) | 24 | (83) | 5 | (17) | 22 | (76) | 7 | (24) | |||
| > 5 mm | 12 | (22) | 42 | (78) | 39 | (72) | 15 | (328) | 22 | (41) | 32 | (59) | |||
| cDOI | |||||||||||||||
| ≤ 10 mm | 29 | (69) | 13 | (31) | 35 | (83) | 7 | (17) | 31 | (74) | 11 | (26) | |||
| > 10 mm | 8 | (20) | 33 | (80) | 28 | (68) | 13 | (32) | 13 | (32) | 28 | (68) | |||
| Metastasis | |||||||||||||||
| Absent | 31 | (55) | 25 | (45) | 44 | (79) | 12 | (21) | 36 | (64) | 20 | (36) | |||
| Present | 6 | (22) | 21 | (78) | 19 | (70) | 8 | (30) | 8 | (30) | 19 | (70) | |||
| Number of LNs | |||||||||||||||
| 31 | (55) | 25 | (45) | 44 | (79) | 12 | (21) | 36 | (64) | 20 | (36) | ||||
| 2 | (17) | 10 | (83) | 11 | (92) | 1 | (8) | 3 | (25) | 9 | (75) | ||||
| 4 | (27) | 11 | (73) | 8 | (53) | 7 | (47) | 5 | (33) | 10 | (67) | ||||
| pT | 0.06 | ||||||||||||||
| 1, 2 | 27 | (75) | 9 | (25) | 31 | (86) | 5 | (14) | 27 | (75) | 9 | (25) | |||
| 3, 4 | 10 | (21) | 37 | (79) | 32 | (68) | 15 | (32) | 17 | (36) | 30 | (64) | |||
| pN | |||||||||||||||
| 0 | 31 | (55) | 25 | (45) | 44 | (79) | 12 | (21) | 36 | (64) | 20 | (36) | |||
| 1 | 2 | (22) | 7 | (78) | 8 | (89) | 1 | (11) | 2 | (22) | 7 | (78) | |||
| 2, 3 | 4 | (22) | 14 | (78) | 11 | (61) | 7 | (39) | 6 | (33) | 12 | (67) | |||
DR Desmoplastic reaction, TB Tumor budding, TILs Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, cDOI clinical depth of invasion, LN lymph nodes, pT pathological T, pN pathological N
Relationships among DR, TB, and TILs in ENE and biopsy (n = 10)
| In matched ENE ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR | |||||
| 0 | 0 | 100% | ― | ||
| 0 | 10 | ||||
| CR | |||||
| 5 | 1 | 90% | |||
| 0 | 4 | ||||
| CR | |||||
| 1 | 1 | 90% | |||
| 0 | 8 | ||||
DR Desmoplastic reaction, TB Tumor budding, TILs Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, ENE Extranodal extension, CR Concordance rate, DR-I Immature desmoplastic reaction, DR-M Mature desmoplastic reaction, TB-H High tumor budding, TB-L Low tumor budding, TILs-L Low-grade tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, TILs-H High-grade tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Relationships among DR, TB, and TILs in biopsy and resection (n = 83)
| In matched biopsy ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR | |||||
| 30 | 7 | 83% | |||
| 7 | 39 | ||||
| CR | |||||
| 55 | 11 | 77% | |||
| 8 | 9 | ||||
| CR | |||||
| 36 | 8 | 82% | |||
| 8 | 31 | ||||
DR Desmoplastic reaction, TB Tumor budding, TILs Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, ENE Extranodal extension, CR Concordance rate, DR-I Immature desmoplastic reaction, DR-M Mature desmoplastic reaction, TB-H High tumor budding, TB-L Low tumor budding, TILs-L Low-grade tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, TILs-H High-grade tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of ENE using surgically resected specimens
| Odds ratio | 95% CI | Odds ratio | 95% CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DR-I | 1.71 | 0.52 − 5.63 | 0.38 | |||
| TB-H | 3.30 | 1.15 − 9.60 | 3.14 | 1.25 − 7.91 | ||
| TILs-L | 1.74 | 0.59 − 5.12 | 0.31 | |||
| pDOI > 5 mm | 1.47 | 0.18 − 11.7 | 0.71 | |||
| pDOI > 10 mm | 6.90 | 1.49 − 31.9 | 8.05 | 2.62 − 24.7 | ||
| DR-I | 1.04 | 0.29 − 3.68 | 0.94 | |||
| TB-H | 1.04 | 1.37 − 13.3 | ||||
| TILs-L | 1.59 | 0.50 − 5.02 | 0.42 | |||
| pDOI > 5 mm | 1.06 | 0.04 − 27.4 | 0.97 | |||
| pDOI > 10 mm | 1.40 | 0.13 − 14.4 | 0.67 | |||
| DR-I | 0.58 | 0.13–2.66 | 0.48 | |||
| TB-H | 5.70 | 1.39 − 23.4 | ||||
| TILs-L | 2.37 | 0.64 − 9.94 | 0.20 | |||
| pDOI > 5 mm | 0.31 | 0.02 − 4.40 | 0.38 | |||
| pDOI > 10 mm | 2.99 | 0.50 − 17.9 | 0.23 | |||
CI Confidence interval, DR-I Immature desmoplastic reaction, TB-H High tumor budding, TILs-L Low-grade tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, pDOI pathological depth of invasion, ENE Extranodal extension
Prediction of ENE by single and combination risk factors in biopsy and surgically resected specimens
| Risk factors | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Accuracy (%) | Cohort proportion (n; yes vs. no) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TB-H | 44 | 84 | 33 | 90 | 78 | (38:148) | |
| pDOI > 10 mm | 85 | 62 | 27 | 96 | 65 | (84:102) | |
| TB-H/pDOI > 10 mm | 37 | 91 | 42 | 88 | 83 | (24:162) | |
| DR-I | 100 | 51 | 22 | 100 | 57 | (46:37) | |
| TILs-L | 80 | 58 | 21 | 95 | 60 | (39:44) | |
| TB-H | - | - | - | - | - | 0.16 | (20:63) |
| cDOI > 10 mm | 90 | 56 | 22 | 98 | 60 | (41:42) | |
| DR-I/TILs-L | 80 | 31 | 26 | 96 | 70 | (31:52) | |
| DR-I/TILs-L/cDOI > 10 mm | 70 | 77 | 29 | 95 | 76 | (24:59) | |
PPV Positive predictive value, NPV Negative predictive value, CR Concordance rate, TB-H High tumor budding, pDOI pathological depth of invasion, DR-I Immature desmoplastic reaction, TILs-L Low-grade tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, cDOI clinical depth of invasion, ENE Extranodal extension. Boldface indicates statistically significant values