Literature DB >> 35417987

Comparison of different size left-sided double-lumen.

Raisa D Nguyen1, Bryan J Hierlmeier1, Lakshmi N Kurnutala1, Michelle A Tucci1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35417987      PMCID: PMC9244261          DOI: 10.4103/aca.aca_203_21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth        ISSN: 0971-9784


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor, We appreciate the review and the comments regarding our article, “Comparison of different size left-sided double-lumen tubes for thoracic surgery.” Although we agree, one size cannot fit all, a 35F DLT can be safely used for most adult patients. Amar et al. also showed that the use of a 35F DLT in adults was associated with a similar and not worse incidence of the most common clinical outcomes in comparison to conventional sizing recommendations.[1234] It has been recommended by some investigators to keep the bronchial cuff inflation pressures less than 25 cm H2O to avoid compromise of mucosal blood flow.[5] It has been demonstrated that cuff pressure does not necessarily correlate to pressure exerted on the bronchial wall.[5] We did not specifically record the pressure or the amount of air inflated in the bronchial cuff between the two groups; however, it was never more than 5 mL of air. Inflation of the bronchial cuff was only done under direct visualization with the fiberoptic scope and only enough air to create a visible seal around the left main bronchus. In our study, we had no issues maintaining the end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) below 45 mmHg and no events of sustained high peak airway pressures or issues with ventilation. A recent study published by Kar et al.[6] showed that a smaller DLT than recommended for lung isolation did not lead to any clinically appreciable problems in lung isolation, surgeon complaint, or complications associated with spillage. Time to lung collapse was not part of our study; however, we agree that a larger DLT may lead to quicker lung collapse when isolating. Although this may be statistically significant, it is unlikely to be clinically significant. Bussieres et al. showed that surgeons could not reliably determine which device was being used based on the time and quality of lung collapse when comparing double-lumen tubes and bronchial blockers.[7] In conclusion, although there were limitations to our smaller study, we do agree that a 35F DLT cannot be used for all patients, but can safely be used in most adult patients.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  7 in total

1.  A cadaver study to measure the adult glottis and subglottis: defining a problem associated with the use of double-lumen tubes.

Authors:  Alan H Seymour; Navin Prakash
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 2.  Current techniques for perioperative lung isolation in adults.

Authors:  Javier H Campos
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 3.  Left double-lumen tubes: clinical experience with 1,170 patients.

Authors:  Jay B Brodsky; Harry J M Lemmens
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  Lung isolation in thoracic anesthesia, state of the art.

Authors:  Peter Slinger
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Bronchial blocker versus left double-lumen endotracheal tube in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized-controlled trial examining time and quality of lung deflation.

Authors:  Jean S Bussières; Jacques Somma; José Luis Carrasco Del Castillo; Jérôme Lemieux; Massimo Conti; Paula A Ugalde; Nathalie Gagné; Yves Lacasse
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  A comparison of the reliability of two techniques of left double-lumen tube bronchial cuff inflation in producing water-tight seal of the left mainstem bronchus.

Authors:  M S Hannallah; F Gharagozloo; M N Gomes; G A Chase
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Practice patterns of left-sided double-lumen tube: Does it match recommendation from literature - A single-centre observational pilot study.

Authors:  Prachi Kar; Archana Pathy; Ayya Syama Sundar; Ramachandran Gopinath; Srilata Moningi
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.