Literature DB >> 35417677

A genealogical estimate of genetic relationships.

Caoqi Fan1, Nicholas Mancuso2, Charleston W K Chiang3.   

Abstract

The application of genetic relationships among individuals, characterized by a genetic relationship matrix (GRM), has far-reaching effects in human genetics. However, the current standard to calculate the GRM treats linked markers as independent and does not explicitly model the underlying genealogical history of the study sample. Here, we propose a coalescent-informed framework, namely the expected GRM (eGRM), to infer the expected relatedness between pairs of individuals given an ancestral recombination graph (ARG) of the sample. Through extensive simulations, we show that the eGRM is an unbiased estimate of latent pairwise genome-wide relatedness and is robust when computed with ARG inferred from incomplete genetic data. As a result, the eGRM better captures the structure of a population than the canonical GRM, even when using the same genetic information. More importantly, our framework allows a principled approach to estimate the eGRM at different time depths of the ARG, thereby revealing the time-varying nature of population structure in a sample. When applied to SNP array genotypes from a population sample from Northern and Eastern Finland, we find that clustering analysis with the eGRM reveals population structure driven by subpopulations that would not be apparent via the canonical GRM and that temporally the population model is consistent with recent divergence and expansion. Taken together, our proposed eGRM provides a robust tree-centric estimate of relatedness with wide application to genetic studies.
Copyright © 2022 American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ancestral recombination graph; genetic relationship matrix; population structure

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35417677      PMCID: PMC9118131          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.043


  56 in total

1.  Improved linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Jennifer Listgarten; Christoph Lippert; Carl M Kadie; Robert I Davidson; Eleazar Eskin; David Heckerman
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  The genome-wide patterns of variation expose significant substructure in a founder population.

Authors:  Eveliina Jakkula; Karola Rehnström; Teppo Varilo; Olli P H Pietiläinen; Tiina Paunio; Nancy L Pedersen; Ulf deFaire; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; Juha Saharinen; Nelson Freimer; Samuli Ripatti; Shaun Purcell; Andrew Collins; Mark J Daly; Aarno Palotie; Leena Peltonen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  A Comprehensive Map of Genetic Variation in the World's Largest Ethnic Group-Han Chinese.

Authors:  Charleston W K Chiang; Serghei Mangul; Christopher Robles; Sriram Sankararaman
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Haplotype Sharing Provides Insights into Fine-Scale Population History and Disease in Finland.

Authors:  Alicia R Martin; Konrad J Karczewski; Sini Kerminen; Mitja I Kurki; Antti-Pekka Sarin; Mykyta Artomov; Johan G Eriksson; Tõnu Esko; Giulio Genovese; Aki S Havulinna; Jaakko Kaprio; Alexandra Konradi; László Korányi; Anna Kostareva; Minna Männikkö; Andres Metspalu; Markus Perola; Rashmi B Prasad; Olli Raitakari; Oxana Rotar; Veikko Salomaa; Leif Groop; Aarno Palotie; Benjamin M Neale; Samuli Ripatti; Matti Pirinen; Mark J Daly
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Variation in actual relationship as a consequence of Mendelian sampling and linkage.

Authors:  W G Hill; B S Weir
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  A unified genealogy of modern and ancient genomes.

Authors:  Yan Wong; Jerome Kelleher; Gil McVean; Anthony Wilder Wohns; Ben Jeffery; Ali Akbari; Swapan Mallick; Ron Pinhasi; Nick Patterson; David Reich
Journal:  Science       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Efficient Bayesian mixed-model analysis increases association power in large cohorts.

Authors:  Po-Ru Loh; George Tucker; Brendan K Bulik-Sullivan; Bjarni J Vilhjálmsson; Hilary K Finucane; Rany M Salem; Daniel I Chasman; Paul M Ridker; Benjamin M Neale; Bonnie Berger; Nick Patterson; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Polygenic adaptation on height is overestimated due to uncorrected stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Mashaal Sohail; Robert M Maier; Benjamin Neale; Iain Mathieson; David Reich; Shamil R Sunyaev; Andrea Ganna; Alex Bloemendal; Alicia R Martin; Michael C Turchin; Charleston Wk Chiang; Joel Hirschhorn; Mark J Daly; Nick Patterson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  The Opportunities and Challenges of Integrating Population Histories Into Genetic Studies for Diverse Populations: A Motivating Example From Native Hawaiians.

Authors:  Charleston W K Chiang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Demographic history mediates the effect of stratification on polygenic scores.

Authors:  Arslan A Zaidi; Iain Mathieson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 8.713

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.