Literature DB >> 35416999

Errors in Results and Table 3.

.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35416999      PMCID: PMC9008501          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


× No keyword cloud information.
In the Original Investigation titled “Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Pain Control After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial,”[1] published February 28, 2022, there were errors in the Quality of Blinding subsection and the P values reported in Table 3. In terms of identifying their group assignment, the difference between the acupuncture and placebo groups was statistically significant (P = .02). In Table 3 for the perception of group allocation, there were 58 participants in the acupuncture group and 55 in the placebo group. The correct P value for the responses is P = .02. A total of 59 participants in the acupuncture group and 55 in the placebo group responded to the question, “Do you want acupuncture again?” The correct P value for the responses is P = .15. This article has been corrected.[1]
  1 in total

1.  Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Pain Control After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Taras I Usichenko; Berthold Johannes Henkel; Catharina Klausenitz; Thomas Hesse; Guillermo Pierdant; Mike Cummings; Klaus Hahnenkamp
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-02-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.