| Literature DB >> 35416710 |
N Falk1, A J Berenstein2, G Moscatelli1, S Moroni1, N González1, G Ballering1, H Freilij1, J Altcheh1.
Abstract
Chagas disease (ChD), caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, has a global prevalence due to patient migration. However, despite its worldwide distribution, long-term follow-up efficacy studies with nifurtimox (NF) are scarce and have been conducted with only small numbers of patients. A retrospective study of a large cohort of ChD treated children and adults with NF. Treatment response was evaluated by clinical, parasitological, and serological after-treatment evaluation. A total of 289 patients were enrolled, of which 199 were children and 90 adults. At diagnosis, 89.6% of patients were asymptomatic. Overall, all symptomatic patients showed clinical improvement. At baseline, parasitemia was positive in 130 of 260 (50%) patients. All but one adult patient had cleared their parasitemia by the end of treatment. That patient was considered a treatment failure. Median follow-up time for children was 37.7 months, with an interquartile range of (IQR25-75 12.2 to 85.3), and for adults was 14.2 months (IQR25-75, 1.9 to 33.8). After treatment, a decrease of T. cruzi antibodies and seroconversion were observed in 34.6% of patients. The seroconversion profile showed that, the younger the patient, the higher the rate of seroconversion (log rank test; P value, <0.01). At least 20% seroreduction at 1 year follow-up was observed in 33.2% of patients. Nifurtimox was highly effective for ChD treatment. Patients had excellent treatment responses with fully resolved symptoms related to acute T. cruzi infection. Clearance of parasitemia and a decrease in T. cruzi antibodies were observed as markers of treatment response. This study reinforces the importance of treating patients during childhood since the treatment response was more marked in younger subjects. (This protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT04274101).Entities:
Keywords: Trypanosoma cruzi; adults; children; efficacy; follow-up; nifurtimox; treatment; treatment effectiveness
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35416710 PMCID: PMC9112880 DOI: 10.1128/aac.02021-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.191
FIG 1Flow diagram.
Demographic data
| Demographic | No. of patients (%) (0–8 mo); | No. of patients (%) (8 mo–2 yrs); | No. of patients (%) (2–7 yrs); | No. of patients (%) (7–12 yrs); | No. of patients (%) (12–18 yrs); | No. of patients (%) ≥18 yrs; | Total no. of patients (%); |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||||||
| Female | 30 (56.6) | 17 (41.5) | 17 (41.5) | 17 (48.6) | 20 (69.0) | 77 (85.6) | 178 (61.6) |
| Male | 23 (43.4) | 24 (58.5) | 24 (58.5) | 18 (51.4) | 9 (31.0) | 13 (14.4) | 111 (38.4) |
| Age (mo) | |||||||
| Median [Q1, Q3] | 2.00 [1.00, 4.00] | 13.0 [10.0, 15.0] | 48.0 [32.0, 60.0] | 120 [96.0, 120] | 168 [156, 192] | 414 [351, 456] | 96 [12, 336] |
| Mean (SD) | 2.66 (1.74) | 13.0 (3.55) | 45.5 (14.6) | 110 (17.1) | 172 (21.0) | 412 (88.3) | 168 (179) |
| Min-max | 1.00–7.00 | 8.00–19.0 | 24.0–72.0 | 84.0–132 | 144–215 | 228–684 | 1.00–684 |
| Route of infection | |||||||
| Vector borne | 1 (1.9) | 3 (7.3) | 9 (22.0) | 6 (17.1) | 3 (10.3) | 8 (8.9) | 30 (10.4) |
| Congenital | 51 (96.2) | 34 (82.9) | 16 (39.0) | 7 (20.0) | 5 (17.2) | 8 (8.9) | 121 (41.9) |
| Blood transfusion | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.4) | 0 | 0 | 1 (1.1) | 2 (0.7) |
| Undetermined | 1 (1.9) | 4 (9.8) | 15 (36.6) | 22 (62.9) | 21 (72.4) | 73 (81.1) | 136 (47.1) |
Age group notation uses a parenthesis when the age limit is not included in the group and a squared bracket when the age limit is included (see section Study design and population).
Clinical finding in symptomatic patients (vector borne and congenital)
| Route of infection/clinical finding | No. of patients (%) |
|---|---|
| Vector borne | |
| Clinical examination | |
| Symptomatic | 12 (40.0) |
| Symptoms | |
| Ocular chagoma | 11 (36.7) |
| Myocarditis | 2 (6.7) |
| Limbs chagoma | 1 (3.3) |
| Generalized edema | 1 (3.3) |
| Hepatomegaly | 1 (3.3) |
| 1 (3.3) | |
| Congenital | |
| Clinical examination | |
| Symptomatic | 18 (14.9) |
| Symptoms | |
| Hepatomegaly | 12 (9.9) |
| Jaundice | 3 (2.5) |
| Myocarditis | 5 (4.1) |
| Splenomegaly | 2 (1.7) |
| Generalized edema | 1 (0.8) |
| Petechiae | 1 (0.8) |
| Tachycardia | 1 (0.8) |
| Respiratory distress | 1 (0.8) |
| Pneumonia | 1 (0.8) |
| Hepatitis | 1 (0.8) |
| Cholelithiasis | 1 (0.8) |
| Seizures | 1 (0.8) |
All patients infected by blood transfusion and undetermined routes were asymptomatic. Note that a patient may present more than one symptom.
Kaplan-Meier summary analysis for median time to seroconversion and seroreduction events (see Fig. 2)
| Serconversion/seroreduction | No. of patients (%) (0–8 mo); | No. of patients (%) (8 mos–2 yr); | No. of patients (%) (2–7 yrs); | No. of patients (%) (7–12 yrs); | No. of patients (%) (12–18 yrs); | No. of patients (%) ≥18 yrs; | Total no.; |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seroconversion (%) | 34 (79) | 26 (66.6) | 22 (53.6) | 9 (25.7) | 4 (13.8) | 1 (1.1) | 96 (34.7) |
| Median time to seroconversion (mo) [95% CI] | 5.6 [4.1–10.6] | 26.4 [13.4–42.1] | 69.7 [45.8–142] | 144.1 [144–nd] | 142.5 [58.7–nd] | ||
| Seroreduction (%) | 38 (88.3) | 32 (82.0) | 29 (70.7) | 22 (62.8) | 20 (68.9) | 18 (20.0) | 159 (57.4) |
| Median time to seroreduction (mo) [95% CI] | 3.8 [2.8–5.6] | 8.4 [5.8–13.6] | 31.2 [13.8–55.1] | 37.8 [20.6–109] | 15.0 [8.4–147] | 31.9 [28.9–nd] |
The observed differences in median times to seroconversion and seroreduction among age groups was statistically significant (P = <0.01; log rank test). Only patients with positive serology at baseline were included. All summary statistics were obtained by means of the “survival” R package. Confidence intervals (CI) were computed using a logarithmic transformation of the survival function. Upper confidence level (UCL95) of median times requires to be computed at least one time point in the survival curve displaying a UCL95 estimation under 0.5 survival probability. Older age groups presenting a few events often do not satisfy that criterion. In such cases, the 95% CI depicts an “nd” symbol (no data).
FIG 2(A to C) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for seroconversion profile (A) and seroreduction profile (C) analysis stratified by age group. Ordinates depict the proportion of patients (P.P.) lacking seroconversion (A) or seroreduction (C). Only patients with positive serology at baseline 277/289 (95.8%) were included in the analysis. Of note, patients in the 0 to 8 months group have the fastest seroconversion rate. (B to D) Cox regression models for seroconversion (B) and seroreduction (D) analysis. In both cases, the infant age groups (0 to 8 months) were considered as reference for hazard ratio computing. Significance P values resulting from comparing HR among the considered reference are depicted according to the following: *, <0.05; **, <0.01; ***, <0.001. The whole analysis was performed by using the “survival” R package version 3.2-7 (29).
Analysis of seroconversion and seroreduction at 1 year follow-up
| Age group | No. (seropositive at baseline) | No. (1-yr follow-up) | Seroconversion (%) | Seroreduction (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (0–7 mo) | 43 | 38 | 26 (60.5) | 33 (76.7) |
| (8 mos | 39 | 33 | 10 (25.6) | 20 (51.2) |
| (2 | 41 | 33 | 3 (7.3) | 10 (24.4) |
| (7 | 35 | 30 | 2 (5.7) | 7 (20.0) |
| (12 | 29 | 27 | 0 (0) | 12 (41.4) |
| (Over 18 yrs) | 90 | 38 | 1 (1.1) | 10 (11.1) |
| Total | 277 | 199 | 42 (15.2) | 92 (33.2) |
Only patients with positive serology at baseline who were studied for at least 1 year after diagnosis were described. Percentages were computed in a conservative way by using the number of patients positive at baseline as denominator. In this way, we avoid any possible bias due to loss of patient follow-up.
FIG 3Kaplan-Meier curves of seroconversion (A) and seroreduction (B) stratified by parasitological results at baseline. Ordinates depict the proportion of patients (P.P.) lacking seroconversion (A) or seroreduction (B). Only patients with positive serology at baseline and a performed parasitological test were included in the analysis. Patients in the infant group (0 to 8 months) were excluded from this analysis in order to avoid a bias caused by the diagnosis criteria (see main text). Patients presenting a negative parasitological result at baseline (n = 130) were plotted in green (Parasit = N) and patients presenting a positive parasitological result (n = 76) at baseline were plotted in red (Parasit = P).