Literature DB >> 35415747

Systemic resilience and COVID-19: lessons from Taiwan.

Victoria Y Wang1.   

Abstract

In May 2021, Taiwan experienced its first COVID-19 surge. Up until then, this geopolitically vulnerable nation had contained the pandemic well. The situation seemed dire at the peak of the surge, however, within two months, the crisis had been resolved. Aside from technical measures such as border control and mandated social distancing, other underlying systemic factors- including an accreditation-strengthened and digitalized healthcare system, government resourcefulness, and continuously adaptive strategies- were crucial to Taiwan's success, and have demonstrated the importance of systemic resilience in terms of navigating the pandemic.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Taiwan; systemic resilience

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35415747      PMCID: PMC9047191          DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzac029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.257


Introduction

Two years into the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, infection rates and deaths continue to rise in many countries. In May 2021, Taiwan experienced its first COVID-19 surge. Up until then, Taiwan had contained the pandemic well, its people had lived a relatively normal life, with fewer than 1300 cases in total. The situation was worrisome at peak of the surge, but by mid-July of 2021, the crisis was quickly resolved. Was this solely because of fortune? Aside from technical measures including stringent border control, mask rationing, quarantining and mandated social distancing [1, 2], what are other underlying systemic factors that have helped this geopolitically vulnerable nation survive the pandemic?

Leadership and public cohesion

Having learned from the 2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreak, Taiwan knew it was imperative that a single agent handle a national public health crisis of this magnitude. In 2016, Taiwan completed its modernization of the Communicable Disease Control (CDC) and Disaster Prevention and Protection (DPP) Acts to provide legal support for emergency curfew, materials requisition, interjurisdictional coordination and economic stabilization [3]. These empowered the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) to mobilize resources from civil administration (such as police and fire departments etc.), transportation and even the national defense system. To establish public cohesion, the CECC was activated early on in January 2020; this has been central to Taiwan’s success in facilitating information transparency, case-based responses and population-based interventions [1, 2].

Prepared for the worst

For nearly 4 decades, cyclic hospital accreditation in Taiwan has strengthened its healthcare system’s preparedness for massive crises, during which infection control, risk management, safety and quality are the priorities. Over the years, Taiwan has rehearsed its Emerging Infectious Disease (EID) surveillance and response system through H1N1, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and avian flu scenarios. To prevent the healthcare system from being overwhelmed by crowds of COVID patients, Taiwan has integrated quarantine infirmaries, surge facilities and major medical centers into a sophisticated support network aimed at curbing community transmission [1, 2]. As early as mid-January 2020, Taiwan’s healthcare facilities started shifting to crisis operation mode by implementing visitor entry control, patient flow reconfiguration and zone compartmentalization [1, 2, 4]. Hospitals are required to place all admitted COVID patients in isolated wards, and to follow the evidence-based treatment guidelines issued by CECC. Taiwan’s National Healthcare Insurance (NHI) has also provided advanced payment plans to ensure hospitals’ financial sustainability during the pandemic.

Securing healthcare capacity

Taiwan learned bitter lessons when many healthcare workers (HCWs) succumbed to SARS. The Joint Commission of Taiwan (JCT) subsequently reformed Taiwan’s post-graduate medical education to enhance quality, safety, infection control and public health training. Protecting HCWs to secure healthcare capacity has remained Taiwan’s top priority throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Major actions have included: (i) maintaining adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies through the national security stockpile program; (ii) subsidizing HCWs to ensure adequate manpower in caring for COVID patients; (iii) preventing staff burnout by optimizing block or team shifts based on a reduced-workload policy; (iv) surveilling HCWs regularly for potential clusters; (v) providing mental health counseling and support to promote HCWs’ wellness; (vi) prioritizing HCWs for early vaccination [1, 2].

Digital transformation

COVID-19 has catalyzed rapid digital transformation. Taking advantage of its robust telecommunication infrastructure and information technology industry, Taiwan quickly adopted smart healthcare solutions to counter the pandemic [4]. GPS-equipped mobile phones and NHI smart healthcare cards are programmed for contact tracing and quarantine monitoring. Big data analyses on NHI, National Immigration Agency (NIA), and Taiwan Center of Disease Control (TCDC) databases provide valuable epidemiology and utilization predictions. It successfully identified early community breakthroughs from Diamond Princess cruise passengers [5-7]. Skyrocketing demands for non-contact healthcare through telemedicine have prompted the NHI to reimburse virtual healthcare services. Daily new confirmed cases per million population [8].

Continuously adaptive strategies

Due to the absence of large-scale community transmission in Taiwan, the CECC has maintained its stance that population-wide screening is scientifically unnecessary, labor-intensive, and economically costly. Learning from mistakes made while dealing with waves of cluster infections during the pandemic, the CECC has continuously refined its ‘targeted testing- contact investigation- evacuation- isolation’ (TCEI) tactics [1, 2]. Even at the height of the community surge, during which the government was heavily scrutinized for its complacency and for not providing universal screening/testing [6], the CECC stuck to its TCEI doctrine and successfully flattened the curve within 2 months (Figure 1) [8]. Continuous adherence to evidence-based guidelines and monitoring of the quality of COVID-19 management, including appropriate diagnostic testing, disease monitoring and treatment, is crucial.
Figure 1

Daily new confirmed cases per million population [8].

Vaccination efforts

Taiwan faces an unstable vaccine supply problem. However, pre-determined national policies have supported domestic vaccine development; a made-in-Taiwan, protein-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine has received emergency use authorization (EUA) to fulfill the gap of domestic demand.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 crisis has been dynamic with tremendous societal and economic impacts. The accreditation-strengthened, highly regulated and digitized healthcare system, as well as government financial support (including the reimbursement of virtual healthcare) and EID rehearsal strategies allowed Taiwan to establish its own anti-COVID playbook. Taiwan maximized its performance and exemplified how systemic resilience- with relentless preparation, proactive strategizing, resourceful leadership and adaptable mindset- helps navigate uncertainty during this once-in-a-century pandemic. As the pandemic continues, it is imperative that Taiwan continues to adapt, as well as monitor the quality of covid care and guideline conformation.
  5 in total

1.  Taiwan's experience in fighting COVID-19.

Authors:  Shih-Chung Chen
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 25.606

2.  Response to COVID-19 in Taiwan: Big Data Analytics, New Technology, and Proactive Testing.

Authors:  C Jason Wang; Chun Y Ng; Robert H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: the race to trace: contact tracing scale-up in San Francisco-early lessons learned.

Authors:  Michael Reid; Wayne Enanoria; Juliet Stoltey; Susan Philip; Jonathan Fuchs; Amy Lockwood; Elizabeth Krueger; Karen White; Jessica Celentano; George Rutherford; Susan Scheer; Trang Nguyen; Darpun Sachdev
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.222

4.  Legal preparedness as part of COVID-19 response: the first 100 days in Taiwan.

Authors:  Tsung-Ling Lee
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-05

5.  Containing COVID-19 Among 627,386 Persons in Contact With the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship Passengers Who Disembarked in Taiwan: Big Data Analytics.

Authors:  Chi-Mai Chen; Hong-Wei Jyan; Shih-Chieh Chien; Hsiao-Hsuan Jen; Chen-Yang Hsu; Po-Chang Lee; Chun-Fu Lee; Yi-Ting Yang; Meng-Yu Chen; Li-Sheng Chen; Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Chang-Chuan Chan
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 5.428

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.