| Literature DB >> 35415683 |
Natsumi Takei1, Takashi Kuda1, Natsumi Handa1, Sae Fujita1, Hajime Takahashi1, Bon Kimura1.
Abstract
Wheat bran (WB) and wheat straw fibre (WSF) are by-products of the wheat flour industry. To prove the existence of indigenous gut bacteria responsible for WB and WSF, the Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) mice were fed a diet containing no fibre (CS), 10% WB, or 5% WSF for 14 d. The caecal microbiome was analysed by 16S rDNA (V4 region) amplicon sequencing. Typical colonies were isolated and estimated by 16S rRNA gene BLASTn analysis. The predominant amplicon sequence variants in all diet groups belonged to Bifidobacterium pseudolongum- and Faecalibaculum rodentium-like bacteria. Lactobacillus johnsonii- and Limosilactobacillus reuteri-like bacteria were high in the WB group compared with those in the CS group. Lactobacillus johnsonii Wheat-1 and L. reuteri Wheat-12 strains could be isolated. Lactobacillus johnsonii Wheat-1 exhibited good fermentation activity in 10% (w/v) WB suspension. Superoxide anion radical scavenging capacity of the WB suspension was significantly increased by the fermentation.Entities:
Keywords: Gut microbiome; Lactobacillus johnsonii; Limosilactobacillus reuteri; Wheat bran
Year: 2022 PMID: 35415683 PMCID: PMC8991949 DOI: 10.1016/j.fochms.2021.100071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Chem (Oxf) ISSN: 2666-5662
Composition of test diets (g/100 g).
| CS | 10% WB | 5% WF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corn starch | 43.0 | 35.0 | 38.0 |
| Wheat-bran | 10.0 | ||
| Wheat-insoluble fibre | 5.0 | ||
| Milk casein | 20.0 | 18.4 | 20 |
| DL-Methionine | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Sucrose | 27.0 | 27.0 | 270 |
| Corn oil | 5.0 | 4.6 | 5.0 |
| Vitamin mix (AIN-76)* | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Mineral mix (AIN-76) * | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Choline bitartrate | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Protein** | 17.3 | 17.6 | 17.3 |
| Lipid** | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.6 |
| Carbohydrate** | 65.5 | 65.7 | 66.0 |
| Dietary fibre** | 4.0 | 4.7 | |
| Energy** | 398 | 392 | 380 |
*Ingredients for American Institute of Nutrition Rodent Diet.
**According to Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan-2015.
Body, organ and faecal weights of tested mice.
| CS | 10% WB | 5% WF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | 37.0 ± 1.0 | 37.1 ± 0.8 | 37.0 ± 1.1 |
| After 14 days | 47.2 ± 1.4 | 44.9 ± 1.4 | 46.3 ± 2.1 |
| Gain | 10.2 ± 1.0 | 7.3 ± 0.9 | 9.3 ± 1.1 |
| Frequency ( | 26 ± 2a | 38 ± 2b | 40 ± 2b |
| Weight (g/day/mouse) | 0.22 ± 0.01a | 0.47 ± 0.03b | 0.54 ± 0.02b |
| Caecal content (g) | 0.189 ± 0.012a | 0.317 ± 0.026b | 0.261 ± 0.035ab |
| Liver | 2.760 ± 0.208 | 2.685 ± 0.137 | 2.720 ± 0.175 |
| Kidneys | 0.641 ± 0.033 | 0.725 ± 0.029 | 0.651 ± 0.037 |
| Spleen | 0.085 ± 0.007 | 0.103 ± 0.012 | 0.094 ± 0.009 |
| Caecal wall | 0.059 ± 0.005 | 0.087 ± 0.013 | 0.084 ± 0.014 |
Values are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) values (n = 6 for CS and WSF; n = 5 for WB). a,b There was no significant difference between data with the same letters (p < 0.05).
Total bacterial count and alpha diversity indices in caecal microbiome of tested mice.
| CS | 10% WB | 5% WF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total bacterial count (Log cells/g) | 11.48 ± 0.12a | 11.30 ± 0.08 | 11.06 ± 0.06b↓ |
| Total read number | 100686 ± 9824 | 95608 ± 3829 | 103579 ± 2909 |
| Number of ASVs | 208 ± 11 | 290 ± 25↑ | 213 ± 28 |
| Shannon index ( | 2.911 ± 0.156 | 3.387 ± 0.318 | 2.914 ± 0.442 |
| Simpson diversity ( | 0.861 ± 0.020 | 0.902 ± 0.021 | 0.828 ± 0.045 |
Values are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) values (n = 6 for CS and WSF; n = 5 for WB). a,b Values with different superscript letters are significantly different, based on the Tukey's method (p < 0.05). Up and down arrows indicate higher and lower values than those of CS, respectively, as compared using Dunnett's method (p < 0.05).
Fig. 1Composition of the caecal microbiome in the tested mice. (a) Principal component analysis (PCA), (b) partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLSDA), and (c) sparse PLSDA (sPLSDA) of the amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) in the caecal microbiome of mice that were no fed fibre (CS, open circles), 10% (w/w) wheat bran (WB, closed circles), or 5% wheat straw fibre (WSF, semi-closed circles). (d), (e), and (f) show the phylum, family, and genus levels, respectively. Significant differences among the groups were determined using Tukey’s test and Dunnett’s test. a, b Data indicated with the same letter did not differ significantly. Arrows indicate a significant difference from the CS group (p < 0.05).
Fig. 2Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score computed for gut microbiome differentially identified using LEfSe (a), and a heat-map showing the relative abundance of 40 major identified ASVs of the caecal microbiome in mice who were fed CS, 10% (w/w) WB, or 5% WSF (b). a, b Data indicated with the same letter did not differ significantly. Arrows indicate a significant difference from the CS group (p < 0.05).
Fig. 3Decreasing pH value (a), the HPLC chromatograph (b), and superoxide anion radical scavenging capacity (c) of 10% (w/v) WB suspension inoculated with Lactobacillus johnsonii and Limosilactobacillus reuteri. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) values (n = 3). a-c Data indicated with the same letter did not differ significantly.