| Literature DB >> 35415642 |
Camila Soares de Oliveira1, Gabriel Mascarenhas Maciel2, Ana Carolina Silva Siquieroli3, Danilo Araújo Gomes1, Nádia Mendes Diniz2, José Magno Queiroz Luz1, Rickey Yoshio Yada4.
Abstract
Studies have shown that dwarf plants have the potential for use in obtaining hybrids. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agronomic potential and genetic dissimilarity of saladette type dwarf tomato plant populations through the use of artificial neural networks (ANNs). The following traits were analyzed: mean fruit weight, transverse and longitudinal fruit diameter, fruit shape, pulp thickness, locule number, internode length, soluble solids content, and β-carotene, lycopene, and leaf zingiberene contents. A dendrogram obtained by the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) and Kohonen self-organizing maps (SOM) agreed in the distinction of the BC1F3 populations from the dwarf donor parent. SOM was more consistent in identifying the genetic similarities among the BC1F3 dwarf tomato plant populations and allowed for the determination of weights of each variable in the cluster formation. The UFU SDi 13-1 BC1F3 population was revealed to be a promising option for obtaining saladette type dwarf tomato plant lines.Entities:
Keywords: Backcrossing; Computational intelligence; Dwarfism; Genetic dissimilarity; Solanum lycopersicum
Year: 2021 PMID: 35415642 PMCID: PMC8991817 DOI: 10.1016/j.fochms.2021.100056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Chem (Oxf) ISSN: 2666-5662
Agronomic traits evaluated in 19 BC1F3 tomato plant populations, the recurrent parent, donor parent, and commercial control. Monte Carmelo, MG, Brazil, 2020.
| Genotypes | MW | LD | TD | FS | PT | NL | IL | ZGB | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFU SDi 11-4 | 17.38 | i | * | 4.59 | e | * | 2.75 | e | * | 1.67 | b | * | 0.46 | e | * | 2.28 | d | ns | 2.36 | b | * | 0.10 | c | * | |
| UFU SDi 17-8 | 21.62 | g | * | 4.86 | e | * | 2.98 | e | * | 1.63 | b | * | 0.51 | e | * | 2.34 | d | ns | 2.16 | c | * | 0.08 | c | * | |
| UFU SDi 7-4 | 25.50 | f | * | 4.78 | e | * | 3.08 | d | * | 1.56 | c | * | 0.55 | d | * | 2.45 | c | * | 1.66 | d | ns | 0.17 | b | * | |
| UFU SDi 17-5 | 20.39 | h | * | 4.85 | e | * | 3.00 | e | * | 1.62 | c | * | 0.49 | e | * | 2.45 | c | * | 2.07 | c | * | 0.06 | d | * | |
| UFU SDi 4-3 | 23.35 | g | * | 4.84 | e | * | 3.05 | d | * | 1.59 | c | * | 0.54 | d | * | 2.44 | c | * | 1.73 | d | ns | 0.06 | d | * | |
| UFU SDi 5-4 | 26.31 | f | * | 5.18 | d | * | 3.15 | d | * | 1.65 | b | * | 0.57 | d | * | 2.47 | c | * | 1.94 | d | * | 0.16 | b | * | |
| UFU SDi 17-7 | 18.54 | h | * | 4.88 | e | * | 2.96 | e | * | 1.65 | b | * | 0.52 | d | * | 2.57 | c | * | 2.03 | c | * | 0.09 | c | * | |
| UFU SDi 13-1 | 41.89 | c | * | 5.49 | c | * | 3.75 | b | * | 1.46 | d | * | 0.76 | b | * | 2.65 | b | * | 2.02 | c | * | 0.13 | b | * | |
| UFU SDi 13-2 | 19.33 | h | * | 4.81 | e | * | 2.79 | e | * | 1.73 | b | ns | 0.46 | e | * | 2.53 | c | * | 1.96 | d | * | 0.11 | c | * | |
| UFU SDi 17-1 | 30.22 | e | * | 5.49 | c | * | 3.43 | c | * | 1.60 | c | * | 0.60 | c | * | 2.47 | c | * | 1.96 | d | * | 0.10 | c | * | |
| UFU SDi 13-3 | 22.73 | g | * | 4.79 | e | * | 3.00 | e | * | 1.60 | c | * | 0.45 | e | * | 2.74 | b | * | 1.71 | d | ns | 0.05 | d | * | |
| UFU SDi 7-2 | 25.20 | f | * | 4.66 | e | * | 3.08 | d | * | 1.52 | d | * | 0.51 | e | * | 2.85 | b | * | 1.91 | d | * | 0.16 | b | * | |
| UFU SDi 11-5 | 16.46 | i | * | 4.53 | e | * | 2.86 | e | * | 1.59 | c | * | 0.46 | e | * | 2.45 | c | * | 2.08 | c | * | 0.05 | d | * | |
| UFU SDi 10-5 | 22.71 | g | * | 4.05 | f | * | 2.82 | e | * | 1.44 | d | * | 0.44 | e | * | 2.58 | c | * | 1.89 | d | * | 0.14 | b | * | |
| UFU SDi 4-6 | 26.37 | f | * | 4.81 | e | * | 3.10 | d | * | 1.56 | c | * | 0.50 | e | * | 2.82 | b | * | 1.82 | d | * | 0.10 | c | * | |
| UFU SDi 17-9 | 19.36 | h | * | 5.14 | d | * | 2.90 | e | * | 1.78 | a | ns | 0.49 | e | * | 2.30 | d | ns | 2.44 | b | * | 0.12 | b | * | |
| UFU SDi 17-6 | 22.03 | g | * | 5.00 | e | * | 3.02 | d | * | 1.66 | b | * | 0.48 | e | * | 2.47 | c | * | 2.40 | b | * | 0.04 | d | * | |
| UFU SDi 18-1 | 33.86 | d | * | 5.75 | c | * | 3.22 | d | * | 1.79 | a | ns | 0.62 | c | * | 2.73 | b | * | 2.18 | c | * | 0.08 | c | * | |
| UFU SDi 6-1 | 25.68 | f | * | 4.66 | e | * | 3.08 | d | * | 1.51 | d | * | 0.56 | d | * | 2.48 | c | * | 2.31 | b | * | 0.07 | d | * | |
| UFU MC TOM5 | 74.34 | a | * | 7.53 | a | * | 4.48 | a | * | 1.69 | b | * | 0.94 | a | * | 3.38 | a | * | 6.93 | a | * | 0.05 | d | * | |
| Pizzadoro | 55.43 | b | * | 6.33 | b | * | 4.30 | a | * | 1.50 | d | * | 0.95 | a | * | 2.78 | b | * | 6.79 | a | * | 0.03 | d | * | |
| UFU TOM 1 | 5.00 | j | 3.44 | g | 1.85 | f | 1.87 | a | 0.21 | f | 2.00 | e | 1.31 | e | 0.22 | a | |||||||||
| Mean | 26.95 | 5.01 | 3.12 | 1.62 | 0.55 | 2.55 | 9.35 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||||||
| %CV | 4.38 | 4.86 | 5.57 | 4.57 | 6.92 | 6.15 | 2.44 | 28.23 | |||||||||||||||||
| h2 | 99.32 | 97.67 | 97.31 | 88.13 | 98.63 | 91.58 | 97.66 | 91.87 | |||||||||||||||||
| CVg | 53.35 | 15.76 | 16.76 | 6.24 | 29.41 | 10.14 | 59.51 | 47.98 | |||||||||||||||||
| CVg/Cve | 12.36 | 3.24 | 3.00 | 1.36 | 4.24 | 1.64 | 6.36 | 1.68 | |||||||||||||||||
MW: mean fruit weight (g); LD: longitudinal diameter (cm); TD: transverse diameter (cm); FS: fruit shape; PT: pulp thickness (cm); NL: number of locules (locules per fruit); IL: internode length (cm); ZGB: zingiberene content (270 nm). 1Mean values followed by different letters in the column differ from each other by the Scott-Knott test at 0.05. *Mean values in the column differ from the UFU MC TOM 1 dwarf donor line control by the Dunnett test at a level of 0.05. h2: genotypic coefficients of determination; CVg: genetic coefficients of variation; CVg/CVe: ratio between genetic and environmental coefficients of variation.
Fig. 1Comparison among dwarf phenotype tomato plants: DP = donor parent; 1 = UFU SDi 11-4; 2 = UFU SDi 17-8; 3 = UFU SDi 7-4; 4 = UFU SDi 17-5; 5 = UFU SDi 4-3; 6 = UFU SDi 5-4; 7 = UFU SDi 17-7; 8 = UFU SDi 13-1; 9 = UFU SDi 13-2; 10 = UFU SDi 17-1; 11 = UFU SDi 13-3; 12 = UFU SDi 7-2; 13 = UFU SDi 11-5; 14 = UFU SDi 10-5; 15 = UFU SDi 4-6; 16 = UFU SDi 17-9; 17 = UFU SDi 17-6; 18 = UFU SDi 18-1; 19 = UFU SDi 6-1.
Fruit quality traits evaluated in 19 BC1F3 tomato populations and the recurrent parent, donor parent, and commercial control. Monte Carmelo, MG, Brazil, 2020.
| Genotypes | SS | LC | BCC |
|---|---|---|---|
| UFU SDi 11-4 | 5.01c * | 2.77 a | 1.61b |
| UFU SDi 17-8 | 5.18c * | 3.55 a | 2.24 a |
| UFU SDi 7-4 | 4.50 d * | 3.52 a | 1.72b |
| UFU SDi 17-5 | 5.26c * | 2.34b | 1.41b * |
| UFU SDi 4-3 | 6.28b * | 2.91 a | 1.61b |
| UFU SDi 5-4 | 5.05c * | 2.75 a | 1.75b |
| UFU SDi 17-7 | 5.10c * | 3.07 a | 2.25 a |
| UFU SDi 13-1 | 5.40c * | 3.34 a | 2.32 a |
| UFU SDi 13-2 | 4.82 d * | 1.89b | 1.99 a |
| UFU SDi 17-1 | 4.64 d * | 2.87 a | 1.61b |
| UFU SDi 13-3 | 4.32 d * | 2.27b | 1.20b * |
| UFU SDi 7-2 | 5.25c * | 1.88b | 1.49b * |
| UFU SDi 11-5 | 5.18c * | 2.88 a | 1.88 a |
| UFU SDi 10-5 | 5.32c * | 2.79 a | 1.59b |
| UFU SDi 4-6 | 5.45c * | 2.41b | 1.37b * |
| UFU SDi 17-9 | 5.85b * | 2.60b | 1.84 a |
| UFU SDi 17-6 | 5.10c * | 3.09 a | 1.98 a |
| UFU SDi 18-1 | 5.55c * | 3.12 a | 2.05 a |
| UFU SDi 6-1 | 4.93c * | 3.38 a | 1.91 a |
| UFU MC TOM5 | 5.21c * | 2.43b | 1.65b |
| Pizzadoro | 5.73b * | 2.63b | 1.49b * |
| UFU TOM1 | 7.10 a | 2.71 a | 2.39 a |
| Mean | 5.28 | 2.77 | 1.78 |
| %CV | 6.86 | 22.57 | 28.53 |
| h2 | 90.73 | 54.06 | 51.87 |
| CVg | 10.74 | 12.54 | 13.15 |
| CVg/Cve | 1.56 | 0.54 | 0.51 |
SS: soluble solids content (°Brix); LC: lycopene content (mg/100 g); ΒCC: β-carotene content (mg/100 g). 1Mean values followed by different letters in the column differ from each other by the Scott-Knott test at 0.05. *Mean values in the column differ from the UFU MC TOM 1 dwarf donor line control by the Dunnett test at a level of 0.05. h2: genotypic coefficients of determination; CVg: genetic coefficients of variation; CVg/CVe: ratio between genetic and environmental coefficients of variation.
Fig. 2Dendrogram of genetic divergence obtained by the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean “UPGMA” based on Mahalanobis generalized distance: 1 = UFU SDi 11-4; 2 = UFU SDi 17-8; 3 = UFU SDi 7-4; 4 = UFU SDi 17-5; 5 = UFU SDi 4-3; 6 = UFU SDi 5-4; 7 = UFU SDi 17-7; 8 = UFU SDi 13-1; 9 = UFU SDi 13-2; 10 = UFU SDi 17-1; 11 = UFU SDi 13-3; 12 = UFU SDi 7-2; 13 = UFU SDi 11-5; 14 = UFU SDi 10-5; 15 = UFU SDi 4-6; 16 = UFU SDi 17-9; 17 = UFU SDi 17–6; 18 = UFU SDi 18-1; 19 = UFU SDi 6-1; 20 = UFU MC TOM 5; 21 = Pizzadoro; 22 = UFU TOM 1.
Fig. 3Kohonen self-organizing map for twelve classification classes, formed by the artificial neural network. Class 1: row 1 column 1; Class 2: row 1 column 2; Class 3: row 1 column 3; Class 4: row 1 column 4; Class 5: row 2 column 1; Class 6: row 2 column 2; Class 7: row 2 column 3; Class 8: row 2 column 4; Class 9: row 3 column 1; Class 10: row 3 column 2; Class 11: row 3 column 3; Class 12: row 3 column 4; Class 13: row 4 column 1; Class 14: row 4 column 2; Class 15: row 4 column 3; Class 16: row 4 column 4.
Grouping obtained by classification of the observations of the clusters (4 × 4 of radius 1) of genotypes in the classes formed through the artificial neural network by SOM.
| Groups | Classes | Genotypes |
|---|---|---|
| I | 1 | UFU SDi 7-2; UFU SDi 10-5; UFU SDi-4-6 |
| II | 2 | UFU SDi 13-3 |
| III | 3 | UFU SDi 11-4; UFU SDi 17-5; UFU SDi 13-2 |
| IV | 4 | UFU SDi 17-9; UFU SDi 4-3 |
| VII | 6 | UFU SDi 17-6; UFU SDi 18-1 |
| VI | 7 | UFU SDi 11-5 |
| V | 8 | UFU SDi 5-4; UFU SDi 17-1 |
| VIII | 9 | UFU MC TOM 5; cv. Pizzadoro |
| IX | 10 | UFU SDi 13-1 |
| X | 11 | UFU SDi 6-1; UFU SDi 7-4 |
| XI | 12 | UFU SDi 17-8; UFU SDi 17-7 |
| XII | 13 | UFU TOM 1 |
Fig. 4Traits and weights in the activation of each SOM neuron. Lighter colors represent greater effect of a variable on the group determined by the neuron.