Literature DB >> 35415425

A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Automated Physiological Data Acquisition Systems Using Data-Driven Modeling.

Franco van Wyk1, Anahita Khojandi1, Brian Williams2, Don MacMillan2, Robert L Davis3, Daniel A Jacobson4, Rishikesan Kamaleswaran3.   

Abstract

Precision medicine and the continuous analysis of "Big data" promises to improve patient outcomes dramatically in the near future. Very recently, healthcare facilities have started to explore automatic collection of patient-specific physiological data with the aim of reducing nursing workload and decreasing manual data entry errors. In addition to those purposes, continuous physiological data can be used for the early detection and prevention of common, and possibly fatal, diseases. For instance, poor patient outcomes from sepsis, a leading cause of mortality in healthcare facilities and a major driver of hospital costs in the USA, can be mitigated when detected early using screening tools that monitor the changing dynamics of physiological data. However, the potential cost of collecting continuous physiological data remains a barrier to the widespread adoption of automated high-frequency data collection systems. In this paper, we perform cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of machine learning applied to various types of acquisition systems (with different collection intervals) to determine if the benefits of such systems will outweigh their implementation costs. Although such systems can be used in the detection of various complications, in order to showcase the immediate benefits, we focus on the early detection of sepsis, one of the major challenges of hospital systems. We present a general approach to conduct such analysis for a wide range of hospitals and highlight its applicability using a case study for a small hospital with 150 beds and 3000 annual patients where the acquisition system would collect data at 1-min intervals. Lastly, we discuss how the analysis may help guide incentives/policies with regard to adopting automated data acquisition systems. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018, corrected publication 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automated physiological data acquisition; Cost-benefit analysis (CBA); Random forest; Sepsis detection

Year:  2018        PMID: 35415425      PMCID: PMC8982809          DOI: 10.1007/s41666-018-0040-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Inform Res        ISSN: 2509-498X


  40 in total

1.  Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care.

Authors:  D C Angus; W T Linde-Zwirble; J Lidicker; G Clermont; J Carcillo; M R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis.

Authors:  Mitchell M Levy; R Phillip Dellinger; Sean R Townsend; Walter T Linde-Zwirble; John C Marshall; Julian Bion; Christa Schorr; Antonio Artigas; Graham Ramsay; Richard Beale; Margaret M Parker; Herwig Gerlach; Konrad Reinhart; Eliezer Silva; Maurene Harvey; Susan Regan; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Post-Acute Care Use and Hospital Readmission after Sepsis.

Authors:  Tiffanie K Jones; Barry D Fuchs; Dylan S Small; Scott D Halpern; Asaf Hanish; Craig A Umscheid; Charles A Baillie; Meeta Prasad Kerlin; David F Gaieski; Mark E Mikkelsen
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2015-06

Review 4.  Specific Etiologies Associated With the Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome in Children: Part 2.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Upperman; John C Bucuvalas; Felicia N Williams; Bruce A Cairns; Charles S Cox; Allan Doctor; Robert F Tamburro
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.624

5.  Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014.

Authors:  Chanu Rhee; Raymund Dantes; Lauren Epstein; David J Murphy; Christopher W Seymour; Theodore J Iwashyna; Sameer S Kadri; Derek C Angus; Robert L Danner; Anthony E Fiore; John A Jernigan; Greg S Martin; Edward Septimus; David K Warren; Anita Karcz; Christina Chan; John T Menchaca; Rui Wang; Susan Gruber; Michael Klompas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Information technology in critical care: review of monitoring and data acquisition systems for patient care and research.

Authors:  Michael A De Georgia; Farhad Kaffashi; Frank J Jacono; Kenneth A Loparo
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-02-04

7.  Random Forest ensembles for detection and prediction of Alzheimer's disease with a good between-cohort robustness.

Authors:  A V Lebedev; E Westman; G J P Van Westen; M G Kramberger; A Lundervold; D Aarsland; H Soininen; I Kłoszewska; P Mecocci; M Tsolaki; B Vellas; S Lovestone; A Simmons
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.881

8.  Assessing available information on the burden of sepsis: global estimates of incidence, prevalence and mortality.

Authors:  Issrah Jawad; Ivana Lukšić; Snorri Bjorn Rafnsson
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.413

9.  Increased 1-year healthcare use in survivors of severe sepsis.

Authors:  Hallie C Prescott; Kenneth M Langa; Vincent Liu; Gabriel J Escobar; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 30.528

10.  Late mortality after sepsis: propensity matched cohort study.

Authors:  Hallie C Prescott; John J Osterholzer; Kenneth M Langa; Derek C Angus; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-05-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.