Yu Feng1, Xi-Chun Liu1, Lianzhi Li2, Shu-Qin Gao3, Ge-Bo Wen3, Ying-Wu Lin1,3. 1. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China. 2. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China. 3. Key Lab of Protein Structure and Function of Universities in Hunan Province, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China.
Abstract
Human cytochrome c (hCyt c) is a crucial heme protein and plays an indispensable role in energy conversion and intrinsic apoptosis pathways. The sequence and structure of Cyt c were evolutionarily conserved and only a few naturally occurring mutants were detected in humans. Among those variable sites, position 81 was proposed to act as a peroxidase switch in the initiation stages of apoptosis. In this study, we show that Ile81 not only suppresses the intrinsic peroxidase activity but also is essential for Cyt c to interact with neuroglobin (Ngb), a potential protein partner. The kinetic assays showed that the peroxidase activity of the naturally occurring variant I81N was enhanced up to threefold under pH 5. The local stability of the Ω-loop D (residues 70-85) in the I81N variant was decreased. Moreover, the Alphafold2 program predicted that Ile81 forms stable contact with human Ngb. Meanwhile, the Ile81 to Asn81 missense mutation abolishes the interaction interface, resulting in a ∼40-fold decrease in binding affinity. These observations provide an insight into the structure-function relationship of the conserved Ile81 in vertebrate Cyt c.
Human cytochrome c (hCyt c) is a crucial heme protein and plays an indispensable role in energy conversion and intrinsic apoptosis pathways. The sequence and structure of Cyt c were evolutionarily conserved and only a few naturally occurring mutants were detected in humans. Among those variable sites, position 81 was proposed to act as a peroxidase switch in the initiation stages of apoptosis. In this study, we show that Ile81 not only suppresses the intrinsic peroxidase activity but also is essential for Cyt c to interact with neuroglobin (Ngb), a potential protein partner. The kinetic assays showed that the peroxidase activity of the naturally occurring variant I81N was enhanced up to threefold under pH 5. The local stability of the Ω-loop D (residues 70-85) in the I81N variant was decreased. Moreover, the Alphafold2 program predicted that Ile81 forms stable contact with human Ngb. Meanwhile, the Ile81 to Asn81 missense mutation abolishes the interaction interface, resulting in a ∼40-fold decrease in binding affinity. These observations provide an insight into the structure-function relationship of the conserved Ile81 in vertebrate Cyt c.
Human cytochrome c (hCyt c) is one member
of a large distributed group of heme proteins,
which contains a hexa-coordinated heme c with His18
and Met80 as axial ligands in the native state.[1−6] The porphyrin is covalently linked to the peptide chain via two
thioether bonds through a conserved CXXCH motif. The protein is composed
of five α-helices connected by several loop regions, namely
Ω-loops (Figure , PDB code 3ZCF).[7] Cyt c is located
on the outer surface of the inner mitochondrial membrane and has widely
been known as an electron shuttle in the mitochondrial respiratory
chain.[1] The electrons are transported from
respiratory complex III to the terminal oxygen reductase via Cyt c, which is essential to cellular life throughout the electron–proton
energy supplement process.
Figure 1
X-ray structure of hCyt c (PDB
code 3ZCF)[7] showing the overall structure, Ω-loops,
and the heme coordination site. The mutation of I81N was modeled using
PyMol.
X-ray structure of hCyt c (PDB
code 3ZCF)[7] showing the overall structure, Ω-loops,
and the heme coordination site. The mutation of I81N was modeled using
PyMol.Moreover, Cyt c has received interest for its
multifunctionality involving the apoptosis pathway, gene regulation,
and redox signaling.[1,4,5,8] The discovery of the pro-apoptosis activity
of Cyt c was a breakthrough in the biological field.
Cyt c can bind to apoptotic protease-activating factor
1 (apaf-1), which is essential for the successful assembly of an activated
apoptosome. This process was related to the inherent peroxidase activity
of Cyt c, which was further connected to missense
mutation, post-translational modification, pH-dependent conformational
change, and lipid binding.[9] In contrast
to the inaccessible hexa-coordinated heme site in the native state,
Cyt c can transform into alternative conformations
under these perturbations with a more accessible heme site and enhanced
peroxidase activity. Thus, Cyt c can oxidize the
lipids such as cardiolipin on the mitochondrial membrane to enhance
the membrane permeability, which promotes the release of Cyt c to the cytoplasm and subsequently facilitates the assembly
of the apoptosome.[10,11]This view was supported
by experimental results that can be classified
as follows: (i) the modification of distal ligand Met80 or the structure
change near Met80,[12−15] (ii) the structure changes aim to destroy the hydrogen bond networks
constituted by Asn52, Tyr67, Thr78, and water,[16−18] (iii) the substitution
of Lys relating to an alkaline conformation in different pH values,[19] and (iv) the losing of Met80 ligation and the
formation of a well-defined pocket for binding hydrocarbons when Cyt c interacts with detergents,[20] a conformation rearrangement mimic for Cyt c-mediated
cardiolipin oxidation.[21,22]hCyt c was also found to interact with partner proteins to regulate
the intrinsic apoptotic process. For example, Cyt c can bind to neuroglobin (Ngb), a heme protein highly expressed in
the vertebrate nervous systems.[23] This
interaction inhibits the binding between apaf-1 and hCyt c, which was proposed as a crucial mechanism
to protect mammalian neurons against the apoptotic stimulus.[24−26]Because of the important and diverse functions of hCyt c, a few naturally occurring variants
were detected.[27] Although most of the 19
missense mutations are
still lacking studies, 4 mutations (G41S, Y48H, A51V, and Lys100del)
were found to be associated with autosomal dominant thrombocytopenia
4.[28−31] Our group also showed that the N52S variant exhibited a small fraction
of high-spin species and 3–8-fold enhanced peroxidase activity
at neutral pH.[18] Among other variants,
we noticed that position 81 was only allowed a unique Ile-to-Asn missense
mutation.[5] The appearance of the I81N hCyt c variant inspired us to investigate
the structural and functional consequences of the I81N substitution
(Figure ). Position
81 evolves from Ala in yeast to a conserved Ile residue in vertebrates.[11] Recently, Bowler and co-workers showed that
the I81A mutation had a significant influence on the thermodynamics
and kinetics of the access to alternate conformers of hCyt c.[32] The substitution
may perturb the heme environment close to distal ligand Met80 and
Lys79/Lys72. Moreover, I81A hCyt c exhibited a substantial enhancement in peroxidase activity, particularly
below pH 7. In addition, Ile81 is suggested to interact with Lys67,
Leu70, Val71, Ala74, Leu85, Tyr88, and heme of Ngb, whereas it lacks
experimental studies.[26]In this study,
we combined experimental technologies and the protein
structure prediction program Alphafold2[33,34] to investigate
the properties of I81N hCyt c, including
the inherent peroxidase activity and the interaction with human Ngb
(hNgb). Notably, the results showed that I81N hCyt c exhibited enhanced inherent peroxidase
activity compared to that of wild-type (WT) protein, which was pH
dependent and raised at low pH values. Moreover, it was found to interact
much weakly with hNgb, as determined by isothermal
titration calorimetry (ITC), suggesting the unique role of Ile81 in
supporting the structure and function of hCyt c and its interaction with Ngb.
Results and Discussion
Spectroscopic
Studies of I81N hCyt c
The I81N hCyt c variant was purified
from Escherichia coli with high purity
(Figure S1A) and was further confirmed
by mass spectroscopy (Figure S1B). The
ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectra of the I81N variant
were similar to those of the WT hCyt c in both the ferric and ferrous forms (Figure S2), with similar maximum absorptions of the Soret band and
Q bands. The circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy showed that the
protein retained a typical α-helical structure with negative
peaks at 208 and 222 nm and a positive peak at 190 nm in the far-UV
region (Figure S3). Although the ellipticity
(θ) value at 222 nm was slightly decreased compared to that
of the WT hCyt c, the proportion
of the α-helical structure (∼36%) and β-strand
the structure (∼10%) was almost the same for both proteins,
as calculated by K2D2,[35] which suggests
that the overall secondary structure was not perturbed by the I81N
mutation.To investigate whether the Ile-to-Asn mutation affects
the local structural stability of Cyt c, we performed
pH perturbation studies in both acidic and alkaline conditions. The
Cyt c undergoes the acidic unfolding and the alkaline
conformational transition process as described by Theorell and Åkesson.[36] These conformational transitions are related
to the inherent peroxidase activities of Cyt c and
are routinely performed to study the local structural dynamics around
the heme moiety.[37] The specific peak of
the Fe(III)–S bond at 695 nm was chosen to monitor the alkaline
transition process, in which the Met-heme moiety transforms to a Lys-heme
moiety.[38] It also induced a 7 nm blue shift
at the Soret peak due to the structural change adjacent to the heme
moiety (Figure S4). As shown in Figure A, the pH midpoint
(pH1/2) of the alkaline transition decreased from 9.23
± 0.04 of the WT hCyt c to
8.75 ± 0.03 of the I81N variant, with the proton linkage number
(n) varying from 0.85 to 1 (Table ). This result suggests that Ile-to-Asn substitution
altered the Met80-heme ligation of hCyt c in alkaline pHs.
Figure 2
Alkaline conformational transition and acidic unfolding
studies
on the WT and I81N hCyt c. (A) Normalized
absorbance at 695 nm in the alkaline pH range. (B) pH-dependent UV–vis
spectra changes of the I81N hCyt c in acidic unfolding studies. (C) Normalized absorbance of the Soret
band in the acidic pH range. (D) Absorbance at 622 nm in the acidic
pH range.
Table 1
Experimental Parameters
Related to
the Local Structural Stability of I81N Cyt c
I81N
WT
alkaline
transition
pH1/2 695nm
8.75 ± 0.03
9.23 ± 0.04
n
0.85 ± 0.07
0.99 ± 0.08
acidic unfolding
pH1/2 soret
2.55 ± 0.07
2.03 ± 0.03
n
0.48 ± 0.06
0.88 ± 0.05
pH1/2 622nm
2.92 ± 0.01
2.32 ± 0.03
n
1.07 ± 0.03
1.09 ± 0.06
azide binding
kobs (s–1)
0.0085 ± 0.002
0.0014 ± 0.0002
Alkaline conformational transition and acidic unfolding
studies
on the WT and I81N hCyt c. (A) Normalized
absorbance at 695 nm in the alkaline pH range. (B) pH-dependent UV–vis
spectra changes of the I81N hCyt c in acidic unfolding studies. (C) Normalized absorbance of the Soret
band in the acidic pH range. (D) Absorbance at 622 nm in the acidic
pH range.The alteration
of the local structure of the I81N hCyt c was also observed under acidic conditions.
The acidic unfolding process was monitored at both the Soret band
and the Q band at 622 nm (Figures B and S5). The Q band is
contributed by the Fe(III)–O bond of the high spin H2O-heme, as alternative conformers under acidic conditions.[39] The acid titration data show that the I81N variant
exhibits a 0.5–0.6 units higher pH1/2 than that
of the WT protein (Figure C,D and Table ). The pH1/2 soret increases from 2.03 ± 0.03
to 2.55 ± 0.07 and the pH1/2 622nm increases
from 2.32 ± 0.03 to 2.92 ± 0.01, respectively. Together
with the alkaline titration data, the results show that the I81N variant
unfolds for ∼0.5 units of pH early in both acidic and alkaline
conditions, which indicates that the Met80-heme moiety of the I81N
variant might be less stable than that of the WT Cyt c.To further confirm the lability of the Met80-heme ligation,
we
performed kinetic studies using a small ligand, the azide ion (N3–), to compete with the axial ligand Met80
in the protein matrix (Figures and S6). The reaction is assumed
to follow an SN1 mechanism, in which the hexa-coordinated
heme is in equilibrium with a penta-coordinated state and thus leaves
an open proximal site for ligand binding (Figure C). The observed rate constant (kobs) was obtained under pseudo first-order conditions.
As shown in Table , I81N hCyt c (kobs = 8.53 ± 2.41 × 10–3 s–1) reacts with azide ∼6 times faster than the
WT protein (kobs = 1.44 ± 0.2 ×
10–3 s–1). The faster rate of
the azide binding to the heme of I81N hCyt c may suggest the faster dissociation of the Met80-heme
ligation. Previous studies have shown that mutations in the Ω-loop
D (70–85) such as K72A, P76C, K79G/M80X, I81A, F82K, and V83G
may alter the heme crevice dynamics and ligand-binding properties.[19,32,40−42]
Figure 3
Azide-binding studies
on I81N hCyt c. (A) Time-dependent
UV–vis spectra upon mixing 200 mM NaN3 with 10 mM
protein sample in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer
at pH 7.0, 25 °C. (B) Difference spectra obtained by subtracting
the spectrum at 0 s. (C) Proposed SN1 mechanism for the
azide-binding reaction. (D) Absorbance changes at 420 nm upon NaN3 titration.
Azide-binding studies
on I81N hCyt c. (A) Time-dependent
UV–vis spectra upon mixing 200 mM NaN3 with 10 mM
protein sample in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer
at pH 7.0, 25 °C. (B) Difference spectra obtained by subtracting
the spectrum at 0 s. (C) Proposed SN1 mechanism for the
azide-binding reaction. (D) Absorbance changes at 420 nm upon NaN3 titration.
Peroxidase Activity of
I81N hCyt c
The structural perturbations
by I81N substitution may affect the
inherent peroxidase activity of Cyt c because a tight
and stable conformation is essential to keep it at a low peroxidase
activity level in physiological conditions.[28] As recently reported, Cyt c samples the high-spin
conformers more frequently under acidic conditions.[43] Meanwhile, the intermembrane space of mitochondria is an
acidic pH environment (6.88 ± 0.09) and the intracellular pH
decreases during apoptosis.[10,38,44] Thus, it is physiologically relevant to investigate the relationship
between the peroxidase activity of I81N hCyt c and the acidic pH change.To confirm this speculation,
we performed the stopped-flow assay under pH 5–8 conditions
using guaiacol as a substrate (Figures and S7). The kinetic parameters
(kcat and Km) were obtained by fitting the data into the Michaelis–Menten
model. As shown in Table , the difference in Km was small
for those of the WT and I81N Cyt c variant, which
was comparable to the data of the I81A variant reported by Bowler
and co-workers.[32] However, the kcat value of the I81N variant exhibited a strong
relationship with pH values, increasing from 0.16 s–1 at pH 7 to 0.39 s–1 at pH 5, whereas the difference
was subtle in the case of the WT protein at pH 5–7 (Figure B). The enhancement
of the peroxidase activity of I81N Cyt c suggests
that the variant samples the high-spin conformation easier than the
WT under acidic conditions, which agrees with the acidic unfolding
experiments. Notably, the kcat value for
the I81N variant is also up to threefold higher than that of the WT
at pH 5. The strong correlation between the peroxidase activity and
acidic pH indicates that Ile81 is a peroxidase trigger in hCyt c. It is worth mentioning that the
peroxidase activity of the I81A variant (kcat = 0.96 ± 0.01 s–1)[32] is 6-fold higher than that of the I81N (kcat = 0.16 ± 0.01 s–1) and 8.7-fold higher than
that of the WT (kcat = 0.11 ± 0.01
s–1) at neutral pH, and thus the I81A mutation may
not be allowed naturally.
Figure 4
Peroxidase activity assay using guaiacol as
a substrate. (A) Michaelis–Menten
plots vs the concentrations of guaiacol for I81N hCyt c at pH 5–8. (B) kcat vs pH values for I81N and WT hCyt c. The error bars are based on the standard deviation of
six independent experiments.
Table 2
Kinetic Parameters of the Peroxidase
Activity of hCyt c Variants at Different
pH Values with Guaiacol as a Substrate
kcat (s–1)
Km (μM)
pH
I81N
WT
I81N
WT
5.0
0.39 ± 0.01
0.13 ± 0.01
36.9 ± 3
50.2 ± 9
6.0
0.25 ± 0.006
0.14 ± 0.03
21.2 ± 2
20.0 ± 1
7.0
0.16 ± 0.003
0.11 ± 0.002
30.5 ± 1
27.5 ± 1
8.0
0.066 ± 0.003
0.047 ± 0.002
28.1 ± 3
12.9 ± 3
Peroxidase activity assay using guaiacol as
a substrate. (A) Michaelis–Menten
plots vs the concentrations of guaiacol for I81N hCyt c at pH 5–8. (B) kcat vs pH values for I81N and WT hCyt c. The error bars are based on the standard deviation of
six independent experiments.In addition to the guaiacol assay,
the heme degradation by H2O2 was also performed
to gain more information
about the enzymatic kinetics. The partial oxidation of Cyt c is a crucial step to initiating the peroxidase activity.[45] In the absence of a substrate, the activation
of H2O2 in the heme center results in heme degradation
by self-oxidation. This process was monitored at the Soret band, which
decreased over time during the degradation process (Figures and S8). The observed rate constants (kobs)
were obtained at various concentrations of H2O2. It showed the I81N variant degraded about 1.5–3-fold faster
than the WT protein depending on the concentration of H2O2 (Figure B). It should be noted that the reaction between I81N Cyt c and H2O2 did not follow a pseudo
first-order mechanism, with a positive intercept (∼0.005 s–1) representing the dissociation rate constant (kd) of the Cyt c–H2O2 complex.[46] This observation
is similar to those reported for H2O2 binding
to other heme proteins such as bacterial peroxidase and myoglobin
mutants with altered heme active sites,[47,48] which suggests
that the I81N mutation facilitates not only H2O2 activation but also its dissociation from the heme center.
Figure 5
Heme degradation
of hCyt c by
H2O2. (A) Time-dependent UV–vis spectra
of I81N hCyt c in a reaction with
100 mM H2O2. The spectral change of the Soret
band was shown as an inset. (B) Linear fitting of kobs as a function of H2O2 concentrations.
Heme degradation
of hCyt c by
H2O2. (A) Time-dependent UV–vis spectra
of I81N hCyt c in a reaction with
100 mM H2O2. The spectral change of the Soret
band was shown as an inset. (B) Linear fitting of kobs as a function of H2O2 concentrations.
Interactions between I81N hCyt c and Ngb
It is believed that the enhanced peroxidase activity
of Cyt c is related to the instinct apoptosis pathway.
However,
it must be strictly regulated, especially in neurons. The interaction
between Ngb and Cyt c was proposed as a crucial mechanism
to protect neurons in vertebrates.[24] Previous
ITC studies showed the dissociation constant between hNgb and horse heart Cyt c was Kd = 22.0 ± 1.7 μM in 10 mM phosphate buffer.[49] Several acidic residues in Ngb were also found
to participate in the interaction with Cyt c.[26,49−51] Meanwhile, depicting the precise binding interface
is still a great challenge.To gain more insight into the structure–function
relationship of the conserved Ile81, we applied the most accurate
protein structure prediction program Alphafold2 to predict the potential
interactions between hNgb and hCyt c. The five WT hNgb–hCyt c models generated using Alphafold2 displayed
a convergent interaction interface with a high predicted local distance
difference test (pLDDT) score and a low predicted align error (Figures A,B). As the program
identified, the interface hotspots include four pairs of hydrogen
bonds (K72-D73, K86-D63, Q16-S91, and Q16-K95, Figure C) and several hydrophobic contacts (Figure D). Notably, the
Ile81 forms a hydrophobic core, which interacts with the strictly
conserved residues Leu70, Val71, Ala74, Lys85, and Tyr88 in Ngb (Figure S9). This is a reasonable prediction because
these two proteins are coevolutionary in vertebrates and the Ile81
is conserved among vertebrate Cyt c. Other interface
hotspots in hCyt c include Gln16,
Thr28, Lys72, Lys79, Val83, and Lys86 in both oxidation states (Figure S10). It should be noted that some of
these residues are also located at the contacting interface with apaf-1,
such as Ile81, Lys72, and Lys86 (Figure S11),[52] which suggests that the interaction
between hCyt c and apaf-1 might
be blocked by the binding of Ngb.
Figure 6
WT hNgb–hCyt c protein complex model predicted
by the Alphafold2 multimer. (A)
Cartoon representation of the five predicted models. These models
were colored according to the pLDDT score. (B) Predicted alignment
error of the model with the highest confidence. (C) Hydrogen bond
networks in the predicted protein–protein interaction interface
formed by the αE and αF helices
of hNgb (green) and the Ω loop D and the α1
helix of hCyt c (cyan). The distance
between the heme b and heme c groups
was indicated as black dash arrows. (D) Hydrophobic core of the interaction
interface. The Ile81 of hCyt c was
colored red.
WT hNgb–hCyt c protein complex model predicted
by the Alphafold2 multimer. (A)
Cartoon representation of the five predicted models. These models
were colored according to the pLDDT score. (B) Predicted alignment
error of the model with the highest confidence. (C) Hydrogen bond
networks in the predicted protein–protein interaction interface
formed by the αE and αF helices
of hNgb (green) and the Ω loop D and the α1
helix of hCyt c (cyan). The distance
between the heme b and heme c groups
was indicated as black dash arrows. (D) Hydrophobic core of the interaction
interface. The Ile81 of hCyt c was
colored red.To confirm that the Ile81 residue
of hCyt c plays a critical role
in interaction with hNgb, we performed ITC studies.
To make a comparison of the binding
affinity, we performed the titrations in 1 mM potassium phosphate
solution at pH 7 (Figure ) because the binding affinity was lower with the increase
in the concentration of phosphate (Figure S12). The binding constant was determined to be Ka = (5.30 ± 0.26) × 103 M–1 (Kd = 189 μM) for I81N hCyt c (the error was produced from the
data fitting), which decreases almost 40-folds compared to that for
the WT hCyt c, Ka = (2.14 ± 0.53) × 105 M–1 (Kd = 4.67 μM). Moreover, the
reaction enthalpy (ΔH) and entropy (ΔS) changes for I81N hCyt c binding to Ngb were ∼6-fold and ∼2-fold higher than
that of hCyt c, respectively. The
positive ΔH and ΔS suggest
a predominant entropy-driven formation of the Cyt c–Ngb complex, resulting in negative Gibbs free energy (ΔG). The increased entropy may be related to the release
of water molecules from the binding interface during the formation
of the protein–protein complex.[49]
Figure 7
Representative
ITC thermogram of WT (A) and I81N (B) hCyt c titrated into hNgb. Both
samples were prepared in a 1 mM potassium phosphate solution at pH
7.0. The data were fitted to the OneSites binding model.
Representative
ITC thermogram of WT (A) and I81N (B) hCyt c titrated into hNgb. Both
samples were prepared in a 1 mM potassium phosphate solution at pH
7.0. The data were fitted to the OneSites binding model.The Alphafold2 program suggests that the binding interface
mediated
by position 81 was abolished due to the Ile-to-Asn mutation in the
hydrophobic core, resulting in different orientations for residue
81 (Figure A). The
new contact interface includes Lys8, Ile11, Met12, Lys13, and Gln16
in I81N hCyt c and Asp73, Leu70,
Ala74, Leu85, Tyr88, and Ser91 in Ngb, where two hydrogen bonds (Q16-S91
and K8-D73) were formed in addition to hydrophobic interactions among
other residues (Figure B). The molecular dynamics simulations further suggest that this
interaction is less stable than that of the WT protein, with a large
root-mean-square deviation (rmsd) (∼6.5 Å) of the protein
backbone (Figure S13). These experimental
and simulation results thus confirm that the residue Ile81 is important
for hCyt c to interact with hNgb.
Figure 8
Complex models of hNgb-WT/I81N hCyt c predicted using Alphafold2. (A)
Structural
alignment of WT and I81N hCyt c,
showing the different orientations of residue 81. (B) Protein–protein
interface of hNgb-I81N hCyt c in the model with the highest confidence.
Complex models of hNgb-WT/I81N hCyt c predicted using Alphafold2. (A)
Structural
alignment of WT and I81N hCyt c,
showing the different orientations of residue 81. (B) Protein–protein
interface of hNgb-I81N hCyt c in the model with the highest confidence.
Conclusions
In summary, we have shown that the naturally
occurring I81N mutation
in hCyt c regulates both the inherent
peroxidase activity and the interaction with human Ngb. The Ile-to-Asn
mutation perturbs the local structural stability under both alkaline
and acidic pH conditions. The Met80-Fe(III) bond reacts with azide
sixfold faster than that of the WT protein, which confirms the lability
of Met80-heme ligation in the I81N variant. Therefore, the inherent
peroxide activity was increased due to a more accessible penta-coordinated
heme site. High-accuracy structure prediction by deep neural networks,
the Alphafold2 program, suggests that Ile81 is located at the hNgb–hCyt c interaction
interface, serving as the hydrophobic core. The mutation of the hydrophobic
Ile to the hydrophilic Asn may abolish the specific interaction between hCyt c and hNgb. As further
shown by the ITC studies, the apparent binding affinity decreased
by ∼40-fold upon I81N mutation. Taken together, these results
illustrate that the residue Ile81 of hCyt c plays a critical role in protein function regulation,
which provides an insight into the coevolution of Cyt c and Ngb in vertebrates.
Authors: Swati Basu; Agnes Keszler; Natalia A Azarova; Nneka Nwanze; Andreas Perlegas; Sruti Shiva; Katarzyna A Broniowska; Neil Hogg; Daniel B Kim-Shapiro Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Anna Maria Porcelli; Anna Ghelli; Claudia Zanna; Paolo Pinton; Rosario Rizzuto; Michela Rugolo Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2005-01-28 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Monkol Lek; Konrad J Karczewski; Eric V Minikel; Kaitlin E Samocha; Eric Banks; Timothy Fennell; Anne H O'Donnell-Luria; James S Ware; Andrew J Hill; Beryl B Cummings; Taru Tukiainen; Daniel P Birnbaum; Jack A Kosmicki; Laramie E Duncan; Karol Estrada; Fengmei Zhao; James Zou; Emma Pierce-Hoffman; Joanne Berghout; David N Cooper; Nicole Deflaux; Mark DePristo; Ron Do; Jason Flannick; Menachem Fromer; Laura Gauthier; Jackie Goldstein; Namrata Gupta; Daniel Howrigan; Adam Kiezun; Mitja I Kurki; Ami Levy Moonshine; Pradeep Natarajan; Lorena Orozco; Gina M Peloso; Ryan Poplin; Manuel A Rivas; Valentin Ruano-Rubio; Samuel A Rose; Douglas M Ruderfer; Khalid Shakir; Peter D Stenson; Christine Stevens; Brett P Thomas; Grace Tiao; Maria T Tusie-Luna; Ben Weisburd; Hong-Hee Won; Dongmei Yu; David M Altshuler; Diego Ardissino; Michael Boehnke; John Danesh; Stacey Donnelly; Roberto Elosua; Jose C Florez; Stacey B Gabriel; Gad Getz; Stephen J Glatt; Christina M Hultman; Sekar Kathiresan; Markku Laakso; Steven McCarroll; Mark I McCarthy; Dermot McGovern; Ruth McPherson; Benjamin M Neale; Aarno Palotie; Shaun M Purcell; Danish Saleheen; Jeremiah M Scharf; Pamela Sklar; Patrick F Sullivan; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Ming T Tsuang; Hugh C Watkins; James G Wilson; Mark J Daly; Daniel G MacArthur Journal: Nature Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Rita V Chertkova; Alexander M Firsov; Nadezda A Brazhe; Evelina I Nikelshparg; Zhanna V Bochkova; Tatyana V Bryantseva; Marina A Semenova; Adil A Baizhumanov; Elena A Kotova; Mikhail P Kirpichnikov; Georgy V Maksimov; Yuriy N Antonenko; Dmitry A Dolgikh Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2022-05-04