| Literature DB >> 35415088 |
Rajpreet Sahemey1, Anastasios P Nikolaides1.
Abstract
Introduction: The Monteggia fracture is a fracture to the proximal third of ulna associated with a radial head dislocation. Although this is well described and classified in adults, it is uncommon in children. Identifying growth plate trauma and subsequent surgical management are of critical importance. This report identifies a unique variant of Monteggia fracture with a Salter-Harris Type I injury of the radial head instead of a dislocation, and how it was successfully stabilised with a closed reduction. Case Rport: We present a case of a nine 9 year-old female admitted to our unit with a deformed upper extremity following a fall from height. This was a closed and isolated injury without neurovascular compromise. Radiographs revealed a displaced fracture to the proximal ulna shaft. Unlike a true Monteggia, the radial fracture went through the proximal physis with anterior divergence of the distal fragment. The radiocapitellar joint remained congruent. The ulna fracture was stabilized with open reduction and plate osteosynthesis whilst the radial injury underwent closed reduction and intramedullary pinning with excellent outcomes and maintenance of full range of motion.Entities:
Keywords: Case report; Monteggia; fracture; growth plate; pediatric; trauma; variant
Year: 2021 PMID: 35415088 PMCID: PMC8930308 DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2021.v11.i10.2484
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Case Rep ISSN: 2250-0685
Figure 1Emergency radiographs. (a) Antero-posterior view of ulna shaft fracture; (b) lateral view demonstrating congruent radial head with an anteriorly displaced distal metaphysis.
Figure 2Intraoperative fluoroscopy. (a) retrograde flexible nail advancing across proximal radial physis; (b) nail rotated 180° to reduce radial head.
Figure 3Post-operative radiographs. (a) lateral profile at 4 weeks; (b) anteroposterior at 6 months.
Figure 4Twenty-month post-operative radiographs with all metalwork removed demonstrating (a) lateral view in flexion and (b) anteroposterior view in full extension.
Figure 5Clinical assessment at twenty months follow-up demonstrating full supination (a), pronation (b), extension (c), and flexion (d). The injured side is identified by asterisk (*).